Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Delivered by Ingenta
and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Keywords: Micelles, mPEG-DSPE, Beclomethasone Dipropionate, Pulmonary Delivery.
phagocytic system due to their bulky hydrophilic outer purchased from Merck, Germany. Acetonitrile of HPLC
shell and sustain the release of the drug.9 In addition, drug- grade was purchased from Labscan Asia, Thailand. All
loaded polymeric micelles were strongly suggested to pass other chemicals were of AR grade and used as received.
through the mucus layer associated with bronchial inflam-
matory diseases directly to their receptors in the epithelial 2.2. Preparation of Micelles by Solvent
cells. Hence, the polymeric micelles will be very bene- Evaporation Method
ficial in delivering hydrophobic corticosteroids, such as
BDP, for the treatment of chronic pulmonary obstructive 2 mg/mL mPEG5000-DSPE stock solution and 0.5 mg/mL
disease since the inability to penetrate through the mucus BDP stock solution were prepared with methanol. Known
layer to reach the target site was largely the result of fail- volumes of the two stock solutions were taken and the
ure in treatment in the past. In addition, it was reported final volume was adjusted with methanol. The content was
that a mammalian secreted phospholipase A2 (PLA2) was transferred to a round bottom flask, vortexed for 1 minute
able to degrade pegylated phosphatidyl ethanolamine. 11 12 and methanol was evaporated under vacuum at 40 C using
This finding supported the potential of pulmonary delivery a rotary evaporator (Eyela N-1000, Japan). 10 mL of dis-
matrices containing pegylated lipid a prototype to target tilled water was added to dissolve the drug/polymer film
glucocorticosteroids to the inflammed tissues of the lung. in the round bottom flask. The aqueous solution was then
The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of incubated at 40 C for 10 min and vortexed for 30 sec.
using poly-(ethylene oxide)-block-distearoyl phosphatidyl- The micellar solution was filtered using 0.2 m PTFE
ethanolamine (mPEG-DSPE) polymer to prepare beclome- membrane filter to remove any non encapsulated BDP
thasone dipropionate loaded micelles with high entrapment and freeze-dried (Labconco 7753501, USA) overnight. The
various formulations are shown in Table I.
efficiency and mass median aerodynamic diameter of less
than 5 m, demonstrating sustained release properties. The
entrapment efficiency of beclomethasone dipropionate, 2.3. Determination of BDP Entrapment Efficiency
effects of drug-polymer molar ratio on particle size, phys- The lyophilized drug-loaded micelles were reconstituted in
icochemical properties, in vitro inhalation pattern, and a mixture of methanol and water (1:1, v/v) and the amount
in vitro drug release profile of polymeric micelles were of BDP was quantified using a UV spectrophotometer
also investigated. (Hitachi U2000, Japan) at a wavelength of 241.5 nm. The
IP: 5.62.154.87 On: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 10:43:30
entrapment
Copyright: American Scientific efficiency (EE) of the BDP-loaded micelles
Publishers
RESEARCH ARTICLE
2.4. Characterization by FTIR and DSC 2.7. In Vitro Drug Release Study
Approximately 1 to 2 mg of lyophilized drug-loaded Lyophilized BDP-loaded micelles (F5) (corresponding to
micelles and 20 mg of powdered potassium bromide was 208 g of BDP) were dispersed in 30 mL of phosphate
triturated in an agate mortar with a pestle. The homoge- buffer solution pH 6.8. 5 mL was transferred into a 5 cm
nous mixture was then compressed at a compaction force long dialysis tubing (Visking—dialysis tube size 4-22/32,
of 16 tons cm−2 and a holding time of 2 min to obtain UK). The dialysis tubing was immersed in 70 mL of phos-
a potassium bromide disc. The spectrum was measured phate buffer solution pH 6.8 containing 0.1% of Tween
using an IR spectrophotometer (Thermo Nicolet Corpora- 80 in a glass beaker. The latter were horizontally shaken
tion, Nexus model, USA equipped with Omnic 6.1 version (30 rpm) in a thermostatic water bath maintained at 37 ±
software). Samples of BDP, physical mixture of BDP and 05 C. The apparatus was protected from light throughout
polymer, lyophilized BDP-loaded polymeric micelles and the test. 0.1 mL samples were withdrawn from the beaker
mPEG5000-DSPE were examined. at predetermined time intervals of 0, 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72,
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was carried out and 144 hours. The amount of BDP released from the
using a thermal analysis controller (Perkin Elmer, Pyres 6, micelles was determined using HPLC method. The release
UK). About 4 to 7 mg of the lyophilized drug-loaded micel- studies were performed over a period of 6 days and each
les were placed into an aluminum pan and crimped. experiment was conducted in triplicates.
