Professional Documents
Culture Documents
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 1
Copyright (c) 2013 IEEE. Personal use is permitted. For any other purposes, permission must be obtained from the IEEE by emailing pubs-permissions@ieee.org.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication.
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 2
directly fed, the impedance matching is not very good. When patterns measured and simulated at 1.7, 2.2, and 2.7 GHz are
the coupling microstrip line is introduced, the impedance plotted in Fig. 7. There is no significant difference for the
matching is improved. The optimized value for the length of the radiation patterns over the wide frequency range. The measured
coupling microstrip line is (Ln+La) =22.5 mm, which is and simulated antenna gains are depicted in Fig. 8. The
approximately a quarter guided wavelength at 2.2 GHz. simulated gain is about 10 dBi while the measured gain is about
The height (H) of the antenna element above the reflector 9 dBi. (The difference between measured and simulated results
also has effect on the impedance matching of the broadband is due to the losses from the coaxial cable and the SMA
antenna element. The effect on the return loss caused by the connector which were not taken into account in simulation.)
height is depicted in Fig. 4. The impedance matching is not The gain variation over the frequency range 1.7-2.7 GHz is less
good without the reflector, (i.e., H=,). As the reflector is than 1 dB. The higher gain for the broadband antenna element
introduced, the impedance matching is improved. However, as is due to the pair of dipoles that consists of two folded dipoles.
the antenna element gets closer to the reflector, the impedance 0
matching becomes worse. The optimized height is H=42 mm.
The broadband antenna was optimized using Ansoft HFSS 1.65 GHz 2.85 GHz
10
v.13. The optimized geometric parameters are listed in Table I.
Folded dipole Wa
Wl 30
x Ln Ln+La= 0
Wd Lf Ln Ln+La=19.5 mm
40
y z La La
Ln+La=22.5 mm
Ln+La=25.5 mm
Lb 50
Coplanar stripline 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0
Frequency (GHz)
L - shaped microstrip line
Substrate Fig. 3. Effect of the length (Ln+La) of the coupling microstrip line on the
Front side return loss of the antenna element.
t 0
z Back side
θ H Reflector
Ld
y 10
x
Lc
Return Loss (dB)
20
Wg
1.65 GHz 2.85 GHz
30
Fig. 1. Configuration of a broadband planar antenna.
H=32 mm
0 40 H=42 mm
H=52 mm
H H=
10 1.65 GHz 2.85 GHz
50
1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0
Return Loss (dB)
Frequency (GHz)
20
Fig. 4. Effect of the height (H) of the antenna element above the reflector
30 on the return loss.
Wd
40 Wd= 1.5 mm TABLE I
Wd= 2.1 mm OPTIMIZED VALUES FOR THE GEOMETRIC PARAMETERS OF THE
Wd= 2.7 mm BROADBAND PLANAR ANTENNA
50 Parameter Value Parameter Value
1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0
L1 16.85 mm W1 5 mm
Frequency (GHz)
L2 8.4 mm W2 2.1 mm
Fig. 2. Effect of the width (Wd) of the coplanar stripline on the return loss
L3 50 mm W3 1.7 mm
of the antenna element.
L4 11 mm W4 3 mm
A prototype of the broadband antenna is displayed in Fig. 5. L5 53.6 mm t 0.76 mm
The measured RL is compared with the simulation in Fig. 6. L6 8 mm α 150°
Good agreement is observed. The measured bandwidth for L7 30 mm β 120°
RL>15 dB is about 53% (1.65-2.85 GHz). The broad L8 130 mm S 63 mm
bandwidth of the antenna element is due to the introduction of L9 15 mm H 42 mm
the coupling microstrip line and the reflector. The radiation
Copyright (c) 2013 IEEE. Personal use is permitted. For any other purposes, permission must be obtained from the IEEE by emailing pubs-permissions@ieee.org.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication.
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 3
12
10
Gain (dBi)
6
(a) (b) 4
Fig. 5. A prototype of the broadband planar antenna: (a) perspective view,
(b) backside view. 2
Simulated
Measured
0 0
1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7
Frequency (GHz)
2.85 GHz
10 1.65 GHz Fig. 8. Gain of the broadband planar antenna.
