You are on page 1of 15

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/323219904

Meta-Analysis of Association of Mitochondrial DNA Mutations with Type 2


Diabetes and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Article  in  International Journal of Human Genetics · October 2017


DOI: 10.1080/09723757.2018.1430110

CITATIONS READS

0 326

7 authors, including:

Soundarya Priya Muthumeenakshi Bhaskaran


SASTRA University SASTRA University
3 PUBLICATIONS   0 CITATIONS    7 PUBLICATIONS   2 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) View project

UNDERSTANDING THE MECHANISM OF INHIBITION OF MITOTIC KINESIN EG5 AND DEVELOPING ANTICANCER AGENTS USING STRUCTURE BASED STUDIES View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Soundarya Priya on 07 January 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Int J Hum Genet, 17(4): 177-190 (2017)
DO I: 10.1080/09723757.2018.1430110

Meta-Analysis of Association of Mitochondrial DNA Mutations


with Type 2 Diabetes and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Soundarya Priya Alexandar1*, Indhumathi Dhinakaran1*, Vidhya Ravi2, Nandhini Parthasarathy1,
Somasundari Ganesan1, Muthumeenakshi Bhaskaran1 and Ganesh Prasad Arun Kumar1
1
Human Genomics Laboratory, School of Chemical & Biotechnology,
SASTRA University Thanjavur, Thanjavur 613 401, Tamil Nadu, India
2
K.A.P. Viswanatham Govt. Medical College, Trichy, 620 001, Tamil Nadu, India
KEYWORDS Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Meta-analysis. Mitochondrial DNA. Type 2 Diabetes

ABSTRACT Type 2 diabetes mellitus (TIIDM) and Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are two most prevalent
metabolic diseases affecting humans. These two diseases are characterised by oxidative stress that has been
attributed to mitochondrial dysfunction. Over two decades of research has been performed to identify the relationship
of mitochondria l DNA (mtDNA) mutations with TIIDM and GDM giving many contrasting results. T hus a
systematic meta-analysis was performed from literature. A total of 1279 studies were analysed and narrowed down
to 57 studies based on stringent inclusion-exclusion criteria. Literature did not have enough studies to perform
meta-analysis on GDM although mtDNA mutations G15928A, T3394C, T3398C, A8344G and G3316A showed
association with GDM which needs to be verified on diverse populations. Meta-analysis revealed an association of
mtDNA mutations T16189C, A12026G, G3316A, A8296G and A3243G with TIIDM. The paper hence suggests a
strong association of the said mtDNA markers with TIIDM that may be potential biomarker for the disease.

INTRODUCTION mester), stillbirth, neonatal hypoglycemia, res-


piratory distress syndrome, hyperbilirubinemia,
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (TIIDM) is the most cardiac dysfunction and other long-term conse-
common metabolic disorder and is characterized quences. It also increases the number of caesar-
by a state called hyperglycemia, caused by re- ean births and accounts for long-range implica-
sistance of the peripheral tissues to insulin that tions to the mother (Xiong et al. 2001; Lee et al.
lowers the level of glucose and insufficient in- 2008; Robitaille and Grant 2008).
sulin secretion by pancreatic cell (Zimmet et Point mutations, deletions, and duplications
al. 2001). Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) that affect the transcription and translation pro-
is a metabolic disorder characterized by impaired cesses of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) have
insulin secretion and glucose tolerance, which been suggested to be potential genetic etiology
results in varying degrees of maternal hypergly- for both TIIDM and GDM (van den Ouweland
cemia and various pregnancy-associated risks. et al. 1994; Crispim et al. 2008; Khan et al. 2015).
It usually develops during the second trimester TIIDM is associated with various mechanisms
of pregnancy and resolves right after delivery, of tissue damage resulting mainly from oxida-
but women diagnosed with GDM are suscepti- tive stress. Oxidative stress is an imbalance be-
ble to develop diabetes after pregnancy. tween the reactive oxygen species and antioxi-
GDM increases the risk of adverse neonatal dants that plays a primary role in the pathogen-
outcomes like birth defects, birth trauma, con- esis and complications of diabetes. The progres-
genital malformation, macrosomia, shoulder dys- sion of diabetes occurs due to hyperglycaemia
tocia, intra-uterine death (during the third tri- which results in overproduction of oxygen free
Address for correspondence:
radicals (Ilechukwu et al. 2014). Oxidative stress
Dr. G. Arun Kumar increases when the rate of free radical produc-
Human Genomics Laboratory tion increases and antioxidant mechanisms are
School of Chemical & Biotechnology impaired (Irshad and Chaudhuri 2002).
SASTRA University The pathogenesis of GDM is found to mimic
Tirumalaisamudram,
Thanjavur 613 401, Tamil Nadu, India the pathogenesis of TIIDM and evidences show
E-mail: arunkumar.gp@gmail.com oxidative stress to be a common etiology to both
178 SOUNDARYA PRIYA ALEXANDAR, INDHUMATHI DHINAKARAN, VIDHYA RAVI ET AL.

(Weijers and Bekedam 2007). It is proposed that netic polymorphisms, incomplete genotyping
the involvement of mtDNA in disease patho- data and familial studies. For meta-analysis, a
genesis could contribute to biased maternal genetic variant reported by less than 3 indepen-
transmission of GDM as mitochondria are ma- dent studies were excluded.
ternally inherited. Susceptibility to GDM has
genetic determinants similar to TIIDM (Martin Meta-analysis
et al. 1985). There are various mutations in the
mitochondrial DNA that causes diabetes and Meta-analysis of the mtDNA mutations were
these mutations of mtDNA have been linked to performed using MedCal software (https://
defects in insulin secretion. A point mutation in www.medcalc.org/). A minimum of 3 studies for
the tRNALeu(UUR) mitochondrial gene at nucle- a mutation with all relevant data were used for
otide 3243 results in -cell dysfunction and im- meta-analysis. Odds ratio with 95 percent confi-
paired insulin secretion (van den Ouweland et dence interval and P value was estimated for both
al. 1994; Wang et al. 2016). Multiple lines of ev- individual and compiled case control data for meta-
analysis. Both fixed effect and random effect mod-
idences suggest both the occurrence of TIIDM els were used. Test for heterogeneity among stud-
and its complications such as retinopathy or ies was performed using the Q statistic.
nephropathy to be strongly associated with mtD-
NA mutations (Gilkerson 2016; Jha et al. 2017; RESULTS
Sarhangi et al. 2017; Zhu et al. 2017).
Analysis of mtDNA mutations in these two A total of 1599 records were retrieved from
diseases has been undertaken for more than 2 database searches of which 1279 remained after
decades. In this age of personalised and predic- removing duplicates (Fig. 1). After implement-
tive medicine, genetic biomarkers play a quint- ing the exclusion criteria of non-case controls
essential role in predicting the disease before its studies and those without proper genotype num-
onset and its prognosis. Hence the present pa- bers etc., 67 publications remained. Filtering for
per is aimed at identifying mtDNA mutations that the criteria of at least 3 studies for 1 mutation, 57
may have biomarker value in predicting TIIDM studies representing 9 mtDNA mutations quali-
and GDM using a meta-analysis approach of fied for meta-analysis (Fig. 1). The mtDNA mu-
published datasets. tations associated with TIIDM and GDM is dis-
cussed below.
METHODOLOGY
A3243G Mutation
Literature Search Strategy
mtDNA mutation A3243G was represented
Genetic variants related to TIIDM and GDM in 36 publications (Supplementary Fig. 1). The
published up to January, 2017 were identified association ranged from an odds ratio value of
through systematic searches in PubMed and 1.3 in British population to 64.3 in Caucasian
Scopus. The search strategy consisted of que- population (Thomas et al. 1996; Cavelier et al.
ry: “mtDNA mutation diabetes”. In addition, the 2001). The odds ratio for association of this SNP
with TIIDM under the fixed effect model and ran-
references cited by the original studies, were dom effect model was 6.8 (95% CI: 3.709 to 12.805;
also searched and scrutinised. P< 0.001) and 5.9 (95% CI: 3.200 to 11.237; P<
0.001) respectively (Table 1). Thirteen out of the
Eligibility Criteria 36 publications did not find this SNP in either the
case or the controls. This mutation was exclu-
Studies were included for analyses if they sively present only in TIIDM patients (1.6%) sug-
were case-controlled studies with genotype dis- gesting the pathogenic nature of the mutation. In
tribution information in either TIIDM or GDM. the present meta-analysis it was found that this
Exclusion criteria included review papers, com- mutation was present in 8.3 percent of Caucasian,
mentary articles, publication in other languag- 1.1 percent of British, 1.1 percent German, 1.6 per-
es, studies of postpartum diabetes mellitus, du- cent of Chinese, 1.8 percent of Japanese and 0.6
plicated reports, case studies, pedigree analysis percent of South Indian TIIDM patients (Sup-
and genetic studies with no information on ge- plementary Fig. 1).
METANALYSIS OF MTDNA MUTATIONS IN GDM 179

