Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/264860531
CITATIONS READS
0 159
4 authors, including:
Anastasiya Gorshkova
Russian State Technological University
23 PUBLICATIONS 15 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Valentina Dmitrievna Rumyantseva on 19 August 2014.
T properties, use of various ytterbium compounds in chemical reactions, medicine and engineering. The
main attention is paid to ytterbium porphyrins complexes application as sensitive IR-fluorescent probes for
malignant tumors diagnostics.
Keywords: ytterbium, porphyrins, metallocomplexes, fluorescence, life-times, diagnostics, malignant tumors.
Ytterbium was discovered in 1878 by J. when using them in medicine and photochemistry [8].
Marignac in the form of ytterbium "earth" – In malignant tumors diagnostics porphyrins
ytterbium oxide. Name origin goes from Swedish attract special attention because of ability to
town Ytterby. The element has 27 isotopes with accumulate in various types of cancer cells and
mass numbers from 152 to 178; there are 7 stable tumors micro vessels. A number of photosensitizers
isotopes, ytterbium-174 is the most widespread in which effectively generate singlet oxygen, are
the nature. Ytterbium, as well as other lanthanides, developed for today. Among them porphyrin
usually forms M3+ ion, but also is capable to show derivatives – Photofrin II, Photogem; chlorines –
valence 2. It has small atomic volume and atomic Foscan, Photoditazin, Photolon, Radachlorin;
radius that is explained by effect of "lanthanide phthalocyanines – Photosens; δ-aminolevulinic
compression" opened by the Norwegian acid – Alasens, etc. However, luminescence of
geochemist Goldschmidt [1]. The effect is shown in these compounds in tissues is accompanied by
consecutive reduction of rare-earth elements (REE) generation of undesirable, in this case, singlet
ions sizes – from lanthanum to lutetium. Radius of oxygen. To overcome this drawback, allow purely
lanthanum trivalent ion is equal to 1.03 Å, Lu3+ – diagnostic photosensitizers, thus keeping high
0.86 Å [2], and Yb3+ – 1.01 Å [3]. REE ionic affinity to malignant tumors. Ytterbium complexes
radiuses reduction brings significant distinctions in of natural and synthetic porphyrins belong to such
their chemical properties, in particular, basicity compounds [9].
decrease, salts solubility change, complex Now the cancer is on the second place on
compounds stability, etc. [4–6]. Characteristic mortality after cardiovascular diseases. About 470
feature of ytterbium and other REE is a high thousand primary oncological patients are
paramagnetic susceptibility. registered annually in Russia [10, 11]. According to
Metal lanthanides are white, in powdery state – WHO forecasts the number of oncological patients
from gray to black color. Rare-earth metals possess will increase by 50% in 2020 despite considerable
high chemical activity and interact almost with all progress in development of various approaches to a
elements at rather low temperatures with formation cancer therapy. One of the reasons of such situation
of stable oxides, sulfides and various salts. Thus, is lack of effective methods of early cancer
affinity to oxygen decreases with the atomic detection. By us it was shown for the first time that
number increase. REE are dissolved in sulfuric and ytterbium porphyrins complexes can be effective
hydrochloric acids at any concentrations, and also labels for luminescent diagnostics of tumors in the
in the concentrated nitric acid. And, on the NIR [12].
contrary, alkalis don't act on them even when The first works on synthesis of Yb-complexes of
heating. Interaction intensity with halogens tetraphenylporphyrin (TPP) derivatives appeared in
decreases from fluorine to iodine. REE hydroxides 1974 [13]. One year later inserion of Yb
are basic and bad soluble in water and alkalis. mesoporphyrine IX complex in apomioglobin was
Elements basicity from lanthanum to lutetium goes carried out [14]. Because of bad dissoluble of REE
down with ionic radius decrease and ionic potential inorganic salts in organic solvents, they were replaced
increase in the same direction. with organic compounds chelates further. So,
Porphyrin molecules form stable complexes with ytterbium ion incorporation to porphyrin macrocycle
lanthanide ions which possess intensive absorption in was carried out with ytterbium acetylacetonate in
near infrared region (NIR) [7]. At the same time, quite hard conditions, in the inert atmosphere and in
insertion of various substitutes in meso- and/or β- high-boiling solvent (1, 2, 4-trichlorobenzene) within
positions of macrocycle allow to cardinally change several hours.
