Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit -2
The field of strategic HRM is still evolving and there is little agreement among scholars regarding an
acceptable definition. Broadly speaking, SHRM is about systematically linking people with the
organization; more specifically, it is about the integration of HRM strategies into corporate strategies. HR
strategies are essentially plans and programs that address and solve fundamental strategic issues related to
the management of human resources in an organization. The focus is on alignment of the organization’s
HR practices, policies and programs with corporate and strategic business unit plans. Strategic HRM thus
links corporate strategy and HRM, and emphasizes the integration of HR with the business and its
environment. It is believed that integration between HRM and business strategy contributes to effective
management of human resources, improvement in organizational performance and finally the success of a
particular business. It can also help organizations achieve competitive advantage by creating unique HRM
systems that cannot be imitated by others. In order for this to happen, HR departments should be forward-
thinking (future-oriented) and the HR strategies should operate consistently as an integral part of the
overall business plan. The HR-related future-orientation approach of organizations forces them to
regularly conduct analysis regarding the kind of HR competencies needed in the future, and accordingly
core HR functions (of procurement, development and compensation) are activated to meet such needs.
Definition
“Strategic HRM is an approach to making decisions on the intentions and plans of the organization in the
shape of the policies, programs and practices concerning the employment relationship, resourcing,
learning and development, performance management, reward, and employee relations.” – Michael
Armstrong.
Characteristics of SHRM
The strategic approach to human resource management applies the concept of strategy to managing firm’s
human resources.
There are 6 characteristics of strategic human resource management, which are given below:
1. Recognition of the outside Environment: Outside environment presents some opportunities and
threats to the organization in the form of-
Laws
Economic conditions
Social and demographic change
Domestic and international political forces
Technology
Strategic human resource strategy explicitly recognizes the threats and opportunities in each area and
attempts to capitalize on the opportunities while minimizing or deflecting the effect of threats.
2. Impact of Competition: The forces of competition in attracting, rewarding, and using employees have
a major effect on corporate human resource strategy. Forces play out in local, regional and national labor
markets. Labor market dynamics of wage rates, unemployment rates, working conditions, benefits levels
minimum wages legislation, and competition reputation all have an impact on and are effected by
strategic human resource decisions.
3. Long-range Focus: A strategic human resource management should be of long range focus because it
is not easy to change strategic human resource policy.
4. Choice and decision making focus: In other words, strategy has a problem solving or problem
preventing focus. Strategy concentrates on the question, “what should the organization do and why?” this
action orientation requires that decisions be made and carried out.
5. Consideration of all personnel: A strategic approach to human resources is concerned with all of the
firm’s employees, not just its hourly or operational personnel. Traditionally, human resource management
focuses on hourly employees, with most clerical exempt employees also included.
6. Integration with corporate strategy: Human resource strategy adopted by a firm should be integrated
with the firm’s corporate strategy.
The key idea behind overall strategic management is to coordinate all of the company’s resources,
including human resources; in such a way that everything a company does contributes to carrying out its
strategy.
Synergy means the extra benefit or value realized when resources have been combined and coordinated
effectively. This concept often referred to as economic of scope, makes the combined whole of the
company more valuable than the sum of its parts. It is a true benefit of good strategic management of
resources.
The concept of strategic HRM is derived from the concepts of HRM and strategy. It takes the HRM
model with its focus on strategy, integration and coherence and adds to that the key notions of strategy,
namely, strategic intent, resource-based strategy, competitive advantage, strategic capability and strategic
fit.
Armstrong believes that Strategic HRM defines the organization’s intentions and plans on how
its business goals should be achieved through people. It is based on three propositions:
These strategies define intentions and plans related to overall organizational considerations, such as
organizational effectiveness, and to more specific aspects of people management, such as resourcing,
learning and development, reward and employee relations.
Strategic HRM focuses on actions that differentiate the firm from its competitors (Purcell, 1999). It is
suggested by Hendry and Pettigrew (1986) that it has four meanings:
The use of planning; a coherent approach to the design and management of personnel
Systems based on an employment policy and workforce strategy and often underpinned by a
‘philosophy’;
Matching HRM activities and policies to some explicit business strategy;
Seeing the people of the organization as a ‘strategic resource’ for the achievement of ‘competitive
advantage’.
