Professional Documents
Culture Documents
where K is the elastance and P,l. is the pressure developed when the displace-
ment from the relaxation volume is V.
Air Viscance and Turbulence. A method for estimating the magnitude of
the viscous and turbulent forces that must be overcome in moving air through
the respiratory tract has been described previously (9, IO), and data have been
presented which indicate that the relationship between these forces and the
velocity of air flow may be described approximately by the following equation:
Pazc.
= h(g)+k,(g 02
where Pal,. is the pressure gradient between alveoli and mouth that is required
to move the air with a velocity (dV/dt). The constants k1 and & are the air
viscance2 and the turbulent resistance, respectively.
An example of the sort of record from which data were obtained for
purposes of the present investigation is shown in figure I, and the points ob-
tained from measurement of records made on subject R are shown in figure 3.
The parabola was fitted to these points by the method of residuals.
Resistance Associated with Tissue Deformation. It does not seem feasible to
measure directly the non-elastic resistance associated with tissue deformation,
but an estimate may be obtained in the following fashion. A trained subject is
placed in a Drinker respirator and is instructed to relax as completely as
2 Our usage of the word ‘viscance’ in this paper is implicit in equation z and may be used synono-
mously with ‘viscous resistance’; it is expressed in dimensions of pressure per unit flow of respired
gas. ‘Viscance’ was defined by Bayliss and Robertson (6) as “the viscous force per unit deformation”
or “viscous pressure per unit of tidal air volume.” Dean and Visscher (7)) however, use the same
term to mean “viscous resistance to a unit velocity of flow.” Although the definition of Bayliss and
Robertson was stated to make ‘viscance’ analagous to ‘electrical resistance,’ we believe that our
usage of the term is a better analogy.
Fig. I (left). SIMXJLTANEOUS RECORDS of pressure at mouth (zipper tracing) and pneumotachogram
(~OZUY &u&g). In pneumotachogram, inspiration is above and expiration below baseline. Sudden
changes in pressure at mouth and simultaneous interruptions of air flow were produced by brief
closure of solenoid valve located in airway between mouth and pneumotachograph. Method of esti-
mating alveolar pressure (P,z,.) is indicated.
Fig. 2 (righl). SIMULTANEOUS RECORDS of pressure gradient between mouth and inside of Drinker
respirator (@per tracircg) and pneumotachogram (lezeer tracitig). Subject R.
A useful way of representing some of the data that can be obtained from
such a record is shown in figure 4 in which pressure is plotted against accumu-
lated volume for one breathing cycle. The method of constructing such a
diagram will now be described.
The velocity of flow and the simultaneous pressure were measured and
tabulated for each o.r-second interval of the record of the respiratory cycle
shown in figure 3. Then starting at the beginning of inspiration each O.I-
second interval of the flow curve was integrated by multiplying the mean
velocity of flow during each period by 0.1 second. This gave the volume that
flowed during each o.r-second period. These volumes were then added in a
cumulative fashion and the total volume at the end of each time interval was
plotted against the corresponding pressure gradient that existed at the end of
that interval. The plotted points determine the solid lines that form the large
loop in figure 4.
This closed curve represents the relationship between the changes in the
volume of the lung during the respiratory cycle and the external forces (as
represented by the pressure gradient between the respirator and mouth) acting
to produce this change. At two moments (when the cycle reverses from in-
I I I I I I
0 1234 5 6 7
PClLV CM. H,O
0
1 ., , , , , , ” I, , . . .
5 IO 15
PRESSURE C M. H,O
spiration to expiration and vice versa) no air is being moved in either direction.
At these instants, therefore, the total force acting is being used to maintain
elastic tension that has been developed, inertia being assumed to be negligible.
If we assume a linear relationship between elastic pressure and lung volume,
then the diagonal in figure 4 represents this relationship. Approximately, it is a
segment of the relaxation pressure curve.
