Conclusion

From the feasibility study conducted with all three 3 options being studied in detail it was

concluded that option 2 would be best suited for further study. A breakdown of (4) four main

topics were discussed for each option and the best choice was selected. The (4) four main points

for each option was Technical, Environmental, Social and cost. For option 1 which refers to the

repair of the longdenville community center, we listed all the all the repairs that needed to be

done to have it in a functional stage. Some of these construction phases were replacing of roof,

replacing of electrical/plumbing fixtures, repainting of walls and benches, resurfacing of

basketball court just to name a few. A listing of the tools/materials needed to complete each

phase was stated above. We also had all the environmental effects that would affect this

particular option with possible solutions on how to mitigate these problems. The social aspect

was also discussed in detail on how this option would affect the well-being of neighboring

residents. Finally an estimate was done for each construction phase and a cost attached to each

phase. The estimated cost was given with respect to real material prices and labor cost. The total

cost commuted for the progression of this phase was calculated to be $910,000.00. For option 2,

we demolished and reconstructed the community center constructing a 2 story structure than of

previous. We also replaced the fence, guard rail, play park and basketball court. We made

available a functional car park as well as a gym and a communal space for rent. The

environmental part of this option discussed

Also the social part

After dealing with contractors, engineers and consultants, and estimated cost of this option was

given to be $40,000,00.00. For the final option we guarded information in relation to another
 piece of land located opposite the previous proposed location for the other (2) two options. Using

the information guarded from ministry of land and surveys, questionnaires, interviews and other

relevant sources the following information was guarded. The full description of the technical

study was ……………………………………………….

CONCLUSIONS:  the conclusions section of a feasibility or recommendation report amalgamates

all of the conclusions you have already reached in each of the comparison sections. In this
section, you restate the individual conclusions, for example, which model had the best price,
which had the best battery function, and so on. You could give a summary of the relative
strengths and weakness of each option based on how well they meet the criteria.

This section has to go further. It must untangle all the conflicting conclusions and somehow
reach the final conclusion, which is the one that states which is the best choice. Thus, the
conclusion section first lists the primary conclusions—the simple, single-category ones. Then it
must state secondary conclusions—the ones that balance conflicting primary conclusions. For
example, if one tablet is the least inexpensive but has poor battery function, but another is the
most expensive but has good battery function, which do you choose and why? The secondary
conclusion would state the answer to this dilemma.