Professional Documents
Culture Documents
significantly influential in current teaching practices despite his passing, 84 years ago. His theories
stress the importance of social interaction on the developing learner and how these experiences
focussed on external influences such as the importance of social, cultural and historical contexts
within an individual’s environment (Duchesne, McMaugh, Bochner & Krause, 2013). Internalisation,
social interaction, language as a tool and the zone of proximal development [ZPD] were embedded
into his theory of sociocultural development. Through social interaction and utilisation of ZPD to aid
in the learning process, Vygotsky developed the sociocultural theory of cognitive development. His
research is highly recognised, with psychologists further developing his models (McInerney, 2014).
Although his methods are highly recognised, educators need to mindful of possible implications
Cognitive development regarding the sociocultural model can be defined as the acquisition of high
psychological functions such as rational thought and processing of information from the lower or
inherited capabilities, which one receives from birth (McInerney, 2014). When an individual has a
multitude of interactions and experiences it is often reflected in their enhanced learning. Vygotsky’s
research into cognitive development highlighted the requirement for social interaction, arguing that
it is through social interaction where one can make meaning of concepts and achieve learning
(Duchesne, McMaugh, Bochner & Krause, 2013). Studies have indicated the importance of early
social settings such as day-care on the developing learner in the transition to formal kindergarten
education. Barblett, Barratt-Pugh, Kilgallon and Maloney (2011) stress the value of day-care to
facilitate social and emotional development through understanding roles and expectations and
Vygotsky concluded that values of parents and their cultural background play a vital part in shaping
Lauren Jackson 33443557 EDN221: Assessment 1
an individual and how this influences the direction and extent of their own children’s cognitive
development (McInerney, 2014). Children adapt from their surrounding environment; those who are
raised on rural land may have highly developed gross motor skills from living off the land whilst
those brought up being spoken to in more than one language, have a higher possibility of becoming
bilingual. This type of behaviour is a great example of the social structuring process (Duchesne et al.,
2013). The variance in upbringing also renders the values they place on objects, events or
experiences notably diverse. Parents and carers subconsciously structure their children’s
experiences to reflect their own social, cultural or historical background and once a child
understands where specific values are positioned and why they accept it as their own (Duchesne et
al., 2013). “Children are born with a wide range of perceptual, attentional and memory capacities
that are substantially transformed in the context of socialisation and education, particularly through
the use of cultural interventions such as tools, social structures and language…” (McInerney, 2014).
Initially, when children are subjected and participate in certain experiences, they internalise the
ideas and processes, facilitating cognitive growth (Duchesne et al., p. 85). When a child observes a
mentor, engaging in a particular task, they internalise what they have witnessed, communicating
with themselves in the form of inner speech, for the purpose of self-direction. Vygotsky argued that
every learning experience in a child’s life appears twice; first inter-psychological, on a social level and
Language as a mental tool is seen as of the utmost importance regarding cognitive development.
When children are in the initial stages of learning a new task, they may externalise self-talk. This self-
talk is not directed at anyone, it merely acts as an instructional tool in order to reach higher mental
functions. “Speech acts start their career as a form of social interaction, but almost as soon as they
begin to talk, children will also talk to themselves, using speech acts to shape their own
behaviour” (Geurts, 2018, p. 271). Following the intrapsychological development, the learner no
Lauren Jackson 33443557 EDN221: Assessment 1
longer depends on the external environment and has the ability to self mediate their own cognitive
functioning (Kozulin, 2002). As well as using language as a mental tool, they also acquire other
mental tools as a product from the environment they were raised in (Duchesne et al., 2013). This is
evidenced when a year one student attempts an addition exercise and utilises ‘tools’ such as their
fingers, aiding in the development to higher mental functions. “No human, for instance, born a
culturally proficient member; it is necessary to be taught the appropriate cultural practices within
the interactions in a society” (Danesfar & Moharami, 2018, p. 2). Internalising this private speech
begins to serve an intellectual function, as a tool for problem-solving and self-regulation. Once the
concept is explicitly comprehended, the child is then able to internalise their rationale and use
language as a mental tool for ‘private speech’. Internalisation is the transformation to complex
mental processes. Once understanding is established, self-talk is no longer required (Duchesne et al.,
2013, p. 85).