Strategic HRM addresses broad organizational issues relating to changes in structure and culture,
organizational effectiveness and performance, matching resources to future requirements, the
development of distinctive capabilities, knowledge management, and the management of change. It
is concerned with both human capital requirements and the development of process capabilities, that
is, the ability to get things done effectively. Overall, it deals with any major people issues that affect or
are affected by the strategic plans of the organization. As Boxall (1996) remarks: ‘The critical concerns of
HRM, such as choice of executive leadership and formation of positive patterns of labor relations, are
strategic in any firm.’
The fundamental aim of strategic HRM is to generate a perspective on the way in which critical issues
relating to people can be addressed. It enables strategic decisions to be made that have a major and long-
term impact on the behavior and success of the organization by ensuring that the organization has the
skilled, committed and well-motivated employees it needs to achieve sustained competitive advantage. Its
rationale is the advantage of having an agreed and understood basis for developing approaches to people
management in the longer term by providing a sense of direction in an often turbulent environment. As
Dyer and Holder (1998) remark, strategic HRM should provide ’unifying frameworks which are at once
broad, contingency based and integrative’.
When examining the aims of strategic HRM it is necessary to consider the need for HR strategy to take
into account the interests of all the stakeholders in the organization, employees in general as well as
owners and management. In Storey’s (1989) terms, ’soft strategic HRM’ will place greater emphasis on
the human relations aspect of people management, stressing continuous development, communication,
involvement, security of employment, the quality of working life and work-life balance.
Ethical considerations will be important. ’Hard strategic HRM’ on the other hand will emphasize the
yield to be obtained by investing in human resources in the interests of the business. This is also the
philosophy of human capital management. Strategic HRM should attempt to achieve a proper balance
between the hard and soft elements. All organizations exist to achieve a purpose and they must ensure
that they have the resources required to do so, and that they use them effectively. But they should also
take into account the human considerations contained in the concept of soft strategic HRM. In the words
of Quinn Mills (1983) they should plan with people in mind, taking into account the needs and
aspirations of all the members of the organization. The problem is that hard considerations in many
businesses will come first, leaving soft ones some way behind.
Greer (1995) talks about four possible types of linkages between business strategy and the HRM
function / department of an organization:
‘Administrative linkage’ represents the scenario where there is no HR department and some other
figurehead (such as the Finance or Accounts executive) looks after the HR function of the firm.
The HR unit is relegated here to a paper-processing role. In such conditions there is no real
linkage between business strategy and HRM.
Next is the ‘one-way linkage’ where HRM comes into play only at the implementation stage of
the strategy.
‘Two-way linkage’ is more of a reciprocal situation where HRM is not only involved at the
implementation stage but also at the corporate strategy formation stage.
The last kind of association is that of ‘integrative linkage’, where HRM has equal involvement
with other organizational functional areas for business development.
Purcell (1989) presents a two-level integration of HRM into the business strategy – ‘upstream or first-
order decisions’ and ‘downstream or second-order decisions’:
First-order decisions, as the name suggests, mainly address issues at the organizational
mission level and vision statement; these emphasize where the business is going, what sort of
actions are needed to guide a future course, and broad HR-oriented issues that will have an
impact in the long term.
Second-order decisions deal with scenario planning at both strategic and divisional levels for the
next 3–5 years. These are also related to hardcore HR policies linked to each core HR function
(such as recruitment, selection, development, communication).
Guest (1987) proposes integration at three levels:
The matching model of HRM has been criticised for a number of reasons. It is thought to be too
prescriptive by nature, mainly because its assumptions are strongly unitary. As the model emphasises a
‘tight fit’ between organizational strategy and HR strategies, it completely ignores the interest of
employees, and hence considers HRM as a passive, reactive and implementationist function. However,
the opposite trend is also highlighted by research (Storey, 1992). It is asserted that this model fails to
perceive the potential for a reciprocal relationship between HR strategy and organizational strategy
(Lengnick-Hall and Lengnick-Hall, 1988). Indeed, for some, the very idea of ‘tight fit’ makes the
organization inflexible, incapable of adapting to required changes and hence ‘misfitted’ to today’s
dynamic business environment. The matching model also misses the ‘human’ aspect of human resources
and has been called a ‘hard’ model of HRM. The idea of considering and using human resources like any
other resource of an organization seems unpragmatic in the present world.
