Professional Documents
Culture Documents
STANDARD 12647-7
Third edition
2016-11-15
Reference number
ISO 12647-7:2016(E)
© ISO 2016
ISO 12647-7:2016(E)
Contents Page
Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ iv
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. v
1 Scope ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1
2 Normative references ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
3 Terms and definitions ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
4 Requirements .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3
4.1 Colour difference measurements ............................................................................................................................................ 3
4. 2 D ata files , s imulatio n o f ............................................................................................................................................... 3
s creens
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work o f preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters o f
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for the
di fferent types o f ISO documents should be noted. This document was dra fted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some o f the elements o f this document may be the subject o f
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identi fying any or all such patent rights. Details o f
any patent rights identified during the development o f the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).
Any trade name used in this document is in formation given for the convenience o f users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation on the meaning o f ISO specific terms and expressions related to con formity assessment,
as well as information about ISO’s adherence to the World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the
Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see the following URL: www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html.
The committee responsible for this document is ISO/TC 130, Graphic technology.
This third edition cancels and replaces the second edition (ISO 12647-7:2013), which has been
technically revised with the following changes:
— a number o f anomalies identified by industry experts have been addressed;
— substrate selection and measurement specification has been modified to reflect industry practice;
— approximately equivalent CIEDE2000 colour di fference values have been added;
— basic support for spot inks has been added;
— wording has been updated to reflect current terminology and industry thinking.
A list of all parts in the ISO 12647 series can be found on the ISO website.
Introduction
I S O 1 2 6 47-1 s er ve s to provide defi n ition s , the genera l pri ncip le s , the genera l order, the materia l to b e
covere d i n I S O 1 2 6 47-2 to I S O 1 2 6 47- 8 , the defi n ition o f the d ata, the me as u rement cond ition s , and the
rep or ti ng s tyle .
T h i s do c ument relate s to the s ubj e c t o f d igita l pro o fi ng a nd e s tabl i s he s pro o fi ng re qui rements for the
s p e ci fie d i n I S O 1 2 6 47-1 for d igita l pro o f pri nti ng. P ri mar y p arame ters that defi ne a pri nti ng cond ition
include screening parameters (where applicable), the colours of the solids, the colour of the print
f
s ub s trate, colou rs o i nterme d iate ti nt va lue s and the tone c u r ve . T h i s do c ument a l s o s p e ci fie s te s t
methods for those properties of digital proof prints and their substrates that are considered relevant
for s table and rel iable pro o fi ng cond ition s , and thu s for a cer ti fic ation pro ce du re .
T he graph ic te ch nolo g y i ndu s tr y ma ke s e xten s ive u s e o f pro o fi ng to pre d ic t the renderi ng o f d igita l data
fi le s b y a wide varie ty o f h igh- defi n ition, h igh- qua l ity o ff-pre s s pri nti ng pro ce s s e s and appl ic ation s .
E ach pre d ic tion i s b a s e d on a cha rac teri z ation d ata s e t that defi ne s a p a r tic u l ar pri nti ng cond ition .
Typic a l ly, the s p e c i fie d pri nti ng cond ition i s defi ne d th rough a n I nternationa l C olor C on s or tiu m (I C C )
pro fi le or the a s s o ci ate d ch arac teri z ation data s e t, b o th o f wh ich relate s ou rce data and colori me tric
va lue s o f the pri nte d colour. Such data may b e derive d from pri nti ng cond ition s con form i ng to the
T he pur p o s e o f a pro o f pri nt i s to s i mu late the vi s ua l charac teri s tics o f the fi n i she d pro duc tion pri nt
pro duc t as clo s ely as p o s s ible . I n order to vi s ua l ly match a p a r tic u lar pri nti ng cond ition, pro o fi ng
or phenomena s uch as glo s s , l ight s c atter (with i n the pri nt s ub s trate or the colou rant) , a nd tran s p a renc y.
I n s uch c a s e s , it i s a l s o found that s p e c tro colori me tr y ta ke s pre ce dence over den s itome tr y.
Another problem area is the matching of a double-sided production print on a lightweight printing
substrate, such as often used in heat-set web and publication gravure printing, to a digital proof on
f
a ne arly op aque s ub s trate . I f the pro o wa s pro duce d u s i ng a colour ma nagement pro fi le b as e d on
measurements with white backing, there will be an unavoidable visual and measurable difference
between the proof on the one hand and the production print placed on black on the other hand. A
black b acki ng i s fre qu i re d or double - s ide d pro duc tion pri nti ng on non- op aque pri nts , as s p e ci fie d
in the pertinent parts of ISO 12647. The possible occurrence of such differences needs to be well
communicated, in advance, to all parties concerned.