physical and chemical properties of lanthanide Ytterbium porphyrins complexes are stable in
porphyrin complexes that plays an important role the air and in the majority of organic solvents and
Vestnik MITHT (Fine Chemical Technologies). 2014. V. 9. № 1
therefore can be isolated by a chromatography with with use of 1,2-dichlorobenzene and DMFA
use of various adsorbents [15]. In the case of water- mixture (in the ratio 1:9) in presence of dry lithium
soluble porphyrins the best results were received chloride. Reaction time 15-20 min, temperature in
when alloying in imidazole [16]. microwave oven 145 °C at the power 650 w. Thus,
Works have appeared recently regarding a time of process was considerably reduced, energy
microwave radiation application in synthesis of consumptions decreased, reaction was carried out
Er2+ and Gd2+ porphyrin complexes in at lower temperature, there was no need for inert
dimethylacetamide medium in presence of dry atmosphere.
lithium chloride [17]. In our researches we have REE β-diketones possess high stability [2] and
applied this method to Yb tetra-meso-(3- maintain high temperatures (> 200 °C). Ammoniac
methoxyphenyl) porphyrin complex synthesis [18]. method was applied for REE acetylacetonates
The Yb-complex was received with an yield 58.4% synthesis [19]:
YbCl3 + 3CH3COCH2COCH3 + 3NH4OH → Yb(acac)3 + 3NH4Cl + 3H2O
Mediums pH has the main significance at REE number, bond nature and ytterbium complexes
complex compounds synthesis [20] since the type symmetry. Yb3+ ion has only one multiplet term 2F
of lanthanide complexes formation depends on it, related to 4f-electrons; 2F5/2 and 2F7/2 components
and so does the character of complex formation in of the term are far remote owing to spin-orbital
water and in water-organic mediums. When interaction that gives characteristic Yb3+ transitions
carrying out the reaction in water with REE salts it in the NIR.
is required that pH of reaction mass doesn't exceed Adler investigated mechanisms of bond
value at which ytterbium hydroxide is formed. formation between porphyrin macrocycle and
Value of ytterbium hydroxide sedimentation pH lanthanide metal ions in 1979 [21]. Buchler carried
and its control in the course of synthesis are out synthesis of several lanthanides porphyrin
necessary conditions when receiving ytterbium complexes and established their dimeric structure
complexes. Used oxygen-containing bidentate in 1986 [22].
donors (for example, acetylacetone) should be the Increased interest in studying of lanthanide ions
low-main. In this connection, reaction between luminescence in the NIR (900–1500 nm) is caused
ytterbium salts with such ligands can be carried out by possibility of application this region for contrast
in neutral and very subacidic mediums (pH 5-6). agents creation for obtaining magnetic resonance
Tris-acetylacetonates isolate from water solutions images [23]. Distinctive feature of Yb porphyrins
in a form of hydrates Yb(acac)3×nH2O, where n = complexes is the characteristic narrow and rather
1–4. In Yb(acac)3×H2O series with n = 2, 3, 4 the intensive luminescence band located in the IR-
structure basis is consist of Yb(acac)×(H2O)2 region at 975–985 nm in so-called “therapeutic
complexes with three chelate (bidentate) window of tissues transparency” [24, 25].
acetylacetonate groups and two water molecules in There is a significant amount of works both
complex internal sphere. domestic [26–30] and foreign authors [31, 32]
Subsequent purification of ytterbium devoted to study of spectral-luminescent
porphyrins metallocomplexes is carried out by characteristics of ytterbium porphyrins complexes.
