Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Comparative Study of Sodium Hydrogen Titanate Nanotubes 2017 Journal of C
A Comparative Study of Sodium Hydrogen Titanate Nanotubes 2017 Journal of C
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The performances of sodium titanate nanotubes (Na-TT), hydrogen titanate nanotubes (H-TT), sodium
Received 6 August 2016 titanate nanoribbons (Na-TR) and hydrogen titanate nanoribbons (H-TR) on adsorption, photo-
Received in revised form degradation of methylene blue (MB) and sedimentability were investigated. The intrinsic property of Na-
6 February 2017
TT with high hydroxyl groups (anionic) provided a strong electrostatic interaction between the MB
Accepted 6 February 2017
Available online 6 February 2017
(cationic) under dark condition. The equilibrium and kinetic adsorption were fitted with Langmuir
isotherm models and the pseudo-second-order model, respectively. That is, Na-TT showed the best
maximum adsorption capacity of 178.6 mg/g and adsorption kinetics of 0.119 g/mg$min. When the light
Keywords:
Titanate
is turned on, H-TT showed advance its photocatalytic reaction rate of 1.16 102 min1 compared with
Nanotube Na-TT (the reaction rate of 1.02 102 min1). This attributed the saturated MB adsorption on Na-TT
Nanoribbon obstructed capacity to absorb photons, and thus the reaction gradually occurred. For the separation of
Adsorption photocatalysts from the suspension by adding alum as coagulant, Na-TT afforded the best sedimentability
Photocatalytic activity of which remaining Na-TT in water was approximately 5%. This study demonstrates that adsorption,
Sedimentation degradation and sedimentability were governed by the surface area and crystal structure, which revealed
increasing the performance in the order TiO2 < H-TR < Na-TR < H-TT < Na-TT.
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.043
0959-6526/© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
906 K. Kiatkittipong, S. Assabumrungrat / Journal of Cleaner Production 148 (2017) 905e914
Nanotubes
Nanoribbons
2. Hydrothermal Treatment
Temperature 150 °C 200 °C
Time 72 h 24 h 40 h
3. Washing
flocculation. The 200 mL of suspension was stirred for 60 min in a where hydrogen bond array (e.g., Ti-O-H) is faster than that of the
beaker. Then, 0.5 g of alum used as a coagulant was added in the sodium bond array (e.g., Ti-O-Na) under milder conditions
suspension, and the suspension was stirred for 20 min after which (Kiatkittipong et al., 2010). However, the structures are slightly
it was allowed to rest and settle for a given period of time. After fragmented may be because Naþ is replaced by Hþ during acid
coagulation-flocculation, the particles remaining in the water were wash.
separated by filtration. The XRD patterns for all samples are shown in Fig. 3(a). 100%
anatase of TiO2 commercial used as starting material is confirmed.