H i s toric a l ly, there h as b e en no con s i s tenc y i n the way th at either the cha rac teri z ation data or the
criteri a and l i m its for a s ati s fac tor y match have b e en provide d . T h i s ha s le d to s ign i fic a nt re du nda nc y
and i ncon s i s tencie s i n the eva luation o f pro o fi ng s ys tem s for d i fferent, but s i m i la r, appl ic ation s , and a
co s t and ti me bu rden on the i ndu s tr y. T h i s do c u ment there fore attemp ts to provide gu ida nce i n th i s
Annex A s u m mari z e s the re qu i rements for the d igita l pro o f pri nts l i s te d i n the mai n b o dy o f th i s
do c u ment; the s e are weighte d with re s p e c t to thei r releva nce i n th re e typic a l s ituation s:
— re qu i rements with wh ich a pro o f pri nt, made for a p ar tic u la r pri nti ng cond ition, mu s t comply i f it
i s to b e re ference d i n a contrac t b e twe en the pri nter and the provider o f the d igita l data (C er ti fie d
P ro o f C re ation) ;
— re qu i rements with wh ich a vendor ’s pro o fi ng s ys tem, compri s i ng hardware and s o ftware, mu s t
comply i f it i s to b e con s idere d c ap able o f rel i ably pro duci ng d igita l contrac t pro o fs for a p a r tic u lar
— re qu i rements with wh ich a pro o f pri nt made for a p ar tic u lar pri nti ng cond ition mu s t comply when
I S O 1 2 6 47- 8 defi ne s re qui rements for va l idation pri nts . B e c au s e data a re exchange d ele c tron ic a l ly
and vi s ua l i z ation s o f tho s e data a re pro duce d at mu ltiple s ite s , there i s a marke t ne e d for defi ne d
re qu i rements for va l idation pri nts to promo te a de gre e o f con s i s tenc y th roughout the workflow.
Va l idation pri nts are i ntende d to b e u s e d at e arly s tage s o f the pri nt pro duc tion workflow, p a r tic u larly
at the do c u ment de s ign s tage a nd have le s s s tri ngent re qu i rements , p ar tic u larly on colou r fidel ity, to
a l low thei r pro duc tion on le s s el ab orate a nd le s s co s tly device s th an are re qui re d for contrac t pro o fs .
Va l idation pri nts are no t i ntende d to replace “contrac t pro o fs ” as s p e ci fie d in th i s do c ument for
pre d ic ti ng colou r on pro duc tion pri nti ng device s . It is e xp e c te d that the mo d i fic ation s of the
requirements for both contract proofs and validation prints, along with the requirements for contract
pro o fs , wi l l conti nue i n the future as i ndu s tr y re qu i rements and i magi ng te ch nolo gie s develop .
pro o f pri nts i ntende d to s i mu late a pri nti ng cond ition defi ne d by a set o f ch arac teri z ation data .
Recommendations are provided with regard to appropriate test methods associated with these
requirements.
2 Normative references
T he fol lowi ng do c u ments are re ferre d to i n the tex t i n s uch a way th at s ome or a l l o f thei r content
con s titute s re qu i rements o f th i s do c u ment. For date d re ference s , on ly the e d ition cite d app l ie s . For
u ndate d re ference s , the late s t e d ition o f the re ference d do c ument (i nclud i ng a ny amend ments) appl ie s .
