Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Serves As A Mode of Analysis Examining The Relationship Between Ownership, Power, and Social Change
Serves As A Mode of Analysis Examining The Relationship Between Ownership, Power, and Social Change
Learning Objective:
MELC: Critique a literary selection based on the following approaches:
structuralist/formalist, moralist, Marxist, feminist, historical, and reader-
response.
Key Concepts:
English 10 Learner’s Material
What to Do: Read carefully the text below and answer the questions that follow.
OWNERSHIP
POWER
Power is frequently defined by political scientists as the ability to influence the behavior of others
with or without resistance. The term authority is often used for power perceived as legitimate by
the social structure. Power can be seen as evil or unjust, but the exercise of power is accepted as
endemic to humans as social beings. The use of power need not involve coercion, force or the
threat of force. At one extreme, power closely resembles what English speakers call “influence”,
although some authors make a distinction between the two.
The sociological examination of power involves discovering and describing the relative strengths:
equal or unequal; stable or subject to periodic change. Sociologists usually analyze relationships
in which parties have relatively equal or nearly equal power in terms of constraint rather than of
power. Thus power has a connotation of unilateralism. If this were not so, then all relationships
could be described in terms of power, and its meaning would be lost.
Power may derive from a number of sources, including social class (material wealth can equal
power), resource currency (material items such as money, property, food), personal or group
charisma, ascribed power (acting on perceived or assumed abilities, whether these bear testing or
not), social influence of tradition (compare ascribed power), etc.
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-sociology/chapter/politics-power-and-
authority/#:~:text=Power
SOCIAL CHANGE
Sociologists define social change as changes in human interactions and relationships that
transform cultural and social institutions. These changes occur over time and often have
profound and long-term consequences for society. Well known examples of such change have
resulted from social movements in civil rights, women's rights, and LBGTQ rights, to name just a
few. Relationships have changed, institutions have changed, and cultural norms have changed as
a result of these social change movements. That's pretty heady stuff. Don't you think?
https://www.snhu.edu/about-us/newsroom/2017/11/what-is-social-change
2. The term ________________ is often used for power perceived as legitimate by the social
structure.
5. For sociologist, social change is changes in human interactions and relationships that
transform ______________________ institutions.
Activity 1.2
Inside the box, write a simple meaning that can be found in the reading text above.
What is the relationship of the three factors in the society? Explain briefly.
___________________________________________________ .
Reflection:
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-sociology/chapter/politics-power-and-
authority/#:~:text=Power
MARX’S SOCIAL AND POLITICAL THEORIES
Name:___________________________________________________Section:_________
Learning Objective:
Key Concepts:
Reference: English 10 Learner’s Material
What to Do: Read and study carefully the information about Marx Theories below. Answer the
questions that follow.
The ideas expressed by Marx might offer one alternative that is indeed more considerate to human rights.
Levin introduces four categories where Marxism can contribute to a maybe fairer and more just society:
1.) Marx’s theory on different classes within the society can provide valuable suggestions on how these
classes can interrelate to form a whole and therefore demonstrate society’s functionality as one single unit.
2.) The theory can help us consider the present in a long term perspective through Marx’s historical sense, as
well as understand the inherent dynamic of a society as a whole and not only their functionality as separate
units.
3.) Marxism can provide a theory of a society in accordance with the highest human ideals to a very high
extent.
4.) Marxism can serve as a mode of analysis examining the relationship between ownership, power and
social change and thus illuminate a wider variety of social transformation than whatever is currently
dominant (Levin, 2000).
https://www.grin.com/document/231598
Marx’s general ideas about society are known as his theory of historical materialism.
Materialism is the basis of his sociological thought because for Marx material conditions
or economic factors affect the structure and development of society. His theory is that
material conditions essentially comprise technological means of production and human
society is formed by the forces and relations of production.
Samples
Reflection:
Answer briefly.