3. Results and discussion With the alkaline hydrothermal reaction, the XRD pattern of Na-TT
corresponds to sodium titanate (Na2Ti3O7). The distinct peak
3.1. Structures and morphology located at 9 indicates interlayer spacing of approximately 0.8 Å.
The pattern of acid washed sample (H-TT) can be indexed to
The influences of reaction temperature and acid washing on hydrogen titanate (H2Ti3O7). The decrease in interlayer spacing to
sample morphology were investigated by SEM and corresponding 0.79 Å due to replacing Naþ ions with Hþ with a smaller ionic radius
TEM (inset) as shown in Fig. 2. Fig. 2(a) shows that morphology of compared with Naþ ions (Pu et al., 2010). The crystal structure of
starting TiO2 is non-defining morphology. After hydrothermal re- H2Ti3O7 or Na2Ti3O7 was explained to be monoclinic, where is ar-
action of starting TiO2 and NaOH at 150 C for 72 h (Na-TT), the SEM ranged in the form of TiO6 edge-sharing octahedron. Each slab is
image in Fig. 2(b) reveals that the morphology of sample is a connected at its corner to form layers that are separated by either
defined tube-like structure having an outer diameter of approxi- Naþ or Hþ ions (Kolen’ko et al., 2006). Fig. 3(a) indicates that the
mately 9 nm and length in the order of microns. Similar XRD patterns for Na-TR and H-TR are sodium titanate (Na2Ti3O7)
morphology was obtained for sample (H-TT) washed with acid after and hydrogen titanate (H2Ti3O7), respectively which are similar to
the hydrothermal condition 150 C for 72 h in Fig. 2(c). The nano- those observed for Na-TT and H-TT. The distinct peak indicating
tube diameter is similar to that observed by other (Yu et al., 2006a). interlayer spacing of nanoribbons (Na-TR) is located at 2Ө z 11. A
At higher temperature (i.e. 200 C for 40 h) (Na-TR), nanoribbon distinct difference in interlayer spacing between nanotubes and
structure having a width of approximately 10e100 nm and length nanoribbons derives from structural formation. The nanoribbon
in the order of microns is formed as shown in Fig. 2(d). At a shorter system comprises multilayered titanate sheets while bending of the
hydrothermal time of 24 h, acid washing the sample after hydro- multilayered sheets addresses the nanotube formation
thermal treatment accelerated nanoribbon formation (H-TR) in (Kleinhammes et al., 2005). Naþ and Hþ exchange process can be
Fig. 2(e). This was explained that the shorter hydrothermal time confirmed by EDX analysis as shown in Fig. 3(b) and (c). EDX
needed to produce the interlayered architecture in the acid washed analysis of the individual samples Na-TT and Na-TR showed a
908 K. Kiatkittipong, S. Assabumrungrat / Journal of Cleaner Production 148 (2017) 905e914
(a)
(b) (c)
50 nm 50 nm
(d) (e)
0.5 μm 0.5 μm
Fig. 2. SEM images of (a) TiO2 (starting material), (b) Na-TT, (c) H-TT, (d) Na-TR, (e) H-TR. Corresponding TEM (inset) showing the formation of Na-TT, H-TT, Na-TR and H-TR.
significant amount of sodium (Fig. 3(b)), while there was no sodium spectra for sodium titanate appear the binding energy of the main
ion present in both the H-TT and H-TR samples (Fig. 3(c)), indicating peaks Ti 2p, O 1s and Na 1s in Fig. 4(a). The peak of Ti 2p corre-
that sodium was successfully exchanged with Hþ. sponds to Ti 2p3/2 and Ti 2p1/2 of Ti (IV) oxidation state (Esparza
XPS spectra for the sodium titanate (Na-TT and Na-TR) and et al., 2013). The peak of O 1s attributes to Ti-O and -OH (Yu
hydrogen titanate (H-TT and H-TR) are provided in Fig. 4. The et al., 2006b). The evidence of Na 1s located at 1072 in sodium
K. Kiatkittipong, S. Assabumrungrat / Journal of Cleaner Production 148 (2017) 905e914 909
(a)
H-TR
(b)
Na-TR
H-TT
TiO2
H-TT, H-TR
Fig. 3. (a) XRD patterns of TiO2 and all synthesized titanate, EDX analysis of (b) Na-TT, Na-TR and (c) H-TT, H-TR.
Table 2
O1S
TiO2 10
Intensity (a.u.)
C1S
Na-TT 138
H-TT 143
(b) Na-TR 32
Na1S
H-TR 35
(a) H-TR, 32e35 m2/g). When comparing the sodium titanate and
hydrogen titanate, it is apparent that the samples washed with HCl
have slightly higher surface area than the samples washed with
only water. That is, H-TT (143 m2/g) > Na-TT (138 m2/g), and H-TR
200
600
400
1,000
800
(35 m2/g) > Na-TR (32 m2/g). This may due to the minor collapse of
samples after acid washing as was illustrated in Fig. 2. Fig. 5(a)
Binding Energy (eV) shows the adsorption-desorption isotherm of Na-TT. It was
observed that the N2 isotherm of Na-TT is type IV of hysteresis loop
Fig. 4. XPS spectra of (a) Na-TT, Na-TR and (b) H-TT, H-TR. according to IUPAC classification. The hysteresis loop of Na-TT was
located at relative pressure between 0.6 and 1, where the internal
pore of tube structure was presented at P/P0 < 0.8. The hysteresis
loop at 0.8 < P/P0 < 1 corresponded to the interspace pore between
titanate was found, which agrees with the EDX analysis. The tubes. This showed good agreement with the TEM represented in
hydrogen titanate in Fig. 4(b) is also obviously observed the pres- Fig. 2. The pore distribution in Fig. 5(b) exhibits that the smaller
ence of peaks Ti 2p and O 1s. However, the peak of Na 1s in pores (pore diameter < 10 nm) corresponding to the pore inside
hydrogen titanate is not as intense as that in sodium titanate due to nanotubes, and the larger pores (pore diameter > 10 nm) attrib-
Naþ and Hþ exchange process, corresponding to EDX analysis. uting to voids occurring from overlap of nanotubes were both
Table 2 shows that the formation of nanostructures is reflected found in Na-TT. In case of nanoribbons, the adsorption-desorption
by the changes of surface area. The surface area of TiO2 (starting isotherm of Na-TR in Fig. 6(a) is a small hysteresis loop at a high
materials) was 10 m2/g. It was found that alkaline hydrothermal relative P/P0. This is due to aggregation of ribbon structure resulting
reaction can yield higher surface area products. The titanate in formation of macropores. This corresponded to the pore distri-
nanotubes (Na-TT and H-TT) have surface area of 138e143 m2/g bution in Fig. 6(b) presenting only high pore diameters, which
which is much higher than that of titanate nanoribbons (Na-TR and ascribed to the secondary pore.