ISO 187, Paper, board and pulps — Standard atmosphere for conditioning and testing and procedure for
monitoring the atmosphere and conditioning of samples
ISO 2813, Paints and varnishes — Determination of gloss value at 20°, 60° and 85°
ISO 3664, Graphic technology and photography — Viewing conditions
ISO 8254-1, Paper and board — Measurement ofspecular gloss — Part 1: 75° gloss with a converging beam,
TAPPI method
ISO 12040, Graphic technology — Prints and printing inks — Assessment of light fastness using filtered
xenon arc light
ISO 12639, Graphic technology — Prepress digital data exchange — Tag image file format for image
technology (TIFF/IT)
ISO 12640-1, Graphic technology — Prepress digital data exchange — Part 1: CMYK standard colour image
data (CMYK/SCID)
ISO 12642-2, Graphic technology — Input data for characterization of 4-colour process printing — Part 2:
Expanded data set
ISO 13655, Graphic technology — Spectral measurement and colorimetric computation for graphic
arts images
ISO 15397:2014, Graphic technology — Communication of graphic paper properties
3 Terms and definitions
For the purpo ses o f this do cument, the terms and definitions given in ISO 12647-1 and the fol lowing apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— IEC Electropedia: available at http://www.electropedia.org/
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at http://www.iso.org/obp
3.1
chromatic primaries
c ya n, magenta and yel low pro ce s s i n ks
3.2
CIELAB chromaticness difference
Δ Ch
d i fference b e twe en two colours o f approxi mately the s ame l ightne s s proj e c te d onto a con s ta nt l ightne s s
re s p e c tively
3.4
digital proof print
digital hard-copy proof
digital proof (3.3
) pro duce d a s a refle c tion copy on a proo fing substrate (3.5)
3.5
proofing substrate
pri nti ng s ub s trate u s e d for ha rd- cop y pro o fi ng pro ce s s e s
3.6
halftone proof
pro o f pri nt made u s i ng the s ame s c re en i ng te ch nolo g y ( genera l ly centre -weighte d h a l ftone do ts) a s the
artefacts, such as rosettes, moiré, or aliasing patterns, as expected in the corresponding production print. One
p o s s ibi l ity i s to b a s e p ro o fi n g o n the b itm ap p ro duce d o n the p ro duc tion p l ate or fi l m s e tter.
3.7
primaries
s e t o f pro ce s s i n ks: c yan, magenta, yel low a nd black
3.8
print stabilization period
time elapsed since the production of a proof print until a stable colour is achieved
N o te 1 to entr y: T h i s pro p er ty i s to b e s p e c i fie d b y the m a nu fac tu rer.
3.9
spot colour inks
inks which are not part of the set of process inks
N o te 1 to entr y: Sp o t colou r i n ks a re o ften u s e d when pr i nti n g b ra nd co lo u rs .
4 Requirements
4.1 Colour difference measurements
In previous revisions o f this document, CIELAB 1976 colour di fference measurements (Δ E*ab) were
used as detailed in ISO 13655 for normative colour difference measurements.
Con formance with this document requires the reporting o f all colour di fferences as CIEDE2000 (Δ E00 ).
NOTE The relationship o f Δ E*ab to Δ E00 varies throughout the colour space and there is no simple correlation
between the two metrics. Users are advised that some proofs that are in conformance with ISO 12647-7:2013
may not be in con formance with this document and that some proo fs that are in con formance with this document
may not be in con formance with ISO 12647-7:2013.
The measurement conditions shall be as specified in 5.4; the digital control strip specified in 5.2 and an
ISO 12642-2 compliant chart shall be used.
The CIELAB colour coordinates of the process colour solids shall agree with the pertinent aim values
o f the printing condition to be simulated as given by the data (see 4.2.1), within 3,0 Δ E00 units. The
CIELAB metric hue di fference for CMY shall not exceed 2,5.
The variability o f the colouration across the proo f print format is limited by the provision that the
colours o f nine measurement locations evenly spaced on the test objects (see 5.3.4), which have been
printed without prior modification in view o f the printing condition, shall have the following:
— a standard deviation of less than 0,5 each for values of L*, a *, and b*;
— a maximum o f 2,0 Δ E00 units between the average value and any one point.
The CIELAB colour coordinates o f the control patches, defined in 5.2 or ISO 12642-2, shall agree with
the pertinent aim values o f the printing condition to be simulated as given by the data (see 4.2.1) within
the tolerances specified in Table 2.
I f the proofing conditions are such that the simulation o f the production printing substrate requires
overprinting o f the proofing substrate, the maximum colour di fference between the overprinted
proofing substrate and the production printing substrate shall be less than or equal to 3,0 Δ E00 units.
4.3.4 Gamut
The 226 outer gamut patches of ISO 12642-2 shall be proof printed. The average colour difference
between actual and aim values for those patches shall not exceed 2,5 Δ E00 units. See Annex C for the list
of outer gamut patches of ISO 12642-2.
Where multiple printing conditions are supported by a proo f printer, this test may be applied to ensure
that the proo f printer colour gamut is su fficiently large to allow all printing conditions to be supported
e ffectively.
Solid and a representative set o f tints, including at least a 50 % tint where a definition is available, o f all
spot colours to be simulated shall be proof printed. The maximum colour difference between actual and
aim values for those patches shall not exceed 2,5 Δ E00 units.
NOTE ISO 17972-4 defines an exchange format (CxF/X-4) for spectral measurement data o f inks to provide
a means to characterize spot colour inks to allow reliable printing and proofing o f products that have been
designed using these inks.