Despite the many criticisms, however, the matching model deserves credit for providing an initial
framework for subsequent theory development in the field of strategic HRM. Researchers need to adopt a
comprehensive methodology in order to study the dynamic concept of human resource strategy. The main
propositions emerging from the matching models that can be adopted by managers to evaluate scenario of
strategic HRM in their organizations are:
Do organizations show a ‘tight fit’ between their HRM and organization strategy where the
former is dependent on the latter? Do specialist people managers believe they should develop
HRM systems only for the effective implementation of their organization’s strategies?
Do organizations consider their human resources as a cost and use them sparingly? Or do they
devote resources to the training of their HRs to make the best use of them?
Do HRM strategies vary across different levels of employees?
The actual content of HRM, according to this model, is described in relation to four policy areas, namely,
human resource flows, reward systems, employee influence, and works systems. Each of the four policy
areas is characterised by a series of tasks to which managers must attend. The outcomes that these four
HR policies need to achieve are commitment, competence, congruence, and cost effectiveness. The aim
of these outcomes is therefore to develop and sustain mutual trust and improve individual / group
performance at the minimum cost so as to achieve individual well-being, organizational effectiveness and
societal well-being. The model allows for analysis of these outcomes at both the organizational and
societal level. As this model acknowledges the role of societal outcomes, it can provide a useful basis for
comparative analysis of HRM. However, this model has been criticised for not explaining the complex
relationship between strategic management and HRM (Guest, 1991).
The matching model and the Harvard analytical framework represent two very different emphases, the
former being closer to the strategic management literature, the latter to the human relations tradition.
Based on the above analysis, the main propositions emerging from this model that can be used for
examining its applicability and for determining the nature of SHRM in different contexts are:
What is the influence of different stakeholders and situational and contingent variables on HRM
policies?
To what extent is communication with employees used to maximise commitment?
What level of emphasis is given to employee development through involvement, empowerment and
devolution?
SHRM therefore has many different components, including HR policies, culture, values and practices.
Schuler (1992) developed a ‘5-P model’ of SHRM:
philosophies
policies
programs
practices and
processes
This model melds the HR Practices with strategic business needs, and reflects management’s overall plan
for survival, growth, adaptability and profitability. The strategic HR activities form the main components
of HR strategy. This model to a great extent explains the significance of these five SHRM activities in
achieving the organization’s strategic needs, and shows the interrelatedness of activities that are often
treated separately in the literature. This is helpful in understanding the complex interaction between
organizational strategy and SHRM activities.
This model further shows the influence of internal characteristics (which mainly consists of factors such
as organizational culture and the nature of the business) and external characteristics (which consist of the
nature and state of economy in which the organization is existing and critical success factors, i.e. the
opportunities and threats provided by the industry) on the strategic business needs of an organization.
This model initially attracted criticism for being over-prescriptive and too hypothetical in nature. It needs
a lot of time to gain an understanding of the way strategic business needs are actually defined. The
melding of business needs with HR activities is also very challenging, mainly because linkages between
human resource activities and business needs tend to be the exception, even during non-turbulent times
(Schuler, 1992: 20). In essence, the model raises two important propositions that are core to the strategic
HRM debate. These are:
What is the level of integration of HRM into the business strategy?
What level of responsibility for HRM is devolved to line managers?
The normative perspective of human resource management bases itself on the concepts of “hard HRM”
and “soft HRM,” on which the foundations of human resource management rest. The concept of “Hard
HRM” is the basis for the traditional approach toward human resource management. This concept traces
its origins to the Harvard model that links workforce management to organizational strategy. Hard HRM
stresses the linkage of functional areas such as manpower planning, job analysis, recruitment,
compensation and benefits, performance evaluations, contract negotiations, and labor legislations to
corporate strategy. This enforces organization interests over the employees' conflicting ambitions and
interests. It views the workforce as passive resources that the organization can use and dispose at will.