1. The difficult part of the lesson is ________________________ because
________________________________________.
Name:___________________________________________________Section:_________
Learning Objective:
Key Concepts:
Reference: English 10 Learner’s Material
1) Phonetics, Phonology This is the level of sounds. One must distinguish here between the set
of possible human sounds, which constitutes the area of phonetics proper, and the set of system
sounds used in a given human language, which constitutes the area of phonology. Phonology is
concerned with classifying the sounds of language and with saying how the subset used in a
particular language is utilised, for instance what distinctions in meaning can be made on the
basis of what sounds.
2) Morphology This is the level of words and endings, to put it in simplified terms. It is what one
normally understands by grammar (along with syntax). The term morphology refers to the
analysis of minimal forms in language which are, however, themselves comprised of sounds and
which are used to construct words which have either a grammatical or a lexical function.
Lexicology is concerned with the study of the lexicon from a formal point of view and is thus
closely linked to (derivational) morphology.
4) Semantics This is the area of meaning. It might be thought that semantics is covered by the
areas of morphology and syntax, but it is quickly seen that this level needs to be studied on its
own to have a proper perspective on meaning in language. Here one touches, however, on
practically every other level of language as well as there exists lexical, grammatical, sentence and
utterance meaning.
5) Pragmatics The concern here is with the use of language in specific situations. The meaning of
sentences need not be the same in an abstract form and in practical use. In the latter case one
speaks of utterance meaning. The area of pragmatics relies strongly for its analyses on the notion
of speech act which is concerned with the actual performance of language. This involves the
notion of proposition – roughly the content of a sentence – and the intent and effect of an
utterance.
Source : https://www.uni-due.de/SHE/REV_Levels_Chart.htm#GlossTop
3. This is the level of sounds. One must distinguish here between the set of possible human
sounds, which constitutes the area of phonetics proper, and the set of system sounds used
in a given human language,
a. Phonetics b. Morphology c. Syntax d. Pragmatic
4. It refers to the analysis of minimal forms in language which are, however, themselves
comprised of sounds and which are used to construct words which have either a
grammatical or a lexical function.
a. Lexicology b. Syntax c. Morphology d. Pragmatic
6. It is concerned with the study of the lexicon from a formal point of view and is thus closely
linked to (derivational) morphology.
a. Morpology b. Lexicology c. Semantic d. Pragmatic
Reflection:
Answer briefly.
In this lesson, I understand that ________________________________.
References for Learners:
“Celebrating Diversity through World Literature Grade 10”, First Edition. Manila: Rex Book
Store Inc., 2015.
https://www.booktopia.com.au/the-force-of-language-driley/book/9781403942487.html
https://www.uni-due.de/SHE/REV_Levels_Chart.htm#GlossTop
History provides us a way of thinking about the past. The use of historical inquiry shows
students a way to inquire into, organise and explain events that have happened.
Historical inquiry is the process of “doing history”. It is a cyclical process that begins with
the asking of guiding historical questions. This is followed by locating and analysing
historical sources to establish historical evidence. The historical evidence is then used to
construct historical interpretations that seek to answer the guiding historical questions.
The use of historical inquiry is thus at the heart of history instruction and learning, and
students must be provided with the opportunities to learn the skills required through
practice and engagement in historical inquiry. The use of an inquiry question in each
unit provides the focal point for students to investigate, extract, order, collate, synthesise
and analyse information to formulate and test hypothesis and reach a conclusion
explored in the syllabus.
There are six generic questions to further guide students in their inquiry to the issues
and topics covered in the syllabus:
What were the major forces and developments during this period?
What caused these major forces and developments?
Who were the key players involved?
How did the developments influence peoples’ decisions and actions and vice-versa?
How did people’s views and perspectives shape their interpretation of these
developments?
How did these developments impact societies?
The inquiry approach, when implemented effectively, can develop critical thinkers
and independent learners.
https://fuchunsec.moe.edu.sg/our-community/departments/humanities/historical-inquiry-process
Activity 1.6 : LET’S DO THE PROCESS!
