Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
1. Description of the loan............................................................................................................................... 2
2. Description of the company....................................................................................................................... 2
2.1 Company history...................................................................................................................................... 2
2.2 Ownership structure................................................................................................................................ 3
2.3 The company management...................................................................................................................... 3
2.4 Equipment and technology....................................................................................................................... 4
2.5 Product analysis....................................................................................................................................... 4
2.6 Future Development and Strategy........................................................................................................... 5
2.7 Current outstanding credits and banking relations of MedLife...............................................................6
3.Analysis of the business/ market/ industry/ economy......................................................................................7
3.1 The private medical services industry in Romania.........................................................................................7
3.2 The analysis of the company’s competitors......................................................................................................9
3.3 MedLife’s suppliers..........................................................................................................................................10
3.4 Analysis of company’s customers...................................................................................................................10
3.5 Analysis of the company’s market position...................................................................................................11
4. Financial analysis of the borrower............................................................................................................... 12
4.1 Turnover evolution................................................................................................................................. 12
4.2 Main Financial Ratios............................................................................................................................ 13
4.3 Assets Evolution..................................................................................................................................... 14
4.4 Equity and Liability Evolution............................................................................................................... 14
5. Cash Flow Analysis...................................................................................................................................... 15
6. Collateral Analysis....................................................................................................................................... 16
7. SWOT Analysis............................................................................................................................................ 17
8. Risk Evaluation............................................................................................................................................ 17
9. Credit scoring.............................................................................................................................................. 18
10. Credit committee decision.......................................................................................................................... 19
Bibliography..................................................................................................................................................... 20
Ownership structure
Marcu Nicolae
12%
Marcu Mihail
18%
The current total number of outstanding shares is 22 145 082 and the total social capital is
5 536 270,50 RON.
Figure 3- CAGR for 2018-2023 development of private healthcare markets in Central Europe
The payments time ranges between 30-90 days for all the suppliers listed by the
company. MedLife has developed long-term relationships with its suppliers and it has no
dependence on any of them.
3.4 Analysis of company’s customers
MedLife offers a wide range of packages aimed to suit the needs of companies
operating in all sectors. Thus, it offers 4 prevention packages to choose from: Executive
Package, Business Package, Classic Package and the Standard Package.
In addition to this, the company also has private individuals who pay. In this case, the
payment is either done directly by the patient through cash payments or through the
National Health House.
Overall, the company has reported that the average credit period on collection for
services rendered is 90 days. They have formed long-term partnerships with the
companies for which it offers healthcare insurance and they currently have about 5000
companies in their portfolio. Credit risk is spread over a large customer base and the
Group is not dependent on the collection of receivables from a limited number of
customers.
3.5 Analysis of the company’s market position
Ever since it has started its journey in the Romanian private healthcare market,
MedLife has managed a process of organic growth which is owed to a great extent to the
quality of the services that it provides. The brand reputation and image have helped it
gather a large, diverse pool of customers, which is reflected in the fact that in its 20 years
of operations it has served over 5 million unique customers. About 57% of its sales come
from the Private sector (cash), while 24% come from Health Prevention Packages (HPP).
The remaining 19% of its recorded sales are coming from Public Money through the
State and the National Health Insurance Houses.
The structure of MedLife’s turnover is as it follows:
Turnover structure
Other
StomatologyPharmacies
6% 5%1% Clinics
30%
Laboratories
17%
Corporate Hospitals
20% 21%
As it can be seen, the main source of turnover is represented by the clinics, followed
by hospitals and the corporate sector close by. The stomatology represents a lower part,
but MedLife believes that this number will grow in the following years.
4. Financial analysis of the borrower
1,000,000,000
800,000,000
600,000,000
400,000,000
200,000,000
0
2017 2018 2019
As it can be seen in the graph presented above, MedLife has found itself recording an
increasing turnover trend, with the turnover results improving significantly each of the
studied years. Therefore, in 2018 the sales went up by 27.5% and in the following year,
2019, the sales increased by 22% compared to the figure in 2018.
This can be explained mainly by the significant growth in all of the Group’s business
lines, led on a percentage basis by Clinics, Hospitals, Corporate and Laboratories, as well
as the impact of the acquisitions completed by the Group. The highest increase, of over
30% was recorded in the Dentistry field, showing that the investments are starting to pay
off. Among the most important acquisitions recorded by the company in the timeframe
2018 are Solomed Clinic, Ghencea Medical Center and Polisano Clinic, while in 2019,
the most noteworthy ones are: Rozsakert Medical Center Group Hungary, Onco
Team Diagnostic, Lotus Hospital and Micromedica Medical Center.
The increase recorded in the EBITDA was of 22.4% in absolute value in 2018
compared to 2017, respectively an increase of 57% in absolute value in 2019 compared to
2018. The increase was also influenced by the implementation of IFRS 16, which restates
rent expenses in financial expense and depreciation. The impact of IFRS 16 on EBITDA
for 2019 is RON 36,904,921.
We can also note that EBIT has been constantly increasing, influenced by the constant
increase in sales. In addition to this, other factors of significant influence when it comes
to understanding the operations of MedLife and its Profit and Loss account, which
directly influence the profit, are the operating expenses. There were, as a percentage of
sale, relatively constant, at 95.6% in 2017, 95.2% in 2018 and 94.2%, with a slight
decrease in all of the years studied due to the company’s improvement of its technology.
