You are on page 1of 1

ENGLISH CONJUNCTIONS, CONJUNCTIVE ADVERBS AND PREPOSITIONS

and their associated relationship, with examples taken from the ESV

about Temporal Mt 20:6 Ground 1 Co 3:17 on behalf of Advantage Eph 3:1


Result 1 Th 5:4
above Locative Is 14:14 for Temporal Lk 12:19 Series Ga 4:14
or
Purpose Jn 9:39 Alternative Mt 6:24
according to Standard Nu 36:5 Advantage Ro 5:8
out of Source Mt 13:52
after Temporal Mt 2:1 for the sake of Advantage Co 1:24
over Locative Eph 1:22
Disadvantage Mt 18:15 Source Ze 10:4
against
Locative Mk 15:46 Agency Mt 1:18 rather Negative Ga 3:12
from
Temporal Mk 10:20
along Locative Ac 27:5 Separation Da 9:13 Ground He 9:17
since
Temporal Col 1:6
also Series Ac 2:26 Negative Ro 8:9
however
Concessive 1 Kg 2:15 Series Ro 16:21
so
although Concessive Ro 8:10 Ground He 13:6
Ground Ro 11:6
if
among Locative Lk 24:5 Condition Ro 4:2 Result Mt 8:24
so that
Purpose Ac 8:19
and so Result Ti 2:4 Locative Mt 5:25
Context Co 2:23 so too Comparison Ro 11:5
in
and then Progression Mt 16:27 Temporal Mt 3:1
Manner Ti 3:3 specially Example Ti 1:10
around Locative Mk 1:6
in place of Substitution Mt 2:22 such as Example 1 Co 14:7
Comparison Mt 13:40
as Standard Ro 1:17 in order that Purpose Phm 13 Content Jn 14:2
Temporal Ac 7:17 Explanation Ti 2:8
that
in order to Purpose 1 Jn 3:5 Purpose Jn 14:3
Temporal Mt 1:11 Result 2 Co 3:7
at
Locative Mt 5:23 in that Manner Ro 5:8
that is Explanation Ro 9:30
because Ground Gn 27:23 Comparison Ac 1:11
in the same way
Standard Ga 4:3 Progression Ac 26:20
then
Temporal Mt 6:8 Ground Jn 6:26-28
before
Locative Mt 11:10 in the time of Temporal Lk 4:27
therefore Ground 1 Pe 4:7
behind Locative He 9:3 Manner Mt 1:18
in this way
Explanation Ac 13:34 though Concessive 2 Co 7:8
beside Locative Mt 13:1
instead Negative Lk 12:31 Locative Lk 1:65
besides Distinction Nu 28:10 through Agency Jn 1:17
instead of Negative Ha 2:16 Means Ro 7:11
beyond Comparison Ga 1:14
into Locative Mt 3:10 throughout Locative Mt 4:24
Alternative Ro 2:9-10
but Negative Ps 118:17 just as Comparison Mt 12:40 Purpose Mt 8:34
to
Concessive Ro 14:14 Destination Ne 2:11
just like Comparison Le 7:7
Agency Mt 2:15 toward Locative Lk 12:21
Locative Mt 4:18 lest Purpose Mt 5:25
by
Manner Ro 8:3 unless Condition Mt 5:20
Means Mt 6:27 like Comparison Mt 7:26
upon Locative Ro 9:28
by means of Means Lk 16:9 likewise Comparison Lk 3:11
when Temporal 1 Jn 3:2
concerning Reference Ro 9:27 meaning Explanation 1 Co 5:10
whenever Temporal Mk 3:11
consequently Ground He 7:25 more than Comparison Mt 10:37
where Locative Mt 6:19
due to Ground Eph 4:18 more than that Progression Ro 8:34
whereas Negative 2 Co 7:10
during Temporal Lk 4:2 moreover Series Ac 21:28
wherever Locative Mt 8:19
even Explanation Php 2:8 namely Explanation Ro 1:20
Negative 1 Co 14:22
while
even as Comparison Lk 6:36 neither Series 1 Co 11:8-9 Temporal Mt 14:32

even though Concessive Mk 14:29 nevertheless Concessive 1 Kg 15:14 Accompaniment Mk 9:50


with
Manner 2 Ch 30:21
Negative Ac 20:23 nor Series Mt 22:30
except
Condition Mt 5:32 with regard Reference Ac 28:22
not Negative Ti 2:3
finally Progression Mt 21:37 with respect to Reference 1 Pe 4:4
on Locative Mt 4:5
yet Concessive Ho 7:15
on account of Ground Jn 14:11

This list is not exhaustive, but an aid to identifying the logical relationships of common English conjunctions, conjunctive adverbs and prepositions.
The conjunction “and” has not been included because it can express any of the relationships.

You might also like