KINGS

OWN
[BUS 700:
INSTITUTE ECONOMICS]
INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT
SUBMITTED BY:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Australia's sustenance and basic need segment is under extraordinary weight from a scope of
strengths including the aggressive way of the market retail segment; curbed trust in the more
extensive monetary environment; Australian money changes; and a relatively higher cost of
working together in Australia than different nations. The Supermarkets and Grocery Stores
industry is a standout amongst the most savagely focused ventures in Australia. The
Supermarket and Grocery Stores industry is in a develop life cycle stage. Enduring
development and commitment to the economy, moderately stable undertaking numbers and
item legitimization all show a develop industry. The way of items sold and mechanical
headways are relied upon to keep the business from entering the declining stage throughout
the following years. The continuous value war inside the basic supply retailers channel keeps
on influencing the whole classification in 2016. Despite the fact that basic need retailer’s
keeps on being driven by the general stores Woolworths and Coles, in 2016 discounters
fasten Aldi kept on testing the position of both brands. The position of Woolworths and Coles
has been challenged with more buyers now shopping at Aldi. Subsequently these general
stores have occupied with a value war amid a large portion of the audit time frame which has
affected the execution of staple retailers.

The main findings of both part A and part B are-

1. Coles and Woollies have duopoly in the Australian grocery supermarket.

2. There is a critical requirement for the development of diversity and competition in the
grocery supermarket for promoting equality.

3. The traditional small retailers must be benefitted by framing new byelaws.

The major recommendations are-

1. Parity between the buyers and sellers must be introduced to avoid dominancy by these two
supermarket players.

2. Modifications must be introduced in the legislation by the Australian law making bodies to
benefit the small retailers and local farmers.

3. The Competition Act along with the Consumer Act must be amended to control the
unethical market dominance by any firm.

1
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

PART A-INTRODUCTION 3-4

FINDINGS 4

PART B-INTRODUCTION 5-6

FINDINGS 6-7

RECOMMENDATIONS 7

CONCLUSION 7

REFERENCES 8-9

2
INTRODUCTION

Australia has a standout amongst the most moved basic need advertises on the planet.
Woolworths and Wesfarmers (proprietor of Coles) record for very nearly 81% of all retail in
Australia. The more piece of the pie they have the more impact they have over providers and
the less demanding it is to stamp out littler autonomous retailers (Wordpress, 2017). Grocery
stores have an expanding part in the advancement of the Australian farming area. An
acceleration in piece of the overall industry for Coles and Woolworths has made a testing
situation for some Australian agriculturists and providers. It has prompted to worries that the
present irregularity in market control, supporting the real general stores, is adverse to
Australia's rural industry (FDI Team, 2014).

PART A COLES AND WOOLLIES HAVE TOO MUCH MARKETPOWER

Organizations like West farmer and Woolworths are emphatically, maybe extraordinarily,
situated to contribute decidedly to society. Their bad habit like hold on supply binds enables
them to set measures and impact business conduct – in connection to the treatment of
chickens by egg makers and transient specialists by natural product cultivators, for instance.
What's more, they can do this in courses much more prompt, less expensive and apparently
more successful than any type of government control (Beaton, 2015). Through vertical
coordination and long haul supply gets, the purchasing force of our real grocery store binds
empowers them to advance maintainability in our cultivating area and development in
assembling, having to a greater degree an effect than any administration freebee or bolster
measure. Their impressive market control gives the two combinations the capacity to decide
costs, influence passage hindrances and set up a level of desire in the division. This puts
weight on whatever is left of the natural pecking order in Australia. Numerous nearby
agriculturists are set in a helpless position by choices made by Coles and Woolworths,
regardless of whether they include estimating, the volume of exchanges or other business
strategies (Nunizio, 2014). Market control alludes to an unbalanced impact over terms of
exchange. As retailers steadily increment their piece of the overall industry, they can merge
their position inside sustenance supply chains. This incorporates venture into the generation,
appropriation and handling segments. Australian clients of Coles and Woolworths have
encountered remarkable advantages from the development of the two chains, especially
through enhanced access to more moderate items. These advantages, and their present points
of interest for Australian sustenance security, can't be downplayed. An examination of the