Records identified through Records identified through other


primary database searching database searching
(PUBMED) (SCOPUS, back references etc)
(N=880) (n=719)

Records remaining after removing duplicates


(n=1279)

Records screened for case control design Records excluded


with appropriate sample details (n=1279) (n=1212)

Articles eligible for meta-analysis


(n=67)

Articles used for qualitative synthesis with


more than 3 studies per mutation
(n=57)

Fig. 1. Flow diagram of systematic Meta-analysis performed in the present study

G3316A Mutation mtDNA Mutations Negatively Associated with


Type 2 Diabetes
The mutation G3316A mutation occurs in the
ND1 gene of the mitochondria and it is consid- The mutation T3394C in the ND1 gene was
ered to be a pathogenic mutation. Eighteen pub- negatively associated with TIIDM with an odds
lications showed association of this mutation ratio of 0.402 (95% CI: 0.272 - 0.593; P<0.001)
with TIIDM with odds ratio ranging from 0.43 in (Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 6). This mutation
Caucasian Brazilians (Crispim et al. 2002) to 24.9 causes a non synonymous change from Tyrosine
in Chinese (Yu et al. 2004). The odds ratio under to Histidine. The molecular consequences of this
the fixed effect and random effect models was mutation need to be elucidated but the present
found to be 2.01 (95% CI: 1.436 to 2.819; P<0.001) meta-analysis based on 14 studies shows a neg-
and 1.7 (95% CI: 1.242 to 2.531; P=0.002). This ative association. This is in contrast to a study
shows a strong association of this mutation with by Crispim et al. (2002) who showed a high as-
TIIDM (Supplementary Fig. 2). This mutation is sociation (OR=1.9) in Caucasians from Brazil
a non-synonymous mutation in ND1 gene re- (Crispim et al. 2002). It needs to be verified if the
sulting in replacement of tyrosine to histidine. association of this mutation with TIIDM is pop-
Although this mutation has been associated with ulation specific. Mutations C5178A and A3246G
TIIDM, its molecular mechanism of pathogene- also showed negative association with TIIDM
sis is still to be elucidated (Lam et al. 2001; (Table 1, Supplementary Figs. 7, 8), although the
Maechler and Wollheim 2001). later was based on only 3 studies and had a
non-significant negative association.
A8296G Mutation
Association of mtDNA Mutations with
This mutation in the tRNALys gene showed Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
an overall odds ratio of 3.507 (95% CI: 0.612 to
20.100; P value 0.159) under the fixed effect model A number of studies have attempted associ-
based on 3 studies of which two were from south ating mtDNA mutations with GDM (Supplemen-
India (Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 3). The non- tary Text 2). Most of the mutations did not have
significant association requires further validation multiple studies on the same mutation. Only the
to see if this is a population specific association. mutation A3243G was studied in 4 different stud-
180 SOUNDARYA PRIYA ALEXANDAR, INDHUMATHI DHINAKARAN, VIDHYA RAVI ET AL.

Meta-analysis of A3243G T2D

Otabe et al., 1994 (Japanese)


Kishimoto et al., 1995 (Japanese)
Nakagawa et al., 1995 (Japanese)
Odawara et al., 1995 (Japanese)
Thomas et al., 1996 (British)
Kobayashi et al, 1997 (Japanese)
Smith et al., 1997 (Chinese)
Zhong et al., 2000 (Chinese)
Cavelier et al., 2001 (Caucassian)
Iwasaki et al., 2001 (Japanese)
Iwase et al., 2001 (Japanese)
Ji et al., 2001 (Chinese)
Klemm et al., 2001 (German)
Ohkubo et al., 2001 (Japanese)
Crispim et al., 002 (African Brazilians)
Crispim et al., 2002 (Caucasian Brazilians)
Kleiner et al., 2004 (Croatian)
Yu et al., 2004 (Chinese)
Zhang et al, 2004 (Chinese)
Larijani et al., 2005 (Iranian)
Tang et al., 2005 (Chinese)
Tang et al., 2005 (Chinese)
Yu et al., 2005 (Chinese)
Tang et al., 2006 (Chinese)
Zhao et al., 2006 (Chinese)
Liu et al., 2007 (Chinese Han)
Rebai et al., 2007 (Tunisian)
Naveed et al, 2009 (Pakistani)
Wang et al., 2009 (Chinese)
Duraisamy et al., 2010 (S. India)
Mezghani et al., 2010 (Tunisian)
Padma et al., 2010 (S. India)
Ameh et al., 2011 (Nigerian)
Rebai et al., 2013 (Tunisian)
Wang et al., 2013 (Chinese Han)
Zhou et al., 2015 (Chinese)
Total (fixed effects)
Total (random effects)