Soft HRM is synonymous with the Michigan model of human resources and is the bedrock of the
modern approach to strategic human resource management. This model considers human capital as
“assets” rather than “resources” and lays stress on organizational development, conflict management,
leadership development, organizational culture, and relationship building as a means of increasing trust
and ensuring performance through collaboration. This approach works under the assumption that what
is good for the organization is also good for the employee.
The critical perspective of human resource management is a reaction against the normative perception.
This highlights some inherent contradictions within the normative perspective.
This perspective espouses a gap between rhetoric, as organizations claim to follow soft HRM policies
when they actually enforce hard HRM. A study by Hope-Hailey et al. (1997) finds that while most
organizations claim employees to be their most important assets and make many commitments for their
welfare and development, in reality employers enforce a hard HRM-based strategic control, and the
interests of the organization always take priority over the individual employee.
The behavioral perspective of human resource management has its roots in the contingency theory that
considers employee behavior as the mediator between strategy and organizational performance. This
theory holds that the purpose of human resource intervention is to control employee attitudes and
behaviors to suit the various strategies adopted to attain the desired performance. This perspective thus
bases itself on the role behavior of employees instead of their skills, knowledge, and abilities.
For instance, an organization aiming to innovate will require a workforce that demonstrates a high degree
of innovative behavior such as long-term focus, cooperation, concern for quality, creativity, propensity
for risk taking, and similar qualities. The role of human resource management in such a context is to
inculcate and reinforce such behavioral patterns in the workforce.
The systems perspective describes an organization in terms of input, throughput, and output, with all
these systems involved in transactions with a surrounding environment. The organized activities of
employees constitute the input, the transformation of energies within the system at throughput, and the
resulting product or service the output. A negative feedback loop provides communications on
discrepancies.
1. Competence management to ensure that the workforce has the required competencies
such as skills and ability to provide the input needed by the organization.
2. Behavior management through performance evaluation, pay systems, and other methods
to ensure job satisfaction, so that employees work according to the organizational strategy,
ultimately boosting productivity.
3. Setting up mechanisms to buffer the technological core from the environment in closed
systems.
4. Facilitating interactions with the environment in open systems.
Among the different perspectives of human resource management is the agency or transaction cost
perspective, which holds the view that the strong natural inclination of people working in groups is to
reduce their performance and rely on the efforts of others in the group. When one person delegates
responsibility to another person, conflicts of interests invariably arise.
The major role of human resource management in such a context is to promote alternative ways of
controlling behavior to reduce the effects of such conflicts and minimize the cost to the organization. The
two major approaches include
The human resource department needs to adopt the approach that minimizes transaction cost to the
organization.
An organizations technology is the process by which inputs from an organization’s environment are
transformed into outputs. Technology includes tools, machinery, equipment, work procedures and
employee knowledge and skills.
All organizations, be they manufacturing or service, public or private, large or small, employ some form
of technology to produce something for the open market place or for a specific group of constituents.
With constant advances in technology and work processes, organizations are under increased competitive
pressure to implement, if not develop on their own, more efficient means of operations. However, the
financial considerations of whether to adopt a new technology must be balanced with a number of
strategic issues and, more specifically, a number of specific strategic HR issues as indicated in the exhibit
given below
Consideration of adopting new Technology
At the same time it is necessary to understand the three ways in which work is changing. They are,
In addition to impacting how work is organized and organization structure, technology has created three
new areas of concern for HR and organizations: Telecommuting, Workplace monitoring & Surveillance,
and e-HR.
Telecommuting
Telecommuting, the process by which employees work from home but connect to the organization via
the use of telecommunications, is dramatically gaining popularity in popularity in both small and large
organizations.
Telecommuting involves more than merely an agreement between employees and supervisors that the
subordinate can work at home. It involves a management system that allows employees a tremendous
amount of discretion as to how they fulfill their job responsibilities.
