Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (Opcrf) For School Heads

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF) FOR SCHOOL HEADS
School ID:
School Name: Name of Rater:
District: Position:
School Head: Date of Review Period:
Division: Bohol
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight ACTUAL RATING
PREXC KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA Performance Indicators(Quality/Effectiveness, Efficiency, Timeliness) Actual Results SCORE
(%) Q E T A
Quality Efficiency Timeliness
5-Outstanding
1.Accounted for learning (90-100)% learning outcomes, vis- Curricular, co-curricular and extra-curricular Learning outcomes were
a-viz goals, objectives and targets, activities were implemented without properly documented and
outcomes of schools and centers both in academic and non- disruption of regular classes. communicated to all
viz-a-viz goals and targets year-round 15% academic assessments achieved. stakeholders one week after
the grading test.

4-Very Satisfactory
(70-89)% learning outcomes, vis-a- Curricular, co-curricular and extra-curricular Learning outcomes were
viz goals, objectives and targets, activities were implemented with disruption properly documented and
both in academic and non- of regular classes, observed once. communicated to all
academic assessments achieved. stakeholders two weeks after
the grading test.

3-Satisfactory
1. Instructional viz goals, objectives and targets, activities were implemented with disruption properly documented and
Leadership - 30% both in academic and non- of regular classes, observed twice. communicated to all
academic assessments achieved. stakeholders three weeks
after the grading test.

2-Unsatisfactory
viz goals, objectives and targets, activities were implemented with disruption properly documented and
both in academic and non- of regular classes, observed thrice. communicated to all
academic assessments achieved. stakeholders four weeks after
the grading test.

1-Poor
(0-29% learning outcomes, vis-a-viz Curricular, co-curricular and extra-curricular Learning outcomes were
goals, objectives and targets, both activities were implemented with disruption properly documented and
in academic and non-academic of regular classes, observed four times or communicated to all
assessments achieved. more. stakeholders five weeks or
more after the grading test.
Page 1 of 14
(%) Q E T A
5-Outstanding
2. Performed instructional Consistently showed at least 8 95%-100% of teachers were Teacher supervision was
complete classroom observation supervised at least 4 times each done in each of the 4
supervision to achieve with pre- and post- observation
learning outcomes quarters
year-round 10% conferences and actual
observation notes and comments

4-Very Satisfactory
Consistently showed 7 complete 85%-94% of teachers were Teacher supervision was
classroom observation with pre- supervised at least 4 times each done in 3 quarters only
and post- observation conferences
and actual observation notes and
comments

3-Satisfactory
1. Instructional Consistently showed 6 complete 65%-84% of teachers were Teacher supervision was
classroom observation with pre- supervised at least 4 times each done in 2 quarters only
Leadership - 30% and post- observation conferences
comments

2-Unsatisfactory
Consistently showed 5 complete 50%-64% of teachers were Teacher supervision was
classroom observation with pre- supervised at least 4 times each done in 1 quarter only
comments

1-Poor
Consistently showed 4 complete less than 50% of teachers were Teacher supervision was
classroom observation with pre- supervised not done in any quarter
comments
Page 2 of 14
3. Conducted Action Research Quality Efficiency Timeliness
on Instructional Improvement
& Teaching Delivery 5-Outstanding
(90-100)% implementation of conducted school-based research in Presented research results to
Action Research on Instructional collaboration with both internal and external stakeholders 4 times a year
Improvement & Teaching Delivery stakeholders, in 4 quarters
year-round 5%
4-Very Satisfactory
(70-89)% implementation of Action conducted school-based research in Presented research results to
Research on Instructional collaboration with both internal and external stakeholders 3 times a year
3-Satisfactory
Research on Instructional collaboration with both internal and external stakeholders 2 times a year
1. Instructional
Leadership - 30%

2-Fair
Research on Instructional collaboration with both internal and external stakeholders, once a year
Improvement & Teaching Delivery stakeholders, in 1 quarter

1-Poor
(0-29)% implementation of Action conducted school-based research in No Action Research output
Research on Instructional collaboration with both internal and external presented
Improvement & Teaching Delivery stakeholders on conceptual level only
Page 3 of 14
(%) Q E T A
5-Outstanding
1. Provided safe and child Has allocated resources in the AIP for Has implemented all the 8 PAPs in the
friendly learning and school the following: school year
1. WinS facilities
environment for 2. GAD
students/learners 3. Child Protection
5% 4. Guidance Services
5. Sports and Recreational services
6. DRRM
7. Waste Segregation
8. Gulayan sa Paaralan

4-Very Satisfactory
Has allocated resources in 7 out Has implemented 7 out of the 8 PAPs in
of the 8 PAPs above the school year