Spot colours which cannot be simulated by the proofing system, such as when they are out o f gamut or
where special inks are used, shall be identified and proo fs should be accompanied by a physical sample
of the required colour.
4.3.5 Permanence o f proofing substrate and printed parts
Four copies o f a test form shall be prepared on the proofing substrate which contains unprinted parts
and patches of printed primaries and secondaries both as solids and as midtones. Combinations of all
o f the process colours used by the proofing system shall be included in this set which may include more
than four colourants.
The four copies of the test form shall be stored for a print stabilization period of at least 24 h in the
dark under standard atmosphere according to ISO 187 (at 23 °C ± 1 °C and a relative humidity o f
50 % ± 2 % RH).
The CIELAB colour values o f the proofing substrate and the printed patches shall be measured according
to ISO 13655 M1.
Each of the four copies of the test form shall be subjected to one of the following storage conditions:
a) 24 h at 25 °C ± 1 °C and at a relative humidity o f 25 % ± 2 % in the dark;
b) 24 h at 40 °C ± 1 °C and a relative humidity o f 80 % ± 2 % in the dark;
c) 1 week at 40 °C ± 1 °C and at a relative humidity o f 10 % ± 2 % in the dark;
d) light fastness exposure using a window glass filtered xenon lamp with a level o f exposure o f the
test form corresponding to a light fastness rating of 3 using the blue wool test as described in
ISO 12040. Fading of blue wool reference 3 (Acid blue 83) should be used to check the dose.
For each of these treatments, for the substrate and for all patches of the test form, the maximum colour
di fference between colour values o f the patches be fore and a fter the treatment shall not exceed 2,5 Δ E00
units and should not exceed 2,0 Δ E00 units. For matte substrates (see 4.3.2 and 5.5), these tolerances
shall be relaxed to 4,0 Δ E00 .
Prints with rough sur faces are generally more susceptible to fading but in some cases having a proo f
with a surface that is similar to that of the production print is more important than having a light fast
proo f and so these tolerances shall be reduced to allow the use o f proo fs with mechanically rough
surfaces.
The reader should be aware that production printing substrates and inks are usually less stable than
typical inkjet-based proofing substrates and inks, see Re ference [12]. It is therefore recommended to
apply this permanence test to proo fs on production printing substrates i f the li fetime o f such proo fs is
o f any concern.
NOTE It is anticipated that window glass application as described in ISO 105-B02, e.g. optical filters, be
fitted to minimize short-wavelength light (less than 310 nm).
The variability o f the proo f print primary and secondary colour solids and primary colour midtone
patches from one day to the following shall not exceed a colour di fference o f 2,0 Δ E00 units. Patches
should be measured by the same instrument and at the same position on the sheet a fter the vendor-
specified warming-up period and, i f necessary, recalibration.
Using the test apparatus and method specified in Annex B , the time required by printed solids to reach
mechanical stability against a rubbing action should not exceed 30 min or the print stabilization period,
whichever is longer. This test shall be performed for each combination of materials and operating
conditions that the proofing system supports.
NOTE A period of 30 min was chosen because this is believed to represent the expectation of the average
user. Where the colour (as distinct from the rub resistance of the colourant) takes longer to stabilize, this
requirement can be relaxed.
T he glo s s o f s ol id tone colours s hou ld b e vi s ua l ly s i m i lar to th at o f the pro duc tion pri nt to b e s i mu late d .
T he i n k s e t glo s s may b e s p e ci fie d i f de eme d ne ce s s ar y; the me tho d s p e c i fie d i n 5.5 shall be used.
NO TE I f the glo s s o f the pro o f p ri nt i s s ub s ta ntia l l y ch a n ge d b y the app l ie d colou ra nts , a s u r face -fi n i s h i ng
Tints intermediate between the (simulated) substrate white and solid shall transfer onto the proof in
a consistent and uniform manner over a tone value range that includes at least the tone reproduction
l i m its o f the pri nti ng cond ition to b e s i mu late d; s e e the p a r t o f I S O 1 2 6 47 that de s c rib e s pro ce s s control
NO TE It is go o d p repre s s p rac tice th at no i m age p a r ts rel y on tone va lue s outs ide o f the tone va lue
5.3.2
T he te s t obj e c ts s p e ci fie d i n sha l l s how no e a s i ly vi s ible s tep s with i n the tone va lue repro duc tion
limits (see 4.3.9) if viewed under ISO viewing condition P1 in accordance with ISO 3664.
