You are on page 1of 2

Introduction to SAP Material Ledger

Zmaterial Ledger is SAP’s solution to performing actual costing. It ontains


the benefits, without the disadvantages, of the two traditional methods of
inventory valuation - Standard Costing and Moving Average. Before you
can understand the functionality of Material Ledger, it is always good to
start with some of the characteristics of these two traditional approaches.
Standard costing is an effective method of obtaining stable prices for
your materials which can be benchmarked against any price fluctuations.
You can therefore perform variance analysis to better understand
whether you are producing efficiently or whether your raw material prices
are reasonable. However, a weakness of the standard costing process is
that the variances that relate to unsold inventory remain in the cost of
sales (price variance) account, and are not posted back to inventory. I was
posed this question by a client about ten years ago, when Material Ledger
was still in its infancy “If I do not sell everything that I have produced in a
period, then what happens to the production variances that are sitting in
the P&L?”. The answer to this at the time was to take the fraction of the
production variances which relates to the inventory not sold in the period
and post it back to the inventory accounts. This was a top level journal
which did not specify the activity for each individual material (as this
would have been too cumbersome a task). The downside to this if you
looked at a profitability report for each material, the variance may skew
the actual cost of sale for the period if you did not sell everything that you
produced.
Moving Average Costing is a good method of keeping your material costs
up to date, particularly in cases where the prices keep fluctuating. Each
time you perform a goods or invoice receipt, the moving average price is
updated based on the total inventory value (taking the latest purchased
price into account) and dividing it by the total inventory quantity. One of
the weaknesses of moving average costing is that the new price is only
posted back to inventory if there is enough inventory quantity to cover the
difference.  This could be the case if you consume a material between the
time that you receive it and when you invoice it, and the invoice price is
different from the goods receipt price. If the invoice is for a quantity that is
greater than the amount of the material left in inventory, the difference
between the invoice and goods receipt will not fully be allocated back into
inventory. Instead, only the portion that relates to the existing inventory
quantity will be allocated back to inventory and the remainder will be
posted to the price variance account. This means that if you looked at the
Moving Average price for that material, it will not represent the true
current price.
Material Ledger’s two main objectives are:
(1) Inventory Valuation in up to three currencies and valuation methods
(2) Performing Actual Costing for Materials
The real beauty of material ledger is number (2). This is because it takes
the variances that occur from inventory transactions and post them back
to ending inventories in order to value them at an actual cost. It does this
while retaining the standard cost of the material as a benchmark. You also
have the option of revaluing the current standard cost with the periodic
unit price (which is the actual cost calculated by material ledger). The two
types of price determination that occur with material ledger:
(1) Single-level price determination: This takes the variances that occur for
an individual material and roll them back into its ending inventory.
(2) Multilevel price determination: This takes the variances that occur for a
lower-level product (e.g. raw material) and roll them (in the proportion of
consumed quantity) into a higher-level product (e.g. finished product).
You can choose to roll the variances that relate to sold inventory, into the
cost of sales account in order to value COS at actual costs. This involves
using Material Ledger’s “Revaluation of Consumption” functionality. With
Material Ledger, you can therefore achieve actual costs for ending
inventory of single and multilevel products and cost of sales, and still
measure your procurement processes according to standard costs.

You might also like