910 K. Kiatkittipong, S. Assabumrungrat / Journal of Cleaner Production 148 (2017) 905e914
(a) (b)
(a) (b)
within 60 min. Na-TT adsorbs MB almost 2 times higher than H-TT Table 4
despite two samples exhibiting similar specific surface area. At this Freundlich isotherm parameters of methylene blue (MB) on TiO2 (starting material),
Na-TT, H-TT, Na-TR and H-TR.
point, it can be highlighted that Naþ ions in titanate exchanged
with a cationic dye of MB, which strongly adsorbed on the surface Photocatalyst KF nF R2
of titanate (Lee et al., 2007). This was similarly observed for titanate TiO2 starting material 2.01 102 0.52 0.985
nanoribbons, but not as much as on titanate nanotubes due to Na-TR 1.00 104 0.35 0.933
lower surface area of titanate nanoribbons. H-TR 3.04 105 0.28 0.910
Na-TT 6.97 1011 0.19 0.977
The equilibrium adsorption isotherm of MB in presence of all
H-TT 7.02 1014 0.12 0.988
samples was studied by Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption
models. The Langmuir adsorption models based on the assumption
of monolayer adsorption is expressed as
based structural materials and other classes of sorbents, the satu-
rated adsorption capacities are summarized in Table 5. The sorption
Ceq 1 Ceq performances of MB on Ti-O based material are very diverse. It
¼ þ
Qe Qm b Qm depends not only on their structures but also details of preparation
(concentration of reagent, ageing time, post treatment procedure).
where, Qe is the amount of MB adsorbed onto sample (mg/g), Ceq is Our sorption capacity in line with other researchers’ reported
MB concentration at equilibrium (mg/L), Qm is the maximum findings and the highlight is the importance of sodium incorpo-
amount of MB adsorbed per unit mass of sample (mg/g), and b is a rated in nanostructure without any further post treatment to ach-
constant related to the adsorption energy (L/mg). Table 3 shows Qm ieve high MB sorption capacity. Comparing to other classes of
and b, which were evaluated from the slope and intercept from sorbent materials, both TR and TT exhibit higher MB sorption ca-
plotting Ceq/Qe against Ceq, respectively. pacity than natural material e.g. kaolin while Na-TT is comparable
The Freundlich isotherm based on the assumption of a hetero- to bentonite and diatomaceous earth. However, the capacity is
geneous surface binding is expressed as much less than commercial activated carbon and biosorbent
(Marungrueng and Pavasant, 2007). Note that intensive review on
1 MB adsorption on natural materials, biosorbents, agricultural and
lnQe ¼ lnKF þ lnCe
nF industrial waste derived materials can be found in Rafatullah et al.
(2010).
where, KF is Freundlich constants (mg/g (L/mg)1/n) and dimen-
sionless nF suggests the favorability of adsorption. 3.3. Adsorption kinetics
Freundlich isotherm parameters of MB on different photo-
catalysts are provided in Table 4. The previous section demonstrated the highest adsorption
From Tables 3 and 4, it can be seen that the adsorption isotherms performance on Na-TT. Then, Na-TT was chosen to study adsorption
can be adequately described by Langmuir adsorption model kinetics. The adsorption kinetics of MB in presence of Na-TT was
because correlation coefficient R2 was found to be closer to unity studied by pseudo-first-order kinetic and pseudo-second-order
rather than Freundlich isotherm. This agreed with previous study kinetic. Pseudo-first-order is expressed as
(Natarajan et al., 2013). This indicates that the adsorption of MB on
TiO2 and titanate can be explained by monolayer adsorption; lnðQe Qt Þ ¼ lnQe k1 t
whereby a layer of MB molecules form over the surface of samples.
