Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ashton Rich
Tyler Smith
FLM 1070
3 May 2021
In this paper, I will be discussing two films, 42 (2013) directed by Brian Helgeland and
Race (2016) directed by Stephen Hopkins. Both films deal with racism in sports before and after
the events of WW2. This was a time of developing political ideology where the world saw
extreme growth, both in industry and ideals. The exploitation of extremely racist fundamentals
by countries abroad really forced Americans to review its own beliefs and practices. With Jim
Crow Law and segregation still overtly present in many parts of the United States, the integration
of African American athletes into sports was one of the first steps toward the dissolution of these
practices. I will review how these films represent African American athletes of this time period
by examining how accurately they are represented, what the filmmakers have done to present a
culturally diverse message, and where those representations may have been guided by
The film 42 is about Jackie Robinson, the first African American baseball player to play
in Major League Baseball. His achievements both on and off the field were instrumental in the
segregation of American sports and laying the foundation for the civil rights movement. This
meant that Hegeland had an enormous responsibility in his representation of this incredible
historical figure. In order to truly show Robinson’s character, Hegeland highlights the
The war produced a continuous sense of patriotism amongst the American people of all
races. The county was unified against a common enemy. However, its unification was
fractionated. Upon the war’s conclusion, African American soldiers returned home to a country
that refused to acknowledge their rights as a citizen and as a human being. Many written and
unwritten laws discriminated against Black citizens and encouraged hatred and bigotry across the
nation. This was especially prevalent in America’s national sport of the time; baseball.
The truly racist behavior exhibited by the players in the film is a reflection of the attitude
of many Americans. Robinson is faced with countless racially discriminatory actions throughout
the film. Some examples include the inability to use entrances or bathrooms labeled “white
only”, a constant barrage of hate mail and death threats, and the physical abuse that he is forced
to endure on the baseball field. Helgeland exploits the sport of baseball by doing so. He is
relentless in this depiction through the use of racial slurs and hateful language. He creates
sympathy through this dialogue and his portrayal of Robinson’s passion for the sport of baseball.
The film shows the racial pressure from Robinson’s perspective. This is most notable
from the crowd’s reaction when he travels to different cities. One scene in particular when he is
in Ohio. A man and a son are seen conversing before the game discussing baseball and the son’s
favorite player, Pee Wee Reese (played by Lucas Black), like any father and son would at a
baseball game. They are shown as being very nice and friendly, until Robinson takes the field.
The father’s demeanor immediately changes as he begins to degrade and threaten Robinson. His
son watches his father and follows his example by shouting racial slurs and cussing him out. It is
at this moment when Reese puts his arm around Jackie and thanks him for what he is doing.
When the boy sees this he becomes visibly ashamed for what he has done. This scene to me
shows how the filmmakers were able to show the prevalence of this kind of racist behavior
Rich 3
during this time, and how it was able to continue. From fans, to police officers, to umpires,
Robinson is outnumbered and the film accurately portrays this struggle and its imbalance.
The film Race shows a similar situation in its portrayal of Jesse Owens and his struggle
as an olympic athlete during the late 1930s. The film not only shows the intolerable racism in the
United States, but an even worse situation in Nazi Germany where the 1936 Olympic Games
were to be held. Director Stephan Hopkins shows the conditions of African American collegiate
athletes of the time. They were given much worse living quarters, were less equipped, unable to
shower when the white athletes were using the locker rooms, and were not considered as
important as the white athletes. This took a considerable toll on Jesse’s home life as it did for
many black families during this time. These struggles are shown and highlighted throughout the
film and seem to be the driving force behind some of his poor decisions. The ludicrous
discriminatory behavior belonging to many at the time are encapsulated in a scene when Owens
is forced to use the service entrance to an event after his gold medal victories in which he is the
guest of honor.
The attitudes toward the Olympic Games are depicted as well. It was difficult for any
African American athlete to participate in these games when there was even more hatred and
racism towards blacks in Germany. Participation for some felt like submission to white power
and indiffernce towards racial injustice. This dilemma is thought on and reflected many times
These films work to portray the numerous struggles faced not only by professional
African American athletes of the time, but those faced by all African Americans. Their
depictions are brutal, and accurate. However, both of these films were directed by white, male
directors. It wouldn’t be unreasonable to say that there are subtle nuances encoded into these
Rich 4
films that support mainstream American capitalist culture in which people of color are still
discriminated against. For example, both of the athletes portrayed in these films have to learn
self-control from a wiser, more intelligent white man. In 42, Branch Rickey (played by Harrison
Ford) is the owner of the Brooklyn Dodgers. He instigated the move to bring Robisnson to the
Dodgers, making him the first African American to play professional baseball. In the film Race,
Owens’ coach, Larry Synder (played by Jason Sudeikis) acts in a similar role. He has to help
Owens overcome his emotions in the face of racial adversity. In both films, the success of these
athletes is dependent on these men.. Though these positions are accurate, it is interesting the
roles that these men play in these movies. In both films, these men are also very financially
driven. Their involvement with these athletes is largely motivated by success measured through
their financial gian, supporting American capitalism and the “American Dream”.
In conclusion, though these films include these subtle nuances, they are accurate in their
depiction of the challenges faced by African Americans during this time and in many ways the
tribulations that are still faced today. They provide an accurate evaluation of racism in the United
States. Films like these allow us to visualize historical events that lead this nation to where it is
today. These films give us the opportunity to reflect on what still needs to be done in the fight for