Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-ii-
LOCAL GOVERNMENT CavMISSIONJ 1983-84
-iii-
REAL ESTATE TAX SALE LAw
TASK FORCE
House Members
Senate Members
J. Doyle Corman
Mark S. Singel
Members
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
-iv-
INTRODUCTION
The Pennsylvania Real Estate Tax Sale Law, (P.L. 1368, No. 542),
with the actjv~ support of The Local Government Commission, the
Pennsylvania Economy League, and the Tax Advisory Committee of the Joint
State Government Commission, was enacted in 1947. A primary purpose of
the act was to promptly return properties with delinquent real estate
taxes to the productive tax rolls, as well as to provide a uniform system
of handling such property, and to help eliminate the frequent title
disputes that arose from the existing systems.
Although the act did not immediately become operative throughout the
Commonwealth, the evident success it had in the areas of the State in
which it was used gradually expanded its use, through either legislative
mandate or voluntary participation. By 1977 only two counties, one city
and one school district, each specifically exempted by law, were outside
its jurisdiction.
Changes have been made over the years by legislative amendment on
several occasions as they were perceived to be necessary. In the 1980's,
because of court decisions, including decisions expanding constitutional
protections and guarantees of property owners and several widely
publicized sales, major amendments were made to the act, some of which
sharply increased administrative costs of the tax claim bureaus.
Consequently, sentiment for a general review of the act became evident.
The Local Government Commission, aware of the need for review of
this act, created a Task Force in 1983 to study the strengths and
weaknesses of the existing law. During the course of this review, the
Task Force determined there was a need to (1) update and modernize
existing procedures; (2) consider and control the costs of administering
the program; (3) examine and adequately protect the constitutional
guarantees of the homeowner; (4) develop a method of returning
unmarketable properties acquired by the counties to the tax rolls; (5)
eliminate obsolete or contradictory language; and (6) eliminate, as far
as possible, language or conditions which created unnecessary hardship or
would precipitate an undue amount of litigation.
After nearly a year and a half of intense work, a proposed
redraft of the Real Estate Tax Sale Law has been put into legislative
form for introduction into the House. This proposed bill meets the
conditions laid down by the Local Government Commission in creating the
Task Force. This commentary is a section by section evaluation of the
proposed changes, the rationale behind the proposed changes, and an
explanation of the reasons for all additions or deletions.
-v-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE I
SHORT TITLE - DEFINITIONS
ARTICLE II
TAX CLAIM BUREAU
ARTICLE III
LIEN OF TAXES - FILING OF TAX RETURNS - ADJUDICATION
ARTICLE IV
SEQUESTRATION
-vi-
ARTICLE V
DISCHARGE OF TAX CLAIM BEFORE SALE
ARTICLE VI
SALE OF PROPERTY
(e) Miscellaneous
Section 617. Errors as to Description; Names, etc., May be Amended on
Petition.
Section 618. Repurchase by owner.
-vii-
Section 629. Notification of Sale.
Section 630. Distribution of Monies Received.
ARTICLE VII
PROPERTY PURCHASED BY TAXING DISTRICT PRIOR TO THIS ACT
ARTICLE VIII
REPEALS AND EFFECTIVE DATE
-viii-
COMMENTARY
ARTICLE I
SHORT TITLE - DEFINITIONS
1
"Taxes" and "Taxing Districts" - Changes to these definitions we1·e
imperative because of the final recent exemption of the second class
county from the provisions of this act. When this was done, these
definitions were changed improperly, by not clearly excluding municipal
subdivisions within this county. The new definitions define taxes to
include all taxes upon real estate which are legitimately levied by all
authorized taxing districts, plus any accrued interest and penalties, and
define taxing districts to clearly exclude those located within an exempt
county. This amendment also deletes obsolete transitional language for
implementation of the act since all taxing districts except those
permanently exempt have been under the provisions of the act since
1/1/76, except certain 4th class counties which became subject to the act
in 1979.