4.3.11 Image register and resolving power
T he ma xi mu m devi ation b e twe en the i mage centre s o f any two pri nte d colou rs sh a l l no t b e la rger tha n
0 , 0 5 m m . T he re s olvi ng p ower o f the pro o f pri nt s ha l l b e s uch that C , M , K p o s itive, non- s eri f, typ e o f
2 -p oi nt s i ze, revers e (ne gative) o f 8 -p oi nt s i z e, a nd 2 -p oi nt revers e l i ne are legibly repro duce d; the te s t
or to c a s e s where the tolerance s for pro duc tion pri nti ng re gi s tration a re s ub s tanti a l ly gre ater than
0,05 mm.
NO TE 1 T h i s cond ition u s u a l l y cor re s p ond s to a n output add re s s ab i l ity o f at le a s t 10 0 pi xel s p er centi me tre .
NOTE 2 This condition includes the effects of colourant migration, if at all present.
4.3.12 Margin information
T he fol lowi ng i n formation sh a l l be provide d and ever y d igita l pro o f s hou ld i nclude the fol lowi ng
i n formation a s a huma n-re adable com mentar y l i ne:
— fi le na me;
to i nd ic ate pr i nti n g cond itio n s va r y but a go o d way to do th i s wou ld b e to identi fy the n a me o f a ch a rac ter i z atio n
5 Test methods
A CMYK digital control strip representing the printing condition to be simulated shall be printed on
every proo f. The control elements identified in the list below should be included while keeping the
total number o f patches within reasonable limits. To provide compatibility with characterization data,
as many control patches as possible should be selected from ink value combinations o f ISO 12642-2.
Control patches shall be selected such that the following control patch types are covered:
a) solid tones o f the chromatic primaries and their secondaries C,M,Y,R,G, and B (6 patches);
b) mid- and shadow tones o f the chromatic primaries and their secondaries C,M,Y,R,G, and B (12
patches);
c) black (K) tone scale with a minimum o f six steps that includes the solid;
d) a set o f patches with CMY values chosen to match the colour o f the patches defined in c) as closely
as possible;
e) selection o f critical tertiary colours such as flesh tones, brown, aubergine, violet (e.g. 15 patches);
f ) simulated print substrate colour o f the production printing condition (1 patch);
g) solid tones of all spot colour inks used in the document.
NOTE 1 There are two practical definitions for grey which are sometimes contradictory: (i) a colour having
the same a * and b * CIELAB values as the print substrate; (ii) a colour having the same a * and b * CIELAB values
as a halftone tint of similar L* value printed with black ink. The latter definition is believed to be useful in the
midtone and upwards whereas the former is believed to work best with highlight tones.
NOTE 2 Grey balance patches composed o f suitable CMY mixtures serve a use ful purpose for quick visual checks
o f whether the CMY tone values have changed, for example from one proo f print to the next. A single grey balance
condition is usually not su fficient to ensure an achromatic colour for all print substrates and printing inks that are
used for a given printing condition. In addition, it usually depends on the particular black composition used.
The L* scale o f the black is usually considerably greater than the three colour scale and care should be
taken to ensure that the patches described in c) and d) above are suitably spaced.
5.3.1 Resolution
For the visual determination o f the resolving power o f the proofing process, the resolution charts S2
and S3 defined in ISO 12640-1 shall be used.
For checks o f the primary and secondary process colours (C, M, Y, K, M+Y, C+Y, C+M, and C+M+Y), a test
form comprising vignette targets such as the test image S6 of ISO 12640-1 should be used. The length
o f the vignettes should be such that they are just below the length where less than smooth behaviour is
visible for normal production printing.
5.3.3 Resolving power
For checks on the resolving power, a test form comprising positive and reverse type o f a non-seri f Latin
font with text sizes of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 points and reverse lines with widths of 2, 3, and 4 points should
be printed both parallel and normal to the edge of the print (diagonal lines are not required). Three sets
o f positive text should be printed using 100 % cyan, 100 % magenta and 100 % black. Reverse printing
should use 100 % black-only background with white knock-out. The same regular body text font should
be used for all cases and all instances of 2-point text should be legible and all instances of 2-point lines
should be visible.
NOTE This is simulation o f the intended printing condition and press colourants are likely to be simulated
by a colorimetric emulation involving multiple colourants on the target device.
5.3.4 Uniformity
For checks on uni formity, create three prints, each with an even tint area that fills the printable format
of the proof printer, using the following tone value combinations:
a) C: 65 %, M: 50 %, Y: 50 %, K: 50 %;
b) C: 40 %, M: 30 %, Y: 30 %, K: 30 %;
c) C: 20 %, M: 15 %, Y: 15 %, K: 15 %.
