Table 2

Frequency Distribution in Terms of Respondents’ Sex

Sex Frequency Percentage

Female 40 70
Male 17 30
Total 57 100

Table 2 shows that majority of the respondents were female (F=40, %=70) while the male

respondents covered more than half the number of the majority respondents (F=17, %=30)

Table 3

Frequency Distribution in Terms of Respondents’ Year Level

Year Level Frequency Percentage

1 11 19
2 11 19
3 16 28
4 19 33
Total 57 100

Table 3 illustrates that the majority of the repondents were from Level 1 (F=11,%=19), Level

2 (F=11,%=19), Level 3 (F=16,%=28) while the least number of respondents were from

Level 4 (F=19,%=33).
Table 4

Frequency Distribution of the respondents’ Satisfaction in Terms of Parent-Child

Relationship

Item Mean SD Verbal Interpretation

1 4.28 .901 Highly Satisfied
8 4.32 .929 Highly Satisfied
9 4.40 .842 Highly Satisfied
15 4.79 .619 Very Highly
Satisfied
18 4.79 .700 Very Highly
Satisfied
19 4.81 .611 Very Highly
Satisfied
Total 4.63 .636 Very Highly
Satisfied

Table 4 tallies the frequency distribution of the respondents’ satisfaction in terms of parent-

child relationship. It is presented that Item 19,”,” garnered the highest mean of 4.81. While

Item 15 and Item 18,”,”recorded a mean of 4.79, respectively. The parent-child relationship

questionaire garnered a total mean of 4.63, which can be interpreted as very highly satisfied.

An independent sample t-test was run to identify the difference between gender in terms of

motivation. There is a significant difference between male (M=3.63,SD=.8784) and female

(M=3.690,SD=.7804) in terms of motivation, t(198)=-2.058, p= .041.

An independent sample t-test was run to identify the method of review in terms of nat review.

There is a significant difference between students with no review (M=102.10,SD=20.296)

and students with group review (M=102.88,SD=18.189), t(198)=-.282,p=.778.

Table 5

Frequency Distribution of the respondents’ Satisfaction in Terms of Peer Relationship

Item Mean SD Verbal Interpretation

23 2.72 1.082 Moderately Satisfied
22 2.89 1.047 Moderately Satisfied
33 2.89 1.030 Moderately Satisfied
29 3.72 .959 Highly Satisfied
26 4.07 .923 Highly Satisfied
37 4.09 .851 Highly Satisfied
Total 3.375 .426 Moderately Satisfied

Table 5 4 tallies the frequency distribution of the respondents’ satisfaction in terms of peer

relationship. It is presented that Item 37,”,” garnered the highest mean of 4.09. While Item

26 ”,”recorded a mean of 4.07, and Item 29”,”,recorded 3.72 respectively. The peer

relationship questionaire garnered a total mean of 3.375, which can be interpreted as

moderately satisfied.

Table 6
Frequency Distribution of the respondents’ Satisfaction in Terms of Teacher-student

Relationship

Item Mean SD Verbal Interpretation

41 1.96 1.085 Slightly Satisfied
50 2.12 1.119 Slightly Satisfied
39 2.18 1.120 Slightly Satisfied
55 3.96 .865 Highly Satisfied
76 3.96 .963 Highly Satisfied
77 4.00 .964 Highly Satisfied
74 4.04 .865 Highly Satisfied
Total 3.198 .509 Moderately Satisfied

Table 6 tallies the frequency distribution of the respondents’ satisfaction in terms of teacher-

student relationship. It is presented that Item 74,”,” garnered the highest mean of 4.04. While

Item 77 ”,”recorded a mean of 4.00, and Item 76”,”,recorded 3.96 respectively. The peer

relationship questionaire garnered a total mean of 3.198, which can be interpreted as

moderately satisfied.

Table 7

Frequency Distribution of the respondents’ Satisfaction in Terms of Emotional Stability

Item Mean SD Verbal Interpretation

 12 3.37 1.112 Moderately Satisfied
8 3.47 .847 Moderately Satisfied
13 3.56 .866 Highly Satisfied
10 3.98 .790 Highly Satisfied
16 4.04 .865 Highly Satisfied
4 4.21 .796 Highly Satisfied
Total 3.744 .592 Highly Satisfied

Table 7 tallies the frequency distribution of the respondents’ satisfaction in terms of

emotional stability . It is presented that Item 4,”,” garnered the highest mean of 4.21. While

Item 16 ”,”recorded a mean of 4.04, and Item 10”,”,recorded 3.98 respectively. The peer

relationship questionaire garnered a total mean of 3.744, which can be interpreted as highly

satisfied.