Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This patient’s minute ventilation would be between 15-20 liters/minute. You decide to place
this patient on 6 liters/min NC which should theoretically deliver an fiO2 ~ 45% (6L x 4% = 24
+ Room Air (21%) = 45%) if the “1:4 rule” holds true.
If this patient is breathing 15-20L through his mouth and through the nares (around the nasal
cannula) at 21% then
do you believe that this patient will actually get 45% fiO2 delivered to the trachea?
Every increase by 1 LPM equates to a 4%
increase in FiO2, starting from 24%. This easy
rule of thumb gives you a safe estimate when
approximating your “effective FiO2” at home
based on your liter flow.
To deliver higher amounts of fiO2 effectively to your patient you have to not only match,
but exceed your patient minute ventilation and inspiratory demands to minimize oxygen
dilution.
Washout of Dead-space
• We normally rebreathe a third of our previously expired tidal volume and instead
of breathing 21% (room air) and negligible amounts of carbon dioxide; we may
rebreathe more like 15-16% oxygen and 5-6% carbon dioxide.
• This is because of previously exhaled breath (low in oxygen and with some carbon
dioxide) is not fully exhaled and remains in the upper airway.
• When you patient takes their next breath from atmospheric gas not all of that gas
enters the alveoli. In fact it’s a mix of the new atmospheric gas (21% 02, negligible
CO2) and their previously exhaled gas (<21% oxygen and some CO2).
• In patients with acute respiratory failure, the percentage of gas we rebreathe gets
larger, and as a result, we can rebreathe larger amounts of carbon dioxide as we
draw our breaths from a mixed reservoir from our upper airway. Another way to
say this is our dead-space increases with acute respiratory failure.
• One of the major benefits of HFNC (some argue it’s actually the main
benefit) is that it gives you a continuous flow of fresh gas at high flow
rates replacing or washing out the patient’s pharyngeal dead-space
(the old gas low in oxygen and high in CO2). Each breath that the
patient now re-breathes will be washed out of carbon dioxide and
replaced with oxygen rich gas improving breathing efficiency
• Infrared absorption images of expiratory flow through a tube model (TM) of upper airways demonstrate rebreathing from dead space.
• The images show four stages of filling of the model with exhaled CO2 at
• (i) peak expiratory flow,
• (ii) expiratory flow 30 l/min,
• (iii) expiratory flow 15 l/min, and
• (iv) end of expiration.
High Flow Nasal Cannula Putative beneficial
mechanisms of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen
therapy. EELV, end-expiratory lung volume; FiO2,
inspiratory oxygen fraction; Temp., temperature.
Review 2: we narratively summarized findings from studies evaluating droplet dispersion, aerosol generation, or infection
transmission associated with HFNC. For both reviews
• Kotoda et al. conducted three simulations using fresh yeast (Sacchromyces
cerevisiae), evaluating dispersion with and without HFNC at 60 Lmin-1 in an
experimental mannequin model.
• Yeast dispersion was evaluated using 18 Petri dishes placed at 30-cm intervals
from the mannequin and four dishes placed 5 m away.
• Colonies were only detected in the closest dish with a mean (SD) of 2.3 (0.5)
colony forming units, and there was increased dispersion extending to two dishes
in front of and lateral to the mannequin with manual repositioning of the cannula
(P = 0.039). The investigators did not observe colony formation on the dishes 5 m
away from the mannequin.
• Leung et al. conducted a prospective study of 19 critically ill adults receiving COT
because of gram- negative bacterial pneumonia. They evaluated the degree of
environmental bacterial contamination with HFNC vs simple face mask oxygen.
The results show that high-flow nasal cannula use was not associated with increased air or contact surface
contamination by either Gram-negative bacteria or total bacteria, suggesting that additional infection
control measures are not required.
shows no difference in GNB count
between the HFNC and OM use for air
samples, settle plates at 0.4 or 1.5 m,
and at six or at 12 ACH (P ¼
0.119e0.500).
This section briefly describes possible modes of transmission for SARS-CoV-2, including
contact,
droplet,
airborne,
fomite,
fecal-oral,
bloodborne,
mother-to-child, and
animal-to-human transmission.
Infection with SARS-CoV-2 primarily causes respiratory illness ranging from mild disease to severe disease and death, and
some people infected with the virus never develop symptoms.
• Airborne transmission is defined as the spread of an infectious agent
caused by the dissemination of droplet nuclei (aerosols) that remain
infectious when suspended in air over long distances and time.
• Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 can occur during medical
procedures that generate aerosols (“aerosol generating procedures”).
• WHO, together with the scientific community, has been actively
discussing and evaluating whether SARS-CoV-2 may also spread
through aerosols in the absence of aerosol generating procedures,
particularly in indoor settings with poor ventilation.
Conclusions
• We found that HFNC applied to patients with respiratory failure may
substantially reduce the need for invasive ventilation and escalation of
therapy to NIV or intubation (low certainty), with no apparent effect on
mortality or patient-reported symptoms. Complications of therapy were
comparable to COT modalities.
• Very low certainty evidence showed uncertain findings with regards to
droplet dispersion and aerosol generation with HFNC. No direct evidence
applicable to COVID-19 was available for either efficacy or infection-related
risk.
• Taken together, the benefits of HFNC in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic
must be carefully balanced against the unknown risk of airborne
transmission of infection to healthcare workers and other patients.
Terima kasih semoga bermanfaat
Semoga badai CEPAT berlalu