Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/277542172
Pollution of Surface Water in Tirupur and its Adjacent Areas by Textile Effluents
CITATIONS READS
0 1,687
4 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Lactic acid bacteria based biorefineries for converting Agro and food waste biomass in PLA and other high value added products View project
Production of biostimulants of crop plant growth and of composting process and production of bioinhibitors of phytopathogen growth based on functionalized materials
derived from fly ash and bacterial inoculants View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Ramakant Sahu on 01 June 2015.
INVESTIGATORS
Mr. Kumar Pranaw
Ms. Priyanka Tripathi
Mr. Ramakant Sahu
Mrs. Poornima Saxena
ADVISORS
Prof. (Dr.) H. B. Mathur
Prof. (Dr.) H. C. Agarwal
July 2014
CONTENTS
02. Introduction 03
06. Conclusions 13
07. References 13
Tables 16
2
CSE Study: Pollution of Surface Water in Tirupur and Its Adjacent Areas by Textile Effluents
2. INTRODUCTION
TIRUPUR, India’s Textile Valley!!!! 50kms from Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadu
has emerged as a leading cotton knitwear industrial cluster in South India both for
overseas market and the domestic market, primarily because the climatic conditions
(high temperature and low rainfall) facilitate easy processing of yarn. It is popularly
known as "Banian City" of the South India. Tirupur town is situated between 11o10’N
to 11o22’N latitude and 77o21’E to 77o50’E longitude. It is located on the bank of noyal
river, a tributary of river Cauvery. It contributes about INR.11000 crores (Rs. 110
billion) annually in foreign exchange earnings to our country, besides a sustainable
contribution to the domestic market. Today, almost 80 per cent of India's cotton
knitwear exports happen from Tirupur. There are 6,250 units involved in various
operations of the textile industry here. It has 4900 knitting and stitching units, around
736 dyeing and bleaching units, 300 printing units, 100 embroidery units and 200
units catering to compacting, raising and calendaring.
3
CSE Study: Pollution of Surface Water in Tirupur and Its Adjacent Areas by Textile Effluents
Though Tirupur and its growth is unique in itself, there are quite a few industries in
and around Tirupur. As has been pointed out earlier, the neighboring Coimbatore city
is known for its machine tools, pumps, yarn and fabrics. The nearby districts like
Karur and Erode are known for bed sheets, curtain cloth, mosquito nets and other
made-up items. Karur district also has lots of processing units for natural dyeing.
Another neighbouring district Udumalipet is a fertile area and grows coconut,
aricanut, cotton etc. Of late, coir industry is also growing in this district. The nearby
areas of Tirupur like Somanur, Avinashi, Palladam and Koduvai are also actively
involved in Textile industry. The first three places have lot of power-looms and
Koduvai focuses on handloom. The constraints faced by Tirupur in terms of
infrastructure and labour problems are leading to the development of industrial
activities in the nearby areas/districts. Some of the exporters have already started
locating their expansion activities in Udumalipet and Pollachi districts.
Tirupur cluster comprises of around 5000 units which are involved in one or the
other activities of Textile value chain. These units discharge nearly 90 mld of effluents
on land or into the Noyyal River, leading to contamination of the ground and surface
water and soil in and around Tirupur and downstream. During 1991, Orathupalayam
dam [Dimension- 2290m (L) x 248m (W), area-423 Hectares and it irrigates 9875
acres of agricultural land in Karur district and 500 acres of land on Erode district] was
made on the river Noyyal, All the effluents discharged in the river Noyyal was
accumulated at Orathupalayam dam and causing environmental concerns for the
residents of Tirupur as water become unsuitable for drinking and even for irrigation.
This may result into three main kinds of ecological risks, i.e. loss of soil productivity,
groundwater pollution and the accumulation of pollutants in the food chain. One of
the major problems recently reported was regarding infertility of humans in a report
(Rajan, 2012).