NOTE The most popular format for proof printing is A3+.
5.4 Colour measurement
Colour measurements shall be made using an instrument (such as a spectrophotometer from which
colorimetric values can be calculated) that is capable o f repeatedly producing measured values well
within the tolerances specified in this document. The measurement condition o f the instrument should
be set to use the CIE Illuminant D50 and the 2° standard observer. The CIELAB colour coordinates L*,
a*, b * shall be calculated as detailed in ISO 13655. Characterization data representing a particular
measurement condition (M0, M1, or M2) shall be verified using an instrument configured to use this
same measurement condition.
Black or white backing shall be selected based on the opacity o f the proofing substrate. Black and white
backing shall be in accordance with ISO 13655.
All colour measurements and computed colour di fferences shall be reported, accompanied by an
associated total uncertainty (using the coverage factor k = 1 as defined in ISO 15790). In addition, it
should include an estimate of the variation between different measurement instruments. The value
may be extracted from the manu facturer’s specification or from a certificate o f calibration from the
manufacturer.
All colour measurements shall be rounded with the same precision as the defined tolerance value.
NOTE A colour di fference o f ∆E 00 = 5,4 is rounded to 5 i f the tolerance is defined as ∆E 00 ≤ 5 and will be in
con formance. The same colour di fference is not in con formance when the tolerance is stipulated as ∆E 00 ≤ 5,0.
The gloss of the substrate or ink set single ink solid areas should be measured with an incidence angle
o f 75° as specified in ISO 8254-1 or 60° as specified in ISO 2813 and shall be classified into categories o f
“matte”, “semi-matte” or “glossy” as follows:
a) 75° (see ISO 8254-1): Matte: <20 GU, Semi-matte: 20 GU to 60 GU, Glossy: >60 GU;
b) 60° (see ISO 2813): Matte: <5 GU, Semi-matte: 5 GU to 20 GU, Glossy: >20 GU.
NOTE The correspondence between the categories a) and b) is based on Re ference [11].
Other gloss measurement methods specified in ISO 15397 may be used as long as it can be demonstrated
that the substrate categories that result from such a measurement are approximately equivalent to
those specified in a) or b).
See Annex D for a typical set of guidelines used for visual evaluations.
NOTE Although the industry is struggling to develop metrologically based techniques for the evaluation o f
the quality o f proo f-to-print matches, un fortunately, most industry trade groups still rely on visual comparisons.
It is recognized that these evaluations are highly dependent on both the subject matter chosen and on the
observers participating.
Annex A
(normative)
Technical requirements for proofing con formity
with this document if the proof print conforms to the requirements listed in A.1.1 for the chosen
printing condition.
A.1.1 All proofs
All proofs shall conform to the following requirements of Clause 4:
— colouration of printed parts (see 4.3.3), except the light fastness, the 24 h colour fading tests and the
p atche s from the I S O 1 2 6 42 char ts;
the proof prints conform to the requirements listed in A.2.2 or A.2.3 for the chosen printing condition.
A.2.2 All proofs
All proofs shall conform to the following requirements of Clause 4:
— 4.3.2), conformance to Table 1
pro o fi ng s ub s trate colou r and glo s s (s e e i s the on ly re qu i rement;
cer ti fie d contrac t pro o fs for a given pri nti ng cond ition i n con formance with th i s do c u ment i f it c an
b e rel i ably demon s trate d that the pro o fi ng s ys tem, compri s i ng hardware and workflow comp onents ,
i f te s te d u nder the envi ronmenta l cond ition s s p e ci fie d b y the vendor, con form s to the re qui rements
listed in A.3.2 or A.3.3 f or s aid pri nti ng cond ition . I n add ition, the s ys tem sha l l b e c ap able o f accep ti ng
— f
rep e atabi l ity o f pro o 4.3.6
pri nti ng (s e e );
— margin information (see 4.3.12 ) wh ich s hou ld b e adde d b y the s a me ma rki ng engi ne that c re ate d
the proof.
A.3.3 Halftone proofs
Halftone proofs shall conform to all requirements of A.3.2 and the following additional requirements of
Clause 4:
— f
s c re en 4.2.2
re quenc y (s e e );
colour inks
Average proof to printing condition dif- 4.3.3
ference for all patches in 5.2 except spot E00 —
Table 2
2,5 Δ
colour inks
Maximum proof to printing condition 4.3.3
difference for spot colour ink solid patches E00 —
Table 2
2,5 Δ
of 5.2
Annex B
(normative)
Rub resistance of the proof colourant
B.1 Apparatus
B.1.1 Slab
For the procedure, a stainless steel slab is used, having dimensions according to Figure B.1, with a
mass o f approximately 400 g, a protruding wipe area o f 10 cm 2 , and hence a ratio of mass per area of
0,4 N/cm2 . A pull string is attachable to the front of the slab by means of two screws whose heads have
a hole (see key 1 o f Figure B.1).
