Professional Documents
Culture Documents
but not to activism. It misrepresents the poor and denies them their dignity, and it
deceives both the helper and the helped. In the end, the images lie about the poor, but
not about the photographer and those paying the bill for the advertisement” (Block et al.,
2016, para. 12). The sole focus of my Capstone Project aims to work toward greater
equity and inclusion for vulnerable and marginalized populations that are used in
nonprofit and NGO marketing through assessing organizations’ marketing tactics and
teaching them how to include and honor those whose stories they are telling.
“The nonprofit sector has a long history of exploiting the stories of the people
they serve, particularly, people of color. This perpetuates racism and oppression, etc.
Known examples are the stories and images you see on TV of ‘the starving and dying
and warring’ children and peoples, particularly in Africa. The nonprofit sector continues
to struggle with diversity among staff, which contributes to non-people of color telling the
stories of people of color” (Shiferaw, 2019, para. 4). Poverty Porn primarily affects black
and brown people in developing countries, especially children, who are clearly the most
vulnerable. Victims in pictures and narratives are usually those who appear to be the
poorest, the hungriest, or the most helpless, which leads the under informed viewers to
think that the whole country/communities of these people are in the same situation,
which isn’t necessarily true. It paints a picture that all people in developing countries are
helpless, and that we (wealthier western nations) need to save them (Garber, Illovsky,
Adetoye, & Kraes, 2020, para. 2). This type of marketing fails to point out why people in
over exploited countries are in a position in the first place. It is not because of their own
negligence, helplessness, or wrongdoing - in fact, this is the wrong stereotype that this
wealthier and more powerful nations (TeleSUR, 2017, para. 9). By using these people
and their stories to accumulate donations, we aren’t including them in the process or
giving them an equitable shot at telling their side of things. These groups are
historically-excluded in the way that the developed industrialized nations see them as
groups are not always given a say in how their stories or photos will be used. This type
of marketing where nonprofit clients’ situations are used to garner emotions and
donations from people contrasts greatly with how we see the stories of those
(particularly white, healthy, financially stable people) in developed nations are being
shared (Tapia, 2019, para. 7). You will see empowering photos and stories of the latter
group, and patronizing photos and stories of the former. How do you explain this
difference? My Capstone project aims to give these marginalized and silenced people
more equity and, more importantly, more power in the telling and sharing of their own
stories and the stories of their communities. This type of exploitative marketing isn’t
diverse in that it always targets poor and underprivileged groups. However, we don’t
want to make this type of marketing more diverse, we want to end it and replace it with
marketing tactics that honor and give a platform for nonprofit clients. This type of pitying
and emotion-playing marketing isn’t used for white, rich, or privileged people who are
stories and discretion in how and where they are told, as well as ensure that they are
empowering, just like we do for the rest of the world. Organizations need their eyes to
be opened to this difference and to look inward to assess how they could be
contributing to this problem. My program aims to walk nonprofits step by step through
inspiring others to do the same. The whole premise of my marketing training program is
to teach nonprofits to include their clients and the communities they serve in the sharing
of their stories.
Ethical marketing is just one step in working towards equitable treatment of those
in over exploited countries. This problem started with nonprofits using unethical tactics
telling stories on behalf of people without their knowledge. The most change will need to
happen at the organizational level. Unfortunately, it’s not yet realistic for state or federal
governments to restrict this type of invasive marketing; it simply isn’t an issue that most
care about regulating or even know about outside of industry experts. However,
organizations like Fair Trade USA operate independently from the government and
have much credibility and authority in the industry. My plan is that my program would
become as large and sought after as programs like the Fair Trade certification. With this
in mind, changes are needed at the organizational level, but are unlikely to occur
without some sort of respected regulatory body who is monitoring marketing practices in
NGOs and nonprofits. Practices that must be dismantled are taking photos and telling
stories of clients without their knowledge or permission regardless of who they are.
Changes that are also needed at the organizational level are for larger, established
nonprofits such as United Way, to spread the word of this issue and model ethical
marketing behavior themselves as well as expecting it from their own partners and grant
recipients. Some good practices for nonprofits and NGOs to start modeling in their
marketing in order to work towards equity and inclusion of their clients are to ask
questions such as: “Are we empowering the person(s) whose photo we’re sharing and
whose story we’re telling?”, “By sharing, does this story/photo help the person(s)”, “Do
we have consent to share the story/photo?”, “Is the person(s) aware of the content of
the story and the scope of the audience who will read it?”, “Is the information in this
story completely factual and true?”, “Are the writer’s opinions in the story or is it purely
about what the client(s) has to say?”, “Does our organization benefit more than the
storyteller(s) by the sharing of this story/photo?”, “Is it glorifying our organization in any
way that takes light off of the storyteller(s)?”, “Is sharing this story/photo perpetuating
“Does sharing this story/photo further our mission and align with the values and/or
written code of ethics of our organization?”, “Should we be the ones sharing this
story/photo?” (Shiferaw, 2019, para. 7). By adding the practice of considering these
questions when including clients in marketing tactics, we can begin to put an end to the
Block, F., Block, F., Jarrin, R., Meiksins, R., Jarrin, S., Levine, C., . . . Schaffer, J. (2016,
July 12). Poverty porn: Do the means justify the ends? Retrieved March, 2021,
from https://nonprofitquarterly.org/poverty-porn-do-the-means-justify-the-ends/
Garber, E., Illovsky, M., Adetoye, A., & Kraes, D. (2020, November 30). The white
savior complex. Retrieved March, 2021, from
http://contemporaryracism.org/123261/the-white-savior-complex/
Shiferaw, A. (2019, September 11). How to tell compelling stories while avoiding
exploitation. Retrieved 2021, from https://www.nten.org/article/how-to-tell-
compelling-stories-while-avoiding-exploitation/
Tapia, A. (2019, April 16). Opinion: Dear westerners, stop taking pictures of other
people's children in developing countries. Retrieved March, 2021, from
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/western-photography-tourism-black-
children-white-people-a8872316.html
TeleSUR. (2017, May 26). Africa isn't poor, it's just exploited. Retrieved March, 2021,
from https://www.iol.co.za/pretoria-news/africa-isnt-poor-its-just-exploited-
9361460#:~:text=Against%20the%20narrative%20that%20Western,the%20major
%20source%20of%20poverty.