Tax Non-Compliance and Perceptions of Corruption: Policy and Implications
for Developing Countries
Corruption in particular creates inefficient tax system, eliminates tax collection legitimacy, and reduce the willingness either individual or corporate to pay tax, in result tax revenue decreases. In order to increase tax revenue, developing country should reduce the corruption first. Corruption used to be assessed with subjective measurement called perceptions of corruption. Perception of corruption can be more harmful than corruption itself, it can raise negative behavior of tax payers such as creating a distrust among stakeholders toward related institution that in the end will disengage reciprocal relationship with the government and underreport the income that can lower the taxes or choose to bribe the tax officials.
There are two classification of corruption, grand corruption, misuse public
power by high level public officials such as ministers or senior staff to gain money, and petty corruption, extortion of small payments by low level public officials in everyday transaction to smoothens transactions. Lack of education about tax among Indonesian people are the caused why petty corruption mostly happens in the daily basis. People sometimes does not understand about the procedure, therefore people tend to choose the shortcut by paying to the public officials.
Tax compliance is taxpayer willingness to accurately report their income. In this
context, we classify tax compliance behavior into two, intentional compliance and intentional non-compliance. Perception of people towards corruption influences intentional underreporting by personal income tax payers (PIT) in Indonesia, while the belief of taxpayer if the government system is ineffective make PITs evades taxes and thus weaken taxpayers’ willingness to contribute their fair state of tax. Indonesia’s Directorate General Tax needs to establish strategic alliances and partnership with other relevant government representatives to increase the compliance by identifying, controlling and catching those who evade. The government should make a strong advertisement of fiscal exchange between government and tax payers, therefore, it will persuade people to pay a fair tax. Range of options should be considered to influence taxpayers’ behavior, such as identification and registration of tax payers, verification of received information, and provision of service excellence and assistance to taxpayers.