Today, two thirds of Fortune 100 companies currently have telecommuting programs, half of which were
implemented over the past three years. Of the remaining Fortune 100 organizations, 60 percent are
planning to implement a telecommuting program.
Most employers and employees agree that technology, particularly access to the Internet, has enhanced
employee’s abilities to do their jobs. The dizzying array of information available on demand on the
Internet allows more comprehensive and faster data collection while addressing issues and problems at
work. On line technology also makes it far easier for employees to work at home via either
telecommuting or in the employee’s own time. As employees perform more of their job responsibilities
on “non-work” time, they may feel much freer to take care of their personal needs during the work hours,
as long as their job responsibilities are being fulfilled.
One study found that 90 percent of employees admitted to visiting non work-related Web sites whole at
work, spending an average of more than 2 hours per week tracking care of personal work and needs.
Much of this activity centers on banking, bill paying, and shopping, but here is also significant employee
visits to adult Web sites, chat rooms, dating sites, and gaming sites during the working day.
Such monitoring raises serious concerns about employee rights to privacy and can also have a detrimental
effect on employee morale and loyalty. As heightened job demands require employees to spend more and
more time at the office and to do work-related business at home, the line between work and personal life
blurs. Hence, employers have to balance the need for employee productivity with employees’ rights to
privacy and their need to maintain a balance between work and personal life. Employees actually have
very limited privacy rights in the area of workplace monitoring.
e-HR:
Technological advances have also provided HR with an incredible opportunity to deliver many of its
transactional types of service online, freeing HR staff to work on more strategic issues. Payroll, employee
benefits, scheduling, recruiting, training, and career development are just some of the areas that are being
delivered in a self-service format to employees.
While there are many examples of how various employers are using e-HR to benefit both employees and
the organization, the examples provided here illustrate the range of HR activities that are being delivered
electronically, as well as the scope of how “deep” such delivery can go.
One of the most comprehensive examples of electronic delivery of human resource services can be seen
at General Motors. GM sees itself as the world’s larger manufacturer of automobiles but rather as an e-
commerce organization that just happens to manufacture cars. A special unit of GM, e-GM, has been
created to produce consumer Web sites and business-to-business portals, and deliver e-HR services. The
delivery of e-HR, through GM’s “Employee Service Center,” is designed to allow HR to move away from
transactional issues and focus more on strategic issues. The ESC allows different information to be
displayed to different employee groups, in line with each group’s needs. Access to the center is not
limited to the workplace; employees can access it anywhere through the Internet. The suite receives more
than 15 million hits per month and allows employees to enroll in classes online, develop a career
development plan that can be reviewed with their supervisor, view job postings, manage their benefits,
and review their employment history. GM has rolled out its ESC to its international divisions and sees the
project as continuous, with an updated re-release of the site planned every 6 months.
Not only is the nature of work and work management is changing, but organizations also are changing as
result of information technology. The distinctions between management and labor have become blurred.
Workers are becoming increasingly responsible to act on matters that they become aware of through
computerized information systems. Further, there is a shift from individual to joint accountability because
more group members have the same information for decision making. Because of the knowledge power
of skilled technology workers, the structure of many of today’s organizations is poorly suited for the
future. Regardless of the exact form, many organizations have become much less hierarchical.
Unbundled Corporations:
Essentially, unbundled corporations employ a portfolio or conglomerate approach toward their peripheral
business units. As a result, units are retained or divested according to profitability and risk criteria.
An example of the unbundled corporation is Johnson & Johnson, which has 190 autonomous operating
companies in 51 countries. Johnson & Johnson has had over 100 consecutive years of profitability and
has achieved exceptional growth.
In unbundled organizations, many of the traditional support services of bureaucracies are outsourced to
consultants and vendors. For example, some traditional human resource management functions such as
training are performed by vendors, along with some compensation and pay-roll functions. An advantage
results from the potential to redeploy resources rapidly to more profitable alternatives. In addition,
developing mangers have more opportunities to exercise general managerial skills in running relatively
autonomous business units that function as profit centers. For a small group of fortunate employees who
form the core unit of the Unbundled Corporation, there is some job security. These units, which may be
quite small, are composed of high- impact employees who coordinate the work of vendors, manage
change, and manager the portfolio of business units.
