University

Project/Practical Report Feedback

College of Science and Engineering
ENGR2721 (or ENGR8731)
Microprocessors

Student Full Name Student Network User Name

Student Comments

Key components Max. Comment

Mark
Working Electronic Copy of the Assembly Code / 10
Completeness and Correctness (Report and Code):
The report/code is complete and contains all necessary
information. The length of the report is within expected / 10
guidelines.
Introduction and problem definition
A brief description of the task your program is solving and
any necessary instructions on how to configure the hardware / 15
and run the program.
Technical details, methodology and formulation of the
problem. The report uses appropriate terminology and forms
of expression. Discussions of a technical nature are factually
correct.
Writing style: The report is written in a clear and direct style,
and flows smoothly. The level of discourse is appropriate for
the audience.
Development process: An account of the process you / 20
followed in developing your solution, including any difficulties
you faced and how you overcame them.
Code outline: An overview of your final code, including a brief
description of the purpose of each module. Note that this
description should complement any documentation in the
code.
Explanation and critical analysis of the results, appropriate
figures/diagrams, analyses and discussions. Use of
figures/flowcharts: The report makes effective use of
figures/flowcharts and other illustrative content.
Figures/Flowcharts are well integrated into the text, and
contribute significantly to understanding.
Design Decisions: A discussion of the key design decisions / 20
you made in writing your code, including alternatives you
considered and the reason why you made the decision you
did. Performance Evaluation: A clear indication of how much
of the problem your program solves, and experimental data
to verify that your program works as claimed.
Report formats and Presentation: titles, references, captions,
etc. The report is attractively presented, with few spelling and
grammatical errors, appropriate use of fonts, and consistent / 15
page layout.

conclusions / 5
Appendix / 5
Total /100 Assessor’s Signature
* Note: If a report is submitted without working electronic copy, only up to 50% of the total mark will be awarded.
Summary comments:
Grade Notation Marks % Grade description
Overall
Mark/Grade
High distinction HD 85–100 An exceptional piece of work in every regard
Distinction D 75–84 A very good attempt exhibiting high quality work in most
areas
Credit C 65–74 A sound attempt exhibiting high quality work in some
areas
Pass level 1 P1 55–64 A sound attempt
Pass level 2 P2 50–54 Just passable
Fail level 1 F1 40–49 Not passable - some areas requiring significant
improvement
Fail level 2 F2 0-39 Not passable – most areas requiring significant
improvement