Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Internal Medicine 2
Case Write-Up
Name: Loga Tharshini
Student ID: 0329763
Date of Posting: 15th March 2021
Case write-up number: 1
Age : 65 years
Gender : Male
Ethnicity : Malay
Nationality : Malaysian
R/N : 56068
Chief Complaint
Mr. R, a 65-year-old Malaysian gentleman, presented with a mild shortness of breath that
lasted for about 20 minutes. This is the second episode within 2 days.
Mr. R was well until suddenly he experienced dyspnea. He described his dyspnea as mild,
and still being able to breathe and speak but had general discomfort. The onset of the
symptom was at night when he just about to sleep. He was still sitting up and was about to lie
down when the episode had started. He had no pain, but some chest tightness and diaphoresis.
This episode was similar to the dyspnea he had the night before, which had resolved
spontaneously after 15 minutes.
He did not have symptoms of paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea as he did not wake up in after
few hours of sleep, due to breathlessness. He did not have any chest pain, chest heaviness or
radiating pain on his jaw or shoulders. He denied any chest pain during the episodes, and
prior to the recent episodes.
Mr R did not notice any breathlessness while lying down, but has recently, for the past 3
years, started sleeping with 2 pillows as he felt more comfortable that way.
He did not have any symptoms of heart burn, nausea or vomiting. There was no exacerbating
or precipitating factors to these episode, as it was sudden on onset. Mr. R rated the severity of
dyspnea as 3 out of 10, as 10 being the most severe shortness of breathing. He claims to be
compliant to his medications and never misses his heath check up appointments. He also
mentioned that he did not have any change in medication or increased medication dosage.
Patient has underlying dyslipidemia and hypertension which was diagnosed 8 years ago and
is on medications for it. He has been hospitalized 3 years ago due to dengue fever, which
resolved within a week. He also had a kidney stone that was removed 4 years ago. No other
hospitalization or surgeries was done in the past.
Drug History
Patient was on amlodipine 10 mg, oral dose, for hypertension and atorvastatin 10 mg for oral
dose for dyslipedemia. He is also on allupurinol 100mg, oral dose, which is medication for
gout, to prevent urate crystals formation.
Family History
Mr. R is a married man with 4 children. His wife is diabetic and is on oral hypoglycemics.
His children are well and healthy with no medical illness. His parents died due to old age, and
suspected cardiac arrest, but he is not aware if they had any underlying medical illnesses. His
3 siblings are alive and well, but he is not sure if they have any underlying medical
conditions. No history of malignancies or congenital anomalies in his family. However,
cardiac diseases cannot be ruled out.
Social History
Mr. R does not smoke, consume alcoholic beverages or abuse recreational drugs. He is a
retired FELDA worker and has a sedentary lifestyle, which does not include exercising. He
also does not follow a healthy or nutritious diet to control to control his dyslipidemia. He
lives with his son in an apartment in the first floor and does not have difficulty or dyspnea
while climbing the stairs.
Physical examinations
General examinations
Systemic examinations
1. Cardiovascular system
a. Inspection: I would like to examine for visible pulsation or heave over the chest wall.
I would also feel for the apex beat at the left 5th intercostal space in the midclavicular
line. If the apex beat if shifted, we could suspect mediastinal mass or cardiomegaly. I
would check for precordial bulge, chest deformities, visible mass, swellings or
surgical scars are seen.
b. Palpation: I would palpate for heaves or thrills over the chest and for the apical
impulse is at the left 5th intercostal space in the midclavicular line. I would check if
the apex beat is only felt at one intercostal space.
c. Auscultation: I would examine for abnormal heart sounds, murmurs or additional
sounds were heard over the heart region.
