You are on page 1of 30

Strategic Management

Concepts & Cases


8th edition
Fred R. David
Chapter 6:
Strategy Analysis &
Choice
PowerPoint Slides By:
Anthony F. Chelte
Western New England College

Ch. 6-1
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Comprehensive Strategic Management Model

External
Audit

Chapter 3

Vision Strategy Implement


Strategies Implement Measure &
& Analysis Strategies:
In Strategies: Evaluate
Mission & Marketing, Performance
Statements Action Mgmt Issues
Fin/Acct,
Choice
R&D, CIS
Chapter 5 Chapter 7 Chapter 9
Chapter 2 Chapter 6 Chapter 8

Internal
Audit

Chapter 4

Ch. 6-2
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
“Strategic management is not a box of tricks or
a bundle of techniques. It is analytical
thinking and commitment of resources to
action. But quantification alone is not
planning. Some of the most important issues
in strategic management cannot be quantified
at all.”

—Peter Drucker—

Ch. 6-3
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice

“Whether it’s broke or not, fix it—make it


better. Not just products, but the whole
company if necessary.”

—Bill Saporito—

Ch. 6-4
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice

“Planning is often doomed before it ever


starts, either because too much is
expected of it or because not enough is
put into it.”

—T. J. Cartwright—
Ch. 6-5
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice

Strategic Analysis and Choice:

Making subjective decisions based on


objective information

Ch. 6-6
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical Framework

Threats Boston
Opportunities Consulting Grand
Weaknesses Group Strategy
Strengths Matrix Matrix
(TOWS) (BCG)

Ch. 6-7
© 2001 Prentice Hall
TWOS MATRIX
Four Types of Strategies

Threats SO WO
Opportunities Strategies Strategies
Weaknesses
Strengths ST WT
(TOWS)
Strategies Strategies

Ch. 6-8
© 2001 Prentice Hall
SO Strategies

Threats Use a firm’s


Opportunities SO internal
strengths to
Weaknesses Strategies
take advantage
Strengths of external
(TOWS) opportunities

Ch. 6-9
© 2001 Prentice Hall
WO Strategies

Improving
Threats internal
Opportunities WO weaknesses by
Weaknesses Strategies taking
Strengths advantage of
(TOWS) external
opportunities

Ch. 6-10
© 2001 Prentice Hall
ST Strategies

Threats Using firm’s


Opportunities ST strengths to
Weaknesses Strategies avoid or reduce
Strengths the impact of
(TOWS) external threats.

Ch. 6-11
© 2001 Prentice Hall
WT Strategies

Defensive tactics
Threats aimed at
Opportunities WT reducing
internal
Weaknesses Strategies
weaknesses and
Strengths avoiding
(TOWS) environmental
threats.

Ch. 6-12
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
The TOWS Matrix

• List the firm’s key external opportunities


• List the firm’s key external threats
• List the firm’s key internal strengths
• List the firm’s key internal weaknesses

Ch. 6-13
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
The TOWS Matrix

• Match internal strengths with external opportunities


and record the resultant SO Strategies
• Match internal weaknesses with external
opportunities and record the resultant WO Strategies
• Match internal strengths with external threats and
record the resultant ST Strategies
• Match internal weaknesses with external threats and
record the resultant WT Strategies

Ch. 6-14
© 2001 Prentice Hall
TOWS Matrix
Leave Blank Strengths-S Weaknesses-W

List Strengths List Weaknesses

Opportunities-O SO Strategies WO Strategies

List Opportunities Use strengths to take Overcome weaknesses


advantage of by taking advantage of
opportunities opportunities
Threats-T ST Strategies WT Strategies

List Threats Use strengths to avoid Minimize weaknesses


threats and avoid threats
Ch. 6-15
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Boston Consulting Group Matrix
(BCG)

• Enhances multidivisional firms’ efforts to


formulate strategies
• Autonomous divisions (or profit centers)
constitute the business portfolio
• Firm’s divisions may compete in different
industries requiring separate strategy

Ch. 6-16
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Boston Consulting Group Matrix
(BCG)

• Graphically portrays differences among


divisions
• Focuses on market share position and
industry growth rate
• Manage business portfolio through relative
market share position and industry growth
rate

Ch. 6-17
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Boston Consulting Group Matrix
(BCG)

• Relative market share position defined:

 Ratio of a division’s own market share in a


particular industry to the market share held by the
largest rival firm in that industry.

Ch. 6-18
© 2001 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix
Relative Market Share Position
High Medium Low
1.0 .50 0.0
High
Industry Sales Growth Rate

+20

Stars Question Marks


II I
Medium
0

Cash Cows Dogs


III IV
Low
-20 Ch. 6-19
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
BCG Matrix

• Question Marks
• Stars
• Cash Cows
• Dogs

Ch. 6-20
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
BCG Matrix

• Question Marks
 Low
relative market share position yet
compete in high-growth industry.
 Cash needs are high
 Case generation is low

 Decisionto strengthen (intensive


strategies) or divest

Ch. 6-21
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
BCG Matrix
• Stars
 High relative market share and high
industry growth rate.
 Best long-run opportunities for growth and
profitability
 Substantialinvestment to maintain or
strengthen dominant position
 Integration strategies, intensive strategies,
joint ventures

Ch. 6-22
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
BCG Matrix
• Cash Cows
 High
relative market share position, but
compete in low-growth industry
 Generate cash in excess of their needs
 Milked for other purposes
 Maintain strong position as long as
possible
 Product development, concentric diversification
 If becomes weak—retrenchment or divestiture
Ch. 6-23
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
BCG Matrix

• Dogs
 Low
relative market share position and
compete in slow or no market growth
 Weak internal and external position
 Decision to liquidate, divest, retrenchment

Ch. 6-24
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Grand Strategy Matrix

• Popular tool for formulating alternative


strategies
• Based on two evaluative dimensions
 Competitiveposition
 Market growth

Ch. 6-25
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix
RAPID MARKET GROWTH
Quadrant II Quadrant I
• Market development • Market development
• Market penetration • Market penetration
• Product development • Product development
• Horizontal integration • Forward integration
• Divestiture • Backward integration
• Liquidation • Horizontal integration
WEAK • Concentric diversification STRONG
COMPETITIVE COMPETITIVE
POSITION Quadrant III Quadrant IV POSITION
• Retrenchment • Concentric diversification
• Concentric diversification • Horizontal diversification
• Horizontal diversification • Conglomerate
• Conglomerate diversification
diversification • Joint ventures
• Liquidation

SLOW MARKET GROWTH


Ch. 6-26
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Grand Strategy Matrix

• Quadrant I
 Excellent strategic position
 Concentration on current markets and products
 Take risks aggressively when necessary

Ch. 6-27
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Grand Strategy Matrix

• Quadrant II
 Evaluatepresent approach seriously
 How to change to improve competitiveness
 Rapid market growth requires intensive strategy

Ch. 6-28
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Grand Strategy Matrix

• Quadrant III
 Compete in slow-growth industries
 Weak competitive position
 Drastic changes quickly
 Cost and asset reduction indicated (retrenchment)

Ch. 6-29
© 2001 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Grand Strategy Matrix

• Quadrant IV
 Strong competitive position
 Slow-growth industry
 Diversification indicated to more promising growth
areas

Ch. 6-30
© 2001 Prentice Hall

You might also like