ARTICLE II
TAX CLAIM BUREAU
Subsections (a) & (b). These subsections clarify the duty of the
bureau to establish an accounting and distribution system and to
maintain separate and accurate accounts of monies collected.
2
Subsection (c). This subsection clarifies and supplements the
requirement that taxing districts (including counties) be reimbursed
for all costs, fees and expenses which may have been advanced to the
bureau before any monies collected by the bureau are distributed.
Then, the bureau may retain from the remaining monies five percent
(5%) of all monies collected as a commission for administrative
costs. In addition the bureau is also newly authorized to retain,
as reimbursement for administrative costs, any interest earned on
any monies invested prior to distribution. It is the intent of this
subsection that the bureau first repay to the taxing districts all
monies which may have been advanced by them and second, retain the
administrative commission to which it is entitled under this sub-
section prior to any distribution of monies pursuant to subsection
(d) of this section.
3
Section 207. Reimbursement of County; Charges.
This section has been amended to increase the fee (to a maximum of
$5.00) chargeable by the bureau for a lien certificate and clarifies that
such a fee shall be payable to the county.
ARTICLE III
LIEN OF TAXES - FILING OF TAX RETURNS - ADJUDICATION
4
costs of the sale. The purpose of this section is to reaffirm that
municipal taxes and municipal claims are divested only to the extent that
they are included in the upset price and collected by the bureau at upset
sale. However, the changes made to this section also 1) reaffirm the
intent of the drafters to accord Commonwealth liens no greater priority
than their priority of payment under this act and that payment of
Commonwealth tax liens is not a condition precedent to divestment of
municipal taxes and claims except only to the extent that the bureau has
included all or part of them in the upset price (see Section 205 and 301
and commentary thereto); and 2) limit divestment of municipal claims to
claims certified to the bureau and included in the upset price (see
Section 605 and commentary).
A portion of this section was excised because the subject matter is
now covered in Section 205 and for editorial reasons.
5
The proposed amendment requires that interest start to be
charged on the first day of the month following the return which
should encourage delinquent taxpayers to pay their taxes as soon as
possible. This will, of course, possibly result in different
periods of interest charges for different taxing districts within a
county, since the date of return is (within the established
parameters), at the discretion of the tax collector. Proposed
changes in new Section 306(c), discussed below, address this
problem.
The present law sets the interest rate at 6%, a long time
realistic and traditional amount, but unrealistic when compared to
existing rates. This low rate encourages the sophisticated investor
or developer to withhold taxes until the date of sale, since he can
today earn more than 6% on the taxes withheld. The taxing district
is therefore deprived of budgeted income, and taxpayers paying
promptly are penalized by a reduction of services, or money spent by
the taxing body to borrow funds to cover the unrealized tax money.
On the other hand it is an equally valid fact that a truly needy
person unable to pay his taxes when due, is aided by the low
interest rate. To compromise between these two positions, an
interest rate of 9% is proposed. Rates as high as 16% were
suggested, but the 9% was adopted, first, because it works out to an
even 3/4% per month, making interest calculation relatively easy,
and second, represents a compromise between the high and low
suggested rates.
6
A good deal of discussion was held on the question requiring
one, or permitting two, return dates (for school and county/local
taxes) under this subsection, but it was decided that the
commissioners, if electing to control the return dates, should
require one date, uniform throughout the county, for the return of
all tax bills, i.e., school and county/local taxes between the
January 1st and April 30th dates.
7
Original Subsection (b). Excised because it applied to obsolete
transitional conditions for implementation of the act.
8
Section 315. Claims; Dockets; Satisfaction.