Return Loss (dB)
20 B. Antenna Array
For base station applications, an 8-element antenna array is
30 developed. The element spacing is 110 mm (~λ2.7, where λ2.7 is
the free-space wavelength at 2.7 GHz). The antenna array is fed
40
Simulated by an eight-way power splitter. The measured RL for the
Measured
antenna array is shown in Fig. 9. The return loss is around 15
1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 dB over 1.56-2.9 GHz. Fig. 10 shows the measured radiation
Frequency (GHz) patterns compared with the simulated results at 1.7, 2.2, and 2.7
Fig. 6. Return loss of the broadband planar antenna. GHz. Good agreement is obtained. There is no grating lobe
z (dB) z
(dB)
0
xoz-Plane 330
0
30 0 yoz-Plane 330
0
30 over the frequency range 1.7 to 2.7 GHz. The simulated and
-10 -10 measured gains for the array are plotted in Fig. 11. The
-20
300 60
-20
300 60
simulated gain is about 18 dBi while the measured gain is close
-30
x
-30
y to 16 dBi. The 2-dB difference between simulation and
-40 270 90 -40 270 90
measurement is due to the losses caused by the feeding network,
-30 -30
coaxial cable and SMA connectors. The half-power beam
-20 240 120
-20 240 120
widths (HPBWs) are also plotted in Fig. 11. The HPBWs in the
-10 -10
-30
x
-30
y 0
-40 270 90 -40 270 90
-10 -10
(b)
(dB) 0 z (dB) 0 z 30
0 0
xoz-Plane 330 30 yoz-Plane 330 30
-10 -10
300 60 300 60
-20 -20 40
-30 -30
x y
-40 270 90 -40 270 90
50
-30 -30
1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0
-20 -20
240 120 240 120 Frequency (GHz)
-10 -10
Fig. 9. Measured return loss of the 8-element broadband planar antenna
210 150 210 150
0
180
0
180 array.
(c)
Fig. 7. Radiation patterns of the broadband planar antenna at (a) 1.7 GHz,
(b) 2.2 GHz, and (c) 2.7 GHz.
Copyright (c) 2013 IEEE. Personal use is permitted. For any other purposes, permission must be obtained from the IEEE by emailing pubs-permissions@ieee.org.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication.
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 4
(dB)
0 xoz-Plane 330
0 z
30
(dB)
0
0 z important considerations for a dual-polarized antenna is the
yoz-Plane 330 30
-10 -10
isolation between the two polarization ports. A lot of feeding
-20
300 60
-20
300 60 techniques [7]-[13] have been proposed for high isolation, e.g.,
-30 -30 L-probe feed [7]-[9], aperture-coupling (slot-coupling) feed
x y
-40 270 90 -40 270 90 [10]-[11], or a combination of these two feed configurations
-30 -30 [12]-[13]. The crossed dipoles are another commonly used
-20 240 120
-20 240 120
configuration for dual polarizations [14]-[17]. All these
-10 -10 dual-polarized antennas have a multilayered or 3-dimenstional
0 210
180
150 0 210
180
150
configuration. In this section, we develop a fully planar 45°
(a) dual-polarized antenna.
(dB) 0 z (dB) 0 z The dual-polarized antenna consists of two broadband planar
0 0
-10
xoz-Plane 330 30
-10
330 30
antenna elements developed in the previous section. To achieve
-20
300 60
-20
300 60 45° dual polarizations, the two antenna elements are placed
-30 -30 orthogonally in the directions of 45° and 45°, respectively. In
x y
-40 270 90 -40 270 90 order to achieve a high isolation, different arrangements for the
-30 -30 45° dual-polarized antenna element are investigated. The
-20 240 120
-20 240 120 basic configuration of the 45° dual-polarized antenna is
-10 -10 illustrated in Fig. 12. The separation between central axes of the
0 210
180
150 0 210
180
150
antenna elements is denoted by S and the distance shifted from
(b) the central axes is ds. Obviously, the isolation will increase as S
(dB) 0 z (dB) 0 z
increases. In order to obtain a compact configuration for the
0
xoz-Plane 330 30 0
yoz-Plane 330 30 dual-polarized antenna, however, we need to keep S as small as
-10 -10
possible. In our design, we choose S=63 mm and realize the
30-dB isolation by adjusting the distance shifted ds. It is
300 60 300 60
-20 -20
-30
x
-30
y interesting to find by simulation that as ds decreases, the
-40 270 90 -40 270 90
isolation between the two polarization ports increases, as
-30 -30
indicated in Fig. 13. The highest isolation is obtained when
-20 240 120
-20 240 120
ds=0, which corresponds to a perpendicular position as
-10 -10
210 150 210 150
illustrated in Fig. 14 for the ±45° dual-polarized antenna.
0 0
180 180
(c) y
L
x
s
y
z x
ds
20 120
18 110
100 : Metal on front side
16 : Metal on back side
Simulated gain 90
14 Measured gain
80 Fig. 12. Basic configuration of the ±45° dual-polarized antenna.
12 0
HPBW (deg)
70
Gain (dB)
ds=0
10 60 ds=0.25Ls
10 ds=0.5Ls
8 50
Simulated HPBW for yoz-Plane ds=0.75Ls
Measured HPBW for yoz-Plane 40
6 20 ds=LS
Isolation (dB)
Copyright (c) 2013 IEEE. Personal use is permitted. For any other purposes, permission must be obtained from the IEEE by emailing pubs-permissions@ieee.org.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication.