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000


Odds ratio

Supplementary Fig. 1. Forest plot for association of A3243G mutation with TIIDM

ies of which only 1 study by Khan et al. (2015) (Weijers and Bekedam 2007). Thus it is impor-
showed the presence of this mutation in Indian tant to understand the association of mtDNA
patients (OR: 3.89, P=0.0403) (Khan et al. 2015). mutations in GDM.
The compilation of the published data showed
association of G15928A, T3394C, T3398C, DISCUSSION
A8344G and G3316A with GDM (Supplementary
Text - 2) although they could not be verified Mitochondria is a key organelle of a cell that
through meta-analysis due to paucity of stud- plays crucial role in many fundamental cellular
ies. Of these 6 mutations, 4 of them are non- pathways of cellular energetics, redox status,
synonymous variants in the ND1 gene while cell signalling (Ca+ and reactive oxygen species),
A8344G is a non-synonymous mutation in the biosynthetic pathways etc. Mitochondrial dys-
tRNALeu gene and G15928A is a synonymous function is a key mechanism of pathogenesis in
mutation in the Cytochrome B gene. It is well metabolic disorders such as diabetes. The role
characterised that GDM is associated with high mitochondrial dysfunction in glucose intoler-
levels of oxidative stress and many of the patho- ance was first described 40 years ago (Yamada
physiology of GDM resembles that of TIIDM et al. 1975). Subsequently many studies have
METANALYSIS OF MTDNA MUTATIONS IN GDM 181

Meta-analysis of G3316A with T2D

Nakagawa et al., 1995 (Japanese)

Odawara et al., 1996 (Japanese)

Ji et al., 2001 (Chinese)

Lam et al., 2001 (Chinese)

Crispim et al., 2002 (African Brazilians)

Crispim et al., 2002 (Caucasian Brazilians)

Yu et al., 2004 (Chinese)

Pranoto et al., 2005 (Indonesian)

Tang et al., 2005 (Chinese)

Tang et al., 2005 (Chinese)

Yu et al., 2005 (Chinese)

Tang et al., 2006 (Chinese)

Zhao et al., 2006 (Chinese)

Liu et al., 2007 (Chinese Han)

Wang et al., 2009 (Chinese)

Wang et al., 2013 (Chinese Han)

Ishak et al., 2014 (Javanese)

Devi et al., 2016 (Karaikudi)

Lalrohlui et al, 2016 (Mizo-Mongoloid)

Total (fixed effects)

Total (random effects)

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000


Odds ratio

Supplementary Fig. 2. Forest plot for association of G3316A mutation with TIIDM

shown down regulation of genes such as PGC1 The association of various mtDNA muta-
that is involved in mitochondrial biogenesis in tions with TIIDM showed the largest effect size
diabetes and its complications (Mootha et al. with A3243G, A8296G and G3316A (Table 1). The
2003; Moreno-Santos et al. 2016; Lee et al. A3243G mutation is one of the highly investi-
2017). The mitochondrial dysfunction in diabe- gated mtDNA mutation that is known to be
tes, in-part has been attributed to mutations in pathogenic. It was shown to be present in up to
the mtDNA. 80 percent of patients suffering from mitochon-
182 SOUNDARYA PRIYA ALEXANDAR, INDHUMATHI DHINAKARAN, VIDHYA RAVI ET AL.

0.22 to 0.558

2.017 to 5.733

1.258 to 7.318

0.665 to 3.172

0.235 to 1.087
1.373 to 64.304

0.0584 to 1.908
drial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis,

0.438 to 24.97
and stroke-like episodes (MELAS) syndrome
OR a mong
Range of

studies
and 75 percent of Diabetes mellitus associated
deafness (Goto et al. 1992; Chinnery et al. 1997;
Chinnery et al. 2000). Recently it was also shown
to be associated with diabetes retinopathy and
increased risk of osteoporosis in diabetes (Sar-
hangi et al. 2017; Zhu et al. 2017). This mutation
included
Studies

occurs in the tRNALeu(UUR) gene that results in


No of

36

19

12

15
3

5
the destabilisation of the tRNALeu leading to low-
er cellular glucose oxidation and impaired NADH
responses (de Andrade et al. 2006).
Table 1: Meta-Analysis of mtDNA mutations in Type 2 Diabetes and their corresponding molecular effec ts

In addition to the strongly associated muta-


OR - Random effect
(95% CI; P value)

0.294 (0.0494 to

5.997 (3.200 to

3.034 (0.516 to

2.128 (1.176 to

1.404 (1.147 to

0.788 (0.574 to

0.428 (0.241 to
1.773(1.242 to

tions, there were some mutations that had low


1.755; P=0.179)

11.237; P<0.001)

2.531; P=0.002)

3.851; P=0.013)

1.719; P=0.001)

1.082; P=0.141)

0.760; P=0.004)
17.845; P=0.22)

effect size. A12026G mutation showed a signifi-


cant association with TIIDM with an odds ratio
of 1.981 (95% CI: 1.376 to 2.854; P value <0.001)
under the fixed effect model based on 6 studies
(Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 4). The studies
used for the present meta-analysis had only East
Asian representation (Supplementary Text). A
(95% CI; P value)

0.285 (0.0486 to
OR - Fixed effect

T>C mutation in the control region at position


6.892 (3.709 to

3.507 (0.612 to

2.012 (1.436 to

1.325 (1.180 to

0.823 (0.689 to

0.402 (0.272 to
1.981 ( 1.376 to
20.100; P=0.159)
1.673; P=0.165)

12.805; P<0.001)

2.819; P<0.001)

2.854; P<0.001)

1.488; P<0.001)

0.984; P=0.032)

0.593; P<0.001)

16189 also showed a significant association with


TIIDM (OR: 1.325 95% CI: 1.180 to 1.488; P<0.001)
based on 12 studies (Table 1, Supplementary
Fig. 5). Many previous association independent
studies have shown similar odds ratio (>1 and
<2) to have an association with the disease (Yu
et al. 2005; Park et al. 2008). But the presence of
Leucine to Methionine
Alanine to Threonine

Tyrosine to Histidine
Iso Leucine to Valine

such lower values even after a meta-analysis


may suggest a real association with the disease.
Most of these mutation that showed strong
Effect

Non coding

or weak associations with TIIDM showed a wide


tRNA Leu

variation in distribution among various popula-


Lys
tRNA

tions. For example G3316A mutation was present


in 2.3 percent of Chinese, 2.4 percent of Japa-
-

nese, 6.6 percent of South Indian and 8.6 per-


Non-synonymous

Non-synonymous

Non-synonymous

Non-synonymous
Type of mutation

cent of Mizo-Mongoloid TIIDM patients, while


it was seen at appreciable frequencies in the
Synonymous

control subjects (Supplementary Text 1). Thus it


may be suggested that population level forces
may have shaped the distribution of these mtD-
NA mutations in different global populations.
Different populations across the globe have
MT-ND 1

MT-ND 1
MT-TL 1
MT-ND1

MT-ND4

MT-ND2
MT-HV1

characteristic mtDNA lineages that have been


M T-T K

subjected to bottlenecks and expansions over


Gene

long periods of time (Mishmar et al. 2003; Mar-


rero et al. 2016). Hence one needs to identify
T 16 1 89 C
A12026G

population specific mtDNA markers that will


G3316A

C5 17 8A

T 3 39 4 C
A3426G

A3243G

A8296G

have association with metabolic disorders like


SNP

TIIDM and GDM that are characterised by


strong oxidative stress.
METANALYSIS OF MTDNA MUTATIONS IN GDM 183

Meta-analysis of A8296G in T2D

Kameoka et al., 1998 (Iranian)