ARTICLE IV
SEQUESTRATION
ARTICLE V
DISCHARGE OF TAX CLAIM BEFORE SALE
The existing Article V used the term, and described the concept of,
"redemption of property". This term was not defined, and was used a
number of times in differing contexts throughout the act and apparently
was subject to numerous interpretations. In some cases it meant removal
of the property from the sale list and in others actual redemption after
the property had been sold to a buyer. Actual redemption after sale is a
concept carried over from the old Treasurer's sale, which permitted a
property owner to void a sale and defeat title of a purchaser by payment
of delinquent taxes within two years after the sale. This historic
concept of "redemption" has been abolished in the Real Estate Tax Sale
Law. At the very most, it appears that in 1947 the intent of the
drafting of the Real Estate Tax Sale Law was to limit just until the time
of sale the period of time during which a property owner may prevent the
sale of real property for delinquent taxes. In order to avoid confusion
created by use of the term "redemption" and to clarify the meaning and
intent of the concept, the terms "discharge of tax claim" and "removal
from sale" have been substituted (as appropriate) for the term
"redemption".
9
the successful bidder makes actual payment of the bid price to the
bureau. Also, the drafters did not intend to require the bureau to
accept a successful bidder's money if the owner is, at the same
time, prepared to pay all delinquent taxes and charges (pursuant to
Section 501) or cause the property to be removed from the sale list
(pursuant to Section 603), or stay the sale of the property by
agreement to make installment payments (pursuant to Section 603).
In these cases, the intent of the act to protect the owner should
govern and the bureau should not accept the successful bidder's
money.
Obsolete or transitional language for implementation of the act
is removed, as well as the requirement that the bureau director
personally sign the claim record to note its discharge. The bureau
is required to acknowledge receipt of payment and provide a
certificate of discharge to the payor. The earlier requirement to
distribute funds to the affected taxing district within three months
is added for emphasis.
ARTICLE VI
SALE OF PROPERTY
10
the act, the specific sub-chapter discussion indicates that the upset
sale is the first sale conducted by the tax claim bureau. It establishes
a minimum sale price and generally includes all charges and claims
against the property. Only claims or charges in the upset price are
discharged by this sale. Judicial sale is described as a final sale
ordered by the court, taxing district, or required to be held after a
designated time. This sale discharges all claims against the property
and it is transferred free and clear to the new owner. A private sale is
a negotiated sale and discharges only tax claims and municipal claims. A
number of safeguards are added in this Article, to insure that both the
bureau, the public, the owner and the buyer are thoroughly protected.
11
effective service of this notice by the sheriff. After lengthy
discussion of various alternatives, the Task Force agreed to the
following proposal. The county commissioners may, at their
discretion, continue to allow the sheriff to serve the notice, or
alternatively may appoint a legally competent person of their choice
to perform the service. A sheriff's return or specified proof of
service of the notice is required and shall include specifically an
attachment of a copy of the notice served. No change has been made
to the option of the bureau to petition the court to waive the
personal service notice if personal service cannot be made in 25
days.
12
liens on the upset sale price, and saleability of the
property;
d) whether distribution of proceeds of the upset sale must be
made first to the Commonwealth for satisfaction of
Commonwealth tax liens in all cases;
e) chronic failure of the Department of Revenue to actively
pursue satisfaction of Commonwealth tax liens; and
f) whether any or all Commonwealth tax liens are divested by
an upset sale.
The amendment to Section 603 introduces several new concepts for the
removal of a property from upset sale by adding substantive provisions
13
and clarifing existing provisions for (installment) agreements to stay
sale. It also differentiates between the concept of removal from sale
and the concept of an agreement to stay sale.
It is intended that every property may be removed from sale or that
an installment agreement to stay the sale be permitted only at the option
of the bureau and only prior to the actual sale. For an explanation of
actual sale see commentary for Section 102 and Section 501. While
consideration was given to a provision which would mandate a bureau to
accept a payment for removal from sale or an (installment) agreement to
stay sale at the option and upon request of the owner, the Task Force
decided that the final draft proposal should clearly set forth that a
bureau be neither required nor prohibited from accepting such payments or
making such agreements.
A property may be removed from sale by the remittance of a single
payment of the sum of all taxes which have become absolute and all
charges and interest thereon. This payment would remove the property
from immediate sale for delinquent taxes which have become absolute but
will not remove the property from exposure to subsequent sale for
delinquent taxes which have been returned but have not yet become
absolute.
