You are on page 1of 4

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/327272103

Cadmium level and severity of peripheral artery disease in patients with


coronary artery disease

Article  in  European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · August 2018


DOI: 10.1177/2047487318796585

CITATIONS READS

8 83

7 authors, including:

Francisco Ujueta Denisse Diaz


Mount Sinai Medical Center Mount Sinai Medical Center
25 PUBLICATIONS   48 CITATIONS    8 PUBLICATIONS   47 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Ana Navas-Acien Gervasio A Lamas


Columbia University Mount Sinai Medical Center of Florida
475 PUBLICATIONS   13,918 CITATIONS    332 PUBLICATIONS   25,788 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Anti-inflammatory Effect of Whole-Food Plant-Based Vegan Diet vs the American Heart Association - Recommended Diet in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: The
Randomized EVADE CAD Trial View project

MESA Air View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Francisco Ujueta on 23 July 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Research letter
European Journal of Preventive
Cardiology

Cadmium level and severity of peripheral 0(00) 1–3


! The European Society of
Cardiology 2018
artery disease in patients with coronary Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
artery disease DOI: 10.1177/2047487318796585
journals.sagepub.com/home/ejpc

Francisco Ujueta1, Ivan A Arenas2, Denisse Diaz2,


Timothy Yates3, Robert Beasley3, Ana Navas-Acien4 and
Gervasio A Lamas1,2

Coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery cadmium levels were lowest in CAD patients without
disease (PAD) both share similar risk factor profiles, evidence of PAD, higher in CAD-PAD (no CLI), and
representing a high disease burden and cost worldwide. highest in the CLI subgroup, who had a 4-fold
Yet the preferential development of CAD, PAD, or increase in urine cadmium levels compared to coronary
both in individual patients is not fully understood. As patients without PAD (0.37  0.19, 0.56  0.34,
part of a study of toxic metals in patients with vascular 1.56  2.33, p ¼ 0.009, Figure 1). A similar pattern in
disease, we explored toxic metal profiles in three prin- urinary cadmium levels was observed in post-edetate
cipal diagnoses: CAD, PAD, and PAD with critical disodium infusion urine samples (2.33  1.42,
limb ischemia (CLI). CLI is the most advanced form 4.06  1.68, 4.1  2.40; p ¼ 0.01, Figure 1). The associ-
of PAD and carries a high (up to 55%) one-year risk of ation between urinary cadmium and PAD status
major vascular events.1 The principal target of this remained significant after adjustment for age and
investigation was cadmium, a toxic atherogenic transi- prior smoking status. In an analysis including only
tion metal of which the principal environmental sources patients with diabetes, urine cadmium levels were high-
are smoking and diet. est in patients with CLI.

Methods Discussion
This is a cross-sectional study of individuals without an Ambient air pollution has multiple adverse effects on
occupational history to toxic metals. Eligible patients human health,4–6 as do ingested environmental pollu-
participated in studies of toxic metals in vascular dis- tants. In this group of CAD patients without an occu-
ease, and had a serum creatinine of 2.0 mg/ml or less. pational history of exposure to toxic metals, the
CAD was defined as evidence of a prior myocardial severity of PAD was associated with higher cadmium
infarction; simple PAD as history of claudication with levels in both spontaneous and stimulated (post-chela-
confirmed evidence of obstruction in the affected leg(s) tion) urine. Urine cadmium reflects total body cad-
by an imaging modality. CLI was defined as Rutherford mium burden. Epidemiologic studies have shown that
4 or 5 stages; essentially minimal arterial circulation higher cadmium is associated with higher prevalence of
with rest pain or early gangrene. Toxic metals were mea- PAD in the general US population.7–9 This small study,
sured in overnight urine and after an ethylenediamine
tetraacetic acid (EDTA)-based chelation infusion as
previously described.2,3 Categorical variables were com-
1
Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, USA
2
Columbia University Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center,
pared with Chi-Square or Fisher’s exact tests and con-
USA
tinuous variables using analysis of variance (ANOVA). 3
Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, USA
4
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University
Mailman School of Public Health, USA
Results
The study included 43 patients (Table 1). Cadmium was Corresponding author:
Gervasio Lamas, Columbia University Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai
detected in the urine of all participants. Chelation with Medical Center, 4300 Alton Road, Suite #2070A, Miami Beach, FL 33140,
EDTA was associated with an average 408% increase USA.
in cadmium urinary excretion. Baseline urinary Email: gervasio.lamas@msmc.com
2 European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 0(00)

Table 1. Baseline characteristics.

