Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Economics for
Hard Times
Better Answers to Our Biggest Problems
BOOK REVIEW
by
Devashree Roychowdhury
Architect - City Planner
India
Make Economics Great Again
Introductory chapter
Stolper-Samuelson theory
The pains from Trade
Clustering of industries
Gains from trade and trade war
Poor economics
Folk theorem
Homophily
Echo chambers
Likes, Wants, and Needs
Holograms
Contact hypothesis
Tipping point
Stagflation
The Great Depression
Total Factor Productivity (TFP)
Predict the future - Gordon V Mokyr
Secular stagnation
Social media - productivity slowdown or boost well-being
Theory of convergence
The End of Growth?
Solow’s model
Lucas’s theory - India V U.S
Impact of technology on economic growth
Exogenous growth model
Diminishing returns
Romer’s theory - spillovers
Economic growth by promoting regional development
The End of Growth?
Wealth tax
The ‘Citizens United’ decision
Happiness quotient
Citizen-centric
Legit.gov
Government action
Fighting corruption
Transparency
Government programs
Importance of stakeholders
Cash and Care
Cash or commodities
Cash transfers
Model of flexicurity
Subsidizing the common good
Mission Locale
Conclusion
Good and Bad Economics
Globalization is an ongoing process - Economic, Social and Political
International migration: immigrant -native relations
In chapter 9 - page 288, the authors are writing about India and the preferences of
the beneficiaries of a specific income group for cash versus food option in direct
benefit transfers program. In my opinion, drawing inferences or giving out
information on the basis of collection of data or research done by a single
individual (or agency) with a small sample size could be avoided in a book that is
comparing nations and talking about the economic progress and their journey in
the last couple of decades. The data and the statistics mentioned for this
particular section could be verified through multiple research firms before
presenting. Also, including the information collected through a single respondent
could be avoided as it might give a wrong impression about the country (as a whole)
with respect to any program, sector or issue. The point is, the readers of foreign
nationalities will not be able to understand India and its states and its vastness,
diversity and complications and will consider the information presented in the
book valid for the whole of the country which might not be true.
Feedback
Another suggestion to the authors is that it’ll be interesting to know the reasons
behind the data gaps wherever it is mentioned ‘there is no evidence for the
particular information’ included in the book. There could be several reasons like
people not willing to answer or interested in giving out information (in such cases
what are the other possible methods by which that particular survey could be
conducted) or the survey is yet to be conducted in that specific country for that
program and sector or some other valid explanation; the reasoning will help the
readers in developing a better understanding of the data gaps and limitations
existing in the system and in creating context for further discussions.
Thank - You