From the data presented it is apparent that the textile industry, although a very
important foreign exchange earner for the country is creating an environmental havoc
4
CSE Study: Pollution of Surface Water in Tirupur and Its Adjacent Areas by Textile Effluents
around Tirupur – one which is expected to have a lasting depilating impact on the
region. There are 600,000 people in Tirupur and around 800,000 along the
downstream of river, who are affected by this pollution (Jayanth et al., 2011). The
industry also cannot be wished away and shut down on environmental grounds. A
qualitative impact of the environmental impact because of the industry is presented
below
A. Orathupalayam dam
In 1991, the Orathupalayam dam was constructed on the Noyyal River at the cost of
Rs.16.46 crores to irrigate an area of 500 acres in Erode district and 9875 acres in
Karur district. But instead of serving its purpose it became a storage tank for
wastewater as the textile units started releasing their effluent into the dam’s
reservoir. This effluent could neither be discharged into the river nor be stored due to
percolation and contamination of groundwater aquifers. The effect of pollution was
noticed when there was great economic loss for farmers in the downstream areas of
Erode and Karur districts, in addition to contaminating the river Cauvery.
B. Physical Impact
a) Impact on ground water
Water levels in the bore wells are lowering due to the large scale exploitation of
groundwater for industrial application. Also, the quality of water is poor from the
deeper aquifers especially the TDS & TSS parameters. Generally, the water is not
suitable for the textile industry and for drinking. The depth of bore well in Tirupur
area varies from 1000 to 1200 feet.
b) Impact on surface water
The river Noyyal which was non perennial earlier now flows throughout the year
because of the effluent discharge from the industries. The water quality is very poor
and few parameters like dissolved solids, chlorides, sulphate, oil and grease are higher
than the permissible limit.
Textile wastewater includes a large variety of dyes and chemical additions that pose
an environmental challenge for textile industry not only as liquid waste but also due
to its chemical composition (Venceslau et al. 1994).The shifting of irrigation water to
fullfill the need of industrial use as well as water quality and lowering of water table
around Tirupur textile hub has been reported in several studies (Datta 2009). The
5
CSE Study: Pollution of Surface Water in Tirupur and Its Adjacent Areas by Textile Effluents
6
CSE Study: Pollution of Surface Water in Tirupur and Its Adjacent Areas by Textile Effluents
chloride effluent into Noyyal river had significantly affected the river water quality,
groundwater quality as well as the Orathupalayam dam which is constructed across
Noyyal river at 32 km down stream of Tirupur. In the year 2006, the honorable High
Court of Madras and TNPCB directed the bleaching and dyeing units to install Zero
Liquid Discharge (ZLD) plant consisting of RO plant and reject management system.
At present there are 17 CETPs with ZLD plant are in operation. The treated effluent is
reused by the member units. The RO reject is concentrated in Multiple Effect
Evaporator (MEE) / Mechanical Vacuum Re-compressor (MVR) and then solar
evaporated (Rajkumar & Nagan, 2011). Typical characteristics of textile effluent are
given in Table-1. Industry has become an essential part of modern society, and waste
production is an inevitable outcome of the developmental activities. In Textile
industry different chemicals are used which have severe effect on environmental
health (Table 2). Frequent use of different chemicals in textile industries leads to
implement higher degree of pollutant in their effluent. Keeping in view that these
chemical are present in textile industry effluent Central pollution control board had
set some parameter for effluent disposal (Table-3).
As per ISI-IS: 2296-1982, the tolerance limits of parameters of surface water are
specified depending on various uses of water. The following classifications have been
adopted in India.
7
CSE Study: Pollution of Surface Water in Tirupur and Its Adjacent Areas by Textile Effluents
the spot) Electrical Conductivity (EC), Total Dissolved Solid (TDS),Total Suspended
Solids (TDS),Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD),
Total Hardness, Total Alkalinity, Chlorides and Sulphates were carried out in the
laboratory as per the standard methods. Their results revealed that the most of the
parameters were not within the permissible limit of PCB standard. The effluent
samples were differentially colored, with pungent smell and pH of the dyeing unit had
slightly above the neutral level and were within the permissible limit where as in the
case of CETPs were not in the permissible limit. Total Suspended Solids (TSS) in the
dyeing as well as CETP effluent was high in the range of 222-896mg/L. Total
Dissolved Solids (TDS) in the textile dyeing effluent CETPs were very high in the range
of 2459-3894 and 6801-9870 mg/l respectively also were not within the permissible
limit of PCB standard. The Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) was in the range of 997-
1124 and 1987- 2865 mg/L in dyeing and CETP effluent respectively. The values were
very much higher than maximum permissible limit of 120-400 mg/l according to PCB
Standard. The Chlorides and sulphats were in the range of 1134- 2865 and 786 – 2675
mg/l respectively. Chloride occurs in all natural waters in widely varying
concentrations. Excessive chloride in potable water is not particularly harmful and
the criteria set for this anion are based primarily on palatability and its potentially
high corrosiveness (Bhujangaiah and Nayak 2005). Chloride in excess (> 250 mg/L)
imparts a salty taste to water and people who are not accustomed to high chlorides
may be subjected to laxative effects.