3
part as played by these two retailers in the Australian retail industry shows that the
organization has accomplished huge level of prevailing position in the Australian retail
industry and the significant reason prompting to such profoundly effective position of the
organization is for the most part the systems as sought after by the company (Keating, 2015).
Coles' and Woolworths' outlets are presently multiplying crosswise over both metropolitan
and local focuses of Australia. The extension of the duopoly is driving out littler
organizations, especially in country zones, which can't rival the major supermarkets. In their
promoting messages, Coles and Woolworths frequently introduce themselves as merchants of
"new" and "nearby" create at low costs. Both chains are presently utilizing big name culinary
experts, Curtis Stone and Jamie Oliver individually, to communicate these promoting popular
expressions to consumers (Knox, 2014). The organizations each work about more than 1200
general stores, and also many petrol stations and other retail outlets, and more than 75
pennies of each dollar spent in Australian markets goes to Coles and Woolworths.

FINDINGS

1. Woolworths and Coles have new difficulties not too far off with markdown grocery stores
positioned to lead the greater part of new market openings in the coming years.

2. Expanded rivalry from markdown retailers benefits shoppers with cost funds

3. Coles and Woollies contribute significantly to the economic richness of the Australian
economy.

4. Both the supermarket retail brands are introducing their own home made labelled products.

4
PART B: COLES AND WOOLLIES ARE GOOD FOR AUSTRALIAN ECONOMY

INTRODUCTION

Advertise control in the sustenance framework is a noteworthy worry in Australia. The

effective duopoly of Coles and Woolworths plainly shows difficulties to independent
ventures and neighbourhood agriculturists, who are attempting to coincide with the grocery
store mammoths. The budgetary weights on little and medium nourishment providers, for
example, deflationary cost weights and requests for expanded generation, notwithstanding,
are unsustainable and can possibly debilitate residential sustenance security. Joint effort and
straightforwardness amongst providers and the general stores must be enhanced, to guarantee
that the procedures utilized are not to the detriment of a focused sustenance framework.
Australia's long haul sustenance security relies on upon keeping up enhancement of both
makers and creates (Ross, 2014). Government systems must be received to guarantee that
retailer conduct does not encroach on the adjust of force amongst purchasers and dealers of
Australian nourishment. Advance development of the real retailers, left over the top, can
possibly destabilize Australia's nourishment framework, to the hindrance of the sustenance
security appreciated by Australians today costs above aggressive levels, undermining the
present standard of sustenance availability in Australia.

Numerous producers have voiced worry about these duties, contending that they don't have a
decision in the matter: it is possible that they pay the impose, or face the possibility of losing
their agreements with Australia's biggest staple chain. As Coles and Woolworths keep on
consolidating their shut purchaser supply chains, providers bring about more prominent costs,
debilitating their long haul money related viability (Mitchell, 2015). Many Australian
providers are compelled to agree to these requests, because of the significance of Coles and
Woolworths to buyer get to. Institutionalization requests load numerous providers with
capital-concentrated creation forms. Different elements, for example, bundling and
traceability necessities, additionally include huge expenses for little and medium providers
who have not set up economies of scale (Ross, 2014). Coles and Woolworths frequently
consult for providers to offer their merchandise beneath cost-cost amid deal advancements.
The supportability of the Australian sustenance framework is in question. To guarantee the
presence of a differing scope of nourishment makers in Australia, It is vital that the adjust of
force amongst purchaser and merchant in the Australian sustenance framework is re-
established. It is indispensable, in any case, that a move in the framework towards merchant

5
power is not all that articulated that providers can manage retail costs above focused levels,
undermining the present standard of sustenance openness in Australia (Beaton, 2015). Coles
and Woolworths have a characteristic favorable position over free retailers since they can
consult with the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees union for lower compensation on
Sundays. They get this business advantage not by being aggressive, but rather through an
organization with a major union. The point of both is to reinforce connections amongst
retailers and providers through more prominent sureness and straightforwardness around
business terms and great confidence business direct (Carmody, 2015).