The increase in MedLife’s equity is mostly due to an increase in the retained earnings
and also from a much smaller increase in the non-controlling interests.
The total debt ratio is below 1 and it has remained relatively constant, around 0.7,
which is below 1 and it shows that a greater portion of the company’s assets is funded
through debt. The increase recorded between 2017 and 2019 is a result of some of the
added debt that the company has incurred in order to finance its future plan regarding
MedLife Medical Park.
The current ratio has significantly dropped due to the large amount of debts that
MedLife has taken out in the last 2 years to build its projects and acquire stakes in
numerous businesses. Thus, before it was slightly above 1, indicating that it could meet
its short-term liabilities, while now it rests below 1 showing that there might be some
trouble with that.
The operating profit margin has increased slightly from 2018, which is in line with the
company’s stated plans of working hard to increase the profit margin for each of the units
of business that it operates, through the improvement of the IT documentation of patient
conditions by using better suppliers of technology from abroad and employing a better
cost-saving method regarding the employees’ paid time and health insurance.
The interest coverage of MedLife has increased in 2019 from the previously recorded
2,45 and it indicates that the company is being able to pay the interest on its outstanding
debt and this was done by increasing the net operating income and by slightly decreasing
the operating expenses as it was seen before, while also paying the current part of its
debt.
The equity ratio shows how much the company’s assets have been generated by
issuing equity shares rather than by taking on debt. The decrease noted in the case of
MedLife is consistent with the fact that it took out larger amounts of debt in 2018 and
2019 in comparison to 2017 in order to finance its future development plans.
6. Collateral Analysis
The credit will be backed by a 1st rank mortgage on the building and land of the
laboratory with its equipment located in Drobeta Turnu-Severin, which is owned by
MedLife.
The market value of the collateral is 313 000 EUR, to which the bank applied a 25%
risk coefficient, thus resulting in the accepted market value of 235 000 EUR.
The value of this collateral covers the entire amount of the loan agreement (the loan
amount, the amount of interest payable in the course of the first year of the credit) and
also the expense related to the collateral enforcement.
7. SWOT Analysis
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
strong brand and reputation in Romania
leader of the private healthcare market in
Romania and comptetent management prices above average for a large portion of the
Romanian market
one of the large providers of private
healthcare services in Central and Eastern Europe expensive data protection software needed
balanced and robust business model, spanning all long wait times for patients insured through
key private healthcare segments NHH
largest number of HPP clients in Romania big amount of administrative work
Strong financials with an asset-rich balance sheet
Access to the financing required for expansion
Sales largely from cash-pay and HPP with low
dependency on NHIH funding
Opportunities: Threats:
MedLife
expanding global market for medical services
increased expenditure on medical services
high political instability
Romanian doctors leaving to Western
rising demand for good quality healthcare
aging of the population
Europe
growth of the private healthcare market high, exacerbated competition
government regulations and possibility of
lawsuits
new, emerging start-ups in the medical
tech field
8. Risk Evaluation
9. Credit scoring
Evaluation Weight Values Mark Evaluation
criteria
Qualitative criteria
Management 21% Experience 1 0.21
quality, age of within the
the company and market, good
business strategy, reputation,
collateral good
received development
strategy,
organic
growth
Ownership 4% Most shares 2 0.08
structure owned by the
management
Quantitative criteria
Current ratio 18% 0.62 5 0.9
Solvability 18% 1.25 2 0.36
MedLife has an overall credit score of 2.63, which according to the bank’s norms is
included in the type B category of credits, meaning credits under supervision. In this
class, there are included companies who currently have a good financial standing, but
will not be able to maintain it in the following period. This could be owed to the
extensive debts that the company has taken out in order to fund its acquisition of other
companies and to invest in its plan of opening MedLife Medical Park.
https://www.medlife.ro/site_storage/public/documente_bursa/documente_adm/investors_and_analys
ts_presentation_medlife_group_2018_final.pdf
https://www.medlifeinternational.com/public_files/documente_bursa/conso_en.pdf
https://www.medlifeinternational.com/public_files/documente_bursa/en_annual_report_2018_full_file
.pdf
https://www.medlifeinternational.com/public_files/documente_bursa/en_finall.pdf
http://www.daeef.ase.ro/Media/Default/Studii%20-%20Cercetare/AEEF_86.pdf
https://www.bursa.ro/editie-speciala-medlife-medlife-in-cifre-40196837
https://mypmr.pro/products/private-healthcare-market-in-romania-2018
https://business-review.eu/business/healthcare/br-analysis-romania-begins-major-health-reform-to-
boost-private-funding-202223
https://www.expatarrivals.com/europe/romania/healthcare-romania
https://www.romania-insider.com/private-healthcare-services-market-2017
Table of Figures:
Figure 1- MedLife Ownership Structure......................................................................................................3
Figure 2- Value of private healthcare market in Central Europe (bn. euros)...............................................8
Figure 3- CAGR for 2018-2023 development of private healthcare markets in Central Europe..................8
Figure 4- Turnover Structure.....................................................................................................................12
Figure 5- Turnover Evolution.....................................................................................................................12
Figure 6- SWOT Analysis............................................................................................................................17
Figure 7- Credit Scoring.............................................................................................................................18
Y