Prabha et al., 2013, also studied about the impact assessment of textile effluent on
groundwater quality in the vicinity of Tirupur industrial area. In the year 2008–2009,
for Kasipalayam, the values of EC and TDS are extremely high making groundwater
potability unsuitable for drinking and irrigation purpose (EPA secondary drinking
water guidelines). Water with a TDS above 1,500–2,600 mg/l (EC greater than 2.25–4
mmho/cm) is generally considered problematic for irrigation use on crops with low
or medium salt tolerance. The high EC may be because of the continuous effluent
discharge into the river without any treatment favoring percolation to aquifer. This
river water recharges the unconfined aquifers in the region thus making it highly
unsuitable for use of domestic or irrigation purpose. The TDS present in groundwater,
8
CSE Study: Pollution of Surface Water in Tirupur and Its Adjacent Areas by Textile Effluents
besides affecting the growth of the plants directly, also affects the soil structure,
permeability and aeration, indirectly affecting the plant growth. In Kasipalayam and
Anaipalayam , high TDS was observed by Prabha et al., 2013 in the range of 3012-
6080 mg/L. The concentration of anions in both the regions followed the trend as Cl-
>HCO3>NO3>SO4-2 while in cations sodium was maximum ranged from 517.22 to 918
mg/L.
Paul et al. 2012, studied about the characterization of textile industrial waste water in
solapur city. They had reported very high concentration of sulphide in the ranges
from 22 to 79 mg/L and average value is found to be 49 mg/L, which is about 25
times higher than CPCB standards. Hydrogen sulphide is commonly originates in
water owning to the decomposition of organic matter or bacterial reduction of
sulphate under anaerobic condition
The degradation of water quality cascades several other direct and indirect
implications like change in cropping pattern, decrease in agricultural productivity, soil
salinity, change in biology of river, and depleting water table around Tirupur area.
There were several positive interventions adopted to cope with textile pollution in
Tirupur industrial hub, the zero-discharge norm is recent one. It is imperative that in
the regime of reuse of water from their effluent itself, i.e. Zero-Discharge, the surface
and groundwater quality must be improving as compared to earlier time. Thus the
discharge into the river is now stopped. However the damage caused to the surface/
ground water and soil in the river basin is yet to be restored.
9
CSE Study: Pollution of Surface Water in Tirupur and Its Adjacent Areas by Textile Effluents
Appropriate preservatives were added during the sampling and the samples were
brought to the laboratory for analysis.
4.2. EQUIPMENTS
Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (Thermo) Solar M-6 Series (AAS)
Spectrophotometer Agilent Carry 100 model
Water bath
Weighing Balance
4.3. CHEMICALS
All the acids and reagents – nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, potassium permanganate,
etc. used for the analysis were of analytical Grade and purchased from Merck.
Ultrapure water was used from Elga USF Maxima Ultra Pure Analytical Grade DI
Water System.
4.4. GLASSWARE
Different glasswares used viz. beakers, volumetric flasks, conical flasks, funnels,
pipettes, watch glasses and glass rods were obtained from Borosil. The volumetric
flasks and pipettes used, were calibrated. All the glasswares were cleaned with
detergent followed by 10 % nitric acid and rinsed thoroughly with distilled water
before use. All the glasswares used in the estimation of phenolic compounds were
10
CSE Study: Pollution of Surface Water in Tirupur and Its Adjacent Areas by Textile Effluents
cleaned with detergent and rinsed thoroughly with tap water followed by distilled
water. Thereafter, glasswares were washed with chloroform and dried before use.
