Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Asignmnentfinal6552 2
Asignmnentfinal6552 2
Assignment no 2
Level: M.Ed. / M.A
Semester autumn 2019
Q.1Explain the ethical consideration in writing .Discuss the models of of co writing.
Ethical considerations
It is imperative that ethical issues are considered during the formulation of the evaluation plan. Ethical
considerations during evaluation include:
Informed consent
Voluntary participation
Do no harm
Confidentiality
Anonymity
Only assess relevant components
Informed consent
Informed consent means that the person participating in the evaluation is fully informed about the evaluation
being conducted. Participants need to be made aware of the purpose of the project, who or what group is
funding it, how the findings will be used, if there are any potential adverse impacts of their participation and
who will have access to the findings. The main purpose of informed consent is that the participant is able to
make an informed decision as to whether they will participate in the evaluation or not. Additional
information should also be provided in the event that the participant becomes distressed in any way during
their participation.1,2
Voluntary participation
Voluntary participation means that people participate in the evaluation free from coercion. Participants are
free to withdraw their participation at any time without negatively impacting on their involvement in future
services or the current program2 and relationships with any of the researchers or research bodies involved.
It can be challenging to encourage high risk youth to become engaged in a program and it is therefore
difficult when participants choose not to continue in a program. It is the right of participants to leave a
program of this nature at any time, therefore no pressure should be placed on those who choose not to
continue. Explanations are also not required.
Do no harm
Harm can be both physical and/or psychological and therefore can be in the form of: stress, pain, anxiety,
diminishing self-esteem or an invasion of privacy.2 It is imperative that the evaluation process does not in
any way harm (unintended or otherwise) participants.
Confidentiality
Confidentiality means that any identifying information is not made available to, or accessed by anyone but
the program coordinator.2 Confidentiality also ensures such identifying information is excluded from any
reports or published documents. Given that there are often small numbers in peer based programs, it is very
important to consider how reports are worded to ensure that there is no opportunity for people to be
identified even though names are not used.
Anonymity
Anonymity is a stricter form of privacy than confidentiality, as the identity of the participant remains
unknown to the research team.2 This is more difficult to achieve than confidentiality as participants in the
context of social research are usually known to the program coordinator.1
Only assess relevant components
Only assess those components that are of relevance to the program/initiative being conducted. High risk
populations are sometimes being used as guinea pigs or a captive audience to ask all sorts of questions in
evaluations that are of interest to groups conducting the program/initiative but not relevant to the program
nor will be to the group who are involved in the program. It is important to keep evaluations as simple as
possible and to remain focused on the intention of the evaluation and what the data gathered will be used for.
The models of of co-writing
Collaborative writing involves two or more persons working together to produce a written document. Also
called group writing, it is a significant component of work in the business world, and many forms of business
writing and technical writing depend on the efforts of collaborative writing teams.
Observation
"Collaboration not only draws on the expertise and energy of different people but can also create an outcome
that is greater than the sum of its parts." -Rise B. Axelrod and Charles R. Cooper
Guidelines for Successful Collaborative Writing
Following the ten guidelines below will increase your chances of success when you write in a group.
Know the individuals in your group. Establish rapport with your team.
2. Do not regard one person on the team as more important than another.
3. Set up a preliminary meeting to establish guidelines.
4. Agree on the group's organization.
5. Identify each member's responsibilities, but allow for individual talents and skills.
6. Establish the time, places, and length of group meetings.
7. Follow an agreed-on timetable, but leave room for flexibility.
8. Provide clear and precise feedback to members.
9. Be an active listener.
10. Use a standard reference guide for matters of style, documentation, and format.
Collaborating Online
"For collaborative writing, there are various tools which you can use, notably the wiki which provides an
online shared environment in which you can write, comment or amend the work of others...If you are
required to contribute to a wiki, take every opportunity to meet regularly with your collaborators: the more
you know the people you collaborate with, the easier it is to work with them...
"You will also need to discuss how you are going to work as a group. Divide up the jobs...Some individuals
could be responsible for drafting, others for commenting, others for seeking relevant resources." -Janet
MacDonald and Linda Creanor.