means of chromatography methods on silica gel, Ytterbium porphyrins complexes were chosen
aluminum oxide, acrylex R-2 depending on as research objects because of luminescence
porphyrin structure. observed at π-electronic molecule part excitement,
Luminescence in helate REE compounds with the luminescence is caused by Yb3+ ion 4f-electrons
β-diketones and other organic ligands is observed transitions of 2F5/2 →2F7/2 level (2F5/2 – excited
only under condition that REE resonant level lies state, 2F7/2 – main state). Ytterbium ion
below triplet level of molecule organic part incorporation in porphyrin leads to decrease in
(intramolecular electronic excitement energy photochemical activity but thus selectivity of
transfer) [20]. For example, the luminescence of accumulation in malignant tumors remains the
ytterbium phthalocyanine complex was not found, same as for the majority of porphyrins. Decrease of
as a result the conclusion was drawn that triplet quantum yield of singlet oxygen generation is
level of phthalocyanine ring is located below explained by that luminescent level of Yb3+ ion lies
ytterbium 2F5/2 resonant level (10300 cm-1) that slightly lower than triplet level of organic molecule
received experimental confirmation further. On the part but higher than that of singlet oxygen. As a
contrary, triplet level of tetrabenzoporphyrine result, porphyrin matrix excitement under influence
(TBP) metallocomplexes is located in the range of external light radiation is transferred not to
about 12500 cm-1, i.e. above the Yb3+ 2F5/2 level, oxygen and intercepted by Yb3+ ion, thereby
and, therefore, similar complexes are convenient harshly reducing singlet oxygen generation
research objects of intramolecular energy migration sensitized by porphyrin. These transformations are
in metalloporphyrin system. Fluorescent spectrum shown in fig. 1.
gives important information about coordination
Vestnik MITHT (Fine Chemical Technologies). 2014. V. 9. № 1
Yb-tetra-meso-(1-N-phenyl-3(m-methoxyphenyl)-
18. 430 557, 596 А
pyrazol-4-y)porphyrin
19. Yb-tetra-meso-(p-tolyl)porphyrin 419 512, 548 А
20. Yb-tetra-meso-mesitylporphyrin 420 513, 549 А
21. Yb-tetra-meso-(p-ethylphenyl)porphyrin 419 512, 549 А
DME – dimethyl ether, TME – tetramethyl ether; * А – chloroform, В – 1% sodium bicarbonate solution.
acac
R R
x 2 Im
N N N N
H3COOC Yb3+ COOCH3 HOOC Yb3+ COOH
N N N N
COOCH3 COOH
1. а. R = 4-OH-Ph 2. а. R = 4-OH-Ph
b. R = 4-Py b. R = 4-Py
c. R = 3-Py c. R = 3-Py
d. R = 4-COOCH3-Ph d. R = 4-COOH-Ph
Researches into the influence of solvent type Carried out researches allowed to establish that
on ytterbium complexes luminescence quantum the most perspective compound for diagnostic
yield have shown that use of 20% DMSO aqua purposes is the Yb 2,4-dimethoxyhematoporphyrin
solution instead of water solutions increases the IX complex (4) (fig. 5). The method of this
quantum yield of Yb-2,4-dimethoxyhemato- substance synthesis is described in works [44, 45].
porphyrin IX from 0.27 to 0.86.
3
Acute toxicity of Yb-2,4-dimethoxyhemato-
porphyrin IX dipotassium salt was investigated.
2,5
Experiments were carried out on 46 Balb/C mice
for a test-doses definition and a search of the most
2
endurable drug dose. Doses of 125, 150, 175, 200,
250 and 400 mg/kg of animal body weight were
Abs
1,5
used. It was shown that dose of 400 mg/kg
conforms to LD100, of 250 mg/kg – to LD66. The
1
most endurable dose was found to be 125 mg/kg of
body weight for Balb/C line mice [11].
0,5
Accordingly, therapeutic doses lie in a range of 10-
25 mg/kg of body weight. The results obtained
0
350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700
witness indicated a relatively low toxicity of this
nm drug.
Ln-complex; 3 – localization of the exciton on the (Yb, Tm, Fr, Ho), applied in near-infrared polymer
Ln-ion to afford its F-centered excited state; 4 – electroluminescent devices (PLED), were described
NIR emission. The NIR emission wavelength is in 2001 [69, 70]. The complexes were generated by
determined by the Ln-ion. the reaction of dilithiotetraphenylporphyrin
The first works about isolation of anhydrous bis(dimethoxyethane) with lanthanide trichloride
tetraphenylporphyrin complexes with lanthanides tris(tetrahydrofuran) salts (fig. 12).