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 5
3
W
OPTIMIZED VALUES FOR THE GEOMETRIC PARAMETERS OF THE
L4 45° DUAL-POLARIZED ANTENNA
W
Parameter Value Parameter Value
4
x L3 L1 16.85 mm W1 5 mm
y z L2 8.4 mm W2 2.1 mm
L3 50 mm W3 1.7 mm
L4 11 mm W4 3 mm
t
L5 53.6 mm t 0.76 mm
L9
z L6 8 mm α 150°
θ H
y L7 30 mm β 120°
x
L7
L8 130 mm S 63 mm
L8 L9 15 mm H 42 mm
Therefore, the highest isolation may occurs at β=0° and θ=90°, Simulated |S21| Measured |S21|
which corresponds to a perpendicularly orientated position as -50
1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0
indicated in Fig. 15b. For the ±45° dual-polarized antenna, the Frequency (GHz)
perpendicularly orientated position corresponds to ds=0, which Fig. 17. S parameters of the ±45°dual-polarized antenna.
explains why the highest isolation occurs at ds=0.
12
e2
ol
10
ip
D
β=
0°
8
ρ
Gain (dBi)
θ=
9
L2
0°
6
Simulated gain of +45deg polarized element
D
ip
Copyright (c) 2013 IEEE. Personal use is permitted. For any other purposes, permission must be obtained from the IEEE by emailing pubs-permissions@ieee.org.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication.
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 6
B. Antenna Array
z z
A ±45° dual-polarized antenna array is developed. The (dB)
0
xoz-Plane 330
0
30
(dB)
0
yoz-Plane 330
0
30
array are plotted in Fig. 19. The measured bandwidth for -20 240 120
-20
240 120
210 150
is close to 30 dB. The measured radiation patterns are compared 0
180
0
180
HPBW (deg)
antenna array. 12 70
Gain (dBi)
0 10 60
Measured S11
Measured S22 8 50
-10 1.6 GHz 2.9 GHz
Simulated HPBW for yoz-Plane 40
6
Measured HPBW for yoz-Plane
30
S Parameters (dB)
-60
1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 IV. CONCLUSION
Frequenc (GHz)
A broadband planar antenna has been developed for base
Fig. 19. Measured S parameters of the ±45° dual-polarized antenna array.
stations. The planar antenna achieves a wide bandwidth of
z z
about 53% (1.65-2.85 GHz) and a high gain of 9 dBi. A ±45°
(dB) 0 (dB) 0
0 0
xoz-Plane 330 30 yoz-Plane 330 30
(a)
(dB) 0 z (dB) 0 z
The authors wish to express their gratitude to the No.7
0
xoz-Plane 330 30 0
yoz-Plane 330 30 Research Institute of China Electronics Technology Group
-10 -10
Corporation (CETC) for radiation pattern measurement.
300 60 300 60
-20 -20
-30
x -30
y REFERENCES
-40 270 90 -40 270 90
[1] Kyohei Fujimoto, “Antennas for base stations” in Mobile Antenna
-30 -30
Systems Handbook, 3rd edition, Boston: Artech House, Inc., 2008,
-20 240 120
-20 240 120 pp.141-211.
-10 -10
[2] C. L. Mak, K. M. Luk, K. F. Lee, and Y. L. Chow, “Experimental study of
210 150 210 150
0
180
0
180 a microstrip patch antenna with an L-shaped probe,” IEEE Transactions
on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 777-782, May 2000.
(b)
Copyright (c) 2013 IEEE. Personal use is permitted. For any other purposes, permission must be obtained from the IEEE by emailing pubs-permissions@ieee.org.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication.
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 7
[3] Y. Liu, K. M. Luk, and H. C. Yin, “Bowtie patch antenna with electric
dipole on a HIS substrate,” 2010 International Conference on Microwave
and and Milimeter Wave Technology (ICMMT), pp. 278-280, 2010.
[4] U. K. Revankar and Harishchandra., “Printed dipole radiating elements
for broadband and wide scan angle active phased array,” 2001 IEEE
International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation Society, vol. 4,
pp. 796-799, Jul. 2001.
[5] R. L. Li, T. Wu, B. Pan, K. Lim, J. Laskar, and M. M. Tentzeris,
“Equivalent-circuit analysis of a broadband printed dipole with adjusted RongLin Li (M’02-SM’03) received the B.S. degree in
integrated balun and an array for base station applications,” IEEE electrical engineering from Xi’an Jiaotong University, China, in 1983, and the
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 2180-2184, M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from Chongqing University,
July 2009. in 1990 and 1994, respectively.