Duraisamy et al., 2010 (S.Indian)

Padma et al., 2010 (S. Indian)

Total (fixed effects)

Total (random effects)

0.01 0.1 1 10 100


Odds ratio

Supplementary Fig. 3. Forest plot for association of A8296G mutation with TIIDM

The mutations in mtDNA correlating with myelodysplastic syndrome and muscular age-
GDM were only a handful as studies of these ing (Gattermann 2000; Fayet et al. 2002; Catter-
associations were limited. Most of the mutations uccia et al. 2015). Thus the correlation of these
that showed associations were non-synony- mutations with GDM required a deep molecular
mous variants in the ND1 gene (Supplementary genetic characterization.
Text 2). The ND1 gene codes for NADH: Overall, it can be observed that T16189C,
Ubiquinone Oxidoreductase Core and mutations A12026G, G3316A, A8296G and A3243G are as-
in this gene causes variations in the NADH de- sociated with TIIDM while T3394C is not asso-
hydrogenase activity. Many of the mtDNA mu- ciated with diabetes. Similar studies investigat-
tations associated with TIIDM are also present ing the association of mtDNA mutations with
in the ND1 gene (Yu et al. 2004; Wang et al. GDM in various populations of the globe is war-
2016). Another surprising weak association be- ranted along with the cellular and physiological
tween A8344G and GDM was made in Indian consequences of the mutations. Given that TI-
population (Khan et al. 2015). This mutation in IDM is a metabolic disorder characterised by
the Cytochrome B gene is a non-synonymous high oxidative stress, it will be worth to consider
mutation that has been associated with myo- the above said mtDNA markers as potential
clonic epilepsy with ragged red fibers syndrome, biomarkers for TIIDM.
184 SOUNDARYA PRIYA ALEXANDAR, INDHUMATHI DHINAKARAN, VIDHYA RAVI ET AL.

Meta-analysis of A12026G with T2D

Tawata et al,, 1998 (Japanese)

Yu et al, 2005 (Chinese)

Wang et al., 2006 (Chinese)

Liu et al., 2007 (Chinese Han)

Wang et al., 2009 (Chinese)

Wang et al., 2013 (Chinese Han)

Total (fixed effects)

Total (random effects)

0.01 1 10 100
Odds ratio
Supplementary Fig. 4. Forest plot for association of A12026G mutation with TIIDM

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS hearing loss due to mitochondrial DNA defects. Brain,


123 ( Pt 1): 82-92.
Chinnery PF, Howell N, Lightowlers RN, Turnbull DM
The authors thank SASTRA University for 1997. Molecular pathology of MELAS and MERRF:
providing access to journals for this study. The relationship between mutation load and clinical
phenotypes. Brain, 120 (Pt 10): 1713-1721.
Crispim D, Estivalet AAF, Roisenberg I, Gross JL, Ca-
REFERENCES nani LH 2008. Prevalence of 15 mitochondrial DNA
mutations among type 2 diabetic patients with or
Catteruccia M, Sauchelli D, Della Marca G, Primiano G, without clinical characteristics of maternally inher-
Cuccagna C, Bernardo D, Leo M, Camporeale A, ited diabetes and deafness. Arquivos Brasileiros de
Sanna T, Cianfoni A, Servidei S 2015. “Myo-cardi- Endocrinologia e Metabologia, 52: 1228-1235.
omyopathy” is commonly associated with the Crispim D, Tschiedel B, Souto KE, Roisenberg I 2002.
A8344G “MERRF” mutation. J Neurol, 262: 701- Prevalence of three mitrochondrial DNA mutations
71 0. in type 2 dia betic patients from southern Brazil.
Cavelier L, Erikson I, Tammi M, Jalonen P, Lindholm Clin Endocrinol (Oxf), 57: 141-142.
E, Jazin E, Smith P, Luthman H, Gyllensten U 2001. de Andrade PB, Rubi B, Frigerio F, van den Ouwel, JM,
MtDNA mutations in maternally inherited diabetes: Maassen JA, Maechler P 2006. Diabetes-associated
Presence of the 3397 ND1 mutation previously as- mitochondrial DNA mutation A3243G impairs cel-
sociated with Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. lular metabolic pathways necessary for beta cell func-
Hereditas, 135: 65-70. tion. Diabetologia, 49: 1816-1826.
Chinnery PF, Elliott C, Green GR, Rees A, Coulthard A, Fayet G, Jansson M, Sternberg D, Moslemi AR, Blondy P,
Turnbull DM, Griffiths TD 2000. The spectrum of Lombes A, Fardeau M, Oldfors A 2002. Ageing muscle:
METANALYSIS OF MTDNA MUTATIONS IN GDM 185
Meta-analysis of T16189C T2D

Ge et al., 2005 (Chinese)

Lin et al., 2005 (Taiwanese)

Tang et al. 2005 (Chinese)

Crispim et al., 2006 (Caucasian-Brazilian)

Tang et al., 2006 (Chinese)

Liao et al., 2008 (Chinese Han)

Park et al., 2008 (Korean)

Park et al., 2008 (Japanese)

Park et al., 2008 (Hong Kong)

Park et al., 2008 (Taiwanese)

Park et al., 2008 (Chinese)

Aral et al., 2011 (Turkish)

Total (fixed effects)

Total (random effects)

0.1 1 10
Odds ratio
Supplementary Fig. 5. Forest plot for association of T16189C mutation with TIIDM
Meta-analysis of T3394C with T2D

Hirai et al., 1996 (Japanese)

Thomas et al., 1996 (British)

Ohkubo et al. 2001 (Japanese)


Crispim et al, 2002 (Caucasian Brazilians)

Crispim et al., 2002 (African Brazilians)

Yu et al., 2004 (Chinese)


Pranoto et al., 2005 (Indonesian)

Tang et al., 2005 (Chinese)

Yu et al., 2005 (Chinese)

Tang et al., 2006 (Chinese)

Liu et al., 2007 (Chinese Han)


Liao et al., 2008 (Chinese Han)

Wang et al., 2009 (Chinese)


Wang et al., 2013 (Chinese Han)

Lalrohli et al., 2016 (Mizo-Mongoloid)

Total (fixed effects)


Total (random effects)

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100


Odds ratio
Supplementary Fig. 6. Forest plot for association of T3394C mutation with TIIDM
186 SOUNDARYA PRIYA ALEXANDAR, INDHUMATHI DHINAKARAN, VIDHYA RAVI ET AL.