2. Respiratory system
a. Inspection: I would examine for deformities of the chest wall and any use of
accessory muscles during breathing. Chest wall rise and fall was symmetrical. Patient
was able to speak. Patient was not tachypneic. No signs of severe respiratory distress.
b. Palpation: No evidence of deviation of trachea. Chest wall movement is
symmetrical. I would examine for increased vocal fremitus over both lungs and local
tenderness over the chest wall palpation. I would also check for increased vocal
fremitus to rule out fluid accumulation or mass in the lungs, in supraclavicular,
infraclavicular, mammary, axillary, infra axillary, suprascapular, infrascapular and
interscapular areas.
c. Percussion: I would also examine for reduced resonance over the lungs. Region of
cardiac dullness should be appreciated. I would check for at supraclavicular,
infraclavicular, mammary, axillary, infra axillary, suprascapular, infrascapular and
interscapular areas.
d. d. Auscultation: I would auscultate at supraclavicular, infraclavicular, mammary,
axillary, infra axillary, suprascapular, infrascapular and interscapular areas. I would
mainly look for inspiratory course crackles to rule out pulmonary edema in the lower
lobes of the lungs.
. Gastrointestinal system
a. Inspection: Patient is at a normal weight and not obese. I would examine if his skin
had any abnormal pigmentation or discoloration, to rule out jaundice and skin infections.
I would check if his abdominal wall were symmetrical with no surgical scars. I would
also examine the umbilicus and check for swellings that can be appreciated on any
quadrants of the abdomen. I would check of movements of all quadrants of the
abdominal wall with respiration was normal. No striae, hernias, engorged veins or
lesions were seen. I would also check for presence of generalized or localized distention,
that may suggest ascites or herniation.
b. Palpation: Upon palpation, I would check for tenderness or masses felt while doing
the superficial and deep palpation of the abdomen, to ensure no guarding or rebound
tenderness, to rule out peritonitis. I would also check if patient was comfortable
throughout the palpation progress. I would do a renal punch and bimanual palpation of
the kidney was done to detect the enlargement or pain over of the flank, as he already had
history of kidney stone removal. I would palpate for tenderness over the liver. I would also
do a hepatojugular reflux to check raised jugular venous pulsation that may indicate right
heart failure. I would also palapte to check for hepatomegaly to rule out fatty liver. Next
I would examine the spleen to check for splenomegaly and any pulsating mass.
c. Percussion: I would examine for fluid thrill to check if there is free fluid in the
peritoneum to rule out ascites. I would percuss the bowels for general tympanic sound, to
ensure no obstruction. I would expect left hypochondriac region, right lumbar region,
umbilical region, left lumbar region, right iliac fossa region, hypogastric region
left iliac fossa region to be tympanic. Psoas sign and obturator sign would also be done
for rule out appendicitis and completion of the examination.
Auscultation: I would auscultate for absence or increased bowel sounds over the
quadrants of the abdomen. I would check for renal bruits to rue out renal artery stenosis.
Examination of the genitalia and rectal: I would complete the with examination of
genitalia and rectum. Patient however reported no abnormalities, rash, pain or mass
present around the area of rectum and genitalia.
Provisional Diagnosis
Differential diagnosis
Disease Supporting factors Factors Against
Pulmonary Sudden onset dyspnea No chest pain
Embolism sweating No leg pain or claudication
No signs of deep vein
thrombosis or reduced
movement
Pleural effusion Dyspnea No pain upon inspiration or
expiration.
No signs heart failure
No signs of kidney failure
Pulmonary Dyspnea No congestive heart failure or
edema severe pitting edema
No raised jugular venous pulse
Myocardial Dyspnea No palpitation
infarction Dyslipidemia No sharp chest pain or
Hypertension radiating pain
Percentage of neutrophil
Percentage of lymphocyte
Percentage of monocyte
Percentage of eosinophil
Percentage of basophil
Close monitoring of potassium and magnesium levels is important in patients with acute
coronary syndrome because low levels may predispose them to ventricular arrhythmias.
Routine measurement of serum potassium levels and prompt correction are recommended.
b. Renal profiling
I would also do a renal profile to check the kidney function, as the patient mentioned he
sometimes had oedema in his lower limbs, which may suggest nephrotic syndrome. The
bilirubin levels help in determining presence of haemolysis. The normal value ranges are
given below.
A creatinine level is also needed, particularly if cardiac catheterization is considered. Use of
N -acetylcysteine and adequate hydration can help prevent contrast material–induced
nephropathy.
d. Lipid profile
I would do a lipid profile to check if the patient’s dyslipidaemia is controlled or needs
intervention. High triglycerides and LDL cholesterol may suggest impending or may
support diagnosis of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases.