Pseudo second-order is expressed as
Na-TT provided the highest amounts of MB adsorption of 178.6 mg/
g with 0.39 L/mg constant related to the adsorption energy, which t 1 t
is slightly higher than the value reported by other (Xiong et al., ¼ þ
Qt k2 Qe 2 Qe
2010). The saturated adsorption capacities of MB for H-TT, Na-TR,
H-TR and TiO2 were reported as 111.1, 86.2, 80.7 and 4.7 mg/g,
where k1 is the rate constant of pseudo-first-order kinetic model
respectively. The order has been similarly observed by adsorption
(min1), k2 is rate constant of pseudo-second-order (g/mg min), Qe
performance in Fig. 7. It is worth to note that the amount of the MB
and Qt are the amounts of preferential adsorption of MB dye on Na-
adsorbed on Na-TT at equilibrium increased from 115 to 167 and
TT (mg/g) at equilibrium and at time t (min), respectively.
179 mg/g with the increase of initial MB concentration from 10 to
Table 6 showed kinetic data of the pseudo-first-order and
50 and 100 mg/L. This is due to the increase of driving force of the
pseudo-second-order kinetic models. It can be seen that the fitting
concentration gradient with increasing initial MB concentration. As
of experimental data exhibited a good compliance with pseudo-
constant sorbent loading, the removal efficiency decreased from
second-order kinetic equation, and linear plots of t/Qt versus t
59% to 17% and 9%. In order to increase removal efficiency, opti-
with correlation coefficients (R2) is closer to unity rather than
mizing amount of Na-TT loading is recommended for further
pseudo-first-order. The pseudo-second-order model can be
investigation.
explained that chemical sorption involving valency forces through
To compare the sorption performance of MB with other Ti-O
sharing or exchange of electrons between adsorbent and adsorbate
might be significant (Ho and McKay, 1999).
Table 3
Langmuir isotherm parameters of methylene blue (MB) on TiO2 (starting material), 3.4. Photocatalytic activity
Na-TT, H-TT, Na-TR and H-TR.
Photocatalyst Qm (mg/g) b (L/mg) R2 Fig. 8 presents the relative concentration of MB (C/C0) over time,
TiO2 starting material 4.7 0.06 0.999 where C and C0 are reaction concentrations at a specific time and
Na-TR 86.2 0.18 0.992 the initial concentrations of MB, respectively. Prior to photo-
H-TR 80.7 0.09 0.997 catalytic degradation, MB was adsorbed on the surface of photo-
Na-TT 178.6 0.39 0.999 catalyst for 60 min under the dark condition according to the
H-TT 111.1 0.12 0.994
aforementioned result illustrating the equilibrium adsorption
912 K. Kiatkittipong, S. Assabumrungrat / Journal of Cleaner Production 148 (2017) 905e914
Table 5
Maximum sorption capacity of MB on different Ti-O based structural materials and other class sorbents.
Table 6
Kinetic data of the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models at concentration ca. 10 mg/l.
TiO2
H-TR
Na-TR
H-TT
Na-TT
Fig. 8. Changes in the relative concentration (C/C0) of methylene blue over time by TiO2 (starting material), Na-TT, H-TT, Na-TR and H-TR.
(Fig. 6). As seen from the C/C0, a smaller degradation of MB on indicated that the photocatalytic performance relied on the corre-
typical TiO2 was obtained when compared to that of titanate sponding surface area as shown in Table 2. At this point, the pho-
nanostructures. A significant decrease in approximate 80% MB todegradation of MB on TiO2 and titanate nanostructures was found
degradation was seen for the titanate nanotubes while titanate to follow first order reaction, which was similarly observed by other
nanoribbons exhibited approximate 60% MB degradation. This (Choudhury et al., 2016). The rate constant for TiO2 was 8.56 103
K. Kiatkittipong, S. Assabumrungrat / Journal of Cleaner Production 148 (2017) 905e914 913
min1. For titanate nanotubes, the reaction rate constant (k) for Na-
TT (1.02 102 min1) was lower than that for H-TT (1.16 102
min1), despite a higher MB adsorption on Na-TT in dark condition. TiO2
The suppression of MB degradation on Na-TT may attribute that the
high amount of MB absorbed on Na-TT may block the active site for H-TR
light absorption. For nanoribbons, the reaction rates of Na-TR and
H-TR were 9.14 103 min1 and 9.32 103 min1, respectively.