Meta-analysis of c5178a in T2D

Tawata et al.2000 (Japanese)

Watsunaga et al. 2001 (Japanese)

Wang et al. 2001 (Japanese)

Lu et al. 2007 (Chinese Han)

Liao et al. 2008 Chinese Han)

Total (fixed effects)

Total ( random effects)

0.01 0.1 1 10
Odds ratio

Supplementary Fig. 7. Forest plot for association of C5178A mutation with TIIDM
Meta-analysis of A3426G in T2D

Yu et al. 2003 (Chinese)

Yu et al. 2004 (Chinese)

Yu et al. 2005 (Chinese)

Total (fixed effects)

Total (random effects)

0.01 0.1 1 10
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Odds ratio
Supplementary Fig. 8. Forest plot for association of A3426G mutation with TIIDM
METANALYSIS OF MTDNA MUTATIONS IN GDM 187

Clonal expansions of mitochondrial DNA point muta- Moreno-Santos I, Perez-Belmonte LM, Macias-Gonza-
tions and deletions cause focal impairment of mito- lez M, Mataro MJ, Castellano D, Lopez-Garrido M,
chondrial function. Neuromuscul Disord, 12: 484-493. Porras-Martin C, Sanchez-Fernandez PL, Gomez-Do-
Gattermann N 2000. From sideroblastic anemia to the blas JJ, Cardona F, de Teresa-Galvan E, Jimenez-Na-
role of mitochondrial DNA mutations in myelodys- varro M 2016. Type 2 diabetes is associated with de-
plastic syndromes. Leuk Res, 24: 141-151. creased PGC1alpha expression in epicardial adipose
Gilkerson R 2016. Commentary: Mitochondrial DNA tissue of patients with coronary artery disease. J Transl
damage and loss in diabetes. Diabetes/Metabolism Re- Med, 14: 243.
search and Reviews, 32: 672-674. Park KS, Chan JC, Chuang LM, Suzuki S, Araki E, Nanjo
Goto Y, Horai S, Matsuoka T, Koga Y, Nihei K, Koba- K, Ji L, Ng M, Nishi M, Furuta H, Shirotani T, Ahn BY,
yashi M, Nonaka I 1992. Mitochondrial myopathy, Chung SS, Min HK, Lee SW, Kim JH, Cho YM, Lee HK
encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like epi- 2008. A mitochondrial DNA variant at position 16189
sodes (MELAS): A correlative study of the clinical is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Asians.
features and mitochondrial DNA mutation. Neurology, Diabetologia, 51: 602-608.
42: 545-550. Robitaille J, Grant AM 2008. The genetics of gestational
Ilechukwu C, Ebenebe U, Ubajaka C, Ilika A, Emelumadu diabetes mellitus: Evidence for relationship with type
O, Nwabueze S 2014. The role of oxidative stress in 2 diabetes mellitus. Genet Med, 10: 240-250.
diabetes mellitus: A 24-year review. Afrimedic Journal, Sarhangi N, Khatami F, Keshtkar A, Heshmat R, Atlasi R,
5: 1-7. Mohammadamoli M 2017. The role of mitochondrial
Irshad M, Chaudhuri PS 2002. Oxidant-antioxidant sys- DNA in development of diabetic retinopathy: A sys-
tem: Role and significance in human body. Indian J tematic review. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Oph-
Exp Biol, 40: 1233-1239. thalmol, 6.
Jha SK, Jha NK, Kumar D, Ambasta RK, Kumar P 2017. Thomas AW, Edwards A, Sherratt EJ, Majid A, Gagg J,
Linking mitochondrial dysfunction, metabolic syn- Alcolado JC 1996. Molecular scanning of candidate
drome and stress signaling in neurodegeneration. Bio- mitochondrial tRNA genes in type 2 (non-insulin de-
chim Biophys Acta, 1863: 1132-1146. pendent) diabetes mellitus. Journal of Medical Genet-
Khan IA, Shaik NA, Pasupuleti N, Chava S, Jahan P, ics, 33: 253-255.
Hasan Q,Rao P 2015. Screening of mitochondrial mu- van den Ouweland JM, Lemkes HH, Trembath RC, Ross
tations and insertion-deletion polymorphism in gesta- R, Velho G, Cohen D, Froguel P, Maassen JA 1994.
tional diabetes mellitus in the Asian Indian population. Maternally inherited diabetes and deafness is a distinct
Saudi J Biol Sci, 22: 243-248. subtype of diabetes and associates with a single point
Lam CW, Yang T, Tsang MW, Pang CP 2001. Homoplas- mutation in the mitochondrial tRNA(Leu(UUR)) gene.
mic 3316G—>A in the ND1 gene of the mitochondrial Diabetes, 43: 746-751.
genome: a pathogenic mutation or a neutral polymor- Wang X, Ren Y, Wang W, Song J, Long Y, Tian HM, Yu
phism? J Med Genet, 38: E10. HL, Zhang XX 2016. Association of nt3434AG mu-
Lee H, Jang HC, Park HK, Metzger BE, Cho NH 2008. tation in mitochondrial DNA ND1 gene with diabetes
Prevalence of type 2 diabetes among women with a mellitus. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sci-
previous history of gestational diabetes mellitus. Dia- ence Edition), 47: 810-812.
betes Res Clin Pract, 81: 124-129. Weijers RN, Bekedam DJ 2007. Relationship between
Lee S-Y, Kang JM, Kim D-J, Park SH, Jeong HY, Lee YH, gestational diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes: evi-
Kim YG, Yang DH, Lee SH 2017. PGC1 activators dence of mitochondrial dysfunction. Clin Chem, 53:
mitigate diabetic tubulopathy by improving mitochon- 377-383.
drial dynamics and quality control. Journal of Diabetes Xiong X, Saunders LD, Wang FL, Demianczuk NN 2001.
Research, 2017. Gestational diabetes mellitus: Prevalence, risk factors,
Maechler P, Wollheim CB 2001. Mitochondrial function maternal and infant outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,
in normal and diabetic beta-cells. Nature, 414: 807-812. 75: 221-228.
Marrero P, Abu-Amero KK, Larruga JM, Cabrera VM Yamada T, Ida T, Yamaoka Y, Ozawa K, Takasan H,
2016. Carriers of human mitochondrial DNA macro- Honjo I 1975. Two distinct patterns of glucose intoler-
haplogroup M colonized India from southeastern Asia. ance in icteric rats and rabbits. Relationship to im-
BMC Evol Biol, 16: 246. paired liver mitochondria function. J Lab Clin Med,
Martin AO, Simpson JL, Ober C, Freinkel N 1985. Fre- 86: 38-45.
quency of diabetes mellitus in mothers of probands Yu DM, Li MZ, Liu DM 2005. Study on the mitochondrial
with gestational diabetes: Possible maternal influence DNA mutations in patients with early-onset diabetes
on the predisposition to gestational diabetes. Am J mellitus. Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics, 22: 14-17.
Yu P, Yu DM, Liu DM, Wang K, Tang XZ 2004. Relation-
Obstet Gynecol, 151: 471-475.
ship between mutations of mitochondrial DNA ND1 gene
Mishmar D, Ruiz-Pesini E, Golik P, Macaulay V, Clark and type 2 diabetes. Chin Med J (Engl), 117: 985-989.
AG, Hosseini S, Brandon M, Easley K, Chen E, Brown Zhu J, Yang P, Liu X, Yan L, Rampersad S, Li F, Li H,
MD, Sukernik RI, Olckers A, Wallace DC 2003. Natu- Sheng C, Cheng X, Zhang M, Qu S 2017. The clinical
ral selection shaped regional mtDNA variation in hu- characteristics of patients with mitochondrial tRNA
mans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 100: 171-176. Leu(UUR)m.3243A > G mutation: Compared with type
Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF, Subramanian A, 1 diabetes and early onset type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes
Sihag S, Lehar J, Puigserver P, Carlsson E, Ridderstrale Complications, 31: 1354-1359.
M, Laurila E, Houstis N, Daly MJ, Patterson N, Me- Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Shaw J 2001. Global and societal
sirov JP, Golub TR, Tamayo P, Spiegelman B, Lander implications of the diabetes epidemic. Nature, 414:
ES, Hirschhorn JN, Altshuler D, Groop LC 2003. PGC- 7 82 -7 87 .
1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phos-
phorylation are coordinately down regulated in human Paper received for publication onAugust 2017
diabetes. Nat Genet, 34: 267-273. Paper accepted for publication on November 2017
188 SOUNDARYA PRIYA ALEXANDAR, INDHUMATHI DHINAKARAN, VIDHYA RAVI ET AL.