REFERENCES:
1. Populyarnaya Biblioteka Khimicheskikh Elementov. Kniga 2. Serebro – Nil’sboriy [Popular Library of
Chemical Elements. The 2nd book. Silver – Nielsbohrium]. Moscow: Nauka, 1983. 157 p. (in Russ.).
2. Spicyn V.I., Martynenko L.I. Koordinatzionnaya Khimiya Redkozemel’nykh Elementov [Coordination
Chemistry of Rare-Earth Elements]. Мoscow: MGU [MSU], 1979. 248 p. (in Russ.).
3. Khimicheskaya Encyclopediya [The Chemical Encyclopedia] (in 5 volumes). Moscow: Sovetskaya
Enciklopediya, 1990. Vol. 2. P. 276 (in Russ.).
4. Cotton F.A., Wilkinson G. Advanced Inorganic Chemistry (5th ed.). N.-Y.: Wiley-Interscience, 1988.
5. Tret'yakov Yu.D., Martynenko L.I., Grigor'ev A.N., Tcivadze A.Yu. Neorganicheskaya Khimiya [Inorganic
Chemistry]. Moscow: Khimiya, 2001. Vol. 1. 472 p. (in Russ.).
6. Grinvud N., Ernsho A. Khimiya Elementov [Chemistry of Elements]. Мoscow: Binom, 2008. Vol. 2. 666 p.
(in Russ.).
7. Gouterman M. The Porphyrins / Ed. D. Dolphin. N.-Y., San Francisco, London: Academic Press, 1978.
Vol. 3. P. 1–156.
8. Wiglusz R., Legendziewicz J., Graczyk A. [et al.] // J. Alloys & Compounds. 2004. Vol. 380. P. 396–404.
9. Rodshtat I.V. // Vestnik Novyh Medicinskih Tehnologiy (Tula). 1994. Vol. 1. N 1. P. 18–23 (in Russ.).
10. Davydov M.I., Aksel' E.M. // Vestnik RONC im. N.N. Blohina. 2006. Vol. 17. N 3 (Supl. 1). P. 11–132 (in
Russ.).
11. Rumyantseva V.D., Mironov A.F., Schamhalov K.S., Suhin G.M., Shilov I.P., Markushev V.M., Kuz'mina
Z.V., Polyanskaya N.I., Ivanov A.V. // Lazernaya Medicina. 2010. Vol. 14. N 1. P. 20–25 (in Russ.).
12. Chissov V.I., Suhin G.M., Grigoryants V.V., Gaiduk M.I., Mironov A.F., Rumyantseva V.D., Menenkov
V.D., Pecherskih E.V. // Khimioterapiya Opuholey v SSSR. 1989. N 53. P. 137–143 (in Russ.).
13. Wong C.-P., Venteicher R.F., Horrocks W. De W. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978. Vol. 96. N 22. P. 7149–7150.
14. Horrocks W. De W., Venteicher F., Spilburg C.A., Vallee B.L. // Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1975.
Vol. 64. N 1. P. 317–322.
15. Wong W.-K., Zhu X., Wong W.-Y. // Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.11.014. P. 2387–2399.
16. Horrocks W. De W., Hove E.C. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978. Vol. 100. N 14. P. 4392–4396.
17. Gürek A.G., Hirel C. // In: Photosensitizers in Medicine, Environment, and Security // Ed. T. Nyokong, V.
Ahsen: Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012. P. 47–82.
18. Gorbachev S.V., Gorshkova A.S., Kopylova E.V., Rumyantseva V.D. // Proc. of the I All-Russion Sci.
Conf. (with int. participation). Kazan’, March 29, 2013. P. 50–55 (in Russ.).
19. Spicyn V.I., Martynenko L.I. // Izv. AN SSSR. Seriya «Khimiya». 1974. N 5. P. 974 (in Russ.).
20. Lantanoidy. Prostye I Kompleksnye Soedineniya [Lanthanides. Simple and complex compounds]. Rostov-
na-Donu: Universitet Rostova-na-Donu, 1980. 295 p. (in Russ.).