On the contrary, Australia has the most focused store industry of any nation on the planet.
The duopoly undermines the whole retail industry, and their exceptional power permits them
to threaten agriculturists, providers and representatives. While costs at the registration may
fall temporarily, the cost is moved: ranches turned out to be merged, decision develops
constrained and quality falls away. The grocery stores have burned through millions in the
courts battling even their longest-term specialists, some of whom had no history of troubles
with their bosses (Chung, 2015). Australian store chain mammoths Woolworths and Coles
have challenges in front of them, as new rivalry could bring about huge change in the
business. Worldwide discount store Aldi offer buyer’s comparative items at fundamentally
bring down costs. After Coles and Woolworths ruled the staple market each of the previous
two decades because of the absence of any genuine rivalry, they are currently in peril of
remaining ahead with its reality driving net revenues and prevailing business sector share.
With little rivalry and a capacity to incline toward providers with an end goal to minimize
expenses, Woolworths' and Coles' overall revenues expanded in the course of the most recent
15 years from three to eight for every penny (Pierce, 2015). Presently, specialists trust staple
costs will drop in all cases once Australians are offered more choices.

FINDINGS

1. Existing rivalry laws had permitted Coles and Woolworths to command the basic supply
advertise.

2. Customers are worried that they are the failures as far as cost and they need a great deal
more decision and assortment.

6
3. If Woolworths and Coles can't convey an important procedure to their groups, more
individuals will leave intentionally as deals fix, even before the chains begin on
redundancies.

RECOMMENDATION (PART A AND B)

1. Rivalry laws ought to be reinforced to convey a scope of advantages including lower

costs, more noteworthy decision and a by and large more pleasant society.

2. Woollies and Coles should diversify into a market where they wouldn't have a gigantic
contender.

3. Parity between the buyers and sellers must be introduced to avoid dominancy by these two
supermarket players.

4. Modifications must be introduced in the legislation by the Australian law making bodies to
benefit the small retailers and local farmers.

CONCLUSION

Australia has the most focused store industry of any nation on the planet. The duopoly
undermines the whole retail industry, and their exceptional power permits them to threaten
agriculturists, providers and representatives. Woolworths is attempting to limit the harm done
after its business figures were as of late cut, while Coles is practically completed with the
culmination of its venture turnaround activity that it began five years back, which has brought
about better deals comes about. The way Woolworths and Coles handle its new rivalry in
Australia ought to be a decent pointer of how the organizations will flourish throughout the
following decade.

7
REFERENCES

Beaton, C. 2015, July 7. Australian supermarket competition is great for consumers but it
could ruin the economy. Business Insider. Retrieved from:
http://www.businessinsider.com.au/australian-supermarket-competition-is-great-for-
consumers-but-it-could-ruin-the-economy-2015-7

Carmody, B. 2015, July 26. Coles and Woolies: super heroes or bad guys? Smart Company.
Retrieved from: http://www.smartcompany.com.au/finance/economy/47777-coles-
and-woolworths-super-heroes-or-bad-guys/

Chung, F. 2015, June 18. Supermarket monsters: How Coles and Woolworths suffocate us.
Retrieved from: http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/retail/supermarket-
monsters-how-coles-and-woolworths-suffocate-us/news-
story/c901feb4f6c255d3a6b613140cbea30c

FDI Team. 2014, July 17. Market Power in the Australian Food System. Future Directions.
Retrieved from: http://www.futuredirections.org.au/publication/market-power-in-the-
australian-food-system/

Keating, E. 2015, September 15. Supermarket Monsters. Smart Company. Retrieved from:
http://www.smartcompany.com.au/growth/48367-supermarket-monsters-seven-
insights-into-how-coles-and-woolworths-came-to-dominate-australian-groceries/

Knox, M. 2014, August. Supermarket Monsters: Coles, Woolworths and the price we pay for
their domination. The Monthly. Retrieved from:
https://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2014/august/1406815200/malcolm-
knox/supermarket-monsters

Mitchell, S. 2015, March 31. 75pc of Australians want more competition for Coles and
Woolworths, Masters Grocer survey. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from:
http://www.smh.com.au/business/75pc-of-australians-want-more-competition-for-
coles-and-woolworths-masters-grocer-survey-shows-20150330-1mbjul.html

Nunzio, J. 2017, July 7. Concentrated Power in Australia’s Food System. Retrieved from:
http://www.futuredirections.org.au/publication/market-power-in-the-australian-food-
system/

8
Pierce, F. 2015, June 8. Woolworths, Coles feeling heat from new competition. Australia
Business Review. Retrieved from:
http://www.businessreviewaustralia.com/finance/1679/Woolworths-Coles-feeling-
heat-from-new-competition

Wordpress. 2017. Supermarkets in Australia. Shop Ethical! E-store. Retrieved from:

http://www.ethical.org.au/3.4.2/get-informed/issues/supermarkets-in-australia/