From 1983 to 1987, he worked as an Assistant Electrical Engineer in
[6] Z. W. Zhou, S. W. Yang, Z. P. Nie, “A novel broadband printed dipole
Yunnan Electric Power Research Institute. From 1994 to 1996, he was a
antenna with low cross-polarization,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas
Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Zhejiang University, China. In 1997, he
and Propagation, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 3091-3093, Nov. 2007.
visited Hosei University, Japan, as an HIF (Hosei International Fund) Research
[7] H. Wong, K.-L. Lau, and K.-M. Luk, “Design of dual-polarized L-probe Fellow. In 1998, he became a Professor in Zhejiang University. In 1999, he
patch antenna arrays with high isolation,” IEEE Transactions on visited the University of Utah, USA, as a Research Associate. In 2000, he
Antennas and Propagation, vol. 52, no. 1 pp. 45-52, Jan. 2004. worked as a Research Fellow at the Queen’s University of Belfast, UK. Since
[8] Y.-X. Guo, K.-W. Khoo, and L. C. Ong, “Wideband dual-polarized patch 2001, he has been a Research Scientist with Georgia Institute of Technology,
antenna with broadband baluns,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and USA. He is now an Endowed Professor in the South China University of
Propagation, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 78-83, Jan. 2007. Technology. Dr. Li has published more than 100 papers in refereed Journals
[9] H. -W. Lai and K. -M Luk, “Dual polarized patch antenna fed by and Conference Proceedings, and 3 book chapters. He is a Senior Member of
meandering probes,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, IEEE and a member of the IEEE International Compumag Society. He
vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 2625-2627, Sep. 2007. currently serves as an Editor of the ETRI Journal and a reviewer for a number
of international journals, including IEEE Transactions on Antennas and
[10] S. Gao, L. W. Li, M. S. Leong, and T. S. Yeo, “A broad-band
Propagation, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, IEEE
dual-polarized microstrip patch antenna with aperture coupling,” IEEE
Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, IET Microwave, Antennas &
Transactions on Antennas and Propghation, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 898-900,
Propagation, Progress in Electromagnetic Research, Journal of
April, 2003.
Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, and International Journal of
[11] R. Caso, A. A. Serra, M. Rodriguez-Pino, P. Nepa, and G. Manara, “A Wireless Personal Communications. He was a member of the Technical
wide-band slot-coupled stacked-patch array for wireless communications,” Program Committee for IEEE-IMS 2008-2012 Symposia and a session chair
IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 9, pp. 986-989, for several IEEE-APS Symposia. He was the recipient of the 2009 Georgia
2010. Tech-ECE Research Spotlight Award. His current research interests include
[12] T. -W. Chiou and K. -L. Wong, “Broad-band dual-polarized single new design techniques for antennas in mobile and satellite communication
microstrip patch antenna with high isolation and low cross polarization,” systems, phased arrays and smart antennas for radar applications, wireless
IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. sensors and RFID technology, electromagnetics and information theory.
366-401, March 2002.
[13] Y. -X. Guo, K. -M. Luk, and K. -F. Lee, “Broadband dual polarization
patch element for cellular-phone base stations,” IEEE Transactions on
Antennas and Propagation, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 251-253, Feb. 2002.
[14] C. -Y -D. Sim, C. -C. Chang, and J. -S. Row, “Dual-feed dual-polarized
patch antenna with low cross polarization and high isolation,” IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 57, no. 10, pp.
3321-3324, Oct. 2009.
Peng Wang received the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in
[15] H. Wong and K. M. Luk “Design of a magneto-electric dipole element for electrical engineering from Xidian University, Xi’an, China, in 2003, 2006, and
mobile communication base station antennas,” ZTE Communications, vol. 2008, respectively.
9, pp. 20-26, June 2011. He is currently a system engineer in ZTE Corporation, Xi’an, China. His
[16] J. Perruisseau-Carrier, T. W. Hee, and P. S. Hall, “Dual-polarized research interests include computational electromagnetics, active antenna
broadband dipole,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. systems and beamforming for mobile communication base stations.
2, pp. 310-312, 2003.
[17] L. Siu, H. Wong, and K. -M. Luk, “A dual-polarized magneto-electric
dipole with dielectric loading,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and
Propagation, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 616-623, March. 2009.
[18] J. D. Kraus and R. J. Marhefka, “Self and mutual impedances” in
Antennas: For All Applications, 3nd edition, McGraw-Hill, 2002, pp.
455–457.
Copyright (c) 2013 IEEE. Personal use is permitted. For any other purposes, permission must be obtained from the IEEE by emailing pubs-permissions@ieee.org.