If Dell were expected to grow at 50% in 1997 with same operating efficiency and profitability as in 1996, will it be able to fund its growth internally?
Some facts to have in mind beforehand:
Higher asset efficiency:
• Reduced cash, receivables, inventory, and other current assets.
• Needed addl. $447 million of operating assets. Sources of funds:
• Increase in current liabilities = $187 million.
• Net Profit = $272 million. Dell’s performance in 1996:
• Dell introduced Pentium technology.
• Unit sales grew by 48%. • Average unit revenue grew by 3%. • Gross margin declined by 1% due to aggressive pricing strategies and account mix shift. • Net margin improved from 4.3% to 5.1% • Common stock was issued to employees. Funding 50% Growth in 1997:
The income statement projection for 1997.
• Operating assets in 1996 = $2148 - $591 =$1557. • Percent operating assets to sales in 1996 = 1557/5296 = 29.4%. • Operating assets in 1997 = sales in 1996 x percent operating assets = 29.4% x $7944 = $2336 • Increasing of operating assets = $2336 - $1557 =$779 • Cash flow from profit = $396 • Financing from current liabilities (without account payable) and retained earnings in 1996 = $473 + $570=$1043 • Percent to sales = 1043/5296 = 19.69% • Financing from current liabilities (without account payable) and retained earnings in 1996 =19.69% x $7944 = $1565 • Increasing from 1996 to 1996 = $1565 - $1043 = $522 • Total cash flow = $396 + $522 = $918 So, the total cash flow more than operating assets that is required for funding dell’s operation in 1997.