Another pan was used to serve as the baseline. The ther- The HPLC system was comprised of a pump (Shi-
mograms covered a temperature range of 0 to 250 C at a madzu LC 6A), a UV detector (Shimadzu SPD-6A, Japan)
heating rate of 10 C/min. The thermal properties of BDP, equipped with an integrator (Hitachi D2500, Japan).
physical mixture of BDP and polymer, lyophilized BDP- A Rheodyne 7725 sample injector was fitted with a 20-L
loaded polymeric micelles, and mPEG5000-DSPE were sample loop. A Zorbax C18 (5 m, 250 mm × 4.6 mm ID)
examined. column (Agilent, USA), fitted with a guard column was
used for the chromatography separation. The mobile phase
2.5. Particle Size Determination by TEM consisted of acetonitrile and distilled water (58:42, v/v).
Analysis was run at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The sam-
The morphological examination of the drug-loaded micel- ples were quantified using peak area at a detection wave-
les was carried out using a transmission electron micro-
IP: 5.62.154.87 On: Fri, 20 Dec of
length 2019
25410:43:30
nm. The HPLC method was validated.
Copyright: American
scope (TEM) (Phillips CM12, Netherlands) equipped with Scientific Publishers
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Delivered by Ingenta
an image analysis system (Docu version 3.2, SIS, Ger-
2.8. Aerodynamic Characterization of
many). The lyophilized micelles were first dispersed in
Nebulized Micelles
water and a drop of the sample was then placed onto a
400 mesh copper grid coated with a film of carbon. Excess A known amount of lyophilized micelles F5 was dispersed
water was removed by blotting with filter paper. The sam- in distilled water and nebulized using a Pari LC Plus nebu-
ple was left to dry at room temperature before examination. lizer connected to a compressor (Pari Master Type 84G73,
The TEM images were taken at different magnifica- Pari, Germany) through a 8-stage cascade impactor (Cop-
tions and labeled with the corresponding scale bars. Two ley, NGI Model 170, UK) at a flow rate of 30 L/min using
dimensional measurements (breadth and length) were car- a flow meter (Copley, Model DFM2, UK), at 25 C. BDP
ried out manually for the particles. The particle size for was collected at different stages of the cascade impactor by
formulations containing different drug to polymer ratios direct rupture of the polymeric micelles with acetonitrile.
was determined. The mean and standard deviation were The amount of BDP in each stage was determined using
calculated. No staining method was employed in the TEM HPLC. The determination was carried out in triplicates.
measurement. The mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD), geo-
metric standard deviation (GSD), and fine particle fraction
2.6. Particle Size Determination Using Photon (FPF) were evaluated. MMAD and GSD were determined
Correlation Spectroscopy after plotting the cumulative values of drug amount
deposited in each stage of the cascade impactor versus
The mean particle size and size distribution of BDP-loaded their corresponding aerodynamic diameter as specified by
micelles (F5) before freeze drying were determined by the cascade impactor using log-probability paper.13 The
photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS) using a Zetasizer fine particle fraction (FPF) was measured according to
1000HS (Malvern Instrument, UK). The sample was mea- Yamamoto et al. (2004).14
sured for three cycles, with 10 measurements in each
cycle. The measurement was carried out at 25 C and MMAD m = D50%
the angle of measurement was 90 . The mean Z average
particle diameter and polydispersity index (span) were D841%
GSD =
obtained using the Malvern Software System. D159%
0 3
The results of the studies were treated statistically using 1
Polymer
PC based software SPSS. General linear model univaraite 1.5 2
test, Post Hoc Tukey Honestly Significant Difference test, 2 1
and bivariate correlation test were applied, where appro- BDP 2.5
priate. A statistically significant difference was considered
3 0
when p < 005.