Patients (n ¼ 43) PAD (n ¼ 22) No PAD (n ¼ 21) p-Value

Age 67.3 (10) 70.9 (10.2) 63.5 (8.4) 0.52


Baseline creatinine (mg/dl) 0.99 (0.33) 1.03 (0.36) 0.94 (0.29) 0.119
Sex (male) 38 (88%) 17 (77%) 21 (100%) 0.027
Hypertension 28 (65%) 15 (68%) 13 (62%) 0.62
Myocardial infarction 37 (86%) 16 (73%) 21 (100%) 0.12
Diabetes mellitus 30 (70%) 20 (91%) 10 (48%) 0.002
Chronic kidney disease 10 (23%) 4 (18%) 6 (29%) 0.328
Smoking history 22 (51%) 13 (59%) 9 (43%) 0.177
PAD: peripheral artery disease.
Categorical variables are described as n (%) and continuous variable in mean (standard deviation).

p = 0.01

p = 0.01

4.5
4.06 4.1
4

3.5
p = 0.009
Urinary Cd (µg/g creatinine)

2.5 p = 0.048 2.33

2
1.56
1.5

1
0.56
0.5 0.37

0
Baseline Post-edetate disodium

CAD, no PAD PAD + CAD (no CLI) CAD + CLI

Figure 1. Urinary cadmium (Cd) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with and without peripheral artery disease (PAD).
Individual p-values within groups of CAD with no PAD, CAD+PAD (no critical limb ischemia (CLI)) or CADþCLI for urinary Cd were
significantly higher as disease severity increased for baseline and post-edetate disodium. The association between urinary Cd and PAD
status remained after adjustment for age and smoking status.

however, suggests that PAD patients have greater body form of PAD – CLI. The present study suggests poten-
cadmium levels compared with patients that have vas- tial lines for future research into cadmium as a bio-
cular disease, but not PAD. This extends epidemiologic marker for severity of PAD, and as a therapeutic
studies of healthy populations. target in patients with CLI. A pilot study focusing on
In conclusion, the present study suggests that cad- the latter question is currently in progress.
mium accumulation may be a quantitative risk factor
for graded development of symptomatic disease of the Declaration of conflicting interests
lower extremities, from low cadmium burden in CAD The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with
only, intermediate cadmium burden in CADþsimple respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this
PAD, and highest cadmium burden in the most severe article.
Ujueta et al. 3

Funding 5. Mannucci PM. Air pollution levels and cardiovascular


The authors received no financial support for the research, health: Low is not enough. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2017; 24:
authorship, and/or publication of this article. 1851–1853.
6. Yang WY, Zhang ZY, Thijs L, et al. Left ventricular func-
tion in relation to chronic residential air pollution in a
References
general population. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2017; 24:
1. Iida O, Takahara M, Soga Y, et al. Prognostic impact of 1416–1428.
revascularization in poor-risk patients with critical limb 7. Tellez-Plaza M, Guallar E, Fabsitz RR, et al. Cadmium
ischemia. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 10: 1147–1157. exposure and incident peripheral arterial disease. Circ
2. Lamas GA, Goertz C, Boineau R, et al. Design of the trial Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2013; 6: 626–633.
to access chelation therapy. Am Heart J 2012; 163: 7–12. 8. Zhuang X, Ni A, Liao L, et al. Environment-wide associ-
3. Escolar E, Lamas GA, Mark DB, et al. The effect of an ation study to identify novel factors associated with per-
EDTA-based chelation regimen on patients with diabetes ipheral arterial disease: Evidence from the National Health
mellitus and prior myocardial infarction in the Trial to
and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999–2004).
Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT). Circulation 2014; 7:
Atherosclerosis 2018; 269: 172–177.
15–24.
9. Navas-Acien A, Guallar E, Silbergeld EK, et al. Lead
4. Cohen G, Levy I, Yuval, et al. Long-term exposure to
exposure and cardiovascular disease–a systematic review.
traffic-related air pollution and cancer among survivors
Environ Health Perspect 2007; 115: 472–482.
of myocardial infarction: A 20-year follow-up study. Eur
J Prev Cardiol 2017; 24: 92–102.

View publication stats

You might also like