4.5. DETERMINATION OF PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES:
Different physico-chemical analysis viz., total dissolved solids, dissolved oxygen,
chloride and sulphate were determined by using the standard methods published
jointly by American Public Health Association (APHA), the American Water Works
Association (AWWA), and the Water Environment Federation (WEF). The chemical
oxygen demand (COD) of all the samples was determined by using the reagents
procured from Merck and the methodology followed corresponds to the ISO 15705
and is analogous to EPA 410.4 and APHA 5220 D.
4.6. DETERMINATION OF SULPHIDES:
The total 500mL of water samples was filtered through blotting paper and sediment
were mixed with 200 mL filtrate. Add 2 mL of 6N HCl to each sample and mix well.
0.025N iodine solution in 10 mL slot was added till pale yellow colour appeared. Now
2-3 drops of 2% starch solution were added and titrated with 0.1N sodium
thiosulphate solution.
4.7. DETERMINATION OF TOTAL PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS:
To determine phenolic compounds the samples were distilled. For distillation, 500mL
of sample was taken and pH was adjusted to 4.0 with H3PO4 solution. After receiving
450mL distillate distillation was stopped. After boiling were ceased, 50mL of warm
water was added to distilling flask and distillation was continued until a total of
500mL had been collected because the volatilization of phenolic compounds is
gradual, the distillate volume must ultimately equal to that of the original sample.
100 mL distillate was taken as sample and 100 mL double distilled water as blank into
250 mL conical flask. In both sample and blank, 2.5 mL of 0.5N NH4OH solution was
added and pH was adjusted to 7.9±0.1 with phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). After that 1.0
mL of 2% 4-aminoantipyrine solution was added and mixed well. 1mL of 8%
K3Fe(CN)6 was then added and mixed properly and kept for 15 min for color
development. Finally the absorbance of samples was measured at 500 nm against
reagent blank.
11
CSE Study: Pollution of Surface Water in Tirupur and Its Adjacent Areas by Textile Effluents
COD were analyzed and results were found in the range 12.8- 331.2 ppm (table-4).
The highest value 331.2 ppm of COD was recorded at Kasipalayam check dam (S-6)
followed by 241.6 ppm of Managalam (S-2), 235.2 ppm Kulandipalayam (S-7) and
201.5 ppm Koolipalayam (S-5). It revealed that, the concentration was higher in the
river water samples.
On the basis of prescribed limit of Chloride, only 25% samples meet the criteria of
Class-C&E, viz., Samlapuram pond (S-1), Andipalayam (S-3), Sulur lake (S-13) and
Ukkadam pond (S-15).
All the fifteen samples were analyzed for sulphate and were found to be in the range
of 41.5-424 ppm. It was found that only one sample i.e., Managalam (S-2) had
maximum sulphate 424 ppm, which is higher by 6%. Rest all samples were found
below 280 ppm and it can be made suitable for drinking after conventional treatment
followed by disinfection.
12
CSE Study: Pollution of Surface Water in Tirupur and Its Adjacent Areas by Textile Effluents
Phenolic compounds were also determined in these samples and only one sample
(Kasipalayam check dam) was found to contain phenolic compounds (0.1 ppm) which
makes it unfit for any kind of use.
Sulphide analysis was also carried out for all the surface water samples and found in
the range 0.19-24.0 ppm (table-4). Highest sulphide was recorded as 24 ppm in
Tirupur main town river sample (S-4) followed by 14.66 in Andipalayam (S-3), 12.89
ppm in Kasipalayam check dam (S-6), and 4.08 ppm in Mamarathupallam (S-11).
Sulphide was not detected in about 40% of total samples, i.e., 6 samples [S-5, S-7, S-10,
S-12, S-13, S-14 and S-15]. However there is no prescribed limit for sulphides given by
different environmental protection agencies for surface water.
The ground water sample collected from Perur patishwerar temple was fully
fit for drinking except TDS was higher by 16.5%.
7. REFERENCES:
APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater,
21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington DC.
13
CSE Study: Pollution of Surface Water in Tirupur and Its Adjacent Areas by Textile Effluents
Babu BR, Parande SR, Kumar TP (2007) Cotton textile processing: waste
generation and effluent treatment. J Cotton Sci 11:141–153.