While the jobs of core of permanent employees are more protected, there is lower commitment to the
employees of the peripheral units. Essentially, some of the employment security of the core employees
comes at the expense of the peripheral’s employees. Other implications for human resource strategy are
that some of the benefits of using temporary employees may be offset by the reduced control and
inefficiencies of dealing with “employees” through a vendor / supplier relationship. Further, when scarce
labor is involved, the wage savings of unbundling may be wiped out by the increased costs of components
purchased from vendors who must employ such labor.
Charles Snow, Raymond Miles, and Henry Colemen have used the term network organizations to describe
organizations that are similar to unbundled corporations. (They refer to unbundled corporations,
consisting of one corporate entity with multiple autonomous units, such as Johnson & Johnson, as
internal networks.).
One of the driving forces for the evolution or creation of network organizations is the need to outsource
activities that other companies, consultants, or joint venture partners can perform better or more quickly.
The term virtual corporation also has been used to describe similar organizations in which there is heavy
reliance on outsourcing and a critical need for speed. Membership of the network may include companies
from throughout the world. Like unbundled corporations, network organizations also have a permanent
core member that performs a broker role. However, the non-core membership of the network may be
stable or dynamic. With the dynamic network in form, the core network member or broker may replace
network components with some frequency. For example, a member of a dynamic network performing a
manufacturing role may be replaced because its production facilities cannot handle a new product t design
preferred by customers. However, with the stable network form, the organization retains the component
members for long periods of time.
Cellular Organizations:
Another structural form is called the cellular organization, which has some similarities with classical
guilds. Such organizations are typically groups of small technology oriented companies that maintain
affiliations over time. Employees of these companies are pre-dominantly technical professionals. Subsets
of the organization’s companies join forces on various projects when their unique skills and capabilities
are needed. One company takes the leadership role depending on the nature of the project. Individual
companies also may join projects even when they only want to learn about a new technology that may be
involved. The skills required of managers in cellular organizations are technical knowledge, cross
functional experience, international experience, collaborative leadership, self-management skills, and
flexibility.
Respondent organization:
Another structural form, the respondent organization, is essentially an entrepreneurial corporation that
exists by filling niches to supply customized services to unbundled corporations and bureaucracies.
In such corporations, decision making is quick and likely retained at the level of the central
entrepreneurial figure. Unfortunately, these corporations are risky and have high failure rates. The
positive trade-offs, from the employees perspectives, are that although there is greater risk and less
individual development from participative decision making, there should be opportunities to develop as a
generalist and acquire new skills as well as the potential for financial gain. Some of today’s smaller
Internet players are respondent organizations.
Management Trends
Strategic Management Trends:
Strategic management is the process in which management implements a plan or strategy that maximizes
the utilization of resources for the benefit of the organization. Often times companies implement a plan,
but fail to execute a process that measures performance on meeting and achieving goals. The strategic
management plan should be used as a general blueprint of the direction of the organization, which
includes a strategic analysis, such as -- SWOT (strength, weaknesses, opportunities and threats). And
successful plans need to be flexible and innovative in order to adapt to complex fluid environments.
When conducting the strategic analysis either a "values" or "SWOT" analysis is required depending on
the enterprise.
Trends are defined as either a general direction that something moves toward or something that is in
vogue or stylish. The most successful strategic management philosophies are those that are historically
effective as opposed to a trend. Trends, by definition, are things that fail the test of time. In order to build
a successful organization, strategic management needs to be a general philosophy that provides the
organizational management the ability to adapt and overcome changing customer needs and demands,
government regulation and laws, markets, business and technological innovations, economies and
geopolitically-driven economic events.
In recent years, two management trends that seem significant in response to international competition are
the adoption of Japanese management practice and the renewed efforts to achieve excellence in product
and service quality.
