Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your Name:
CWID:
History 1302:
Section Number:
Assignment: Exam II
Social Darwinism
Social Darwinism was a philosophical ideology of the late 19th century, combining
natural selection perspective by Charles Darwin with Herbert Spencer's, Malthus', and other
science and sociology theorists' work supporting imperialist, racist, or liberal economic policy.
In the 18th century Enlightenment, the total acceptation of nature's law in human beings'
definition grew. Social Darwinism is a rivalry within societal classes, typically leading to the
fittest or competent dominating. Social Darwinists believe that the power's strength and
prosperity should rise while the poor should. Social Darwinist agrees that they can society can
propagate the strong and do away with the vulnerable. Industrialization also contributed to
shifts in capitalism in the wage economy of the 19th century (Rudman & Lina 1140). Social
resources since citizens were trying to cultivate an intrinsic self-sufficient mentality. It changed
Social Darwinism is a philosophy that people act following natural selection rules and
are subject to competition. They develop from an indistinct primitive state to one where
distinction and development are achieved (Brinkley 11). This indicates that people were
always quite alike, beginning in prehistoric times. Through time, human beings changed
further, and some became stronger. Some have been wiser and tougher, and such individuals
continue to succeed in life. People who are sick, disabled, or seem inadequate have been
Surname 2
discriminated against. They were regarded as inferior or not so successful as some. Anyone
Social Darwinism also upholds Eugenics' believes that the human race should
promoting individuals with less favorable characteristics to replicate. Social Darwinism is the
idea that the best survives, such that you improve the human race by utilizing Eugenics to
create the most suitable species. Some States banned unspeakable and weak marriages in the
United States (Hofstad 22). This was their attempt to make sure that specific individuals
could not replicate with undesirable characteristics. Often Eugenics is referred to as social
engineering. This covers all forces that enhance a face's innate attributes, including those that
profit greatly. Physical fitness, wealth, and superior capabilities are positive characteristics
sought in humans. People with favorable traits such as excellent health are considered more
significant than others. According to social Darwinism, individuals with superior qualities are
In the late 19th century and early 20th century, many individuals were discriminated
against because of Social Darwinism and Eugenics. Immigrants are one of the communities it
targeted since the eugenics campaign labeled them as biologically weaker. Immigrants were
often portrayed as unhealthy, frail, and an interbreeding threat. People thought that refugees
were less intelligent than anyone and that since they had not been effective in their home
nation, they were poor and would be nothing more than a burden to society. The American
Government was among several countries where immigration reform was decided or
influenced by eugenic concerns (Rajas, 1139). Anti-immigrant advocates argued that refugees
posed a fertility problem and that poverty and disease accompanied them.
Surname 3
America in the early 1900s when immigration to the United States was substantial. Certain
types of individuals were barred from being citizens of the United States. Eugenics has a
significant impact on these policies. Certain people were denied access to the nation as they
were deemed inferior. Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, this idea created instability (Rudman
& Lina 1147). Such citizens embraced Eugenics and suppressed and mistreated foreigners to
protect what they considered were better humans. Then others invested in assisting refugees
and establishing a more equitable world for everyone. Immigrants faced discrimination for
various causes, and the Eugenics hypothesis did little to improve their situation. Most
Christian Fundamentalists opposed Darwinism since it contradicted what their faith said.
Fundamentalist Christians concluded that the Bible was God's word and that everything it
claimed was true and could be done (Brinkley, 16). Darwinism rejects the Religious doctrine
in creation. The Christian faith claims that God formed the Earth in few days, while
Darwinism believes in nature and that things shift and rise all the time, and that all life
evolved from a tiny organism. This posed a problem for these Believers since it was contrary
to their religion.
turning it into an arena rather than a playground. Because of how social Darwinism has
changed the market's perceptions and reality, it has progressed. It has a healthy, efficient
environment for individuals to make money to sell their products and services. Furthermore,
the theories of Social Darwinism are still widespread today. The principle that only the best
life is still valid in today's economy (Hofstad, 24). The Social Darwin hypothesis is based on
how bigger, better-funded corporations exclude tiny, more customized firms. The principle of
governmental non-interference in the market has been used extensively in developing the
economies of multiple and varied communities. Charity and scholarships have now been a
Surname 4
feature of culture to support less fortunate people to survive. People may also take advantage
Finally, Social Darwinism and Eugenics affected both refugees and native-born
Americans. During the Industrial Age, these ideas influenced millions of citizens. These
hypotheses are still being created. In a graded culture, this has been a feature of our past, and
that is how many of us are used to living. It has sparked debate in schools and the legislature.
It altered the way citizens regarded and viewed one another. Immigrant groups have a more
difficult time.
Surname 5
Works Cited
Brinkley, Douglas. American Heritage History of the United States. New Word City, 2015.
Rajas, Jarmila. "Disciplining the human rights of immigrants: market veridiction and the
Rudman, Laurie A., and Lina H. Saud. "Justifying social inequalities: The role of social