Supplementary Text 1: List of studies used for meta- Supplementary Text 1: Contd...
analsyis of association of mtDNA mutations with
Type 2 Diabetes S. Population Mutation Reference
No.
S. Population Mutation Reference
No. 50 Indonesian G3316A Pranoto 2005
51 Japanese G3316A Odawara et al. 1996
1 Japanese A3243G Otabe et al. 1994 52 Japanese G3316A Nakagawa et al. 1995
2 Japanese A3243G Kishimoto et al. 1995 53 Japanese G3316A ISHAK et al. 2014
3 Japanese A3243G Nakagawa et al. 1995 54 Karaikudi G3316A Devi et al. 2016
4 Japanese A3243G Odawara et al. 1995 55 Mizo- G3316A Lalrohlui et al. 2016
5 British A3243G Thomas et al. 1996 Mongoloid
6 Japanese A3243G Kobayashi et al. 1997 56 African T3394C Crispim et al. 2002
7 Chinese A3243G Smith et al. 1997 Brazilians
8 Chinese A3243G Zhong et al. 2000 57 British T3394C Thomas et al. 1996
9 Caucasian A3243G Cavelier et al. 2001 58 Caucasian T3394C Crispim et al. 2002
10 Japanese A3243G Iwasaki et al. 2001 Brazilians
11 Japanese A3243G Iwase et al. 2001 59 Chinese T3394C Tang et al. 2006
12 Chinese A3243G Ji et al. 2001 60 Chinese T3394C Tang et al. 2005
13 German A3243G Klemm et al. 2001 61 Chinese T3394C Yu et al. 2005
14 Japanese A3243G Ohkubo et al. 2001 62 Chinese T3394C Yu et al. 2004
15 African A3243G Crispim et al. 2002 63 Chinese T3394C Wang et al. 2009
Brazilians 64 Chinese T3394C Liu et al. 2007
16 Caucasian A3243G Crispim et al. 2002 Han
Brazilians 65 Chinese T3394C Liao et al. 2008
17 Croatian A3243G Martin-Kleiner et al. 2004 Han
18 Chinese A3243G Yu et al. 2004 66 Chinese T3394C Wang et al. 2013
19 Chinese A3243G Zhang et al. 2004 Han
20 Iranian A3243G Larijani et al. 2005 67 Indonesian T3394C Pranoto, 2005
21 Chinese A3243G Tang et al. 2005b 68 Japanese T3394C Ohkubo et al. 2001
22 Chinese A3243G Tang et al. 2005a; 69 Japanese T3394C Hirai et al. 1996
Larijani H et al. 2005 70 Mizo- T3394C Lalrohlui et al. 2016
23 Chinese A3243G Yu et al. 2005 Mongoloid
24 Chinese A3243G Tang et al. 2006 71 Chinese A3426G Yu et al. 2003
25 Chinese A3243G Zhao et al. 2006 72 Chinese A3426G Yu et al. 2004
26 Chinese A3243G Liu et al. 2007 73 Chinese A3426G Yu et al. 2005
Han 74 Chinese A3426G Liu et al. 2007
27 Tunisian A3243G Mkaouar-Rebai et al. 2007 Han
28 Pakistani A3243G Naveed et al. 2009 75 Japanese C5178A Tawata et al. 2000
29 Chinese A3243G Wang et al. 2009 76 Japanese C5178A Matsunaga et al. 2001
30 S.India A3243G Duraisamy et al. 2010 77 Japanese C5178A Wang et al. 2001
31 Tunisian A3243G Mezghani et al. 2010 78 Chinese C5178A Liu et al. 2007
32 S.India A3243G Vijaya Padma et al. 2010 Han
33 Nigerian A3243G Ameh et al. 2011 79 Chinese C5178A Liao et al. 2008
34 Tunisian A3243G Mkaouar-Rebai et al. 2013 Han
35 Chinese A3243G Wang et al. 2013 80 Iranian A8296G Kameoka et al. 1998
Han 81 S.Indian A8296G Duraisamy et al. 2010
36 Chinese A3243G Zhou et al. 2015 82 S.Indian A8296G Vijaya Padma et al. 2010
37 African G3316A Crispim et al. 2002 83 Chinese A8296G Wang et al. 2009
Brazilians 84 Chinese A8296G Wang et al. 2013
38 Caucasian G3316A Crispim et al. 2002 Han
Brazilians 85 Japanese A12026G Tawata et al. 1998
39 Chinese G3316A Yu et al. 2005 86 Chinese A12026G Yu et al. 2005
40 Chinese G3316A Zhao et al. 2006 87 Chinese A12026G Wang et al. 2006
41 Chinese G3316A Tang et al. 2005b 88 Chinese A12026G Liu et al. 2007
42 Chinese G3316A Tang et al. 2005a Han
43 Chinese G3316A Tang et al. 2006 89 Chinese A12026G Wang et al. 2009
44 Chinese G3316A Lam et al. 2001 90 Chinese A12026G Wang et al. 2013
45 Chinese G3316A Yu et al. 2004 Han
46 Chinese G3316A Ji et al. 2001 91 Chinese T16189C Ge et al. 2005
47 Chinese G3316A Wang et al. 2009 92 Taiwaneese T16189C Lin et al. 2005
48 Chinese G3316A Liu et al. 2007 93 Chinese T16189C Tang et al. 2005
Han 94 Caucasian-
49 Chinese G3316A Wang et al. 2013 Brazilian T16189C Crispim et al. 2006
Han 95 Chinese T16189C Tang et al. 2006
METANALYSIS OF MTDNA MUTATIONS IN GDM 189

Supplementary Text 1: Contd... Kobayashi T, Nakanishi K, Nakase H, Kajio H, Okubo