Na-TR
The suppressed degradation of MB on Na-TR exhibited similar H-TT
behavior explained for titanate nanotubes, but the degradation of
MB between Na-TR and H-TR was not significantly different. This
Na-TT
behavior was also observed for oxalic degradation (Kiatkittipong
et al., 2013). This effect was not as pronounced for titanate nano-
ribbons because of their comparatively low surface area. Through
the results of this study, it was suggested that the adsorption pro-
cess and photodegradation should occur simultaneously. The
photocatalyst stability of all synthesized samples for MB degrada-
tion is illustrated in Fig. 9. The results reveal that the reaction rates
of Na-TT, H-TT, Na-TR, H-TR were not significantly different for at
least 3 cycles, indicating that all synthesized samples have photo-
catalytic stability.
Fig. 10. Particles remaining in water for suspensions over time.
3.5. Sedimentability
The sedimentability of suspension was studied by over the time immersed in HCl solution, Naþ is replaced by Hþ to form hydrogen
frame of 0e30 min. Their separability was presented in term of the titanate nanotubes (H-TT). For titanate nanoribbons, a sodium
particle remaining in water as shown in Fig. 10. Their sedimentation titanate nanoribbons (Na-TR) having surface area of 32 m2/g can be
of particles was fast, and the particles remaining in water was obtained at temperature of 200 C for 40 h. When acid washing was
below 50% during the first 5 min. It is interesting that the sedi- employed, hydrogen titanate nanoribbons (H-TR) were formed at
mentation of all synthesized titanates (particles remaining < 20%) 200 C for 24 h under hydrothermal condition. All synthesized
was more compared to TiO2 (particle remaining 30%) after 30 min. titanate nanostructures were more proficient for MB adsorption
The particles remaining in water for Na-TT and H-TT were performance as compared to starting material TiO2 due to higher
approximately 5% and 10%, respectively. Titanate nanotubes were surface areas. The largest MB adsorption capacity was seen for Na-
observed to provide a better settle down than titanate nanoribbons TT which is found as one of the highest sorption capacity among Ti-
(18% of Na-TR and 20% of H-TR remaining in water). This attributed O structural materials from the literature. That is, the adsorption of
the higher negative charge on the surface of titanate nanotubes MB dye on Na-TT was explained by Langmuir adsorption model
which is more favourable surface for a high charge density of Al3þ with a maximum amount of 178.6 mg/g. The sodium incorporation
ion to form large particles and settle as sediment. in titanate nanotubes is one of key parameters to achieve high MB
sorption capacity. The reaction of MB adsorption was pseudo-
second-order with the rate constant (k) of 0.075 g/mg min. This
4. Conclusions
was attributed to the high concentration of hydroxyl groups on the
surface, and negative charge of sodium titanate strongly adsorbed
Titanate nanostructures were synthesized by reacting anatase
cationic form of MB. Under light irradiation, the photocatalytic
TiO2 (surface area of 10 m2/g) with 10 M NaOH under hydrothermal
activity increased in the order TiO2 < titanate
condition. Sodium titanate nanotubes (Na-TT) having a surface area
nanoribbons < titanate nanotubes, which can be explained in term
of 138 m2/g were obtained at 150 C for 72 h. When Na-TT was
of their surface areas. However, the high amount of MB on sodium
titanate suppressed the reaction rate of degradation. This was
-2 -1 especially observed in the case for Na-TT due to comparatively high
X 10 (min ) surface area. That is, the reaction rate constant (k) for H-TT
(1.16 102 min1) was faster than that for Na-TT (1.02 102
min1). For sedimentability after photocatalytic reaction, the pre-
st
sent study clearly ascertained that all synthesized titanate nano-
1 cycle structures provided better separation from water with alum when
compared with TiO2. The strong interaction between titanate
nd nanotubes and the Al3þ ion leads to preferential flocculation and
k 2 cycle easy removal from the water, of which remaining Na-TT and H-TT in
water were approximately 5% and 10%, respectively.
rd
3 cycle
Acknowledgement