Fig. 1. Response surface showing the entrapment efficieny (%) at var-
ious concentrations of BDP (×10−1 mol/ml) and mPEG5000-DSPE
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION (×10−1 mol/ml).
3.1. Effect of BDP and mPEG5000-DSPE
Concentrations on Entrapment Efficiency (EE) The importance of the initial amount of drug on entrap-
The amount of BDP used were 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mol/mL, ment efficiency was also reported by other researchers.15–17
while the amount of polymer used varied from 0 to They found that when the amount of drug present excee-
0.5 mol/mL. The drug to polymer ratios are shown in ded the maximum loading capacity, precipitation of the
Table I. The result shows that the entrapment efficiency drug, and lower yield would be the outcome. In addi-
varied from 6.84 to 102.91% and can be expressed by the tion, EE for some hydrophobic drugs was reported to be
following polynomial equation. more than 90% when suitable formulation parameters were
IP: 5.62.154.87 On: Fri, 20 Dec 2019
employed. et al.18 studied the EE of hydrophobic
10:43:30
Wang
2
EE % = 2165 − 846x + 8549y −Copyright: American
3303xy − 1384y Scientific Publishers
vitamin K3 in PEG3000-DSPE and achieved 980 ± 02%.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Delivered by Ingenta 19
2 2 2 3
+ 647xy − 134x y + 118x y + 023xy 3 Zhang et al. reported a high EE of approximately 100%
when PEG5000 conjugated with different phospholipids
+ 011x4 + 001y 4 including DSPE were used.
R2 = 0935 F = 6168 p < 001
Where 5
x = BDPmol/mL
y = mPEG5000-DSPEmol/mL 4
90 80 70 60 50 40 30
Figures 1 and 2 show the response surface and contour
mPEG5000-DSPE
1662
bdp1 1
1617
1727
50 0
1184
%T
10
Heat flow
1755
–0
bdp-peg/mix 1662 20
1468
60
30
%T
1111
40
1615
1727
40
20
80 bdp-peg2 50
60 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
1662
1737
1111
%T
40
1468
20 Temperature
peg2
60
1468
40 0 2
%T
1110
1738
20 10
Heat flow
2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 20
30
Wavenumbers (cm–1)
40
Fig. 3. FTIR spectra for BDP (1), physical mixture (2), lyophilized 50
BDP-loaded polymeric micelles (3), and mPEG5000-DSPE (4). 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Temperature
3.2. FTIR
0 3
Figure 3 shows the FTIR spectra for BDP, physical mix-
Heat flow
10
ture, lyophilized BDP-loaded polymeric micelles, and 20
30
mPEG5000-DSPE. Both BDP and the physical mixture 40
showed the characteristic bands at 1662 cm−1 of car- 50
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
bonyl ketone and 1615 cm−1 of C=C stretching. How- Temperature
ever, for the lyophilized BDP-loaded polymeric micelles,
these peaks were diminished with the carbonyl ketone 0 4
band unchanged at 1662 cm−1 and the carbon double
Heat flow
10
bond shifted slightly to around 1630 cm−1 . The smaller 20
30
peak sizes were due to the relatively smaller amount of 40
BDP as compared to the pegylated lipid. In the spec- 50
trum of mPEG5000-DSPE, only theIP: 5.62.154.87
carbonyl ketoneOn:
bandFri, 20 Dec 20190 10:43:30
50 100 150 200 250 300
Copyright: American Scientific Publishers
was observed. Our result indicated that there wasDelivered
no clear by Ingenta Temperature
RESEARCH ARTICLE
interaction between BDP and the polymer was detected. Fig. 4. DSC thermographs of BDP (1), physical mixture (2), lyophilized
Hyvönen et al.5 prepared BDP loaded poly(L-lactic acid) BDP-loaded polymeric micelles (3), and mPEG5000-DSPE (4).