Achieving Excellence
In their best seller on America’s best-run companies, In Search of Excellence, Peter and Waterman found
eight basic principles that reflected these companies, management value and corporate culture. The eight
principles of excellent companies are:
Bias toward action. Successful companies value action, doing, and implementation.
Closeness to the customer. Successful companies are customer driven; a dominant value is
customer need satisfaction.
Autonomy and entrepreneurship. Organization structure in excellent corporations is designed
to encourage innovation and change.
Productivity through people. People are encouraged to participate in production, marketing, and
new-product decisions.
Hands on, value driven. Excellent companies are clear about their value system.
Sticking to the knitting. Successful firms are highly focused. They do what they know best.
Simple form, lean staff. The structural form and systems of excellent companies are elegantly
simple, and few personnel are employed in staff positions.
Simultaneous loose-tight properties. Excellent companies use tight controls in some areas and
loose controls in others. A tight, centralized control is used for the firm’s core values. In other
areas employees are free to experiment, to innovate, and to take risk in ways they will help the
organization achieve its goals.
Application of these “principles” in the best-managed companies tends to produce an environment that
fosters entrepreneurial pursuit of new opportunities and adaptation to change.
Globalization
Organization in recent days has changed the style of working and tries to spread worldwide. Tapping new
market place, new technology or reducing cost through specialization or cheap labor are few of the
different reasons that motivates organizations to become global Moreover the way companies integrate
their business practices with other countries has also changed. Instead of controlling the whole supply
chain, countries outsource some part of it to gain advantage of specialization. Thomas Friedman
highlights this phenomenon in his book “The world is flat” There are several types of organizational
changes that has occurred to help business adopt to globalization, as the old principles no longer work in
the age of globalization Strategic changes, technological change, change in organizational cultural
including organizational structural change and a redesign of work tasks are some of the important one. In
line with these changes, there is strong expectation of employee to improve their knowledge and become
an integral part of successful business formula in order to respond to the challenges brought by the global
economy. In other words it leads to formation of a learning organization, which is characterized by
creating, gaining and transferring the knowledge, and thus constantly modifying the organizational
behavior.
Emerging employment relationship:
Changing trends in organizations in recent years have made it utmost important to consider some of the
emerging employee relations issues which can affect employers in the coming decade. Understanding
these issues will help management to better plan and respond to changes in the workplace. Employer
employee relationship is also showing change in the modern era. Employers are no more autocrats and
participative style of leadership is welcomed. Flexible working hours and increased authority motivates
employees to perform to their best. Management now welcomes upward communication and participation
of lower level employees in the decision making process.
Changing workforce
The demographic of the workforce has changed in the recent years... This is due to a number of factors
such as an aging population, labor shortages and immigration. Another significant factor that has changed
the workforce is the changes in the attitudes of workers. Employers need to adapt their recruitment,
training and management processes to adapt to changing workforce. An example of this is that where
employers may have previously looked to younger people as a source of recruits, they may now have to
broaden their view as there are currently a large number of older people either currently employed or
seeking employment. These people may need extra training to bring their skills up to date.
New parents now want to work closer to home or from home, employers may find that they need to make
this a possible option in order to retain or find new staff. Allowing people to work from home will also
make the employer and job more attractive to a wider range of people.
Recent days is also witnessing a shortage of skilled labor in many sectors. Hence employers may have to
take on less skilled workers initially and develop them, rather than simply hiring experienced people.
Hiring employees from overseas also serves the purpose.
Knowledge Management:
Knowledge management is a structured activity that improves an organization’s capacity to acquire,
share, and utilize knowledge for its survival and success. Knowledge management is around us from a
very long period of time in one form or the other. The decisions we make and the action we take both are
enabled by knowledge of some type. Hence to improve quality of these actions and decisions it is
important to understand the process of knowledge management.