21. Adler A.D., Newman W., Mulvaney M., Paone J. Porphyrin Chemistry Advances / F.R. Longo (Ed.). Ann
Arbor Science Publ., Michigan, 1979. P. 265.
22. Buchler J.W., Elsässer K., Kihn-Boyulinski M., Sharbert B., Tansil S. // In: M. Gouterman, P.M.
Rentzepis, K.D. Staub (Eds.). J. Am. Chem. Soc., Symp. Ser. 321. 1986. P. 94–104.
23. Chen С., Cohen J.S., Myers C.E., Sohn M. // FEBS Lett. 1984. Vol. 168. P. 70–74.
24. Tsvirko M.P., Stelmakh G.F., Pyatosin V.E., Solovyov K.N., Kachura T.F., Piskarskas A.S., Gadonas R.A.
// Chem. Phys. 1986. Vol. 106. P. 467–476.
25. Werts M.H.V. // In: Lanthanide Luminescence. Springer Series on Fluorescence. 2011. Vol. 7. P. 133–159.
26. Kachura T.F., Sevchenko A.N., Solov’ev K.N., Tsvirko M.P. // Dokl. Phys. Chem. 1974. Vol. 217. P.
783–786 (in Russ.).
27. Tsvirko M.P., Kachura T.F. // Zhurnal Prikladnoy Spektroskopii. 1975. Vol. 23. N 5. P. 907–909 (in Russ.).
28. Tsvirko M.P., Stelmakh G.F., Pyatosin V.E., Solov’ev K.N., Kachura T.F. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 1980. Vol.
73. P. 80–83.
29. Shushkevich I.K., Dvornikov S.S., Kachura T.F., Solov'ev K.N. // Zhurnal Prikladnoy Spektroskopii. 1981.
Vol. 35. N 4. P. 647–653 (in Russ.).
30. Solov’ev K.N., Tsvirko M.P., Kachura T.F. // Optika i Spektroskopiya. 1976. Vol. 40. N 4. P. 684–690
(in Russ.).
31. Horrocks W. De W., Wong C.-P. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976. Vol. 98. N 23. P. 7157–7162.
32. Gouterman M., Schumaker C.D., Srivastava T.S., Yonetani T. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 1976. Vol. 40. P. 456–461.
33. Rumyantseva V.D., Mironov A.F., Vendilo N.V., Gaiduk M.I., Grigoryants V.V., Roytman L.D, Sukhin
G.M. // Patent of Russian Federation 1340087, filed on 20/06/1985.
34. Gaiduk M.I., Grigoryants V.V., Mironov A.F., Roytman L.D., Chissov V.I., Rumyantseva V.D., Sukhin
G.M. // Dokl. AN SSSR. 1989. Vol. 309. N 4. P. 980–983 (in Russ.).
35. Gaiduk M.I., Grigoryants V.V., Mironov A.F., Chissov V.I., Rumyantseva V.D., Sukhin G.M. // J. Photo-
chem. Photobiol. B: Biology. 1990. Vol. 7. N 1. P. 15–20.
36. Gaiduk M.I., Grigoryants V.V., Menenkov V.D., Mironov A.F., Rumyantseva V.D., Suhin G.M. // Izv. AN
SSSR, seriya fizicheskaya. 1990. Vol. 54. N 10. P. 1904–1908 (in Russ.).
Vestnik MITHT (Fine Chemical Technologies). 2014. V. 9. № 1
37. Gaiduk M.I., Grigoryants V.V., Mironov A.F., Rumyantseva V.D. // Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci. Phys. Math.
1991. V. 40. N 3. P. 198–204.
38. Schomaecker K., Gaiduk M.I., Rumyantseva V.D., Fischer T., Loehr H., Salditt S., Liebenhof S., Schicha H.
// Nuklearmedizin. 1999. Bd. 38. S. 285–291.
39. Bonnet R. Сhemical Aspects of Photodynamic Therapy. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Science Publ.,
2000. 305 p.