NOTE This procedure is modelled after method A of DIN 53131-2 [9] .
Dimensions in millimetres
Key
1 screw M5
2 hole, of 2 mm to 3 mm in diameter, for fastening of pull string
Figure B.1 — Slab
Key
1 text sample area
2 colour sample area
Figure B.2 — Example layout for printed test objects
Strictly observe the temperature and relative humidity ranges specified by the vendor. Place all
materials and test devices in that environment at least 24 h prior to the test.
Fasten a piece o f unprinted proofing substrate o f the type to be tested, 40 mm by 80 mm, to the front
part of the slab such that it extends rearwards over the protruding part of the slab. Orient the normal
printing side o f the proofing paper away from the slab so that this sur face will come in contact with the
printed test area.
B.4.3 Test
Attach a 40 cm pull string to the screws o f the slab (key 1 in Figure B.1) so that the slab may be pulled to
slide over the table sur face. Place the rubber mat on a flat table. Firmly attach the proo f print (with its
six rectangular test objects; see Figure B.2) to the rubber mat, printed side up.
Place the prepared slab on the proof print behind a rectangular printed object, with the protruding part
facing the proof print. Orient the slab such that longer sides of the protruding part of the slab and those
o f the printed test area are parallel. At a speed o f approximately 5 cm/s, pull the slab fully across the
chosen test area in the direction perpendicular to its longer side. Do not apply vertical forces to the slab.
While pulling the slab, keep the string parallel to the table surface. Inspect the substrate attached to
the bottom o f the slab. I f it is marked by trans ferred colourant, replace it with a fresh piece o f proofing
substrate. Repeat the rubbing pulls for the remaining five test areas.
B.4.4 Evaluation
Visually scrutinize the printed test areas and the adjacent unprinted parts for traces o f the rubbing
action. Visually examine the proofing substrate that was attached to the slab for traces o f trans ferred
colourant. For the striped test areas, note which colourant is a ffected most by the rubbing.
B.4.5 Mechanical stabilization period of colourant
Determine the colourant mechanical stabilization period as follows. Make a series of tests according
to B.4.3 , starting immediately a fter the proof print fully emerges from the proofing system. Repeat at
least three times, at evenly spaced intervals o f approximately 10 min. The time elapsed a fter printing
until the point when no visual traces of the rubbing action can be seen is the colourant mechanical
stabilization period.
B.5 Test report
The test report shall include the following information:
a) a re ference to this document, i.e. ISO 12647-7;
b) the proofing substrate (vendor, type, article number);
c) the colourant (vendor, type, article number);
d) the proo f printer (vendor, type, article number);
e) the printer driver and setting (vendor, type, version);
f ) the application program (vendor, type, version);
g) the raster image processor (RIP) (type and version);
h) the operating system (vendor, type, version);
i) the test conditions and any deviations from this document that might have influenced the results;
j) a scan or photograph o f the test form accompanied by notes from the evaluator (see B.4.4);
k) the date and name o f person carrying out the test.
Annex C
(normative)
Outer gamut patches
Table C.1 contains a selected subset of outer gamut patches of ISO 12642-2. The outer gamut patch set
Table C.1 gives the order
i s a l s o a s ub s e t o f the p atche s defi ne d i n I S O 1 2 6 42 -2 . T he fi rs t colu m n o f
number used in ISO 12642-2. The remaining columns give the data tone values of the patches.
NO TE I n s ome c a s e s , s ys tem s u s e 8 -b it va lue s i n wh ich c a s e s ome o f the va lue s i n th i s tab le m ay no t b e
Annex D
(informative)
Organizational certification routines for visual appraisal o f proo f-
print press-print matches
It is useful to complement the measurements and visual checks listed in Annexes A and B by visual
judgements o f a panel o f colour experts. The di fficulty resides in trying to exclude subjective judgement,
observer fatigue, and varying viewing conditions. In view o f these well-known sources o f error, the
following guidelines 1) are offered.
