Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A child’s first days, months and years – particularly setting. This leads to high numbers of children dropping
from prenatal until the age of eight – are crucial. out of education, potentially adding to the 67 million
Those first years will determine how well a child’s children who are already out of school.3
brain matures, their ability to develop language skills
and to interact with society. Ultimately, this period will Early childhood care and development (ECCD) is
shape the rest of his or her childhood, adolescence the main foundation for child survival and holistic
and adult life. human development.4 Investing in ECCD is one of the
Worldwide, more than 200 million children aged under best ways in which governments can reduce primary
five do not reach their full developmental potential due school drop-out rates and the number of children who
to the absence of early childhood care programmes.2 repeat a year. Such an investment will optimise a
In developing countries, poverty, a lack of good government’s spending on education, offsetting higher
nutrition, care and stimulation means nearly 40 per costs that governments would otherwise face if having
cent of children under five fail to reach their to adopt measures later on to ensure all children have
milestones for cognitive development. Those who do equal access to primary school and complete primary
reach primary school often lack the basic skills to education.
develop or learn in a classroom
• Remain critical to
achieving Millennium
Development Goals 2, 3,
4 and 5.
• Help governments achieve equity
in education from children’s
very early years.
• Ensure that parents value
education from children’s
Credit: Jenny Bloxham/Save the Children
3
Figure 1
rom poor and disadvantaged groups, to children with disabilities, and to marginalised populations as well as those in emergency situations a
Optimal timing for the right type of Development Agency, GIZ, “improvements in
investment
Achieving visible results quickly is often a priority for
donors. It also suits governments’ short-term tenures.
However, quick results and short-term agendas do not
necessarily enhance children’s education. For ECCD
programmes to have a positive impact on children over a
14
lifetime, long-term thinking is vital.
Enough evidence exists to prove the added value of
ECCD investment. For example, increasing the learning
component of ECCD programmes, by increasing
preschool enrolment rates to 25 per cent in every low-
income and middle-income country could yield an
estimated US$10.6 billion through higher educational
achievement. A 50 per cent increase could generate
15
US$33.7 billion. Furthermore, according to the German
5
LAYING THE FOUNDATIONS: EARLY CHILDHOOD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT
educational efficiency alone are calculated to pay back
close to 85 per cent of the costs of ECD interventions
16
for underprivileged children.”
6
Governments have often introduced ECCD after The responsibility for ECCD budgets often falls with
other aspects of the Education For All agenda education ministries. However, ECCD investment and
have been fulfilled. In such cases, centre-based budget allocations need to be linked across many other
ECCD interventions could seem expensive, sectors and government offices, including health,
particularly because they often involve setting nutrition, care and protection, child and gender welfare.
up basic infrastructure, such as buildings adjacent By establishing effective coordination systems or inter-
to existing infrastructure, and employing agency task forces, ministries can communicate,
qualified staff. implement initiatives together and make their
Governments must acknowledge that investing in investments as efficient as possible. Other ECCD
ECCD programmes is an investment in the future of stakeholders should also be included in decision-
their citizens. Implementing quality ECCD programmes making processes, such as representatives of the
effectively can have broader social benefits, ensure public and private sectors, and civil society
optimal financial returns and secure economic benefits organisations.
for the whole country.
In practice, communities often develop ECCD
programmes themselves in the absence of
government support. Communities value ECCD
because they can see the positive impact it has on
their children and the “return on their investment”.
However, when government under-investment
directly transfers financing responsibilities to
households, it has the effect of “pricing the poor out of
20
the system” and can put a strain on parents’ ability
to send their children to ECCD centres.
Even when budgets are highly constrained, it is
possible for governments to widen the reach of
21
pre-primary education and establish ECCD centres.
For example, by using existing community
infrastructure and mobilising caregivers and
teachers from within the community, particularly in
remote areas.
development
Governments are encouraged to “adopt and promote
an approach to ECC[E] that is both holistic and multi-
sectoral to ensure good birth outcomes (prenatal stage),
neonatal health and nutritional well-being, care and
education of children aged zero to eight, with special
29
focus on children aged zero to three”.
The experiences of young children, in particular
from nought to five years, as well as a future
mother’s health and education, will have an impact
on children’s learning experiences.
• Experiences such as long-term starvation, abuse
and neglect, or being exposed to violence,
compromises brain development in young
children.