nanoparticles and found clear shifts in both the carbonyl
and the carbon double bond peaks in the nanoparticles as 100 nm, except Formulations F3 and F11. In general, the
compared to the reference BDP. mean diameter was inversely correlated to both BDP con-
centration and polymer concentration (p < 001) (Table I).
3.3. DSC Figure 5 shows the TEM of lyophilized BDP-loaded poly-
meric micelles, formulations having BDP to polymer ratios
Figure 4 shows the DSC thermograms of the various sam-
of 2:1 and 2:3, respectively. The TEM micrographs showed
ples. It can be seen that BDP melted with decomposi-
that the micelles were not homogenous in appearance and
tion at about 212.7 C. The peak for mPEG5000-DSPE
resembled multivesicular liposome in structure21 but the
was at ca. 60 C, similar to the melting point provided
micelles obtained in the present study were below 200 nm
by the supplier of the polymer. The peaks for the physi-
in size.
cal mixture were at both 59 C and 205 C. Samples of
lyophilized BDP-loaded micelles showed only one peak
at 58 C, but no BDP peak, indicating that BDP was 3.5. Particle Size Determination by Photon
molecular dispersed in the polymeric matrix. Nimodipine- Correlation Spectroscopy
loaded poly(caprolactone)-poly(ethylene oxide)-polylac- The particle size of Formulation F5 before freeze-drying
tide amphiphilic polymer nanoparticles were formulated by determined by zetasizer was 218 ± 05 nm (polydispersity
Hu et al.20 They found the DSC of the drug loaded nanopar- of 0.14) smaller than the size obtained using TEM
ticles showed no nimodipine peak and that the drug was
(7129 ± 1534 nm). In both cases, the micellar samples
molecularly dispersed in the nanoparticles.
were dissolved in aqueous medium. The variation in par-
3.4. Morphology and Particle Size ticle size by TEM and PCS might be due to the difference
Analysis by TEM in the mechanism of the measurement and interpreta-
tion of results. TEM images involved a two-dimensional
Most of the micelles were spherical in shape and majority measurement, while photon correlation spectroscopy was
of the formulations yielding mean diameters of less than based upon Mie Theory which allowed measured intensity
y = 8.3092x–2.9772
100
R2 =0.99
% of BDP released
80
60
40
20
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Square root of time (hr)
100 nm
phosphate buffer solution pH 6.8 containing 0.1% of
Tween 80 was utilized as the dissolution medium in the
drug release study at 37 C. The release profile of F5 and
the reference BDP powder can be seen in Figure 6. Nearly
100% of BDP was released from the reference BDP pow-
der at the end of 24 hours. In contrast, about 12% of BDP
was released from F5 within the first 2 hours, followed
by a continuous release to reach 98.1% over six days.
The kinetic of BDP release from F5 was found to follow
Higuchi diffusion model with r 2 value of 0.99 (Fig. 7).
Delivered byimpactor.