2. Learning 3-Satisfactory
Environment - 15%

2-Unsatisfactory

1-Poor
Has allocated resources in 4 or Has implemented 4 or less out of the 8
less out of the 8 PAPs above PAPs in the school year
Page 4 of 14
2. Evaluates the school plant, Quality Efficiency Timeliness
physical facilities fitness, safety 5% 5-Outstanding
and sufficiency 1.Has a School Site Development Plan 96-100% of learners, teachers and
2. Has a disaster stakeholders are aware of these
preparedness/response plan facilities/provisions
3. Has installed safety measures for
learners, teachers and stakeholders
4. Has provisions for persons with
disabilities

4-Very Satisfactory
Has 3 out of items 1-4 91-95% of learners, teachers and
stakeholders are aware of these
facilities/provisions

3-Satisfactory
2. Learning
Environment - 15% Quality Efficiency Timeliness
2-Unsatisfactory

1-Poor
Has None of items 1-4 80% and below of learners, teachers and
Objective 3 - Add here Quality Efficiency Timeliness

5-Outstanding

4-Very Satisfactory

3-Satisfactory
Page 5 of 14
2-Unsatisfactory

1-Poor

(%) Q E T A
5-Outstanding
1. Provided technical assistance to Has submitted 1 and 2 below plus any 1. Has conducted at least 1 school-based
teachers on matters pertaining to 2 of items 3-8 INSET in the school year
1. Minutes of SLAC 2. Has conducted at least 4 SLAC in the
enhancement of classroom 2. Training matrix with signature of school year
management, skills and proper authorities
instructional competence and to 3. Summary of PPST-RPMS Ratings
non-teaching personnel for for the school year
support services within the RPMS 4. Portfolio of IDP of teachers with
signatures
cycle
5% 5. Record of interventions provided to
address the IDP of teachers
6. Development activities for non-
teaching personnel, if applicable
7. Professional development activities
fotr teachers
8. SIP showing budget for teacher
training

4-Very Satisfactory
Has submitted 1 and 2 below 1. Has conducted at least 1 school-based
plus any 1 of items 3-8 INSET in the school year
2. Has conducted at least 3 SLAC in the
school year

3-Satisfactory
Has submitted 1 and 2 plus 1. Has conducted at least 1 school-based
any 1 of items 3-8 INSET in the school year
2. Has conducted at least 2 SLAC in the
school year
Page 6 of 14
2-Unsatisfactory
Has submitted either 1 of 1. Has conducted at least 1 school-based
items 1 and 2 plus any 1 of INSET in the school year
2. Has conducted 1 SLAC in the school year
items 3-8

1-Poor
Has NOT submitted items 1 1. Has NOT conducted school-based INSET in
and 2 the school year OR
2. Has NOT conducted SLAC in the school
year
2. Rated all school personnel Quality Efficiency Timeliness

3. Human Resource performance and recommends 5-Outstanding
Management and promotion 1. Has completed the 4 phases of the
Development 15% RPMS cycle for 100% of teachers Has rated all teachers
2. Has a career succession plan for within 1 week after the
teachers rating period

4-Very Satisfactory
1. Has completed the 4 phases of the
RPMS cycle for 91-99% of teachers Has rated all teachers
within 1 week after the
rating period
3-Satisfactory
1. Has completed the 4 phases of the Has rated all teachers
RPMS cycle for 81-90% of teachers within 2 weeks after the
rating period
2-Unsatisfactory
RPMS cycle for 71-80% of teachers within 3 weeks after the
rating period
1-Poor
RPMS cycle for 70% and below of beyond 3 weeks after the
teachers rating period
Page 7 of 14
5-Outstanding

4-Very Satisfactory

3-Satisfactory

2-Unsatisfactory

1-Poor
Page 8 of 14
(%) Q E T A
5-Outstanding
1. Established school and family Submitted all of the following: 1. Conducted at least 4 PTA Meetings
1. Record of Quaterly PTA Meetings 2. Documented donations of at least
and community partnership for 10,000.00 in the school year
with parents/guardians
school performance 2. Record of grants, donations, etc.
3. 100% utilization of the SEF allocation for
the school
3. Record of utilization of SEF 4. Documented at least 1 Adopt-A-School
4. Record of Adopt-A-School partnership
year-round 5% Partnership, School governing Council, 5. Documented at least 1 PTA/alumni/LGU
Partnership with NGO, PO, CSO, etc. sponsored projects and/or activities
5. Record of PTA/alumni/LGU
sponsored projects and activities

4-Very Satisfactory
Submitted any 4 of items 1-5
Met 4 of items 1-5 above

3-Satisfactory

2-Unsatisfactory

1-Poor
Submitted any 1 or none of
items 1-5
Met 1 or none of items 1-5 above
4. Parents’
Involvement and
Community
Partnership 10%
Page 9 of 14
2. Coordinated with stakeholders in 3% Quality Efficiency Timeliness
the acquisition of learning materials, 5-Outstanding
4. Parents’ resources and equipment within
Involvement and 1. Has acquired learning materials from Has at least 5 documented groups of
target date stakeholders
stakeholders during the SY
Community 2. Has acquired learning resources
Partnership 10% from stakeholders during the SY
3. Has acquired equipment from
stakeholders during the SY