M, Murase T, Kosaka K 1997. In situ characteriza-
S. Population Mutation Reference tion of islets in diabetes with a mitochondrial DNA
No. mutation at nucleotide position 3243. Diabetes, 46:
15 67-157 1.
96 Chinese T16189C Liao et al. 2008 Larijani B, Houshmand M, Dorraj GS, Darvishzadeh F
Han 2005. Prevalence of mt DNA mutation in type II
9 7 Korean T16189C Park et al. 2008 diabetes mellitus. Iranian Journal of Diabetes and
9 8 Japanese T16189C Park et al. 2008 Lipid Disorders, 4: E5+E5i-E5vii.
9 9 Hong Kong T16189C Park et al. 2008 Liu SM, Zhou X, Zheng F, Li X, Liu F, Zhang HM, Xie
10 0 Taiwanese T16189C Park et al. 2008
Y 2007. Novel mutations found in mitochondrial
10 1 Chinese T16189C Park et al. 2008
10 2 Turkish T16189C Aral et al. 2011 diabetes in Chinese Han population. Diabetes Re-
search and Clinical Practice, 76: 425-435.
Re ferenc es for Supple mentar y Text-1 Martin-Kleiner I, Pape-Medvidovic E, Pavlic-Renar I,
Metelko Z, Kusec R, Gabrilovac J, Boranic M 2004.
Ameh J, Godwin I, Obi I, Puepet F, Aminu B, Suleiman A pilot study of mitochondrial DNA point mutation
T 201 1. The search for mitochondrial tRNA A3243G in a sample of Croatian patients having
Leu(UUR) A3243G mutation among type 2 diabe- type 2 diabetes mellitus associated with maternal
tes mellitus patients in the Nigerian population. inheritance. Acta Diabetol, 41: 179-184.
African Journal of Biotechnology, 10: 13383-13389. Mezghani N, Mkaouar-Rebai E, Mnif M, Charfi N,
Cavelier L, Erikson I, Tammi M, Jalonen P, Lindholm Rekik N, Youssef S, Abid M, Fakhfakh F 2010. The
E, Jazin E, Smith P, Luthman H, Gyllensten U 2001. heteroplasmic m.1 470 9T> C muta tion in the
MtDNA mutations in maternally inherited diabetes: tRNA(Glu) gene in two Tunisian families with mi-
presence of the 3397 ND1 mutation previously as- tochondrial diabetes. J Diabetes Complications, 24:
sociated with Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. 2 70 -2 77 .
Hereditas, 135: 65-70. Mkaouar-Rebai E, Chamkha I, Mezghani N, Ben Ayed
Crispim D, Tschiedel B, Souto KE, Roisenberg I 2002. I, Fakhfak h F 201 3. Screening of mitochondrial
Prevalence of three mitrochondrial DNA mutations mutations in Tunisian patients with mitochondrial
in type 2 diabetic patients from southern Brazil. disorders: An overview study. Mitochondrial DNA,
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf), 57: 141-142. 24: 163-178.
Duraisamy P, Elango S, Vishwanandha VP, Balamuru- Mkaouar-Rebai E, Tlili A, Masmoudi S, Belguith N,
ga n R 201 0. Preva lence of mitochondria l tRNA Charfeddine I, Mnif M, Triki C, Fakhfakh F 2007.
gene mutations and their association with specific Mutational analysis of the mitochondrial tRNALeu
clinical phenotypes in patients with type 2 diabetes (UUR) gene in Tunisian patients with mitochondri-
mellitus of Coimbatore. Genet Test Mol Biomark- al diseases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 355:
ers, 14: 49-55. 10 31-103 7.
Iwasaki N, Babazono T, Tsuchiya K, Tomonaga O, Nakagawa Y, Ikegami H, Yamato E, Takekawa K, Fujisa-
Suzuki A, Togashi M, Ujihara N, Sakka Y, Yokoka- wa T, Hamada Y, Ueda H, Uchigata Y, Miki T, Ku-
wa H, Ogata M, Nihei H, Iwamoto Y 2001. Preva- mahara Y et al. 1995. A new mitochondrial DNA
lence of A-to-G mutation at nucleotide 3243 of the mutation associated with non-insulin-dependent di-
mitochondrial tRNA(Leu(UUR)) gene in Japanese abetes mellitus. Biochem Bioph ys Res Commun,
patients with diabetes mellitus and end stage renal 209: 664-668.
disease. J Hum Genet, 46: 330-334. Naveed AK, Wahid M, Naveed A 2009. Mitochondrial
Iwase M, Gotoh D, Urata M, Kang D, Hamasaki N, tRNALeu(UUR) gene mutation and maternally in-
Yoshinari Mand Fujishima M 2001. Clinical fea- herited diabetes mellitus in Pakistani population.
tures of diabetic patients with 0.01-0.1% hetero- International Journal of Diabetes Mellitus, 1: 11-
plasmy A3243G mutation in leukocyte mitochon- 15 .
drial DNA. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 54: 215-217. Odawara M, Sasaki K, Yamashita K 1995. Prevalence
Ji L, Hou Xand Han X 2001. Prevalence and clinical and clinical characterization of Japanese diabetes
characteristics of mitochondrial tRNA leu(UUR) mt mellitus with an A-to-G mutation at nucleotide 3243
3243 A—>G and ND-1 gene mt 3316 G—>A muta- of the mitochondrial tRNA(Leu(UUR)) gene. J Clin
tions in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. Chin Endocrinol Metab, 80: 1290-1294.
Ohkubo K, Yamano A, Nagashima M, Mori Y, Anzai K,
Med J (Engl), 114: 1205-1207.
Akehi Y, Nomiyama R, Asano T, Urae A, Ono J
Kishimoto M, Hashiramoto M, Araki S, Ishida Y, Ka-
2001. Mitochondrial gene mutations in the tRNA
zumi T, Kanda E, Kasuga M 1995. Diabetes melli-
(Leu(UUR)) region and diabetes: prevalence and clin-
tu s carrying a mu tation in the mitochondrial ical phenotypes in Japan. Clin Chem, 47: 1641-
tRNA(Leu(UUR)) gene. Diabetologia, 38: 193-200. 1648.
Klemm T, Neumann S, Trulzsch B, Pistrosch F, Hanefeld Otabe S, Sakura H, Shimokawa K, Mori Y, Kadowaki H,
M, Paschke R 2001. Search for mitochondrial DNA Yasuda K, Nonaka K, Hagura R, Akanuma Y, Yazaki
mutation at position 3243 in German patients with Y et al. 1994. The high prevalence of the diabetic
a positive family history of maternal diabetes mel- patients with a mutation in the mitochondrial gene
litus. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes, 109: 283-287. in Japan. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 79: 768-771.
190 SOUNDARYA PRIYA ALEXANDAR, INDHUMATHI DHINAKARAN, VIDHYA RAVI ET AL.