An agreement to stay sale is an installment payment plan. The total
amount due under this plan shall be the total amount of all tax claims
returned to the bureau to date, whether absolute or not, and tax
judgements and interest and costs attributable to such tax claims and
judgements. Under this provision for an installment agreement the bureau
may negotiate or require the total number of installments (not to exceed
3 in addition to the initial installment) and the amount of each
installment, but the first installment must be at least 25% of the total
amount due. The agreement must state that full payment is due within one
year and the dates on or before which any installment is due and the
amount of each installment. Every payment shall be applied against the
oldest delinquent tax accounts first. If there is a default in the
agreement but sufficient payment has been made to discharge all absolute
tax claims, with interest and costs, the property shall not be sold but
may be exposed to subsequent sale for all taxes returned which are
delinquent but not yet absolute. If payment is not sufficient to
discharge all absolute tax claims with interest and costs, upon default
the property shall be sold at either the next scheduled upset sale or at
a special upset sale, either of which must be held at least 90 days after
such default.
In order to prevent abuse of the installment payment provision, the
bureau is prohibited from making any further agreements with a person in
default of a prior agreement within three years of the default.
14
available a list of their claims in sufficient time to be included in the
advertised upset sale price, an amendment to this section has been added
which requires the municipality or municipal authority to certify to the
bureau prior to August 30 of the year of the scheduled sale, a list of
all claims which became a claim before August 1 of that year. If the
municipality or municipal authority fails to certify such a list prior to
August 30, the claims shall be divested by the upset sale.
This amendment also reaffirms that every upset sale must be held,
and shall not be continued, beyond the end of the calendar year, and
further requires that no private or judicial sale may be held unless the
property has first been exposed to upset sale, but has not sold because
of insufficient bid.
15
court, in a local newspaper and in the designated legal journal, a notice
that the court has confirmed the consolidated return nisi, and that any
objections or exceptions must be filed within 30 days of the confirmation
date, or an absolute confirmation will be made.
Changes to time sequences have in no manner reduced the time
permitted to the owner to challenge the sale, but have merely corrected
obvious conflicting sequences in the existing act. Additional
protections have been mandated to ensure that the owner enjoys all the
protection and consideration the law allows, including the opportunity to
file objections and exceptions out of time if a notice of sale under this
section is defective. This will prevent a court from invalidating a sale
solely for the reason of a defective sale notice.
16
costs; 2) to give the local municipality its justly due revenues by
collecting payment of delinquent taxes; and 3) return of the property to
the tax rolls as soon as possible. These court decisions make this goal
more difficult to attain.
The Legislature solved this problem by eliminating the divestiture
provision at the upset sale by passage of Act 79 of 1984, which made each
upset sale subject to all recorded liens, mortgages, estates,
obligations, claims and ground rents.
This section is now further amended to save Commonwealth tax liens
from divestiture if the amount of any such liens is not received as part
of the proceeds of the upset sale. The purpose of this provision is to
preserve Commonwealth tax liens from divestiture whenever the bureau does
not advertise and sell the property at a price which includes the amount
of unpaid Commonwealth tax liens. However, this provision is not
intended to save from divestiture Commonwealth tax liens of which the
Department of Revenue is required to give notice to the tax claim bureau
prior to upset sale under the provisions of Section 602(h); and all such
tax liens are specifically divested under the authority of Section 602(h)
if the Department of Revenue does not comply with Section 602(h). See
commentary to Section 602(h) for a further discussion of this issue.
17
Section 612. Hearing and Order for Judicial Sale.
18
notice. The intent of the publication is to give any interested
party, including any person interested in purchasing the property,
the opportunity to object to the sale in the manner provided in this
section.
This subsection was further amended to require that the court,
if it disapproves the sale, direct that the bureau conduct an
auction-style sale of the property for no less than a minimum price
at which no person other than the parties to the petition (filed
under this subsection) may submit bids. It is intended to limit
participation in this auction-style sale because principles of
equity and fairness should require that only persons who have
demonstrated more than a frivilous interest in the property by
investment of time, effort and money necessary to petition a court,
be given preferential opportunity to make the best possible offer
for the property which exceeds the minimum price set by the court.
