Professional Documents
Culture Documents
§ Public goods
□ These are considered to be a market failure.
® No private firm would be willing to supply a public good becau
there aren't any property rights so people can consume it
regardless of whether they have paid.
® If the government does not provide public goods they will not
provided and society will be worse off.
◊ In theory you could privatise these things but like some
people would get fucked over
§ Club goods
□ Not failure because they have property rights so people who don’t p
cant use. But on person wont lose out because the other gets.
not
ce
use
t be
pay
◊ In theory you could privatise these things but like some
people would get fucked over
§ Club goods
□ Not failure because they have property rights so people who don’t p
cant use. But on person wont lose out because the other gets.
§ Common resources
□ Rival Non excludable
® There are no property rights so there is mqraket failure.
® The market would fail to provide a public good due to the lack
property rights
® This means they have to be provided by the government inste
® The issue is that there are 'free riders' these are people who a
able to consume them even if they haven't contributed to it’s
upkeep or construction.
® Tragedy of the commons
◊ Common property goods share non-excludable
characteristics of public goods but are rival in consumpt
◊ For example, the ocean, ownership is universal there are
property rights
◊ But if you use the ocean you impose an external cost on
other users reffered to as the 'tragedy of the commons'
◊ So governments need to intervene and act as the protec
and regulator to prevent abuse of commonly owned
resource. The way the government does this is by
introducing restrictions eg licences.