Smith PR, Dronsfield MJ, Mijovic CH, Hattersley AT, Supplementary Text 2: List of studies that associ-
Yeung VT, Cockram C, Chan JC, Barnett AH, Bain ated mtDNA variants with Gestational Diabetes
SC 1997. The mitochondrial tRNA[Leu(UUR)] A
to G 3243 mutation is associated with insulin-de- S. mtDNA Population Reference
pendent and non-insulin-dependent diabetes in a No. mutation
Chinese population. Diabet Med, 14: 1026-1031. 1 9bp dele- - Thomas et al. 1996
Tang DL, Zhou X, Li X, Zhao L, Liu F 2006. Variation tion 8277
of mitochondrial gene and the association with type 2 9 bpre- - Thomas et al. 1996
2 diabetes mellitus in a Chinese population. Diabe- pea t8 27 7
tes Research and Clinical Practice, 73: 77-82. 3 A15924G - Thomas et al. 1996
Tang DL, Zhou X, Zhou KY, Li X, Zhao L, Liu F, 4 A3243G - Thomas et al. 1996
Zheng F, Liu SM 2005a. [Association of mitochon- 5 A3348G - Thomas et al. 1996
drial DNA variation with type 2 diabetes mellitus]. 6 A3434G - Thomas et al. 1996
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi, 22: 636- 7 A3480G - Thomas et al. 1996
64 0. 8 A5656G - Thomas et al. 1996
9 A8245G - Thomas et al. 1996
Tang J, Li J, Tian X, Kong Q, Zhang Y 2005b. [Mito- 10 C16 0 69 T - Thomas et al. 1996
chondrial DNA 3243, 33 16 point mutations and 11 C16 1 26 T - Thomas et al. 1996
type 2 diabetes mellitus]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan 12 C7 47 6 T - Thomas et al. 1996
Xue Za Zhi, 22: 198-200. 13 C8 25 2 T - Thomas et al. 1996
Thomas AW, Edwards A, Sherratt EJ, Majid A, Gagg J, 14 G3438A - Thomas et al. 1996
Alcolado JC 1996. Molecular scanning of candidate 15 G3483A - Thomas et al. 1996
mitochondrial tRNA genes in type 2 (non-insulin 16 G5780A - Thomas et al. 1996
dependent) diabetes mellitus. Journal of Medical 17 G8251A - Thomas et al. 1996
Genetics, 33: 253-255. 18 G8269A - Thomas et al. 1996
Vijaya Padma V, Anitha S, Santhini E, Pradeepa D, 19 G8290A - Thomas et al. 1996
Tresa D, Ganesan P, Ishwarya P, Balamurugan R 20 T 16 0 93 C - Thomas et al. 1996
2010. Mitochondrial and nuclear gene mutations in 21 T 3 39 4 C - Thomas et al. 1996
the type 2 diabetes patients of Coimbatore popula- 22 T 3 39 6 C - Thomas et al. 1996
23 G15927A - Thomas et al. 1996
tion. Mol Cell Biochem, 345: 223-229. 24 A3447G - Thomas et al. 1996
Wang S, Wu S, Zheng T, Yang Z, Ma X, Jia W, Xiang K 25 G15928A - Thomas et al. 1996
2013. Mitochondrial DNA mutations in diabetes 26 A3243G American Allan et al. 1997
mellitus patients in Chinese Han population. Gene, 27 A3243G Singapore Chen et al. 2000
531: 472-475. 28 A3 3 9 9 T Singapore Chen et al. 2000
Wang SJ, Wu SH, Zheng TS, Wang L, Lu HJ, Xiang KS 29 C3 25 4A Singapore Chen et al. 2000
2009. Study on the mitochondrial DNA mutations 30 T 3 39 4 C Singapore Chen et al. 2000
in familial diabete mellitus in Chinese population. 31 T 3 39 8 C Singapore Chen et al. 2000
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics, 26: 6-10. 32 G3316A Singapore Chen et al. 2000
Yu DM, Li MZ, Liu DM 2005. Study on the mitochon- 33 A3156G Japanese Ohkubo et al. 2001
drial DNA mutations in patients with early-onset 34 A3243G Japanese Ohkubo et al. 2001
35 C3 37 5A Japanese Ohkubo et al. 2001
diabetes mellitus. Chinese Journal of Medical Ge- 36 G3357A Japanese Ohkubo et al. 2001
netics, 22: 14-17. 37 T 3 39 4 C Japanese Ohkubo et al. 2001
Yu P, Yu DM, Liu DM, Wang K, Tang XZ 2004. Rela- 38 A8344G Asian Indian Khan et al. 2015
tionship between mutations of mitochondrial DNA 39 A3243G Asian Indian Khan et al. 2015
ND1 gene and type 2 diabetes. Chin Med J (Engl),
117: 985-989. Re ferenc es for Supple mentar y Text-2
Zhang XY, Zhang SL, Ke BS, Jiang ZS, Sun R 2004. Allan CJ, Argyropoulos G, Bowker M, Zhu J, Lin PM, Stiver
[Study on mitochondrial DNA gene tRNA K, Golichowski A, Garvey WT 1997. Gestational diabe-
(Leu(UUR)) A3243G mutation in type 2 diabetes tes mellitus and gene mutations which affect insulin se-
mellitus]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi, cretion. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 36: 135-141.
21: 168-170. Chen Y, Liao WX, Roy AC, Loganath A, Ng SC 2000.
Zhao J, Ji JZ, Wang DW, Zhang J, Wu HJ, Lu JX 2006. Mitochondrial gene mutations in gestational diabe-
Detecting of mtDNA mutations at position A3243G tes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 48: 29-35.
and G3316A in patients with type 2 diabetes melli- Khan IA, Shaik NA, Pasupuleti N, Chava S, Jahan P,
tus in Wenzhou. Yi chuan = Hereditas / Zhongguo Hasan Q, Rao P 2015. Screening of mitochondrial
Yi Chuan Xue Hui Bian Ji, 28: 1206-1212. mutations and insertion-deletion polymorphism in
gestational diabetes mellitus in the Asian Indian pop-
Zhong S, Ng MC, Lo YM, Chan JC, Johnson PJ 2000. ulation. Saudi J Biol Sci, 22: 243-248.
Presence of mitochondrial tRNA(Leu(UUR)) A to Ohkubo K, Yamano A, Nagashima M, Mori Y, Anzai K,
G 3243 mutation in DNA extracted from serum and Akehi Y, Nomiyama R, Asano T, Urae A, Ono J 2001.
plasma of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Mitochondrial gene mutations in the tRNA(Leu(UUR))
Clin Pathol, 53: 466-469. region and diabetes: Prevalence and clinical pheno-
Zhou MC, Min R, Ji JJ, Zhang S, Tong AL, Xu JP, Li types in Japan. Clin Chem, 47: 1641-1648.
ZY, Zhang HB, Li YX 2015. Analysis of association Thomas AW, Edwards A, Sherratt EJ, Majid A, Gagg J,
among clinical features and shorter leukocyte te- Alcolado JC 1996. Molecular scanning of candidate
lomere length in mitochondrial diabetes with mitochondrial tRNA genes in type 2 (non-insulin de-
m.3243A>G mitochondrial DNA mutation. BMC pendent) diabetes mellitus. Journal of Medical Genet-
Med Genet, 16: 92. ics, 33: 253-255.

View publication stats

You might also like