Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Activity Description
This course is in English and as it is specified in the Rules and conditions for course
development: “The student must develop the proposed activities on due time,
in English. Contributions in different languages won´t be evaluated”.
Collaborative:
As a final assessment of the course, the students will prepare a negotiation of a
software according to a real case, developing the following activities:
1. Each student reads and reviews all references for units 1, 2 and 3 at the
Learning Environment.
1
3. According to the part of the article titled 4. Case Study Compañía De
Software Colombia S.A, the group will help the company to solve the
problem of defining how to commercialize its software, preparing a
negotiation, building the “Head of Agreement” document based on the
structure proposed by Mc Manus, J. P. in its chapter Negotiation and
Licensing from the references studied in Unit 3 of this course.
2
15. Warranty on Student Name
License Patents
16. Ownership of IP Student Name
17. Ownership of Student Name
Improvements
18. Infringement Student Name
19. Termination Student Name
20. Choice of law Student Name
21. Dispute Student Name
Resolution
Student chosen to Student Name
submit the final
document to the
Evaluation
Environment:
Note: All items of the Head of Agreement document for the commercialization
of the software developed by Compañía De Software Colombia S.A, must be
completed by the members of the group who are working on it, it means if only
three students are working, all the 21 items must be completed between the
three of them.
3
the date, presenting a short speech to explain the advantages of the proposal
to commercialize the technology in the case, according to the PowerPoint
presentation and all contents studied in this course. Make sure it is a
professional presentation, taking care of your body language and personal
image.
Save the video in YouTube or any other resource to get a public link and share
it in the Discussion Forum.
In case you don´t have a software to record videos including your camera,
you can visit the following link and use the free tool to record the screen
online: https://www.apowersoft.es/grabador-de-pantalla-gratis
6. All students in the group read and review the activities developed by the other
members, consolidate all evidences in a PDF and the student selected in
Activity 3, submits it at the Evaluation Environment, according to the
guidelines given below in section Collaborative Work Evidences, naming it with
the following structure:
4
Each student posts on the Discussion forum its contribution to the Head of agreement
document according to Activity 3 and a video related to Activity 5.
From guidelines:
PDF format
Page Size: Letter
Font type: Times New Roman
Font size: 12
Line spacing: Double
Page margins: 2.54 cm
Paragraph Alignment: Left-aligned
All members of the group must participate with their contributions in the
development of the activity.
In each group a single member will be chosen to submit the requested product in
the environment indicated by the teacher.
5
Before submitting the requested product, students should check that it meets all
the requirements mentioned in this activity guide.
Only the members of the group that participated with contributions during the
time assigned for the activity should be included as authors of the submitted
product.
Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.
Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)
6
First evaluation High level: The student prepares the negotiation of the
criterion: software in the case, proposing a head of agreement document,
identifying the clauses for each one of the 21 items,
Prepare a consolidating the contents in the proposed chart, following all
technology assets guidelines.
negotiations
proposing the If your work is at this level, you can get between 35 points
guidelines of the and 40 points
agreement
Average level: The student prepares the main concepts of a
This criterion head of agreement document presenting just part of the
represents 40 required information, following just part of the guidelines, or
points of the total including some mistaken information.
of 125 points of
the activity. If your work is at this level, you can get between 2 points
and 34 points
Second evaluation
criterion: High level: The student presents a proposal to commercialize
the software developed by the company in the case, recording a
Propose a strategy video presenting himself a PowerPoint presentation that includes
to commercialize clear recommendations in relation to IP protection, technology
the software in the valuation and licensing negotiation, mentioning the contents
case studied in the course.
7
If your work is at this level, you can get between 2 points
and 54 points
Low level: The student does not record a video evidencing the
proposal to negotiate the software developed in the case.
Third evaluation
criterion: High Level: The student submits at the Evaluation
Environment, a PDF document according to the given guidelines,
Present the evidencing proper grammar and spelling, presenting a proper
document according development of the activities proposed to prepare the
to the specified negotiation of the software in the case.
format and
guidelines If your work is at this level, you can get between 20 points
and 25 points