Ingenta The concentration of BDP remaining in the neb-
200 nm
ulizer and mouth piece was approximately 56%. Three dif-
Fig. 5. TEM of polymeric micelles with BDP to polymer molar ratios ferent conventional jet nebulizers having small, medium,
2:1 (1) and 2:3 (2). and large droplet sizes were used to compare the aerody-
distributions to be converted to volume distributions for namic characterization of a commercial BDP preparation
particles of known optical properties. (ClenilR ).23 The amount of BDP retained in the nebulizer
and mouth piece was found to be directly correlated to the
3.6. In Vitro Drug Release relative droplet size produced by the nebulizers. This may
explain the relatively high deposition of BDP in the nebu-
BDP is highly hydrophobic and practically insoluble in lizer and mouth piece since Pari LC Plus, a conventional
water.22 BDP powder having a particle size of 44147 ± jet nebulizer having medium droplet size of 4 to 5 m
16972 nm was used as the reference powder, while was employed in this study. Similarly, high concentrations
of drugs retained in the nebulizers were also reported by
100
80.00
Deposition%
Drug released (%)
80 60.00
40.00 F5
60
20.00
40 F5
0.00
rt)
ct izer
7
1
r
po
te
BDP
e
e
fil
ag
ag
ag
ag
ag
ag
ag
l
20
in ebu
n
io
st
st
st
st
st
st
st
n
du
(
0
at
ro
0 24 48 72 96 120 144
th
Time (hr)
Fig. 8. Distribution of F5 in the nebulizer and throughout the cascade
Fig. 6. Drug release profile of BDP powder (reference) and lyophilized impactor following nebulization at a flow rate of 30 L/min for 15 min.
BDP-loaded polymeric micelles (F5). Mean ± SD, n = 3.
Table II. Aerodynamic parameters for BDP-loaded poly- The mass median aerodynamic diameter and fine particle
meric micelles (F5).
fraction were suitable for pulmonary delivery. Moreover,
Parameter Formulation F5 the small amount of deposited drug in the induction port
(throat deposition) may reduce the incidence of oropha-
FPF < 6.6 m (%) 31.6 ± 7.3
FPF < 3.9 m (%) 21.0 ± 4.3
ryngeal candidiasis, a side effect normally associated with
MMAD (m) 3.4 inhaled corticosteroids therapy.
GSD 2.1 The high encapsulation efficiency, comparable inhala-
FPF, MMAD, and GSD denote fine particle fraction, mass median aero- tion properties, sustained release behavior together with
dynamic diameter and geometric standard deviation, respectively. biocompatibility nature of the pegylated lipid support the
potential of BDP-loaded polymeric micelles as a versatile
Vaghi et al.23 and Darwis and Kellaway3 at 50 to 75% and delivery system to be used in the treatment of asthma and
22 to 74%, respectively. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
The deposition of the inhaled particles in the induction
port (which simulated the throat of the patient) was found Acknowledgments: The authors thank the University
to be as low as 3.6% of the nebulized fraction. The low of Science Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia, for providing the
amount of deposition suggests a possible reduction in the IRPA research grant and the Scholarship from Central Med-
incidence of oropharyngeal candidiasis, a side effect nor- ical Supplies, Khartoum, Sudan, in support of this work.
mally associated with inhaled corticosteroids therapy.
The mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) and References and Notes
geometric standard deviation (GSD) of F5 were found to
1. S. Crowley, Pediatric Respiratory Reviews 4, 153 (2003).
be 3.4 m and 2.1, respectively. MMAD of 3.4 m was 2. C. Terzano, L. Allegra, F. Alhaique, C. Marianecci, and M. Carafa,
at the required level for asthma and chronic obstructive Eur. J. Pharmaceut. Biopharmaceut. 59, 57 (2005).
pulmonary disease treatment of less than 5 micron, while 3. Y. Darwis and I. W. Kellaway, Int. J. Pharm. 215, 113 (2001).
GSD of 2.1 indicated the polydisperse nature of the size of 4. M. M. El-Baseir, M. A. Phipps, and I. W. Kellaway, Int. J. Pharm.
151, 145 (1997).
the nebulized droplets. FPF of <66 m (%) was 31.6%, 5. S. Hyvönen, L. Peltonen, M. Karjalainen, and J. Hirvonen, Int. J.
while FPF of <39 m (%) was 21% (Table II). Vaghi Pharm. 295, 269 (2005).
et al.23 reported the aerodynamic characterization of a 6. M. C. Woodle, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 32, 139 (1998).
commercial BDP product (Clenil® )IP: 5.62.154.87
using On:®Fri,
Pari LC Plus . 207.Dec
M. C.2019
Jones10:43:30
and J. C. Leroux, Eur. J. Pharmaceut. Biopharmaceut.