Some of the information represented by figure 4 may be summarized as
follows. As the lung volume is increased during inspiration, the total pressure
gradient between the mouth and the inside of the respirator is represented by
the abscissa1distance from the axis of ordinates to the inspiratory loop. Of this
total inspiratory pressure (Pin.) at any given lung volume, a certain amount
(P& represented by the abscissa1distance from the axis of ordinates to the
diagonal, is required to overcome elastance; the remainder (Pi,. - Pel.) is the
pressure required to overcome air and tissue viscance and turbulent resistance.
Expiration is produced by the elastic forces that were developed in the
chest and lung during inspiration. However, the total elastic force is not avail-
able, in this case, for overcoming the viscous and turbulent resistances of ex-
piration, because the pressure within the respirator continues to be negative
especially during the first part of expiration. The pressure actually used in
overcoming viscance and turbulence at any moment during expiration is of
course (P,l. - Per.) where P,,. is the abscissa1distance from the axis of or-
dinates to the expiratory loop, i.e. the pressure gradient between the mouth and
the inside of the respirator during expiration. Under the conditions of the
particular experiment illustrated in figure 4, the lung volume does not quite
get back to the relaxation volume by the end of expiration; the respirator
starts an inspiratory movement before expiration is as complete as it would be
if more time were allowed.
The relationship between numerous values of (Pi,. - Pel.) or (P,l. -
Pez.) and the corresponding velocities of flow is represented by the points
plotted in figure 5. These data were obtained from figures z and 4 and other
similarly plotted cycles measured on subject R. The parabolic curve drawn
through the point S was fitted by the method of residuals and may be gener-
ally represented bY
(3)
the slope of which represents the total viscous and turbulent resistance of
breathing.
By subtracting the curve of figure 3 from that of figure 5 a relationship of
the following form is obtained
Pt = k+;)+k,($ (4)
Its slope represents the resistance associated with the non-elastic component of
tissue deformation.
By means of equation 4, Pt was calculated for each o.I-second interval of
figure z and the resulting values were added to the corresponding values of
P,l. during inspiration and subtracted during expiration. These sums or
differences were plotted against the cumulative volume for the corresponding
time interval to form the loop indicated by the broken line in figure 4. The
abscissa1 distance from the diagonal to this loop is the pressure required to
overcome non-elastic resistance of tissue.
Constants for equations I, 2, 3 and 4 evaluated as outlined above are re-
corded in table I for subject R and for two other subjects who were similarly
studied. The values shown for each subject are based on measurements of
several cycles.
Total Force Required for Breathing. The total force required for breathing
is the sum of equations I and 3 or
PZ =KV+K’ 0)
Pn= 2.,($)+2.1($)t
I I I I I I I
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 0
K k1 kz k3 k4 K’ R”
The elastic energy stored during inspiration and represented by the triangle
is available as a power supply for expiration. However, only that portion
bounded by the diagonal and the curve labeled expiration is actually used in
this instance to overcome viscous and turbulent forces; the remainder is
expended in working against the continued action of the respirator which op-
poses expiration during the first part of this phase of the breathing cycle.
Table 2 summarizes measurements of the work of breathing and its frac-
tions obtained by planimetric integration of diagrams such as that illustrated
by figure 4. These data indicate that on the average 63 per cent of the total
work done in inspiration was used in overcoming elastic forces, 29 per cent in
overcoming resistance associated with the movement of air, and 8 per cent in
deforming tissues. These percentages apply, of course, only to the particular
pattern of breathing employed in this experiment. As will be pointed out later,
both the absolute and relative magnitudes of these factors depend to some
extent on the particular pattern of breathing employed.
If one assumes that equation 5 is reasonably valid, the information con-
tained in it makes possible the estimation of the work of breathing for any
breathing cycle for which the velocity pattern (pneumotachogram) is known.
