Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Home Classical Methods Advanced Methods Interface Facto's best Excel F.A.Q. Docs
Contact
Advanced Methods
Multiple Factor Analysis
Multiple Factor Analysis
Multiple Factor Analysis is dedicated to datasets where variables are structured into
Hierarchical Multiple Factor
groups. Several sets of variables (continuous or categorical) are therefore simultaneously
Analysis
studied.
Factor Analysis of Mixed Data
This specific method is useful in many fields where variables are structured into groups,
for example: Dual Multiple Factor Analysis
Interface
Partial representation (individuals seen by one group of
variables) Facto's best
Groups of variables
FactoMineR and Excel
For further information on the MFA, see the following papers:
Multiple Factor Analysis: main features and application to sensory data F.A.Q.
Multiple Factor Analysis presentation (french) Documents
SFDS 2008 slides about FactoMineR
User! 2007 slides about FactoMineR Contact
The example illustrated here deals with sensory evaluation of red wines.
Load the data set as a text file by clicking here.
click to view
To load the package and the data set, type the following line code:
library(FactoMineR)
data(wine)
Objectives
We want to characterize the wines. We are looking for a typology of the wines.
New objectives arise like comparing groups of variables (two sets of variables are close
to each other if two wines which are close to each other according to the first set of
variables are close to each other according to the second one) and highlight a typology
of the groups or comparing simultaneously the typologies of wines seen by each group of
variables taken one by one.
MFA
We are going to study the wines' profiles according to sensory evaluation. We will use as
active groups the odor, visual, odor after shaking and taste groups and origin and
overall groups as supplementary ones.
Type:
click to view
These first results can be interpreted the same way as the ones of a PCA.
The representation of variables shows that most of the variables are highly correlated to
the first dimension, whatever group the belong to. This dimension represents "intensity"
and "harmony", positive notions which are commonly used when speaking of wines.
The variables the most correlated to the second dimension are Spice before shaking and
Odor intensity before shaking for the odor group, Spice, Plant and Odor intensity for the
odor after shaking group and Bitterness for the taste group. This dimension
represents a spicy, vegetal characteristic essentially due to olfaction.
The coordinates of individuals and categories can be linked to this interpretation of the
two first principal components through the second graph.
The wine 1DAM was evaluated as the most "intense" and "harmonious" contrary to
wines 1VAU and 2ING which are the least "intense" and "harmonious". The second axis
is essentially due to wines T1 and T2. As these two wines were in fact the same one
evaluated twice by the assessors, the second dimension will be designed as the
"particular case of the wine T".
Most of the categories are close to the origin of the principal component map, which
means that these categories are not related to "intensity", "harmony" or the "wine T".
The category Env4 has high coordinates on the second axis but only related to T1 and
T2. The category Reference, a priori related to an excellent wine-producing soil, has high
coordinates on the first axis and thus positively correlated to "intensity" and "harmony",
which confirms the a priori.
click to view
The graph of partial individuals represents each wine viewed by each group and its
barycenter. By default, the two wines with the smallest within inertia and the two wines
with the largest within inertia are represented. If you want to plot all the partial points,
use the folowwing line of code:
plot(res,choix="ind",partial="all")
1DAM was evaluated as particularly "intense" and "harmonious" especially by the odor
group: its coordinates on the first axis are more extreme from this group's point of view
than from the other groups' one. From the odor group's point of view, 2ING was more
"intense" and "harmonious" than 1VAU but from the taste group's point of view, 1VAU
was more "intense" and "harmonious" than 2ING.
All the groups have quite the same vision of the categories except for Env4 which
resumes what we already said from the individuals principal component map.
click to view
click to view
This graph is diplayed to look at the link between the principal components of the MFA
and the ones of each single group.
Except for the origin group, the first dimension of each group is highly correlated to the
MFA's first one.
The second dimension of the MFA is essentially correlated to the second dimension of the
olfactory groups.