Directions: Do the process of historical inquiry by digging more on the life of our National Hero,
Dr. Jose Rizal.
The Life of Dr. Jose Rizal
Historical Inquiry
Process
Reflection:
Key Concepts:
Reference: English 10 Learner’s Material, pp. 489-491
What to Do: Read carefully the Marxist Approach in understanding literature. Answer the
questions that follow.
INTRODUCTION
In literary theory, a Marxist interpretation reads the text as an expression of contemporary class
struggle. Literature is not simply a matter of personal expression or taste. It somehow relates to
the social and political conditions of the time.
How it relates is of course up for debate. Is the text a mirror of social values? Is it a form of
propaganda for the ruling classes? Can literature challenge social norms? These are the
questions that preoccupy Marxist literary critics.
In what follows we’ll first sketch out some broad principles of Marxist analysis before turning to
one possible reading of Wordsworth’s poem “I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud.”
DETERMINISM
Many of the grand theories developed in the second half of the nineteenth century are
deterministic in nature. Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution suggests that much of our
behaviour is determined by our genes. Sigmund Freud argued that our lives are affected by our
unconscious, and that our psychological and sexual wishes and desires are much affected by the
formative influences of our childhood. Similarly, Karl Marx theorized that human beings are the
product of their social and economic environment.
Marx called the economic conditions of life the base or infrastructure. The base includes
everything from technology and raw materials to the social organization of the workplace.
This economic base has a powerful effect on the superstructure, Marx’s term for society, culture,
and the world of ideas.
Marx sometimes referred to the superstructure as consciousness, the way we think and look at
reality. Marx famously said, “It is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but,
on the contrary, their social being that determines their consciousness.” Our ability to think for
ourselves is limited: our ideas are shaped by the material conditions of life.
Literature, for Marx, belongs to the superstructure (along with law, theology, politics, etc.). The
challenge, then, is to see how it is influenced by the economic base.
Marx himself often treated literature as simple propaganda for the ruling classes. There is some
truth to this. For instance, in a Feudal society, people loved chivalric romances, stories about
knights who fight for honour and win their lady’s love. In today’s capitalistic society, many people
enjoy watching James Bond movies, which celebrate the glamorous lifestyle of the modern
gentleman, the lady’s man who dresses in expensive clothes and drives fast cars. In these
cultural fantasies it is the aristocrat who comes to our rescue and saves us from imaginary
villains that seek to destroy the status quo.
Yet many later Marxists were unhappy with Marx’s somewhat naive characterization of literature
as propaganda. For instance, the Italian communist Antonio Gramsci used the concept
of hegemony to describe the way in which ideology (a system of beliefs) is not simply oppressive
and coercive, but also involves an element of consent. There has to be some reason for me to go
see a James Bond movie even when the lifestyle depicted might be unattainable.
More recently, the cultural critic Raymond Williams suggested in Marxism and
Literature (1977) that every historical time period has competing hegemonies. The dominant
hegemony promotes the interests of the ruling classes, the residual hegemony defends the
culture and belief system of the previous era, and the emergent hegemony shares revolutionary
ideas that may later become the dominant hegemony.
Literature thus reveals to us the spirit of the times, the issues that mattered to people. Literature
(and entertainment) is about much more than enjoyment or escapism: it is a manifestation of
class struggle.
https://natureofwriting.com/courses/writing-about-literature/lessons/marxist-literary-theory/
1. Do you agree that our ability to think for ourselves is limited and our ideas are shaped by
the material conditions of life? How and why?
2. In what way does Sigmund Freud Theory different from Karl Marx Theory?
Reflection:
Answer Key:
Activity 1.1
Reviewers:
Daisy F. Santos, SST II
Venus Sheila O. Ayado, SSHT IV
Maria Dinah D. Abalos, PhD, EPS -English