Triglycerides (0.00 – 1.70)
Cardiac Biomarkers
I would obtain a cardiac biomarker tests, that include creatine kinase, CK-MB, and troponin.
Absolute elevations of creatine kinase and its MB isoenzyme (CK-MB) or troponin levels are
highly specific evidence of myocardial cell death and distinguish non−ST-elevation MI
(NSTEMI) from unstable angina. Besides that, I would also do brain natriuretic peptide to
check for significant cardiac dysfunction like heart failure due to increased stress on
myocardium.
Imaging
X- ray
I would do an X ray to have a clear view of the heart and lung fields. It is important to rule
out lung pathology as it could present with similar symptoms.
Electrocardiography (ECG)
Figure 1
Figure 1 shows the results of electrocardiogram (ECG) procedure done for Mr.A on 30th
march 2021. This ECG shows sinus rhythm but sinus bradycardia, which is usually seen in
acute angina. All the waves have smaller amplitude compared to a normal healthy ECG of the
heart. There is no suggestion of cardiomegaly or myocardial infarction as there is no right or
left axis deviation (> 90 degrees). No tall R-waves in RV leads or deep S-waves in LV leads.
No increase in QRS duration. No changes in ST segment or changes directed opposite to
QRS direction. All the p wave are present before the QRS complex, which rules out
arrythmia and heart failure related arrythmia.
Echocardiography
Angiogram
I would also do a coronary angiogram to view the coronary vessels which may possibly cause
ischemia to the myocardium.
Exercise testing
I would not perform this test on this patient as he is in an acute state of unstable angina, and
this test might predispose another episode of angina. However, if the patient is already
stabilized, this test could be done before discharging the patient to ensure check their stress
tolerance.
Discussion
The term unstable angina was meant to signify the intermediate state between myocardial
infarction (MI) and the more chronic state of stable angina. Patients with angina are generally
categorized by presentation, diagnostic test results, or course over time. These categories
include new-onset angina, accelerating angina, rest angina, early postinfarct angina, and early
post revascularization angina.
The patient’s history and diagnostic testing are generally more sensitive and specific for
unstable angina than the physical examination, which may be unremarkable. The patient
however has symptoms of diaphoresis and ECG findings shows sinus bradycardia which is
suggestive of unstable angina. This is due to transient myocardial dysfunction (eg, systolic
blood pressure < 100 mm Hg. Some patients may also present with tachycardia and chest
pain which is absent in this patient.
Laboratory studies for the evaluation of a patient with unstable angina are, 12 lead
electrocardiogram, serial cardiac biomarker assays (eg, creatine kinase MB isoenzyme [CK-
MB], troponin I or T), complete blood count (CBC) with hemoglobin level, serum chemistry
panel (including magnesium and potassium), and lipid panel are vital. However, these reports
are inaccessible in this patient.
Management
Patients with unstable angina require admission to the hospital for bed rest with continuous
telemetry monitoring. One should obtain intravenous (IV) access, and provide supplemental
oxygen if evidence of desaturation is noted. Because the course of unstable angina is highly
variable and potentially life-threatening.
Use of cardiac catheterization with possible revascularization can be done with constant
monitoring of ECG. The therapy should target causes of the unstable angina, such as
increased myocardial rate-pressure product, coronary vasoconstriction, platelet aggregation,
and thrombosis.
Medications that provide symptomatic relief include nitrates (eg, nitroglycerin IV), calcium
channel blockers (eg, diltiazem, verapamil), and low molecular weight heparin. Medications
that have been convincingly shown to be capable of reducing short- or long-term adverse
events are aspirin, clopidogrel, beta-adrenergic blocking agents, lipid-lowering agents
(statins), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa
antagonists.
How does epicardial adipose tissue thickness (EAT) affect the prognosis of unstable angina?
Despite the growing number of patients discharged from hospital with a diagnosis of unstable
angina, the diagnostic procedures and treatment of unstable angina are still greatly debated,
as they have been for patients with myocardial infarction.