Bhujangaiah NS, Nayak PV, (2005). Study of ground water quality in and around
Shimoga City, Karnataka. J. Ind. Coun. Chem. 22(1):42-47
Carneiro PA, Umbuzeiro GA, Oliveira DP, Zanoni MV (2010) Assessment of water
contamination caused by a mutagenic textile effluent/dyehouse effluent bearing
disperse dyes. Hazard Mater 174(1–3):694–699.
14
CSE Study: Pollution of Surface Water in Tirupur and Its Adjacent Areas by Textile Effluents
Prabha S., Das P., Kumar M., Ramanathan A. L., (2013) “Impact assessment of
textile effluent on groundwater quality in the vicinity of Tirupur industrial area,
southern India”. Environmental Earth Science, [DOI 10.1007/s12665-013-2361-
8].
WHO and UNICEF (2010). Progress on sanitation and drinking water. World
Health Organisation and The United Nations Children’s Fund.
15
CSE Study: Pollution of Surface Water in Tirupur and Its Adjacent Areas by Textile Effluents
pH 10 9.8 8.8
16
CSE Study: Pollution of Surface Water in Tirupur and Its Adjacent Areas by Textile Effluents
Table 2: Different chemicals used in textile industry and their effect on environmental
health
17
CSE Study: Pollution of Surface Water in Tirupur and Its Adjacent Areas by Textile Effluents
18
Table4: Different physico-chemical parameters of surface and ground water sample of Tirupur
Phenolic
compounds Sulphides Sulphate
TDS (in TS (in TSS (in COD (in Chloride as as C6H5OH as H2S(in as SO4 (in
S.No. Location pH ppm) ppm) ppm) ppm) Cl (in ppm) (in ppm) ppm) ppm)
SURFACE WATER
(As per ISI-IS: 2296-1982)
Class-A 6.5-8.5 500 - - - 250 0.002 - 400
Class-B 6.5-8.5 - - - - - 0.005 - -
Class-C 6.5-8.5 1500 - - - 600 0.005 - 400
Class-D 6.5-8.5 - - - - - - - -
Class-E 6.5-8.5 2100 - - - 600 - - 1000
1 Samalapuram Pond POND 7.2 1200 1380 180 57.6 473.68 N.D 0.98 122.5
2 Managalam RIVER 8.3 11800 19880 8080 241.6 6947.49 N.D 0.64 424
3 Andipalayam RIVER 9.1 1660 2920 1260 201.5 552.08 N.D 14.66 151.5
4 Tirupur Main Town RIVER 9.7 2460 2820 360 134.4 1207.43 N.D 24.00 200.5
Koolipalayam Reservoir/
5 POND 9.5 2670 3120 450 227.2 1365.32 N.D N.D. 145.5
Nanjarayan Pond
6 Kasipalayam Check Dam RIVER 9.1 1780 2020 240 331.2 622.29 0.1 12.89 127
7 Kulandaipalayam RIVER 8.2 1850 2140 290 227.2 687.30 N.D N.D. 216
8 Chinamuthur RIVER 9.3 1880 2160 280 235.2 705.88 N.D 0.50 222.5
9 Rasampalayam RIVER 8.1 3650 22880 19230 11.2 1151.70 N.D 0.19 278
10 Orathupalayam Dam DAM 8.1 1880 2120 240 20.8 873.06 N.D N.D. 199.5
11 Mamarathupallam RIVER 8.4 2240 2620 380 25.6 835.91 N.D 4.08 172
12 Nathakadaiyur RIVER 7.6 2150 2500 350 22.4 863.77 N.D N.D. 202
13 Sulur Lake LAKE 9.1 1050 1260 210 12.8 334.36 N.D N.D. 76
14 Ungampalayam RIVER 10.5 2060 2480 420 25.6 826.62 N.D N.D. 225
15 Ukkadam Big Tank POND 10.4 1180 1320 140 14.4 482.97 N.D 1.71 41.5
Drinking Water
6.5-8.5 500 - - - 250 0.001 0.05 200
(As per IS-10500-2004)
Perur Patishwerar Temple -
16 WELL 7 603 700 97 11.2 97.52 N.D 0.38 33.5
Ground water
Class A- Drinking water source without conventional treatment but after disinfection; Class B- Outdoor bathing
Class C- Drinking water source with conventional treatment followed by disinfection; Class D- Fish culture and wild life propagation
Class E- Irrigation, industrial cooling or controlled waste disposal.