Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Generation and
Selection
PKN STAN 2020
Ch. 6-1
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Four Types of Strategies
Threats SO WO
Opportunities Strategies Strategies
Weaknesses
Strengths ST WT
(SWOT)
Strategies Strategies
Ch. 6-2
© 2001 Prentice Hall
SO Strategies
Ch. 6-3
© 2001 Prentice Hall
WO Strategies
Improving
Threats internal
Opportunities WO weaknesses by
Weaknesses Strategies taking
Strengths advantage of
(SWOT) external
opportunities
Ch. 6-4
© 2001 Prentice Hall
ST Strategies
Ch. 6-5
© 2001 Prentice Hall
WT Strategies
Defensive tactics
Threats aimed at
Opportunities WT reducing
internal
Weaknesses Strategies
weaknesses and
Strengths avoiding
(SWOT) environmental
threats.
Ch. 6-6
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
The SWOT Matrix
Ch. 6-7
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
The SWOT Matrix
Ch. 6-8
© 2001 Prentice Hall
SWOT Matrix
Leave Blank Strengths-S Weaknesses-W
Ch. 6-10
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Boston Consulting Group Matrix
(BCG)
Ch. 6-11
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Boston Consulting Group Matrix
(BCG)
Ch. 6-12
© 2001 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix
Relative Market Share Position
High Medium Low
1.0 .50 0.0
High
+20
Industry Sales Growth Rate
• Question Marks
Ø Low
relative market share position yet
compete in high-growth industry.
§ Cash needs are high
§ Case generation is low
Ø Decisionto strengthen (intensive
strategies) or divest
Ch. 6-14
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
BCG Matrix
• Stars
Ø High relative market share and high
industry growth rate.
§ Best long-run opportunities for growth and
profitability
Ø Substantialinvestment to maintain or
strengthen dominant position
§ Integration strategies, intensive strategies, joint
ventures
Ch. 6-15
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
BCG Matrix
• Cash Cows
Ø High
relative market share position, but
compete in low-growth industry
§ Generate cash in excess of their needs
§ Milked for other purposes
Ø Maintain strong position as long as
possible
§ Product development, concentric diversification
§ If becomes weak—retrenchment or divestiture
Ch. 6-16
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
BCG Matrix
• Dogs
Ø Low
relative market share position and
compete in slow or no market growth
§ Weak internal and external position
Ø Decision to liquidate, divest, retrenchment
Ch. 6-17
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Grand Strategy Matrix
Ch. 6-18
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix
RAPID MARKET GROWTH
Quadrant II Quadrant I
• Market development • Market development
• Market penetration • Market penetration
• Product development • Product development
• Horizontal integration • Forward integration
• Divestiture • Backward integration
• Liquidation • Horizontal integration
WEAK • Concentric diversification STRONG
COMPETITIVE COMPETITIVE
POSITION Quadrant III Quadrant IV POSITION
• Retrenchment • Concentric diversification
• Concentric diversification • Horizontal diversification
• Horizontal diversification • Conglomerate
• Conglomerate diversification
diversification • Joint ventures
• Liquidation
• Quadrant I
Ø Excellent strategic position
Ø Concentration on current markets and products
Ø Take risks aggressively when necessary
Ch. 6-20
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Grand Strategy Matrix
• Quadrant II
Ø Evaluate present approach seriously
Ø How to change to improve competitiveness
Ø Rapid market growth requires intensive strategy
Ch. 6-21
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Grand Strategy Matrix
• Quadrant III
Ø Compete in slow-growth industries
Ø Weak competitive position
Ø Drastic changes quickly
Ø Cost and asset reduction indicated (retrenchment)
Ch. 6-22
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Grand Strategy Matrix
• Quadrant IV
Ø Strong competitive position
Ø Slow-growth industry
Ø Diversification indicated to more promising growth
areas
Ch. 6-23
© 2001 Prentice Hall