Some studies have shown that significant prognosticators for poor outcome in patients with
unstable angina are ongoing chronic heart failure, presence or history of poor left ventricular
ejection fraction (LVEF), hemodynamic instability, recurrent angina despite intensive anti-
ischemic therapy, new or worsening mitral regurgitation, and sustained ventricular
tachycardia.
Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is part of visceral adipose tissue localized between the heart
and pericardium, particularly in the atrioventricular and interventricular sulcus, lateral wall of
the right ventricle, and around the coronary arteries. EAT has endocrine, paracrine, vasocrine,
and inflammatory characteristic and is associated with metabolic syndrome, insulin
resistance, coronary artery disease, and hypertension. Therefore, measurement of EAT
thickness has gained importance. EAT thickness can be measured by transthoracic
echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography (CT), and cardiac magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) methods. Evaluation by transthoracic echocardiography has many
advantages, such as easy availability, low cost, no radiation exposure and it is fast.
More recent studies indicate that epicardial adipose tissue thickness (EAT) can also be used
to predict major adverse cardiac events. EAT thickness measured during end-systole to be
minimum 1 mm and maximum 22.6 mm with a mean value of 7 mm in males and 6.5 mm in
females among individuals evaluated by echocardiography for standard clinical indications.
In a study of 200 patients hospitalized with stable angina pectoris, unstable angina pectoris,
or acute myocardial infarction who underwent coronary angiography, patients with a baseline
EAT of more than 7 mm suffered significantly more revascularizations, non-fatal myocardial
infarction, and cardiovascular death. While interpreting these threshold limit values, it should
be kept in mind that EAT thickness could be influenced by age, gender, and race and whether
the measurement was done during end-systole or end- diastole
Differentiating EAT from pericardial effusion is of great importance. Even though the EAT is
viewed as a hypoechoic area, it has different features from pericardial effusion. EAT has
specific echo-density that comprises echo-lucent areas and whitish-speckled appearance.
However, pericardial effusion has more hypoechoic appearance. In addition, although EAT is
limited to the front of the right ventricle, pericardial effusion reveals wider spread, and
usually it is more prominent in the posterolateral aspect of the left ventricle while the patient
is left lateral decubitis position.
1. Held, P., & Wallentin, L. (1990). Low-dose aspirin and heparin in unstable coronary
artery disease. The Lancet, 336(8725), 1252. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)92867
2. Brunelli, C., Spallarossa, P., Rossettin, P. et al. Recognition and Treatment of
Unstable Angina. Drugs 52, 196–208 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-
199652020-00004
3. Eroglu, S. (2015). How do we measure epicardial adipose tissue thickness by
transthoracic echocardiography?. The Anatolian Journal Of Cardiology, 15(5), 416-
419. doi: 10.5152/akd.2015.5991
4. Boden, W. (1991). New Concepts for the Treatment of Unstable Angina. Journal Of
Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 18, S1-S6. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199100189-
00002
5. Antman, E. M., & Fox, K. M. (2000). Guidelines for the diagnosis and management
of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: proposed revisions.
International Cardiology Forum. American heart journal, 139(3), 461–475.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-8703(00)90090-5
6. Abrams J. (2000). Medical therapy of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial
infarction. The American journal of cardiology, 86(8B), 24J–34J.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01341-2
7. Rezkalla, S. H., & Benz, M. (2003). Antiplatelet therapy from clinical trials to
clinical practice. Clinical medicine & research, 1(2), 101–104.
https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.1.2.101
8. Gulba, D. C., Eichstädt, H., Engberding, R., Schulze, M. R., Struppler, M., & Rutsch,
W. (2000). International Cardiology Forum (ICF) 1998 [Recommendations of the
International Cardiology Forum (ICF) 1998 on revision of the current guidelines for
the diagnosis and treatment of unstable angina pectoris and nontransmural
myocardial infarct]. Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie, 89(8), 706–721.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s003920070200
9. Abrams J. (2000). Medical therapy of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial
infarction. The American journal of cardiology, 86(8B), 24J–34J.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01341-2
10. Jameson, J., Fauci, A., Kasper, D., Hauser, S., Longo, D., & Jameson, J. et
al. Harrison's principles of internal medicine.