Finally, a provision was added to this subsection to require the
court to also order that the property be sold at judicial sale (see
commentary to Section 610 to 612.1) if no person entitled to
purchase the property under this subsection offers the minimum sales
price fixed by the court. This provision intends to insure that the
property is placed back into the process intended by this act for
the sale of all properties for non-payment of taxes.
19
(e) MISCELLANEOUS
The original Real Estate Tax Sale Law was enacted in 1947, to
accomplish several purposes. One of the primary purposes was to return
delinquent tax properties to the tax rolls as quickly as possible so that
the affected local taxing districts would not be denied needed revenues
or that the burden of taxation not be inequitably shifted to
nondelinquent taxpayers. Over the years, as more and more taxing
districts came under the provisions of this law, this purpose was well
served. However, inevitably some properties, because of particular or
unusual circumstances, did not sell and remained on the books of the
bureau. The most common causes for this condition appear to be a loss of
property value because of changes in road patterns, irregular size (such
as 100' x 5'), inaccessibility, declining neighborhoods, or other similar
reasons. The drafters concluded that in many instances, this type of
property might have some limited value to an adjacent land owner, who
might otherwise be inclined to purchase it but for the inevitable
increase in taxes which would result from the purchase. Consequently,
many suggestions have been offered to overcome this problem'. The
following proposed provisions were adopted by the Task Force as a
reasonable way to solve at least a portion of this difficult impasse. A
section by section discussion of these provisions follows.
20
number of properties which the county, through the bureau, continues to
retain for lack of saleability.
This section provides for the sale of such property. The bureau,
either as a result of a private offer or as the result of any advertising
of "repository" properties, as noted above, may accept any offer for such
property on its own authority, without seeking court approval or
publishing notice of the sale as might otherwise be required in Article
VI. This sale, will divest the property of all claims of whatever kind
in the same manner as if the property were sold at judicial sale. A
title, free and clear of all tax and municipal claims, mortgages, liens,
and charges and estates, except ground rents separately taxes, of
whatever kind, will be provided and recorded by the bureau, but the
recording charges must be paid by the purchaser.
21
combined or contiguous property (owned by the same owner), is improved.
Once any of these three conditions has occurred, the parcel, either
separately or in conjunction with a combined parcel, may be reappraised
on the basis of a new fair market value.
This section is intended to provide an incentive to certain
individuals to acquire "repository" properties since, for a reasonable
period of time, it protects the taxpayer against payment of taxes on a
"repository" property which may exceed the actual value of the property.
The taxing district and bureau are aided to the extent that the
maintenance and administrative costs generated by unsold properties is
eliminated. The taxing districts involved are further protected to the
extent that, if the property as a result of fortuitous circumstances
(such as the development of a shopping mall) becomes a part of a valuable
property, it can then be reassessed to reflect its new value. Likewise,
if the property is sold as a separate parcel or as part of a larger or
combined parcel, the total price of the sale will then become the basis
of a new assessment. Any general reassessment would include the
"repository" property in its valuation of the full property to which it
is attached (or contiguous).
This section requires that the bureau notify all affected taxing
districts, the county assessor, and any affected tax collectors, of the
sale of this "repository" property, and the conditions under which it may
be taxed and appraised, so that the new owner is protected to the extent
promised in this Article.
ARTICLE VII
PROPERTY PURCHASE BY TAXING DISTRICT PRIOR TO THIS ACT
22
county, after exposing a property to sale, acquired the property by
operation of statute if no one purchased it at such a sale. Under this
circumstance, the county would appear to hold the property legitimately
as trustee for the taxing districts. Other properties could also have
been acquired by virtue of the fact that they may never have been exposed
to sale, and are simply being held by the county. Thus ownership,
responsibility for the property, rights to any revenue generated, etc.,
are vague and subject to debate. It is in this framework that Article
VII was reappraised and the following amendments made to the existing
section, with new sections added beginning with Section 704.
The Task Force proposed the following section as a remedy for these
perceived problems.
23
Section 704. Validation of Title.
24