Studies in knowledge management has proved an inseparable relationship between knowledge
management and organizational culture (Davenport and Prusak,2000; Von Krogh, 2000; Nonaka and
Takeuchi, 1995) Research has also proved that organizational culture is a major barrier to leveraging
intellectual assets. They focus on four ways in which culture influences organizational behaviours central
to knowledge creation, sharing, and use. The first is the shared assumptions about what knowledge is and
which knowledge is worth managing. Second is the relationship between individual and organizational
knowledge. Third is the context for social interaction that determines how knowledge will be used in
particular situations. Fourth is the processes by which knowledge is created, legitimated, and distributed
in organizations.
There are three basic elements of knowledge management
1. Knowledge acquisition:- It is method of learning through experiences, sensation or perception.
2. Knowledge sharing:- Knowledge sharing is a process through which knowledge is shared among
family, friends or any community.
3. Knowledge dissemination: It is conceptual and instrumental use of new knowledge. Increased
awareness and ability to make informed choice among available alternatives are the outcomes of
knowledge dissemination.
Knowledge maps:- Knowledge maps guide employees to understand what knowledge is needed to
increase their efficiency and productivity and where these knowledge are located.
Demographic Trends
The major challenge from changing demographics of workforce relates to the following:
(a) Dual Career Couples:
This is a situation where both partners are actively pursuing professional careers. Organizations had been
used to physical relocation of employees. Employees moving through Organizational ranks to upper level
positions need experience in variety of roles in different Organizational units. Job makes and physical
relocation had been used by Organization for developing talent among employees. However, the dual
career couples limit the individual flexibility in accepting such assignments. This hinders the
Organizational flexibility in acquiring and developing talent.
In addition to diversity-related creativity and problem-solving advantages, companies also may be able to
tap gender and racially diverse markets better with a more diverse workforce. They also may obtain better
acceptance from these markets as a result of a good public image based on diversity. As an example, the
Avon Corporation has had success with this strategy. Companies having good records in managing
diversity may be able to attract better employees. Organizations that do a good job of managing diversity
also tend to be more flexible because they have broadened their policies, are more open-minded, have less
standardized operating methods, and have developed skills in dealing with resistance to change.
Relocation of Work
Telecommunication advances have allowed information workers to migrate from cities to rural areas and
small towns. This migration has created what futurists Naisbitt and Aburdene call the electronic
heartland. These workers have been attracted to the heartland because there is less crime, a lower cost of
living, and quality-of-life benefits. Workers who are making this relocation include owners of home-
based businesses, writers, artists, stock traders, composers, software developers, and engineers. 113
Companies also are relocating their operations. In information systems and data processing, companies
are relocating their facilities to areas where there are favorable costs. For example, a New York money
center bank relocated its data processing operations to a nearby state where real estate and the cost of
living are lower. Information is transmitted electronically back and forth with no delay in information
system responsiveness while achieving substantial cost savings. It is increasingly common for
automobile rental companies and hotels to locate their reservations operations in areas of the country
where there are wage advantages.
Another important human resource issue is the increasing use of temporary or contingent workers.
Temporary employees are often used to provide a buffer of protection for the jobs of the core of
permanent employees. Further, the use of such workers is increasing, and there is likely to be additional
unbundling in the future. In contrast to core employees, contingent workers have short-term affiliations
with employers. Examples include temporaries, subcontracted workers, part-time workers, consultants,
life-of-the-project workers, and leased employees. Companies also are using more “leased” employees
who are “rented” from a temporary help agency on a long-term basis. Not surprisingly, unions typically
resist the use of temporary workers.
Although there is growing use of higher-skilled temporary employees, the largest category of temporaries
is still administrative support or clerical work. The second largest category is industrial help workers
such as laborers, equipment cleaners, helpers, and handlers. Because demand for such industrial help
workers is cyclical and seasonal, the advantages to the employer are obvious. Temporary workers are
even being used in the health care industry as registered nurses, practical nurses, and x-ray technicians.
As indicated, the nature of temporary jobs is changing as there is a shift toward the higher skill levels.
Temporary workers now include accountants, computer specialists, engineering personnel, financial
executives, and technical writers. In information systems, temporary management services are being used
for project management, installation of new systems, or during transition periods. Temporary
management personnel and executives are sometimes early retirees from major computer companies or
managers displaced as a result of restructuring.