Vygotsky’s initiative and development of the zone of proximal development [ZPD] is his most
influential strategy to date. ZPD can be defined as teaching one level above the explicit knowledge
an individual has already acquired. ZPD is achieved through guided participation from a more
knowledge other and is attainable through prior knowledge. It is beneficial to recognise that the
more knowledge other is not providing students with answers, rather, prompting them to think for
themselves and problem solve. In essence, Vygotsky placed the high value on collaboration through
the means of active learning, assisted learning and reciprocal teaching (McInerney, 2014). This
theory of ZPD was later developed and renamed ‘scaffolding’ by Bruner (Duchesne et al., 2013, p .
85). Scaffolding is essentially the building blocks educators provide learner to successfully complete
the task at hand (Gredler & Shields, 2007, pp. 101-108). Learning happens when you teach one step
ahead of what they already know (Dempsey, 2019). It is important to recognise that if an educator
attempts to educate year one students on the molecular structure, that this is not appropriate
learning for their age and is far beyond their ZPD. Essentially, they will not be engaged in this activity
Lauren Jackson 33443557 EDN221: Assessment 1
as the content is far too advanced for them. “A teacher’s role is to develop childs understandings
and to regulate their own learning, rather than tell or demonstrate what they are required to know”
(Duchesne et al., p .87). In the course of the development, mistakes are crucial to the process of
into the classroom, each bringing in items such as food and materials. Not only does an experience
like this cater for learning about the different aspects of the world we live in, it also provides the
children with a greater amount of social interaction. It is important to acknowledge that a multitude
of experiences indicates enhanced cognitive growth, allowing them to progress into a more
knowledgeable individual. Children use experiences and interactions to create meaning within the
world they live in (Pange & Kontozisis, 2001). Exposing children to an array of both play-based and
create meaningful experiences when aiming to achieve the content description to “use facial,
expression, movement and space to imagine and establish role and situation” (Australian
Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA], 2014, ACADRM028). For children to
actively participate, educators need to provide students with inviting activities that inspire them to
play. Setting up the classroom with an assortment of stations such as a hairdresser, shop, mechanic
and digging pit showcase authentic materials, allows children to transform into altering characters,
expanding their knowledge. This is integral to stimulate communication and knowledge between the
learners, both verbally and non-verbally, which also contributes to language development. The
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [DEEWR] (2009, p. 10) defines play
as a context for learning, which allows children to make connection and make sense of their social
worlds, as they actively participate with people, objects and representations. By studying one
another in these types of pretend play activities, creates opportunity for children to convey their
intentions and cause behind their individual thinking. Pretend play is vital, granting children to
Lauren Jackson 33443557 EDN221: Assessment 1
manage varying identities, concentrating on the framing of interaction (Kyratzis, 2004). Vygotsky
argues that the more experiences a child has, the greater their cognitive development, although it
must be recognised that these the more genuine and enticing interactions are, the more beneficial it
is to a child’s development.
Integrating Vygotsky’s ZPD method may heed the intended outcome if not applied correctly. For
Vygotsky, learning is social; ZPD resides though social interaction from more knowledge others and
those who are just acquiring skills and knowledge (Ingold & Crawford, 2015). For ZPD to be effective,
an educator or more knowledge other must not provide children with answers to the task at hand,
rather provide strategies to support their own problem-solving abilities. “Effective scaffolding
enables a learner to understand and to produce language that would ordinarily be beyond their
capabilities with a view to enabling this level of linguistic performance in the future without
assistance” (Ingold & Crawford, 2015). ACARA (2014, ACAMUR083) states that children need to
“develop confidence with number sequences to and from 100 by ones from any starting point. Skip
count by twos, fives and tens starting from zero”. In a situation like this if they are struggling, instead
of explaining why the child was mistaken or perplexed, they must instead prompt the children to
reflect and problem solve for themselves. For example, if a child was trying to count a specific shape
but was confused due to the assortment of miscellaneous shapes in front of them, an educator may
encourage the child to sort the blocks into piles, dependant on their shape. This, in turn, allows the
child to count shapes carry out the task with ease, without impeding a child’s learning. Whilst
Vygotsky’s methods are highly effective within the classroom, it is fundamental that educators
In a world where technology is central to everyday life, the utilisation of Vygotsky’s theories may
become problematic due to society engaging less in face to face communication. According to
Vygotsky, exposing students to new experiences such as technology can be constructive for their
Lauren Jackson 33443557 EDN221: Assessment 1
cognitive growth, however, it can be simultaneously damaging for children. As children spend an
extended period on screens, they become dependent upon it and are subjected to fewer
interactions, impacting the way they view the world. This not only has negative effects on mental
functions but also their emotional wellbeing. Despite the prevalence of screen media, it is important
to acknowledge that young children learn more from face to face interactions (Hipp, Gerhardstein,
Zimmermann, Moser, Taylor & Barr, 2017, pp. 33-34). As an educator, these issues need to be
addressed. With information and communication technology [ICT] being an integral part of today’s
curriculum, it would be best to integrate interactive technology within the classroom, where it can
be attentively monitored. Children’s real-world exposure is often limited with the advancement and
prevalence of today’s technology and as a result, challenges may arise due to the decrease of social
interaction.