• A future mother’s health is key to ensuring
that her child survives and thrives during his
30
or her early years. However, stimulation is
also an important way to help children to
achieve their
Credit: Laura Kennedy/Save the Children
Harvard University’s Center on the Developing Child suggests a useful framework for strengthening lifelong health
34
benefits through early childhood policies:
Figure 3
Save the Children’s early childhood care and children were much less nervous about starting
development programme in Mozambique has school than their peers.
successfully supported children’s early learning
skills, prepared them for primary school and The programme significantly increased children’s
promoted their subsequent school enrolment and enrolment and participation in primary school.
attendance. This was demonstrated by an impact Overall, there was an 18 per cent increase in
evaluation carried out with the World Bank in children’s school participation. The evaluation
2011. The impact evaluation has also provided found that the more time children had spent in
Mozambique’s government with critical information the ECCD programme, the greater the probability
as it embarks on an ambitious national strategy on that they had enrolled in first grade on time (aged
ECCD. six). They also spent an average of 43 per cent
more time in school than their peers each week.
The evaluation found that children participating in Two main factors that could account for this
the programme significantly outperformed their increase were that children were less likely to be
peers in problem solving skills, such as completing ill and spent less time working on the family farm
puzzles, comparing objects, and counting, as well compared with their peers.
as precise motor coordination. This includes the Parents supported children’s school participation by
ability to draw straight lines and copy symbols, promoting good hygiene and daily routines.
which are important emergent writing skills.
Parents and caregivers also said that the Positive effects for other family
programme built their children’s social and members
emotional skills, as they became more likely to help
their family members and less likely to fight with The evaluation showed positive knock-on effects for
siblings and peers. It also reduced children’s older siblings’ school participation (aged 10-15).
illness and time spent working, and freed up These children were five per cent more likely to
more time for their carers to earn a living. attend school than peers who did not have a younger
sibling in the ECCD programme. Parents were
School readiness significantly more likely to be earning a living,
presumably because the preschool programme freed
The evaluation showed that the ECCD
up several hours of their time every day.
programme helped children to make a
successful transition to primary school. First Planning for the future
grade teachers reported that children who
graduated from the ECCD programme were Mozambique has some of the lowest ECCD
consistently more likely than their peers to have enrolment rates in the world: only four per
experience in writing; had greater knowledge of cent of its children have access to any type
numbers and shapes; and showed interest in of early
writing and learning about maths. Teachers also learning programme. The education system
said these also faces major challenges: more than 27
per cent of primary school-aged children
are not in school, and more than half of
those who enrol in first grade drop out
before completing fifth grade.
Mozambique’s Ministry of Education
has recognised the importance of
ECCD in improving primary school
indicators. Our evaluation findings will
support their advocacy efforts for a
national pilot with assistance from the
World Bank. Save the Children will work
with the government to scale-up our
Credit: Per-Anders Pettersson/Save the Children model and increase access to quality
programming for young children.
Save the Children is a member of the Consultative Group on
Early Childhood Care and Development. It endorses the four
cornerstones developed to secure a strong foundation for young
children:37
Cornerstone 1: Start at the beginning • Providing teachers with knowledge about
Integrate early stimulation, child development, early childhood, learning environments and
and parenting information into prenatal, early styles, and methods for teaching early
health, nutrition, and education services by: literacy and numeracy during pre/in-service
teacher training;
• Providing access to parenting programmes
that address holistic child development, • Giving children adequate learning materials;
particularly for the most vulnerable families;
• Ensuring smaller sized classes.
• Improving services for young children
and families including early stimulation, Cornerstone 4: Include early childhood
health, nutrition and child care; in policies
Address early childhood in all national policies
Cornerstone 2: Get ready for success
and plans across sectors, including Poverty
Ensure access to at least two years of quality Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs), Common
early childhood programmes prior to formal Country Assessment’s (CCA’s), UN
school entry, beginning with the most Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF),
vulnerable and disadvantaged children. One UN Plan documents, Education for All
(EFA) Plans, and Global Partnership for
Cornerstone 3: Improve primary Education plans (GPE, formerly, the Fast Track
school quality Initiative) Assure adequate resources and multi-
sectoral coordination by ensuring that early
Increase investments and improve the childhood is integral to development and
transition from home or preschool to primary macroeconomic planning and budgeting.
school and the quality of learning in Grades
1-3 by;
Making it happen
There are many good reasons why governments should implement national and global ECCD policies that can
guarantee all children a successful early start in life. This should go hand-in-hand with any attempt to
implement broader MDG and EFA agendas, and efforts to increase access to primary education and improving
children’s learning outcomes.
