Origin of Defect Economic damage or lesion to Where one of the parties is Entered into in the name of Those whose cause, object one of the parties or third incapable of giving consent to a another person by the one who or purpose is contrary to persons; a special declaration contract and where the has been given no authority or law, morals, good customs, by law that the contract is consent is vitiated by mistake, legal representation or acted public order or public subject to rescission (Art. violence, intimidation, undue beyond his power; those who do policy; those which are 1380) influence or fraud (Art. 1390) not comply with Statute of absolutely simulated or Frauds; and those where both fictitious; those whose parties are incapable of giving cause or object did not consent to a contract. (Art. exist at the time of the 1403) transaction; those whose object is outside the commerce of men; those which contemplate an impossible service; those where the intention of the parties relative to the principal object of the contract cannot be ascertained; and those expressly prohibited or declared void by law. (Art.1409) Damage or prejudice There must be damage/lesion Damage or prejudice to other Damage or prejudice to other Damage or prejudice to or prejudice to one of the party not necessary. party not necessary. other party not necessary. contracting parties or third persons. Legal Effect These contracts are valid and These contracts are binding, Contracts are inoperative until Generally, these contracts legally enforceable until unless they are annulled by aratified; There is a contract but it are inexistent and void judicially rescinded. (Art. proper action in court. (Art.cannot be enforced by a from the beginning (Art. 1380) 1390) court action. (Art. 1405) 1409) Remedy Rescission or rescissory action Annulment of contract This is just a personal defense Declaration of Nullity of when plaintiff pursues a specific Contract performance case or complaint for damages based on breach of contract Nature of Action Must be direct action. Direct action needed either in Indirect attack is allowed in the May be attacked directly or Collateral attack is not allowed the complaint or as a counter- form of a defense indirectly claim 1 DEFECTIVE CONTRACTS Persons who can File Contracting parties or third May be instituted by all who Must be contracting parties; Only by contracting parties Action party prejudiced by the are thereby obliged principally cannot be assailed by third and third persons whose contract; exception: creditors or subsidiarily except persons (Art. 1408) interest are directly who are defrauded (Art. 1385) prejudiced third persons (Art. affected (Art. 1421) 1397) Susceptibility to Susceptible to convalidation Susceptible to ratification (Art. Susceptible to ratification (Art. Not susceptible to Ratification but not of ratification proper 1392, Art. 1393) 1405) ratification, neither can the right to set up the defense of illegality be waived. (Art.1409) Prescriptive Period The action to claim rescission The action for annulment shall Action for recovery, or action for The action or defense for must be commenced within be brought within four years. In specific performance or for the declaration of the four years. For persons under cases of intimidation, violence damages for breach of contract, inexistence of contract guardianship and for or undue influence, from the also prescribe. does not prescribe absentees, the period of four time the defect of the consent There being no specified period, (Art.1410) years shall not begin until the ceases. The period shall begin: it could be 10 years if the basis termination of the former's In case of mistake or fraud, of the action is a written incapacity, or until the from the time of the discovery contract or 6 years if unwritten. domicile of the latter is of the same. (Art.1144 and 1145) known. (Art. 1389) And when the action refers to contracts entered into by minors or other incapacitated persons, from the time the guardianship ceases. (Art. 1391)
PUBLIC ESTATES AUTHORITY vs. ELPIDIO S. UY G.R. Nos. 147933-34 December 12, 2001 FACTS: A Landscaping Agreement Was Executed Between Petitioner Public Estates Authority and Elpidio Uy's Company