This document compares the carrier's responsibility under three international maritime conventions:
1. The Hague Rules 1924 - The carrier is responsible from when goods are loaded until discharged from the ship (tackle to tackle). There are 17 exclusions to liability and loss/damage is limited to 100 pounds sterling or equivalent per package.
2. Hague-Visby Rules 1968 - The carrier is responsible during the period in charge of goods. Liability is based on presumed fault or neglect. Loss/damage is limited to 10,000 francs or equivalent per package.
3. Hamburg Rules 1978 - The carrier is responsible during the period in charge of goods. Liability is based on fault or neglect.
This document compares the carrier's responsibility under three international maritime conventions:
1. The Hague Rules 1924 - The carrier is responsible from when goods are loaded until discharged from the ship (tackle to tackle). There are 17 exclusions to liability and loss/damage is limited to 100 pounds sterling or equivalent per package.
2. Hague-Visby Rules 1968 - The carrier is responsible during the period in charge of goods. Liability is based on presumed fault or neglect. Loss/damage is limited to 10,000 francs or equivalent per package.
3. Hamburg Rules 1978 - The carrier is responsible during the period in charge of goods. Liability is based on fault or neglect.
This document compares the carrier's responsibility under three international maritime conventions:
1. The Hague Rules 1924 - The carrier is responsible from when goods are loaded until discharged from the ship (tackle to tackle). There are 17 exclusions to liability and loss/damage is limited to 100 pounds sterling or equivalent per package.
2. Hague-Visby Rules 1968 - The carrier is responsible during the period in charge of goods. Liability is based on presumed fault or neglect. Loss/damage is limited to 10,000 francs or equivalent per package.
3. Hamburg Rules 1978 - The carrier is responsible during the period in charge of goods. Liability is based on fault or neglect.
COMPARISON CARRIER’S RESPONSIBILITY UNDER 3 RULES:
Hague 1924 Hague-Visby 1968 Hamburg 1978
Time "Carriage of goods" covers the period from the The responsibility of the carrier for time when the goods are loaded on to the time the goods under this Convention they are discharged from the ship. (from covers the period during which the tackle to tackle) carrier is in charge of the goods at the port of loading (from the time he has taken over the goods from the shipper) , during the carriage and at the port of discharge (until he has delivered the goods by handing over the goods to the consignee).
Basis of - 3 Main Obligations: - 2 Main Obligations:
liability 1. The carrier shall be bound before and at Presumed Fault or Neglect the beginning of the voyage to exercise due Obligation diligence to: The carrier is liable (a) Make the ship seaworthy. (i) for loss of or damage to the (b) Properly man, equip and supply the ship. goods or delay in delivery caused (c) Make the holds, refrigerating and cool by fire, if the claimant proves that the fire arose from fault or neglect chambers, and all other parts of the ship in on the part of the carrier, his which goods are carried, fit and safe for their servants or agents; reception, carriage and preservation. (ii) for such loss, damage or delay 2. Subject to the provisions of Article 4, the in delivery which is proved by the carrier shall properly and carefully load, handle, claimant to have resulted from the fault or neglect of the carrier, his stow, carry, keep, care for, and discharge the servants or agents in taking all goods carried. measures that could reasonably 3. After receiving the goods into his charge the be required to put out the fire and carrier or the master or agent of the carrier avoid or mitigate its shall, on demand of the shipper, issue to the consequences. shipper a Bill of Lading. -3 Exclusions: - 17 Exclusions: 1. With respect to live animals, the (a) Act, neglect, or default of the master, carrier is not liable for loss, mariner, pilot, or the servants of the carrier in damage or delay in delivery the navigation or in the management of the resulting from any special risks inherent in that kind of carriage. If ship. the carrier proves that he has (b) Fire, unless caused by the actual fault or complied with any special privity of the carrier. instructions given to him by the (c) Perils, dangers and accidents of the sea or shipper respecting the animals and that, in the circumstances of the other navigable waters. case, the loss, damage or delay in (d) Act of God. delivery could be attributed to such (e) Act of war. risks, it is presumed that the loss, (f) Act of public enemies. damage or delay in delivery was (g) Arrest or restraint or princes, rulers or so caused, unless there is proof that all or a part of the loss, people, or seizure under legal process. damage or delay in delivery (h) Quarantine restrictions. resulted from fault or neglect on (i) Act or omission of the shipper or owner of the part of the carrier, his servants the goods, his agent or representative. or agents. (j) Strikes or lockouts or stoppage or restraint of 2. The carrier is not liable, except labour from whatever cause, whether partial or in general average, where loss, general. damage or delay in delivery (k) Riots and civil commotions. resulted from measures to save (l) Saving or attempting to save life or property life or from reasonable measures at sea. to save property at sea. (m) Wastage in bulk or weight or any other loss 3. Where fault or neglect on the or damage arising from inherent defect, quality part of the carrier, his servants or or vice of the goods. agents combines with another (n) Insufficiency of packing. cause to produce loss, damage or (o) Insufficiency or inadequacy of marks. delay in delivery, the carrier is liable only to the extent that the (p) Latent defects not discoverable by due loss, damage or delay in delivery diligence. is attributable to such fault or (q) Any other cause arising without the actual neglect, provided that the carrier fault or privity of the carrier, or without the proves the amount of the loss, actual fault or neglect of the agents or servants damage or delay in delivery not attributable thereto. of the carrier, but the burden of proof shall be on the person claiming the benefit of this exception to show that neither the actual fault or privity of the carrier nor the fault or neglect of the agents or servants of the carrier contributed to the loss or damage.
An amount + An amount exceeding + 835 units of account per exceeding 100 the equivalent of 10,000 package or other shipping unit or pounds sterling per francs per package or 2.5 units of account per kilogram package or unit, or unit or 30 francs per kilo of gross weight of the goods lost or the equivalent of of gross weight of the damaged, whichever is the higher. that sum in other goods lost or damaged, + Where a container: same as currency whichever is the higher Hague Visby 1968 - Delay in delivery: (A franc means a unit - Delay in delivery: two and a half not mentioned consisting of 65.5 times the freight payable for the milligrammes of gold of goods delayed, but not exceeding millesimal fineness 900'). the total freight payable under the + Where a container: contract of carriage of goods by pallet or similar article of sea. transport is used to consolidate goods, the number of packages or units enumerated in the Bill of Lading as packed in such article of transport shall be deemed the number of packages or units for the purpose of this paragraph as far as these packages or units are concerned. Except as aforesaid such article of transport shall be considered the package or unit. - Delay in delivery: not mentioned