Collaborative Writing
"The meaning of the terms collaboration and collaborative writing are being debated, expanded, and refined;
no final decision is in sight. For some critics, such as Stillinger, Ede and Lunsford, and Laird, collaboration
is a form of 'writing together' or 'multiple authorship' and refers to acts of writing in which two or more
individuals consciously work together to produce a common text...Even if only one person literally 'writes'
the text, another person contributing ideas has an effect on the final text that justifies calling both the
relationship and the text it produces collaborative. For other critics, such as Masten, London, and myself,
collaboration includes these situations and also expands to include acts of writing in which one or even all of
the writing subjects may not be aware of other writers, being separated by distance, era, or even death." -
Linda K. Karrell
Andrea Lunsford on the Benefits of Collaboration
"[T]he data I amassed mirrored what my students had been telling me for years: . . . their work in groups,
their collaboration, was the most important and helpful part of their school experience. Briefly, the data I
found all support the following claims:
1. Collaboration aids in problem finding as well as problem-solving.
These somewhat broad categories, which we'll narrow down in a bit, allow teachers to make sure students are
ready to learn. By activating prior knowledge, students make important connections to past learning and
prepare their brains for new content. New content is presented and taught, then applied to real-world or past
situations. Finally, an assessment is given to determine student understanding. Let's dig a bit deeper into
these components.
Activating Prior Knowledge
What does it mean to activate prior knowledge, and how can teachers accomplish this? The term simply
refers to tapping into a student's previous experience with the topic. For example, if the new learning is
oceanic life, a teacher could activate students' prior knowledge by connecting to other life forms they
studied, or asking students to share experiences about the ocean. In fact, many instructional methods can be
used to activate prior knowledge, including:
Brainstorming
Games
Journaling
Conversations
Concept Mapping
Virtually any way you can think of to get students thinking about a prior experience will do the trick.
Acquire New Knowledge
During this instructional time, teachers promote higher order thinking and prompt students to use inquiry
skills in order to master content. Why do this? Instead of a serve-and-return method of instruction, which
simply has students listen and repeat content, the 4-A model fosters a more rigorous learning model, one that
has students thinking deeply about content. This is accomplished in countless ways, such as having guest
speakers, using interactive learning logs, role-playing, and teaching mini-lessons. This is the typical
'instructional methods' portion of lesson plans with an emphasis on pushing towards high-level skills.
For one lesson in the oceanic life study, a teacher may have students watch a video of life in the ocean, then
read about how mammals and fish interact to survive. Another day she may have a zoologist speak to the
students, then have students respond to the experience by writing a letter asking further questions.
Application
During this portion of the 4-A plan, teachers plan for ways students can take in the new information,
consolidate it, and apply it in new and useful ways. Students apply their knowledge by sharing their ideas,
creating a product, participating in activities, doing a case study, and so on.
In our oceanic example, students may create a 3-dimensional model of the ocean, applying all the
information they learned to demonstrate understanding.
Assessment
Finally, teachers plan on methods to assess students both during and at the end of learning. These
assessments can be completed in typical ways, such as quizzes and tests, and more formative methods as
well, such as giving a 'thumbs up,' using think-pair-share, or using exit slips. Teachers use this data to drive
future instruction or determine final student understanding.
model Of GTZ peshawar model for lesson plan for lesson developing
A strategy and road map for the implementation of proposed CPD program in the 3 districts was discussed
and agreed upon with representatives of the department of Elementary & Secondary Education, Govt of
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, DCTE, PITE, and management of the target districts.
The programme was successfully implemented by ESDP-GIZ in all the target districts. Mode of
implementation was PDU (Professional Development Unit) based. Around 780 (M&F) selected supervisors
were trained in Jan-Feb, 2014. After the training of supervisors, they started classroom observation and other
assigned duties in their respective PDUs.
In December, 2014 a follow up study was conducted in all the 3-districts to measure the impact of activities
carried out under CPD program. The study showed encouraging results both in teaching and learning.
Results of the study were shared with E&SED and resultantly department agreed to continue the program at
its own level.
ESDP-GIZ hold a number of meetings at department level to develop a sustainable and cost effective
mechanism to continue the program. After deliberation the department of Elementary & Secondary
Education decided to establish a dedicated CPD unit at PITE and support it at all levels to implement the
program effectively.
The Unit was established at PITE in Oct, 2015. The Unit started its activities in late 2015 and up-scaled the
program to one new district (Mardan). The CPD program as per notified CPD model, is now being
implemented in 2- different modes (1.School-Based, 2. PDU-Based).
The program is now a regular feature of the department and up-scaled every year to 2-new districts. During
the current financial year 2 more districts covered (Malakand and Karak).
Objectives of the CPD program are:
To enable teachers to teach effectively and to ensure students’ learning through:
Enhancing their understanding of 2006 curriculum and its pedagogic principles.
Sensitizing teachers to ensure effective learning through regular self- assessment and peer learning.
Supporting teachers with external professional supervision (observation of teaching and targeted feedback)
Enhancing capacity of teachers through need based and targeted In-service training.