Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rashmi Joshi
282
Women’s Writing
28 August 2018
Sylvia Plath’s poems have always been read as an autobiographical poetic expression
of her life. Even Sylvia Plath in her interview with Peter Orr acknowledged it when she was
asked about the things she would like to write about, “I've been very excited by what I feel is
the new breakthrough that came with, say, Robert Lowell's Life Studies, this intense
breakthrough into very serious, very personal, emotional experience which I feel has been
partly taboo” (169). Plath’s “Daddy” is clearly influenced by and written in the tradition of
this breakthrough for the speaker’s similarity to Plath’s relationship with her father and the
domain of intimate it dwells into. This poetry of the personal is termed as “Confessional” by
M. L. Rosenthal.
Plath’s assimilation of the private and historic is not only reflected in “Daddy” but
several of her other confessional poems. Plath believed that “personal experience is very
important, but certainly it shouldn’t be a kind of shut-box and mirror looking narcissistic
experience. I believe it should be relevant, and relevant to larger things, the bigger things
Joshi 2
such as Hiroshima and Dachau and so on” (Orr 169-70). In “Daddy” she makes the personal
experience relevant by aligning the speaker, her “semifictive self”(Ramazani 1142), to the
Jews and her father to Nazis using metonymy and reducing him to “neat moustache”, “Aryan
eye”; the very symbols of oppression. (“Daddy” 43-44) Many critics argue that by bringing
the symbols of Holocaust to the domain of personal, Plath either trivializes the Nazi
oppression or accentuates her grief, making a personal myth out of it. To counter it
Jacqueline Rose writes, “The argument that she uses the Holocaust to aggrandise her personal
difficulties seems completely beside the point. Who can say that these were not difficulties
In “Daddy” the use of the word “Gobbledygoo” between the symbols of Nazi
oppression, “Luftwaffe”, “Panzer”, “Swastika”, etc. can be seen as an attempt on Plath’s part
to not only depict the shallowness of these symbols but also deflate the
(Smith )in nature but is a “blurring of what is public and private” for personal and “historical
“Daddy” has also been read by critics as an Elegy not in the traditional sense but as a
modern variation of it. “The foremost obstacle to reading Plath’s poem as elegies is probably
their harsh ambivalence; but this is precisely her most important contribution to the genre-her
enlargement of the elegy’s affective parameters beyond the traditional pathos, love,
reverence, and competitive camaraderie” (Ramazani 1143). In “Daddy” Plath makes a final
attempt to get rid of the grip of her dead father, perpetually alive in her psyche. She hints at
this presence in “All the Dead Dears” when she writes, “How they grip us through think and
Joshi 2
thick, / These barnacle dead” (17-18). The tone of “Daddy” is different from the earlier
poems she wrote about her father because of the immediate and striking necessity of taking
revenge. A break from the traditional roles assigned to the female mourner in an elegy, “she
insists on her power as a wrathful mourner instead of effacing it, defaces the name of the
Bibliography