40. Rumyantseva V.D., Markushev V.M., Shilov I.P., Nechaev A.V., Sheveleva E.V., Ivanov A.V., Mironov
A.F., Baryshnikov A.Yu. // Patent of Russian Federation 2372099, filed on 2008.
41. Ivanov A.V., Rumyantseva V.D., Shchamkhalov K.S., Shilov I.P. // Laser Physics. 2010. Vol. 20. N 2.
P. 2056–2065.
42. Roshchina N.V., Rumyantseva V.D., Shilov I.P., Mironov A.F., Kotelnikov V.A. // In: Handbook of
Chemistry, Biochemistry and Biology / Ed. L.N. Shishkina, G.E. Zaikov, A.N. Goloshchupov. N.Y.: Nova Science
Publ. Inc., 2010. Chapt. 30. P. 317–323.
43. Rumyantseva V.D., Roschina N.V., Fedorova L.D., Mironov A.F., Markushev V.M., Shilov I.P. //
Bioorgan. Khimiya. 2011. Vol.37. N 6. P. 844–853 (in Russ.).
44. Rumyantseva V.D., Mironov A.F., Shilov I.P., Schamhalov K.S., Ivanov A.V., Baryshnikov A.Yu. //
Patent of Russian Federation 2411243, filed on 2011.
45. Rumyantseva V.D., Mironov A.F., Shilov I.P., Schamhalov K.S., Ryabov A.S., Ivanov A.V. // Abstracts of
the XIII Int. Sci.-Techn. Conf. «High-Tech in Chemical Engineering-2010». Russia, Suzdal’. June 29 – July 02,
2010. P. 192.
46. Lazernaya Pikosekundnaya Spektroskopiya i Fotokhimiya Biomolekul [Laser Picosecond Spectroscopy
and Photochemistry of Biomolecules] / Ed. by V.S. Letohov. – Moscow: Nauka. Institute of Spectroscopy RAS,
1987. P. 181–184 (in Russ.).
47. Khlebtsov B.N., Panfilova E.V., Hanadeev V.A., Markin A.V., Terentyuk G.S., Rumyantseva V.D., Ivanov
A.V., Shilov I.P., Khlebtsov N.G. // Ros. Nanotehnologii. 2011. Vol. 6. N 7-8. P. 112–117 (in Russ.).
48. Khlebtsov B., Panfilova E., Khanadeev V., Bibikova O., Terentyuk G., Ivanov A.V., Rumyantseva V.,
Shilov I., Ryabova A., Loshchenov V., Khlebtsov N. // ACS Nano. 2011. Vol. 5. N 9. P. 7077–7089.
49. Ivanov A.V., Rumyantseva V.D., Shilov I.P.. Djagarov B.M., Stashevskiy A.S., Vinogradov S.E.,
Khlebcov N.G., Khlebcov B.N., Ivanovskaya N.P., Terentyuk G.S. // Ros. Bioterapevticheskiy Zhurnal. 2013. Vol.
12. N 2. P. 35 (in Russ.).
50. Korovin Yu.V., Kuzmin V.E., Rusakova N.V., Jilina Z.I., Vodzinskiy S.V., Yudanova I.V. // Zhurn. Neorg.
Khim. 2003. Vol. 48. N 3. P. 489–493 (in Russ.).
51. Korovin Yu., Rusakova N. // Rev. Inorg. Chem. 2001. Vol. 21. N 3-4. P. 299.
52. Rusakova N.V., Korovin V.Yu., Zhilina Z.I.,Vodzinskii S.V, Ishkov Yu.V. // J. Appl. Spectr. 2004. Vol.
71. N 4. P. 506–511.
53. Zhuravlyov S., Rusakova N., Korovin Yu. // J. Alloys & Compounds. 2008. Vol. 451. P. 334–337.
54. Rusakova N.V., Kulinich V.P., Zhuravlev S.A., Shaposhnikov G.P., Lebedeva T.A., Shabanov E.V.,
Korovin Yu.V. // J. Appl. Spectr. 2006. Vol. 73. N 5. P. 780–783.