Visual evaluations are to be made by a group o f industry colour experts whose position within their
company requires them to release either colour proo fs or press sheets. A minimum o f four experts is
considered to be essential. Experts should go through a colour vision test such as Ishihara or Farnsworth
Munsell 100 Hue Color Vision Test to veri fy that they have normal colour vision.
Especially at the start o f the evaluations, but also throughout the entire event, once observer fatigue
sets in, the colour experts are presented with a press print and a set o f training proo fs that have, by
previous continual experience, been assessed as
— “passed”,
— “passed by a small margin”,
— “ failed by a small margin”,
— “failed”,
with respect to their visual agreement with the press print. This procedure is an attempt to ensure that
the appraisal process is applied consistently and that the experts have the same relative expectations
o f what is considered to be an acceptable proo f or proofing system. I f an expert judging the set o f
training proo fs appears to be applying expectations that notably di ffer from the given appraisal results
of the set, then this expert should be excused from the evaluation. It is important to note that this set
o f training proo fs should not have any identi fying marks as to previous evaluations; only the person
responsible for implementing the evaluations has that information and thus is in a position to evaluate
the expectations of a given expert.
During each system evaluation, the experts are requested to rotate their position relative to the viewing
booth so that they have the opportunity to view proofs from multiple locations around the viewing booth.
All hard copy proo fs should be compared with a high-quality press print which represents the intended
printing condition that is to be simulated by the proo f print. Viewing should be in accordance with
ISO 3664. A viewing booth conforming to ISO 3664, ISO viewing conditions P1 or P2, and with a viewing
area of at least 100 cm in width and 75 cm in depth should be used. The light source of the viewing
booth should be allowed to stabilize in colour temperature for at least 30 min or until measurement
demonstrates stabilization. All extraneous materials should be removed from the sides and back of the
viewing booth so as to not affect the evaluations. All room lights are to be reduced in order to ensure
that no extraneous light different from D50 is disturbing the visual appraisal.
All proo fs are first checked to make sure no identi fying marks are present that could identi fy the source
o f the proo fs. Proo fs being evaluated should not be turned over so that identi fying marks on the back
side might be readable. The evaluation is intended to be blind, i.e. without knowledge of the origin of
the proof.
The press print is placed in the viewing booth on a white backing. All proofs being evaluated against the
press print are placed close to it. The colour experts are generally given no more than 10 min to assess
each proofing system’s set o f proo fs (normally, there are three pages o f proo fs to be compared with a
press sheet). During that time, comments are recorded by the person overseeing the visual inspection
and, i f necessary, a fter clarification o f imprecise judgements. The comments recorded are tested for
consensus o f the group and, i f necessary, comments outside o f consensus are recorded also. At the end
of the evaluation period of at most 10 min, the colour experts are asked for a consensus judgment on
pass/fail for the proofing system being evaluated and this result is recorded.
Bibliography
[1] ISO 12642-1, Graphic technology — Input data for characterization of four-colour process
printing — Part 1: Initial data set
[2] ISO 12647-1, Graphic technology — Process control for the production of half-tone colour
separations, proof and production prints — Part 1: Parameters and measurement methods
[3] ISO 14861, Graphic technology — Requirements for colour soft proo fing systems
[4] ISO 15076-1, Image technology colour management — Architecture, pro file format and data
structure — Part 1: Based on ICC.1:2010
[5] ISO 15790, Graphic technology and photography — Certified reference materials for reflection
and transmission metrology — Documentation and procedures for use, including determination of
combined standard uncertainty
[6] ISO 15930 (all parts), Graphic technology — Prepress digital data exchange using PDF
[7] ISO 17972-4, Graphic technology — Colour data exchange format (CxF/X) — Part 4: Spot colour
characterisation data (CxF/X-4)
[8] ANSI CGA/TS 5:2003, Graphic technology — Spectral measurement and colorimetric computation
for graphic arts images
[9] DIN 53131-2, Testing of paper — Inkjet mediums — Part 2: Drytime)
[10] SWOP C erti f ic ation P rogram . www.swop.org
[11] H unter R.S., & H arold R. The Measurement o f Appearance. 2nd Ed., J. Wiley, 1987
[12] B ertholdt U., K raush aar A., R emler A., P olle x I., Koch T., Kü hn ö l K. Methods to
compensate the di fferences between proofing and production stock, Fogra Research report
60.055, August 2014. [viewed 3 February 2015]. Available from: https://www.fogra.
org/OBAproject_final_short_report/, accessed 27th October 2016. See also graph at https://
www.fogra.org/OBAproject_mattepapers/ which provides example measurements
ICS 37.100.01
Price based on 23 pages
© ISO 2016 – All rights reserved