To successfully harness the potential of ECCD, Save the Children recommends that governments should:
Invest equitably
Quality ECCD programmes are most effective when they target the poorest and most vulnerable children, and
the most marginalised communities. This will increase their chances of going to school and succeeding in
their education.
Endnotes
1 United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment 7 (2005), ‘Implementing child rights in early
childhood’, paragraphs 28-30
2 The Lancet, Volume 369, Issue 9555, 6 January 2007, p. 60-70
3 Education for All Global Monitoring Report (EFA-GMR) (2011)
4 Moscow Framework for Action and Cooperation, Harnessing the Wealth of Nations, UNESCO World Conference on
Early Childhood Care and Education (2010)
5 United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 7 (2005) Implementing Rights in Early
Childhood, paragraph 6
6 Save the Children, A life free from hunger – Tackling child malnutrition (2012)
7 Center on the Developing Child, In Brief: The Impact of Early Adversity on Children’s Development, Harvard University (2010)
8 Save the Children, State of the World’s Mothers, ‘Investing in the Early Years’, p. 17 (2009)
9 GTZ, Getting the basics right, Contribution of Early Childhood Development to quality, equity and efficiency in education, p. 17
(2009)
10 http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/nigeria_36688.html
11 Young, M. From Early Childhood Development to Human Development, World Bank (2002) in GTZ (2009)
12 Mingat, A. and A. Jaramillo, Early Childhood Care and Education in Sub-Saharan Africa: What Would it Take fo Meet the
Millennium Development Goals?, World Bank, p. 18-19 (2003)
13 United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, (2005)
14 GTZ (2009)
15 Engle PL, Fernald LCH, Alderman H, et al. and the Global Child Development Steering Group, Strategies for reducing inequalities and
improving developmental outcomes for young children in low-income and middle-income countries, Lancet Series (2011)
16 GTZ (2009)
17 Lancet Series (2011)
18 Vargas-Baron, E. Toward establishing national and international investment targets to expand early childhood services. Funding
the Future: Strategies for Early Childhood Investment, Costing and Financing, The Co-ordinators’ Notebook No. 30, p. 18-19
(2008)
19 Vargas-Baron (2008)
20 EFA-GMR (2011), p. 39
21 EFA-GMR (2011), p. 29-39
22 Arnold, C. Positioning ECCD in the 21st century. The Co-ordinators’ Notebook No. 28. An International Resource for
Early Childhood (2004) p. 11
23 Heckman, J. Catch ‘Em Young, Wall Street Journal (2006)
24 Early Childhood Education for All: A wise investment, MIT Workplace Centre (2005)
p. 13 web.mit.edu/workplacecenter/docs/Full per cent20Report.pdf
25 Save the Children (2009)
26 Arnold, C., Bartlett K., Gowani, S. and Merali, R. (2006), Is everybody ready? Readiness, Transition and Continuity: lessons,
reflections and moving forward. Background paper prepared for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report, Strong
Foundations: Early Childhood Care and Education (2007)
27 S. Shanker, Self-Regulation: Calm, Alert and Learning, Education Canada (2010) cea-ace.ca/education-canada/article/self-regulation-
calm-alert-and-learning
28 The Brookings Institution, Centre for Universal Education, A Global Compact on Learning, p. 13 (2011)
29 Moscow Framework for Action and Cooperation (2010)
30 Save the Children, Common Wealth or Common Hunger? (2010)
31 World Bank Newsletter no. 48577, Supplementing Nutrition in Early Years: The role of Early Childhood Stimulation to
maximize nutritional inputs (2009) p. 2
32 Save the Children (2012)
33 Save the Children (2009)
34 Center on the Developing Child, The Foundations of Lifelong Health are built in Early Childhood, Harvard University (2010)
and In Brief: The Foundations of Lifelong Health (2010)
35 Organization for the Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Starting Strong II: Early Childhood Education and
Care, Chapter 1: Why Countries Invest in Early Childhood Education and Care (2006) P. 20
36 EFA-GMR (2011) p. 73-81
37 The Consultative Group on Early Childhood Care and Development. Visit www.ecdgroup.com/4_Cornerstones.asp