Since Vygotsky’s passing, his ideologies have been further developed and are still applied in modern
teaching practices today. His theories of ZPD, internalisation and using language as a tool, are based
around the requirement for social interaction. “For Vygotsky, the learning process was not a
solidarity exploration by a child of the environment…, but rather a process for appropriation or
absorption by the child of culturally relevant behaviour” (McInerney, 2014). Although Vygotsky’s
REFERENCES
Australian Curriculum and Assessment Reporting Authority. (2014). Foundation to Year 10 Curriculum:
Mathematics and Drama (ACMNA012 & ACADRM028). Retrieved from
https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum
Barblett, L., Barratt-Pugh, C., Kilgallon, P., & Maloney, C. (2011). Transition from Long Day Care to
Kindergarten: Continuity or Not? Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(2),42-50. Retrieved
from https://search-informit-com-
au.libproxy.murdoch.edu.au/documentSummary;dn=052819768940883;res=IELHSS
Daneshfar, S., & Mehdi M., (2018). "Dynamic Assessment in Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory: Origins and
Main Concepts." Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 9(3),600-607.
doi:http://dx.doi.org.libproxy.murdoch.edu.au/10.17507/jltr.0903.20.
http://libproxy.murdoch.edu.au/login?url=https://search-proquest-
com.libproxy.murdoch.edu.au/docview/2041568996?accountid=12629.
Dempsey, H. (2019). Topic 2: Cognitive Development. [Video Recording]. Murdoch, WA: ECL4 Lecture
Theatre.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (2009). Early Years Learning Framework.
Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.au/early-years-learning-framework-0
Duchesne, S., McMaugh, A., Bochner, S., & Krause, K. (2013). Education Psychology: For Learning and
Teaching (4th Ed.) South Melbourne, Victoria: Centage Learning Australia Pty Ltd.
Geurts, B. (2018). “Making sense of self talk.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 9(2),271-285.
https://link-springer-com.libproxy.murdoch.edu.au/article/10.1007%2Fs13164-017-0375-y
Gredler, M. E., & Shields, C. C. (2007). Vygotsky's legacy : A foundation for research and practice. Retrieved
from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.libproxy.murdoch.edu.au
Hipp, D., Gerhardstein, P., Zimmermann, L., Moser, A., Taylor, G., & Barr R. (2017). The Dimensional Divide:
Learning from TV and Touchscreens During Early Childhood. R. Barr & N. Linebarger (Eds.) Media
Exposure During Infancy and Early Childhood. Switzerland: Springer, Cham.
Ingold, R., & Crawford, H. (2015). Towards independence: Scaffolding, the ZPD and collaborative writing.
English Australia Journal, 31(1), 55-59.
Kozulin, A. (2002). Sociocultural Theory and the Mediated Learning Experience. School Psychology
International, 23(1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034302023001729
Kyratzis, A. (2004). Talk and Interaction Among Children and the Co-construction of Peer Groups and Peer
Culture. Annual Review of Anthropology (33) 625-649.
doi:http://dx.doi.org.libproxy.murdoch.edu.au/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.144008.
http://libproxy.murdoch.edu.au/login?url=https://search-proquest-
com.libproxy.murdoch.edu.au/docview/199837602?accountid=12629.
Lauren Jackson 33443557 EDN221: Assessment 1
McInerney, D. (2014). Educational psychology: Constructing learning (5th ed.). Frenchs Forest, N.S.W:
Pearson Australia.
Pange, J., & Kontozisis, D. (2001). Introducing Computers to Kindergarten Children Based on Vygotsky's
Theory about Socio-Cultural Learning: The Greek Perspective. Information Technology in Childhood
Education Annual, 193. Retrieved from
http://link.galegroup.com.libproxy.murdoch.edu.au/apps/doc/A78177250/ITOF?
u=murdoch&sid=ITOF&xid=c4881c34