One method would be to calculate the corresponding pressures for numerous
points along the velocity curve and then to follow the procedure described
above that was used in getting the data of table 2. This empirical method is
very tedious, however, and if one can describe the velocity curve by a simple
mathematical expression, the work of breathing may be calculated in a more
direct fashion.
turbulent resistance. The total work done during a single inspiration of volume
V, and duration r/b may be obtained by integration of equation 8 as indicated
below
This is the inspiratory work per unit time but if it is assumed that expip
ation is passive, it is of course an expression of the total work of breathing per
unit time as a function of tidal volume and frequency. If the tidal volume is
divided into an effective or alveolar portion, V,, and a dead space portion,
VD, equatio% II becomes
Of special interest is the fact, illustrated by this graph, that for a constant
alveolar ventilation there is a frequency which is optimal (in the sense of
minimal work). This minimum occurs because when the frequency is too low,
much elastic work is required to produce the large tidal volumes and when the
frequency is too high, much work is uselessly done in ventilating the dead space
with each breath.
The fact that the optimal frequency in this case is in the range ordinarily
observed in the breathing of resting subjects suggests itself as an example of
the principle of minimal effort according to which so many of the body func-
tions seem to be regulated.
By differentiating equation 12 with respect tof, setting the result equal to
o, and solving for VA we have the general solution for the conditions of minimal
rate of doing work.
KDf + K’,lr2Df2 + 4K”r2@f3
VA = ( I 4)
K - 4K?r2 D j”
Various values of f have been substituted in equation 14 and the resulting
curve is shown in figure 8 (curve labeled Wmin .). This curve predicts that the
greater the alveolar ventilation, the higher will be the frequency for the con-
dition of minimal work. Since this curve actually applies to the condition of
minimal inspiratory work, it can not be accepted for minimal total work unless
expiration is completely passive. The curve labeled WV + W. = We in figure
8 shows the frequency at which the work required for expiration (assuming this
is the same as that required to overcome viscous and turbulent resistance of
inspiration) becomes equal to the elastic energy stored during inspiration.
Conditions represented by the area above this curve will, therefore, require the
25 50 75
+.A LITERS MIN.
ventilation and frequency. The scale of ordinates for the calculated mechanical
work has been adjusted so that it is equal to 5.4 per cent of that for the extra
oxygen consumption. This figure is the average of 19 values obtained by
dividing each of Liljestrand’s measurements into the mechanical work cal-
culated for the corresponding condition. The individual values for mechanical
efficiency obtained in this fashion varied from 3.0 per cent for a frequency of 5
and a ventilation of 20 liters per minute to 7.6 per cent for a frequency of 20
and a ventilation of 30 liters per minute.
This variation in the calculated efficiency is reflected, of course, in the
discrepancies between the curves for total energy and those for mechanical work
in figure 9, because exact agreement between these two families of curves would
require that the calculated efficiency be constant for all conditions.
Part of this apparent variability in efficiency under different conditions
can, of course, be attributed to the inexactness of our equation for calculating
mechanical work, but part is probably real, since it is well known that the
efficiency of muscular work varies with muscle length and load.
In Liljestrand’s experiments the breathing was voluntarily regulated and
for the most part the tidal-frequency combinations employed were not those
that the body naturally chooses (cf. figs. 8 and 9). It is perhaps of significance
that the highest calculated efficiency appears for the condition (30 l/min. at
a frequency of 20) that most closely corresponds to a naturally occurring one.
This suggests that the respiratory apparatus may be so designed that the
conditions for minimal mechanical work are also those for maximal muscular
efficiency.
At any rate it would seem that although 5 per cent is a representative
efficiency for a considerable range of frequency-tidal combinations, the breath-
ing under normal conditions of regulation may be usually carried out with a
higher efficiency, in the order of 8 to IO per cent.
It might be supposed that the relatively low mechanical efficiency of
respiration could be attributed to insufficient opportunity for shortening of
the intercostal muscles. Since they are arranged parallel to the circumference
of the chest it might be supposed that they would have difficulty in shortening
when the chest expands. Actually they are attached to the ribs in such a way
that they can shorten an appreciable fraction of their length like any other
muscles in the body. It is a general rule that muscles can shorten in situ only
50 per cent of the length of the individual fibers and the muscles of respiration
are no exception in this respect. Isolated frog muscles, when stimulated, usually
shorten, with no load, about one third of their resting length, and give maximal
work and maximal efficiency when the load is such as to reduce this shortening
to about one sixth. From this point of view, the muscles of respiration must
operate under fairly efficient mechanical circumstances.
Maximal Work Obtainable from the Mtiscles of Breathing. The mechanical
work done in the usual resting breathing may be estimated from figure 7 as
being in the order of 0.4 to 0.5 kilogram meters per minute. Assuming an
efficiency of 5 per cent this corresponds to a total energy requirement of about
0.0234 large calories per minute or 33.7 large calories per day. This amounts to
only I or 2 per cent of the total resting metabolism; the fuel requirement for
24 hours of quiet breathing is only IO grams of sugar, a fraction of a candy bar.
For comparison, it is interesting to estimate the maximal work output that
can be obtained when the breathing system is operated at full capacity. This
estimate may be made by three independent methods, which will now be
described.
The maximal ventilation that an individual can perform is in the order of
150 liters per minute carried out at a frequency of 30 per minute. Under these
conditions expiration can not be entirely passive, but if one assumes that the
same amount of viscous and turbulent resistance must be overcome during
expiration as during inspiration, and that the elastic energy stored during
inspiration is available to aid expiration then inspiratory work rate can be
calculated by equation II and expiratory work rate by:
Rate of expiratory work =
$K'T2(jVT)2 + $K"T~(~VT)~ - +Kjv", (I 5)
The total work per unit time is the sum of equations II and 15, or
Work rate =
+Krn2(f VT)” + $K’%r2(fVT>” (I 6)
By equation 16 it is calculated that the mechanical work required for maximal
ventilation is 270 kilogram meters per minute or 9.0 kilogram meters per
breath.
Another approach is to estimate the potential energy available for maximal
inspiration and expiration from figure I of Rahn, Otis, Chadwick and Fenn
(8) which shows the maximal inspiratory and expiratory forces available at
various lung volumes. The total area bounded by the curves for these maximal
forces gives the theoretical maximal work available during a single cycle con-
WORK/YIN. AT 30 BREATHS/
METHOD OF ESTIMATION WORK/BREATH
MIN.
kg. m. kg. m.
Equation 16. ................................. 9.0 270
Area of P-V diagram. ......................... 10.4 312
Anatomical data. .............................. 8.0 - 13.5 240 - 405
of view along the lines sketched by Rohrer (3). Experimentally, the most
inexactly estimated factor iS probably the value for the non-elastic resistance
of tissue since this determination was based on the assumption that the sub-
jects were able voluntarily to relax completely and to permit the respirator
to do all the work. Complete passivity is most likely not attained under these
conditions, and the overlapping of the two sets of data shown in figures 3 and
5 is probably in part a manifestation of this inability to relax completely.
Wirz (16) was able to describe the non-elastic resistance of the dog lung by an
equation of the same form as our equation 4 but he obtained negative values
for the constant k4. According to Bayliss and Robertson (6) and Dean and
Visscher (7) at least a part of the non-elastic resistance of the lung is independent
of velocity. For these various reasons we do not have confidence in the actual
values obtained in our evaluation of non-elastic resistance of tissue. It seems
likely, however, that we may have overestimated rather than underestimated
the magnitude of this factor.
The approach employed in this analysis of the work of breathing, with
emphasis on energy relationships and efficiency, is not to be justified so much
by the importance of the magnitude of the work, which is generally relatively
small, but rather as an aid in clarifying the interrelationship of some of the
various factors involved.
In a more detailed analysis many factors would have to be included that
are here omitted. For example, there is now good evidence that ventilation to
various parts of the lungs is unequal (17, IS). It is also recognized that for
optimal conditions of gas exchange a certain relationship should be maintained
between blood flow and ventilation (19, 20). Since the breathing apparatus is a
blood pump as well as an air pump, it may play an important part in the
regulation of this ventilation/blood flow ratio. Certain patterns of breathing
may be more efficient than others in this regard, and the selection by the body
of particular tidal-frequency combinations may be related to this function.
Further study of respiratory mechanics should include investigation of the
more detailed behavior of the respiratory muscles, their sequence of contraction
and the behavior of the lungs in producing inequalities of ventilation. The work
done by the breathing apparatus in moving blood as well as air should be
evaluated, and the relationship between the pattern of air flow and that of
blood flow should be considered.
SUMMARY
the respiratory tract was measured on the same subjects by the method of
interruptions. From the experimental data equations are derived that give an
approximate description of the human breathing apparatus as a mechanical
system. These equations permit the estimation of the work of breathing under
various conditions, optimal frequencies of breathing, maximal mechanical
work output of the respiratory muscles, and mechanical efficiency.
The authors wish to acknowledge the cooperation of Dr. Donald Proctor in some of the
preliminary experiments and to thank Mr. William Doherty for technical assistance.
REFERENCES
I. ROHRER, F. Arch.f. d. ges. Physiol. 162: 225, 1915.
2. ROHRER, F. Arch. f. d. ges. Physiol. 165: 419, 1916.
30 ROHRXR, F. Handbzcch der normalen zcnd pathologischen Physiologic. Berlin: Julius
Springer, 1925, vol. 2, p. 70.
40 v. NEERGAARD, R. AND K. WIRZ. Ztschr. f. U/n. Med. 105: 52, 1927.
50 VUILLEUMIER, P. Ztschr. f. klin. Med. 143 : 698, 1944.
6. BAYLISS, L. E. AND G. W. ROBERTSON. Quart. J. Exper. Physiol. 29: 27, 1939.
7* DEAN, R. B. AND M. B. VISXHER. Am. J. PhysioZ. 134: 450, 1941.
8, RAHN, H., A. B. OTIS, L. E. CHADWICK AND W. 0. FENN. Am. J. Physiol. 146: 161,rg46.
90 OTIS, A. B. AND D. F. PROCTOR. Am. J. Physiol. I 52 : 106, 1948.
IO. OTIS, A. B. AND W. C. BEMIBOWER. J. Applied Physiol. 2: 300, 1949.
II. LILJESTRAND, G. Skandinav. Arch. f. Physiol. 35: 199, 1918.
12. MULLER, E. A., H. MICHAELIS AND A. MULLER. Arbeitsphysiol. 12: 192, 1942.
130 NEILSEN, M. Skandinav. Arch. f. Physiol. 74: 299, 1936.
149 VON EBNER, V. Arch. f. Anat. zc. Physiol. 4: 185, 1880.
15 STRASSER, H. Lehrbuch der Muskel und Gelenkmechanik. Berlin: Julius Springer, 1908,
vol. 2.
16. WIRZ, K. Arch. f. d. ges. Physiol. 199: I, 1923.
179 FOWLER, W. S. J. Applied Physiol. 2: 283, 1949.
18. RAUWERDA, P. E. Unequal Ventilation of Dinerent Parts of the Lung. Thesis. Holland:
Univ. Groningen, 1946.
19. RAHN, H. Am. J. Physiol. 158: 21, 1949.
20. RILEY, R. L. AND A. COURNAND. J. Applied PhysioE. I : 12, 1949.
21. BARCROFT, J. AND R. MARGARIA. J. Physiol. 72: 175, 1931.
22. LINDHARD, J. Arch. f. d. ges. Physiol. 161: 233, 1915.
23. HANSEN, E. Skandinav. Arch. f. Physiol. 54: 50, 1928.