Copyright: American Scientific
48, 101Publishers
(1999).
The MMAD, FPF of <5 m (%) and FPF of Delivered <3 m, by Ingenta
RESEARCH ARTICLE
8. K. Kataoka, A. Harada, and Y. Nagasaki, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 47,
were 7.5 m, 23%, and 7%, respectively. Furthermore, 113 (2001).
MMAD of BDP micelles in this study was also compara- 9. D. Marsh, R. Bartucci, and L. Sportelli, Biochimica et Biophysica
ble to the MMAD of the liposomal formulations reported Acta 1615, 33 (2003).
10. V. P. Torchilin, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 57, 95 (2005).
by other authors.24 3 However, the liposomes are known 11. C. Vermehren, K. Jørgensen, R. Schiffelers, and S. Frokjaer, Int. J.
to be ruptured and lose their contents during nebulization. Pharm. 214, 93 (2001).
The introduction of hydrophilic PEG segments in the poly- 12. J. Davidsen, C. Vermehren, S. Frokjaer, O. G. Mouritsen, and
meric micelles are most likely to prevent the direct contact K. Jørgensen, Int. J. Pharm. 214, 67 (2001).
13. N. A. Wiggins, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 17, 1971 (1991).
of the inner drug core to the shear forces generated by the
14. H. Yamamoto, Y. Kuno, S. Sugimoto, H. Takeuchi, and
jet nebulizers and may be more effective for drug delivery. Y. Kawashima, J. Control. Rel. 102, 373 (2004).
15. M. Yokoyama, A. Satoh, Y. Sakurai, T. Okano, Y. Matsumara,
T. Kakizoe, and K. Kataoka, J. Control. Rel. 55, 219 (1998).
4. CONCLUSION 16. G. Kwon, M. Naito, M. Yokoyama, T. Okano, Y. Sakurai, and
K. Kataoka, J. Control. Rel. 48, 195 (1997).
In conclusion, BDP-loaded polymeric micelles with entrap- 17. J. M. A. Abdulla, Y. Darwis, and Y. T. F. Tan, Proc. 14th Int. Symp.
on Microencapsulation, Singapore, 4–6 (2003).
ment efficiency of more than 96% were successfully for-
18. J. Wang, D. A. Mongayt, A. N. Lukyanov, T. S. Levchenko, and
mulated. The entrapment efficiency was affected by both V. P. Torchilin, Int. J. Pharm. 272, 129 (2004).
the drug to polymer molar ratio and the amount of drug 19. J. X. Zhang, C. B. Hansen, T. M. Allen, A. Boey, and R. Boch,
used. The results obtained from FTIR and DSC confirmed J. Control. Rel. 86, 323 (2003).
that there was no chemical or physical interaction and the 20. Y. Hu, X. Q. Jiang, Y. Ding, L. Y. Zhang, C. Z. Yang, J. F. Zhang,
J. N. Chen, and Y. H. Yang, Biomaterials 24, 2395 (2003).
drug was molecularly dispersed within the micelles. TEM 21. Q. Ye, J. Asherman, M. Stevenson, E. Brownson, and N. V. Katre,
images showed that the drug-loaded polymeric micelles J. Control. Rel. 64, 155 (2000).
were spherical in shape. Analysis by photon correlation 22. M. Sakagami, W. Kinoshita, K. Sakon, J. Sato, and Y. Makino,
spectroscopy indicated that the particle size of the BDP J. Control. Release 80, 207 (2002).
23. A. Vaghi, E. Berg, S. Liljedahl, and J. O. Svensson, Pulmonary
loaded micelles before lyophilization was approximately Pharmacology and Therapeutics 18, 151 (2005).
22 nm. In vitro drug release showed a promising sustained 24. M. Saari, M. T. Vidgren, M. O. Koskinen, V. M. H. Turjanmaa, and
release profile over 6 days following the Higuchi model. M. M. Nieminen, Int. J. Pharm. 181, 1 (1999).