55. Zhang T., Zhu X., Wong W.-K., Tam H.-L., Wong W.-Y. // Ytterbium Complexes Chemistry – A Europ. J.
2013. Vol. 19. Is. 2. P. 739–748.
56. Lv T., W. Sun W. // J. Inorg. Organometallic Polymers & Materials. 2012. P. 200–205.
57. Li D.M., Lui G.F., Shi T.S., Liu X.X., Xu J.Q. // Chinese Chem. Lett. 1999. Vol. 10. N. 2. P. 183–184.
58. Beeby A. [et al.] // Chem. Commun. 2000. P. 1183–1184.
59. Jiang F.-L., Wong W.-K., Zhu X.-J., Zhou G.-J., Wong W.-Y., Wu P.-L., Tam H.-L., Cheah K.-W., Ye C.,
Liu Y. // Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2007. P. 3365–3374.
60. Imbert D., Cantuel M., Bünzil J.-C.G, Bernardinelli G., Pirguet C. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003. Vol. 125.
P. 15698–15699.
61. Shavaleev N.M., Moorcraft L.P., Pope S.J.A., Bell Z.R., Faulkner S., Ward M.D. // Chem. Commun.
2003. P. 1134–1135.
62. Klink S.I., Keizer H., van Veggel F.C.J.M. // Angew. Chem. 2000. V. 112. P. 4489–4491: Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2000. Vol. 39. P. 4319–4321.
63. Zhao Z.X., Xie T.F., Li D.M., Wang D.J., Liu G.F. // Synthetic Metals. 2001. Vol. 123. P. 33–38.
64. Mihaylichenko A.I. [et al.] Redkozemel'nye Metally [Rare-Earth Metals]. – Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1987.
(in Russ.).
65. Genovese S., Epifano F., Marcotullio M.C., Pelucchini C., Curini M. // Tetrahedron Lett. 2011. Vol. 52. N
27. P. 3474–3477.
66. Friend R.H., Gymer R.W., Holmes A.B. [et al.] // Nature. 1999. Vol. 397. P. 121–128.
67. Heege A.J. // Rev. Mod. Phys. 2001. Vol. 73. P. 681–700.
68. Schanze K.S., Reynolds J.R., Boncella J.M., Harrison B.J., Foley T.J., Bouguettaya M.B., Kang T.-S. //
Synthetic Metals. 2003. Vol. 137. P. 1013–1014.
69. Harrison B.S., Foley T.J., Shim J., Bouguettaya M., Padmanaban G., Boncella J.M., Holloway P.H.,
Ramakrishnan S., Reynolds J.R., Schanze K.S. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001. Vol. 79. P. 3770–3772.
Vestnik MITHT (Fine Chemical Technologies). 2014. V. 9. № 1
70. Foley T.J., Abboud K.A., Boncella J.M. // Inorg. Chem. 2002. Vol. 41. P. 1704–1706.
71. Foley T.J., Harrison B.S., Knefely, A.S., Abboud K.A., Reynolds J.R., Schanze K.S., Boncella J.M. //
Inorg. Chem. 2003. Vol. 42. P. 5023–5032.
72. Kang T.S., Harrison B.S., Foley T.J., Knefely A.S., Boncella J.M., Reynolds J.R., Schanze K.S. // Adv.
Mater. 2003. Vol. 15. P. 1093–1097.
73. Lobanov A.V., Chudinov A.V., Chudinova G.K., Rumyantseva V.D. // Abstracts of the XIV Int. Sci.-
Techn. Conf. «High-Tech in Chemical Engineering-2012». Russia, Tula. May 21–25, 2012. P. 218. (in Russ.).
74. Shirmanova M.V., Balalaeva I.V., Lekanova N.Yu., Mysyagin S.A., Brilkina A.A, Klapshina L.G.,
Zagaynova E.V. // Biofizika. 2011. Vol. 56. N 6. P. 1117–1124 (in Russ.).
75. Kwong W.-L., Sun R.W-Y., Lok C.-N., Siu F.-M., Wong S.-Y., Low K.-H., Che C.-M. // Chem. Sci. 2013.
Vol. 4. P. 747–754.