4-Very Satisfactory
Has met 2 out of items 1-3 Has 4 documented groups of stakeholders

3-Satisfactory
Has met 1 out of items 1-3 Has 3 documented groups of stakeholders

2-Unsatisfactory
Did not meet any of items 1-3 Has 2 documented groups of stakeholders

1-Poor
Has no record of coordination Has only 1 or NO documented group of
with stakeholders stakeholders

5-Outstanding

4-Very Satisfactory

3-Satisfactory

2-Unsatisfactory

1-Poor
Page 10 of 14
(%) Q E T A
5-Outstanding
1. Performed school leadership, Has complied with all of the following:
1. Record of Liquidation report duly 1. At least 2 SPT meetings conducted in the
management and operations school year
completed for FY 2018
functions 2. Conducted meeting of the School
2. Updated SIP following the prescribed
styleguide with up-to-date APP, AIP and
Planning Team (SPT) monitoring
3. Presence of SIP following the 3. At least 2 trainings/workshops attended All MOOE liquidations
year-round 10% prescribed styleguide were completed before
4. Attendance to Trainings/Workshops the due date (FY 2018)

4-Very Satisfactory
Failed to comply with any 1 Failed to comply with any 1 of items MOOE liquidation was
completed on the due date
of items 1-4 1-4 (FY 2018)

3-Satisfactory
Failed to comply with any 2 MOOE liquidation was

Failed to comply with any 1 of items completed within 1 week
of items 1-4 1-4 after the due date (FY 2018)

2-Unsatisfactory
Failed to comply with any 3 MOOE liquidation was

Failed to comply with any 1 of items completed within 2 weeks
of items 1-4 1-4 after the due date (FY 2018)

1-Poor
MOOE liquidation was
completed beyond 2 weeks
Failed to comply any of items Failed to comply with any 1 of items after the due date (FY 2018)
1-4 1-4 OR
Non-utilization of School
MOOE
5. School Leadership,
Management and Page 11 of 14
Operations 15%
2. Effected judiciously the use of Quality Efficiency Timeliness
school facilities and supply 5-Outstanding
materials within the rating period 1. Has done minor repairs on Has provided items 1-4 in the 4 quarters of
classrooms and other stuctures the rating period
2. Has provided supplies to teachers
out of the MOOE
3. Has provided supplies to learners
out of the MOOE
5. School Leadership, 4. Has completed at least one
Management and infrastructure project during the rating
period
Operations 15%
4-Very Satisfactory
Has accomplished 3 out of Has provided items 1-4 in the 3 quarters of
items 1-4 the rating period

3-Satisfactory
Has accomplished 2 out of Has provided items 1-4 in the 2 quarters of

2-Unsatisfactory
Has accomplished 1 out of Has provided items 1-4 in only 1 quarter of

1-Poor
Has accomplished none of
the 4 items None was provided in any quarter
3. Monitored the maximum use of Quality Efficiency Timeliness

resource materials 5-Outstanding
1. Has an inventory of books for the 91-100% inventory of items 1-4
rating period
2. Has an inventory of learners' chairs
for the rating period
3. Has an inventory of contextualized
learning resources developed by the
school
4. Has a record of utilization of the
LRMDS portal by teachers

4-Very Satisfactory
Has a record of 3 out the 4 81-90%% inventory of items 1-4
items
3-Satisfactory
items
Page 12 of 14
2-Unsatisfactory
items
1-Poor
Has no record of any of the 4
items 60% and below record of inventory

(%) Q E T A
Objective 1 - Write here Quality Efficiency Timeliness
5-Outstanding

4-Very Satisfactory

3-Satisfactory

2-Unsatisfactory

1-Poor

5-Outstanding

4-Very Satisfactory

3-Satisfactory
6. Plus Factor (10%)
2-Unsatisfactory

1-Poor

5-Outstanding
Page 13 of 14
4-Very Satisfactory

3-Satisfactory

2-Unsatisfactory

1-Poor
Over-All Rating for Accomplishments
Rater Ratee Approving Authority
Page 14 of 14

Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (Opcrf) For School Heads

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (Opcrf) For School Heads

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF) FOR SCHOOL HEADS

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Objective 3 - Add here Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

2. Rated all school personnel Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Met 4 of items 1-5 above

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Met 3 of items 1-5 above

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Objective 3 - Add here Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Failed to comply with any 2 MOOE liquidation was

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Failed to comply with any 3 MOOE liquidation was

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

3. Monitored the maximum use of Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness