Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tax Memorandum On The Tax Laws (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 2019
Tax Memorandum On The Tax Laws (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 2019
Tax Memorandum On The Tax Laws (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 2019
www.pwc.com.pk/en/tax-memorandum
Chartered Accountants
a member firm of the PwC network
Dear all,
This Memorandum gives a brief overview of significant amendments made through the
Tax Laws (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 2019 which has been promulgated by the
President of Pakistan on December 26, 2019 and comes into force at once.
Through the Ordinance, certain amendments have been made in the Income Tax
Ordinance, 2001; Sales Tax Act, 1990 and Customs Act, 1969.
If you require any clarification, please feel free to contact your usual contact person within
the firm.
Best regards,
AFF Partners
Karachi / Lahore / Islamabad
January 2, 2020
Table of contents
Page reference
Income Tax 1
Sales Tax 6
Customs Duty 9
INCOME TAX
(ii) Individual having turnover of Rs. 50 (b) For traders of yarn being individuals,
million or more in any of the preceding tax the reduced rate of minimum tax
years is liable to deduct tax under section (payable under section 113 of the ITO
153 while making payments against supply 2001) has been prescribed at 0.5%
of goods, services and contracts. Through for tax year 2020.
the Second Amendment Ordinance,
traders being individuals having turnover (ii) The concessionary rate of tax
upto Rs. 100 million have been exempted withholding on certain payments and
from deducting tax under section 153 while non-applicability of provisions of section
making payment against supply of goods, 111 for suppliers and service providers
services and contracts. The Board is [under Clause (45A) contained in Part IV
expected to clarify the year with respect to of the Second Schedule to the ITO 2001]
which turnover of Rs. 100 million will be were available to those who were
calculated by the trader. registered upto June 30, 2011.
(iii) Through Finance Act 2019, zero rating EMPOWERING FBR TO PRESCRIBE
regime for sales tax applicable for PROCEDURE FOR CLOSURE OF INCOME
exporters or manufacturers of leather, TAX AUDIT OF PERSONS
sports, surgical and textile related goods AUTOMATICALLY SELECTED UNDER
was done away with. The elimination of OMITTED SECTION 214D
zero-rating regime created an anomaly in
the applicability of exemption from Through the Finance Act, 2015, Section 214D was
collection of advance tax on electricity inserted in the ITO 2001 which enabled the FBR
consumption provided to exporters / to automatically select a taxpayer (other than
manufacturers of afore-mentioned goods persons registered as retailers under Sales Tax
under the ITO 2001. It is for this reason Special Procedures Rules 2007) under section 177
that reference to zero rating regime of of the Ordinance if:
sales tax contained in Clause (66) of Part
IV of the Second Schedule to the ITO Complete return of income is not filed
2001 has been removed and it has been within the due date; and
made clear that the exemption from Tax payable as per return is not paid.
collection of advance tax on electricity
consumption is available to taxpayers The above-referred section allowing automatic
registered for sales tax as manufacturer selection for tax audit was deleted through the
or exporter of leather, sports, surgical Finance Act, 2018. To enable closure of tax audits
and textile related goods. already initiated under section 214D for prior
years, a new section 214E was inserted through
the Finance Supplementary (Amendment) Act,
INTER-CORPORATE DIVIDEND IN 2018 enabling FBR to close the audit proceedings
GROUP COMPANIES (initiated under omitted section 214D) after
payment of certain amount of tax / penalty by due
Inter corporate dividend is exempt from tax in date.
case of companies eligible for group relief under
section 59B of the ITO 2001. At present, the said For those cases of audit selection which are not
exemption is partially available in an anomalous yet closed, necessary amendment has been made
manner to the extent of percentage holding of in section 214E so as to enable the FBR to
parent company in the subsidiary company. prescribe the procedure for conclusion of such
audits (including empowering FBR to accept the
Through the Second Amendment Ordinance, the income declared by taxpayer subject to such
requirement for percentage of holding has been conditions as may be prescribed by FBR).
omitted. As a result, partial exemption provided
with regard to percentage of holdings has been
replaced with complete exemption in its original
position of 2008.
ENABLING THE FMU TO REQUIRE Apart from the above, section 230E has further
NECESSARY INFORMATION FROM been amended to provide that transfer pricing
PUBLIC SERVANTS audit initiated under section 230E would not
preclude the concerned Commissioner Inland
Under Section 216 of the ITO 2001, public servant Revenue from determining transfer price at arm’s
are barred from disclosing any information length while conducting audit proceedings under
relating to income tax filings, evidences or section 177 or 214C or amendment proceedings
proceedings of any taxpayer. Certain exceptions under section 122.
to this general prohibition are also contained in
the said section whereby information may be AUTOMATIC RENEWAL OF
disclosed to specified persons, organisations or WITHHOLDING EXEMPTION
authorities. CERTIFICATE UNDER CLAUSE (72B)
By way of an amendment made through the
Clause (72B) contained in Part IV of the Second
Second Amendment Ordinance, Financial
Schedule to the ITO 2001 allows a taxpayer to
Monitoring Unit (FMU) established under the
obtain a withholding exemption certificate from
Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 has been
the concerned Commissioner Inland Revenue so
included in the list of such exceptions which do
as to avoid tax collection at import stage.
not fall within the ambit of confidentiality clause
contained in Section 216. This amendment is
Due to procedural issues, hardships were being
intended to enable FMU to better implement
faced by taxpayer in getting such withholding
anti-money laundering procedures by directly
exemption certificates renewed, which are
obtaining necessary information from public
generally issued for 6-months validity although
servants.
tax liability for the entire year as prescribed is
PROCEDURE PRESCRIBED FOR discharged.
TRANSFER PRICING AUDIT
To facilitate the taxpayers, the relevant clause has
Section 230E was introduced in the ITO 2001 now been amended to provide for automatic
through the Finance Act, 2017 for establishing a approval of application filed on FBR’s IRIS portal
separate Directorate for conducting transfer for renewal of the certificate in case no action is
pricing audit of taxpayers. Through the Finance taken by the Commissioner by the expiry of
Supplementary (Second Amendment) Act, 2019, prescribed time period. The concerned
Section 230E was substituted so as to establish Commissioner has, however, been empowered to
Directorate General of International Tax. cancel or modify any such certificate
However, no specific procedure or mechanism for automatically issued on IRIS but any such
transfer pricing audit was prescribed in the said cancellation or modification may be made after
section which was causing ambiguity amongst the granting the taxpayer an opportunity of being
field officers and taxpayers. heard and for reasons to be recorded by the
Commissioner in writing.
Through the Second Amendment Ordinance,
necessary amendment has been made in Section
230E to prescribe that transfer pricing audit is to
be conducted as per the procedure laid down in
section 177 and other provisions of the
Ordinance. This way, the ambiguity relating to
the transfer pricing audit procedure has now been
removed.
5
Through Finance Act 2019, the concept of (i) setup on land which has not been
business license scheme was introduced in the previously utilized for any commercial,
Ordinance, whereby every person engaged in any industrial or manufacturing activity and is
business, profession or vocation was required to free from constraints imposed by any
obtain and display a business license. Through prior work;
the Second Amendment Ordinance, the following
fines have been prescribed for persons who fail to (ii) built without demolishing, revamping,
obtain business license: renovating, upgrading, remodelling or
modifying any existing structure, faciality
Rs. 25,000, where the person is deriving or plant;
income chargeable to tax under the
Ordinance; or (iii) not formed by splitting up or
reconstruction of an undertaking already
Rs. 5,000 in any other case. in existence or by transfer of machinery,
plant or building form an undertaking
These fines are prescribed in addition to any established in Pakistan prior to
other fine or penalty that may be applicable under commencement of new business and is
the Ordinance or any other law. not part of expansion project;
Furthermore, the Commissioner has been (iv) using any process or technology that has
empowered to cancel the business license in cases not earlier been used in Pakistan and is so
where a person: approved by Engineering Development
Board; and
fails to notify any change in particulars within
30 days of change; or (v) is approved by the Commissioner Inland
Revenue on an application made in the
is convicted of any offence under any federal prescribed manner.
tax law.
The above definition has been made applicable
GREENFIELD INDUSTRIAL from July 1, 2019.
UNDERTAKING
Similar definition has been introduced in the
Under clause (126O) of Part I to the Second Sales Tax Act , 1990 whereunder exemption
Schedule to the ITO 2001, the profits and gains of has been allowed on certain imports of
a company from a greenfield industrial Plant & Machinery by ‘Greenfield Industry’.
undertaking incorporated on after July 1, 2019 is
exempt from tax for a period of five years.
SALES
Asdfj TAX
TIER – I RETAILER GOODS SUPPLIED FROM TAX EXEMPT
AREAS
Definition of the term Tier I retailer has been
elaborated to include a retailer falling in any one A new section 40D has been inserted containing
or more of the categories contained in said provisions / control measures relating to
definition. monitoring of goods supplied from tax exempt
areas to Pakistan.
A retailer whose cumulative electricity bill for last
12 consecutive months exceeded Rs 600,000 was The term ‘tax exempt areas’ has been defined as
included in definition of Tier I retailer. The said Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Gilgit Baltistan,
limit of Rs 600,000 has been enhanced to Tribal Areas and other prescribed areas.
Rs 1,200,000.
RESTRICTION AS TO INPUT TAX ON
Further, FBR has been empowered to prescribe SUPPLIES TO UNREGISTERED
any person or class of persons to be considered a PERSONS
Tier-I Retailer. The amended definition of Tier-I
Retailer is as under: Through the Finance Act, 2019, input tax
attributable to supplies made to unregistered
“Tier-1 retailer” means a retailer falling in any one or person has been disallowed, on pro rata basis,
more of the following categories, namely:– where supplies are made to an unregistered
person and for which sales invoices do not bear
(a) a retailer operating as a unit of a national or
international chain of stores;
the NIC number or NTN of the recipient. The said
restriction, with certain exceptions, was
(b) a retailer operating in an air-conditioned introduced in section 8 of the Act.
shopping mall, plaza or centre, excluding kiosks;
Now through Second Amendment Ordinance, it
(c) a retailer whose cumulative electricity bill during has further been provided that if a registered
the immediately preceding twelve consecutive manufacturer will make taxable supplies to a
months exceeds Rupees twelve hundred person (who is not registered under the Act )
thousand;
exceeding Rs. 10 million in a month and Rs. 100
(d) a wholesaler-cum-retailer, engaged in bulk
million in a financial year, then input tax
import and supply of consumer goods on adjustment (as attributable to such excess
wholesale basis to the retailers as well as on retail supplies to the unregistered person) will not be
basis to the general body of the consumers; allowed. The said restriction has been placed
through a new sub-section introduced in
(e) a retailer, whose shop measures one thousand section 73.
square feet in area or more; and
There is apparently an overlapping or
(f) any other person or class of persons as prescribed duplication in the disallowance of input tax under
by the Board. sections 8 & 73 in certain situations where
supplies are made to unregistered persons.
NEW PENALTIES
GREENFIELD INDUSTRY
New penalties have been inserted from Serial No.
24 to 27 in the Table contained under section 33 Certain imports of Plant & Machinery by
as set out in Annexure I. ‘Greenfield Industry’ are exempt from sales tax
under serial no 150 of Table I of the Sixth
Schedule. The term ‘Greenfield industry’ (which
was previously not defined) has now been defined
in the manner similar to the one defined for
income tax purposes.
7
Annexure
Asdfj I
Offences Penalties Section of the Act
24. Any person, who is integrated for Such person shall pay a penalty of five Sub-section (9A) of
monitoring, tracking, reporting or hundred thousand rupees or two hundred per Section 3 and section
recording of sales, production and similar cent of the amount of tax involved, whichever 40C
business transactions with the Board or is higher. He shall, further be liable, upon
its computerized system, conducts such conviction by a Special Judge, to simple
transactions in a manner so as to avoid imprisonment for a term which may extend to
monitoring, tracking reporting or two million rupees, or with both.
recording of such transactions, or issues
an invoice which does not carry the Any person who abets commissioning of such
prescribed invoice number or barcode or offence, shall be liable, upon conviction by a
bears duplicate invoice number or Special Judge, to simple imprisonment for a
counterfeit barcode, or any person who term which may extend to one year, or with
abets commissioning of such offence additional fine which may extend to two
hundred thousand rupees or with both
25. Any person, who is required to Such person shall be liable to pay a penalty up Sub-section (9A) of
integrate his business for monitoring, to one million rupees, and if continues to section 3 and section
tracking, reporting or recording of sales, commit the same offence after a period of six 40C
production and similar business months after imposition of penalty as
transactions with the board or aforesaid, his business premises shall be
computerized system, fails to get himself sealed and an embargo shall be placed on his
registered under the Act, and if sales
registered, fails to integrate in the manner
as required under law
26. Any person, being a manufacturer, or Such person shall pay a penalty of ten Sub-section (27) of
importer of an item which is subject to tax thousand rupees or five per cent of the amount section 2 and clause (a)
on the basis of retail price, who fails to of tax involved, whichever is higher: Further, of subsection (2) of
print the retail price in the manner as such goods shall also be liable to confiscation. section 3
stipulated under the Act However, the adjudication authority, after
such confiscation, may allow redemption of
such goods on payment of fine which shall not
be less than twenty percent of the total retail
price of such goods
27. Any person, being owner of the goods, Such person shall pay a penalty of ten Section 40D
which are brought to Pakistan in violation thousand rupees or five per cent of the amount
of section 40D of tax involved, whichever is higher.
CUSTOMS DUTY
DECLARATION BY PASSENGER OR Gold, Silver, Platinum or precious Stones
CREW OF BAGGAGE Quantity of Penalty not Imprisonment
goods exceeding upon conviction
Upto 15 tola gold or Value of goods -
Recovery or seizure of any baggage and any equivalent in value
article contained therein, of the passenger or of 16 tola to 30 tola Two times the -
any crew member, subsequent to false gold or equivalent in value of
declaration or failure to declare shall be treated at value currency*
31 tola to 50 tola Three times Upto one year
par with ‘smuggled’ goods’. gold or equivalent in the value of
value goods
51 tola to 100 tola Three times Upto three years
OFFENCES AND PENALTIES gold or equivalent in the value of
value goods
101 tola to 200 tola Four times the Upto five years
Briefly, through the Second Amendment gold or equivalent in value of goods
Ordinance, certain penalties have been specified value
for persons who smuggle goods comprising 201 tola to 500 tola Five times the Three to ten
gold or equivalent in value of years
currency, gold, silver, platinum or precious value currency*
stones in any form. These include confiscation of 501 tola gold & Ten times the Five to fourteen
smuggled goods (exceeding the permissible limit, above or equivalent value of goods years
if any). Further, such persons are also made liable in value
to additional penalty or imprisonment or both in *Apparent legislative intent is “goods” (and not currency)
the following manner, depending upon the
The above penalties are also made applicable to
quantity of smuggled goods thereof:
‘owner’ of baggage who fails to declare or makes
false declaration with respect to such baggage or
Currency
Imprisonment
articles carried by him or refuses to answer the
Excess over Penalty not question by appropriate officer or fails to produce
upon
permissible limit exceeding
conviction baggage or articles for examination, in case goods
carried by him include currency, gold, silver,
Upto USD 10,000 or Value of excess - platinum or precious stones in any form.
equivalent in value currency
USD 10,001 to Two times the - Previously, such owner of baggage was liable to
20,000 or value of excess penalty not exceeding three times the value of
equivalent in value currency goods along with confiscation of same, in respect
USD 20,001 to Three times the Upto two
50,000 or value of excess years of all kind of goods, the penal provisions are now
equivalent in value currency relevant only in case of goods other than
USD 50,001 to Four times the Upto seven currency, gold, silver, platinum or precious
100,000 or value of excess years stones in any form.
equivalent in value currency
USD 100,001 to Five times the Three to ten Furthermore, under Sr. No. 47A of the Table to
200,000 or value of excess years
equivalent in value currency
section 156 of the Customs Act, 1969, owners of
USD 200,001 & Ten times the Five to goods who fail to file goods declaration within the
above or equivalent value of excess fourteen prescribed period were subject to a certain
in value currency years ‘penalty’ as specified therein; however, through
the Second Amendment Ordinance, following
importers have been excluded from applicability
of such penalty:
(i) individuals without NTN or STRN
importing/receiving goods as ‘gifts’ through
courier, air cargo or diplomatic cargo; and
THINGS SEIZED HOW DEALT WITH (iii) Criteria of the appointment of Judicial
Members of the Appellate Tribunal has been
Any seized goods liable to confiscation produced substituted as follows:
before a Court of Special Judge Customs during
Appellate Tribunal
an inquiry or trial may be ordered by the Court to Current
be sold or disposed of if such goods are subject to Current Second
provisions
provisions Amendment
speedy or natural decay. (Inland
(Customs) Ordinance
Revenue)
In case of dangerous drug, intoxicant, Has exercised Has been a Has been a
intoxicating liquor or any other narcotic or the powers of a judge of a judge of a
psychotropic substance seized or taken into District Judge High Court; High Court;
custody, the Court may obtain such number of and is qualified
to be a judge of Has exercised
samples as it may deem fit for safe custody and High Court; or the powers of Is or has been
cause destruction of the remaining portion of the a District a District
property under a certificate issued by it. Judge and is Judge; or
qualified to be
a judge of
COGNIZANCE OF OFFENCES BY High Court; or
SPECIAL JUDGES
Is or has been Is or has been Is an advocate
advocate of a advocate of a of a High
The Special Judge shall decide the case within six High Court and High Court Court with a
months of receipt of report from an officer of is qualified to be and is standing of
customs or any other officer especially authorized appointed as a qualified to be not less than
in this behalf by the Federal Government or judge of a High appointed as a ten years; or
Court judge of a
within such extended period, the Special Judge High Court
may fix for reasons to be recorded in writing.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Through the Second Amendment Ordinance, The rules in respect of the matters covered under
certain significant provisions have been the relevant provisions of section 130 of the
substituted in the law detailed below: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 or section 194 of the
Customs Act, 1969 where applicable shall
(i) the constitution, functioning of benches and continue in force unless amended or repealed.
procedures of the Appellate Tribunal shall
be regulated by the rules prescribed by the
Prime Minister. The rules have been made
effective, notwithstanding the relevant
provisions of section 237 of the Income Tax
Ordinance, 2001 or section 219 of the
Customs Act, 1969 relating to powers of FBR
to make rules, where applicable;