Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This paper was prepared for presentation at the Offshore Technology Conference Asia held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 25–28 March 2014.
This paper was selected for presentation by an OTC program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper have not been
reviewed by the Offshore Technology Conference and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of the Offshore Technology Conference, its
officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper without the written consent of the Offshore Technology Conference is prohibited. Permission to
reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of OTC copyright.
Abstract
The recently discovered super-giant Mamba field is located in the Area 4 deep water block, offshore northern Mozambique
and hosts over 80 TCF of natural Gas in place within Paleogene deepwater deposits. The Coral reservoir unit represents the
Lower Eocene depositional sequence of the Mamba field and is formed by sand-rich turbidite channel and lobe complexes of
proximal deepwater fan accumulations. Generally, the coarse and massive reservoir sandstones are extraordinarily thick, clean
and homogeneous compared to similar deep water plays, e.g. Gulf of Mexico, West Africa. High quality 3D seismic and data
from three wells, including wire line logs and over 100m of core, indicate that the excellent reservoir quality of the Mamba
complex can be related to the presence of strong, deep water bottom currents that influenced the deposition of gravity-flows.
An integrated sedimentological approach on multiple scales, which comprises detailed sedimentological core descriptions,
seismic stratigraphy and seismic attribute analysis, provides new insights into the depositional processes and the reservoir
architecture of a fascinating deepwater play. The depositional model suggests Lower Eocene bottom currents crossing the sand
rich gravity flows perpendicularly. This results in significant flow-stripping and deviation of the turbulent, fine-grained
suspension cloud. The process accumulates the greatest amount of fines on the leeward part of the channel complex and
creates unilateral drift-mounds instead of bi-lateral levee complexes. This leads to relatively mud-free facies types and a
characteristic low angle offset stacking of the amalgamated channel complexes. However, dependent on associated flow-
velocities and grain sizes, also the depositional lobes show exceptionally good reservoir properties, characteristic geometries
and stacking patterns. The integrated and process-oriented approach allowed detailed mapping and modeling of the reservoir
bodies, which permits the prediction of reservoir quality and optimization of the field development.
Introduction
One of the main challenges of deep water field developments is the translation of geology into specific parameters that can be
used to minimize the associated uncertainty and optimize the Field Development Plan. Due to extremely high drilling costs in
deep water fields an exact definition of the drainage area and the associated well amount and placement is crucial. This
requires a detailed understanding of the sedimentology that largely controls the outline, the quality and the heterogeneity
scales of the Coral reservoir. The here presented datasets provide new insights into the reservoir architecture of a deep water
fan with extraordinarily good reservoir properties and distinct geometries that can be related to the influence of bottom
currents. Generally, well documented ancient contourite systems are scarce (e.g. Pickering et al. 1989, Hüneke & Stow 2008,
Shanmugam et al. 1995, Stow et al. 1998) and until recently of minor economic importance. However, hydrocarbon-bearing
sandy contourites, composed of partly re-worked turbidite sands are described for the Eocene deep water deposits in the
Campos basin, offshore Brazil (Mutti , 1992; Mutti & Carminatti, 2011; Stow et al. 2011). Viana & Rebesco (2007) assumed
that contourite deposits could have a significant economic upside potential in oil and gas exploration, due to the general
technical progress in e.g. geophysics, drilling etc. and advances in deep water exploration. The latest discoveries of the super
giant Mamba gas field in ultra deep waters, offshore northern Mozambique, seem to confirm these assumptions. The presence
of unidirectionally migrating channel complexes (e.g. Gong et. al 2013) and their possible relation to the bottom currents of
the main reservoir units in the Mamba Field have been first described by Fonnesu (2013). These observations are supported by
different datasets of the Coral reservoir unit suggesting the influence of bottom currents at several scales as a driver for the
overall stacking pattern and the low shale content of the reservoir rocks. The here presented study gives an overview of the
2 OTC-24907-MS
Lower Eocene reservoir interval, and provides new insights into an economically important hydrocarbon reservoir composed
of bottom-current influenced gravity flow deposits.
Fig.1 Coral is part of the East African discoveries in the Area 4 deep water block, offshore northern Mozambique, which hosts
in total over 80 TCF of natural gas in place within Paleogene deepwater deposits.
Fig. 2 The South-North oriented seismic section (left) shows the typical southwards migration and offset stacking of the
channels. Instead of symmetric levee deposits the unidirectional migration channel complexes (c.f. Gong et al 2013) are
flanked by drift mounds that occur exclusively on the southern margins. The scheme to right (based on Fonnesu, 2013) depicts
the depositional processes leading to the characteristic stacking pattern and the high sand-content of the reservoir facies. The
concept suggests northward directed bottom currents crossing the high volume and sand rich gravity flows perpendicularly.
4 OTC-24907-MS
Fig.3 The figure shows a spectral decomposition map (left) and the interpretation (right) of a stratigraphic slice in the Coral
reservoir. The spectral decomposition provides remarkable, high resolution insights into the channels and individual,
systematically northward oriented and prograding drift lobes
OTC-24907-MS 5
Small scale: facies and stacking patterns from cores and logs
Our facies classification for the turbidite deposits is mainly based the on the concept of Mutti (1992) that provides also a
subdivision for coarse grained, high density turbidite deposits (Ta after Bouma, 1962). The classification of the here presented
Facies Associations uses, however, slightly modified terminology based on Mayall, et al. (2006). Their subsurface optimized
approach links the internal architecture of turbidite channel deposits with the seismic sequence stratigraphic framework.
Diagnostic sedimentary structures for bottom current activity are mainly consistent with observations of e.g. Stow & Faugères
(2008) and Martín–Chivelet, et al. (2008).
1) High N/G Facies Association: This Facies Association represents the largest portion and the best properties of the Coral
reservoir. It consists of poorly to fairly sorted, massive, coarse to very coarse sandstones with varying pebble content and
shale rip-up clasts (Facies F5). The sandstones are mostly massive and structureless, apart from occasional flame and
dish structures. Individual beds can show subtle fining-upward trends and reach thicknesses of several meters. The beds
are amalgamated with minor facies changes or intercalations of shales and form thick discrete packages that reach overall
thicknesses of over 50 m and a net to gross of over 80%. The overall stacking pattern is blocky and sequences often start
with a sharp erosional base, cutting into a several meter thick debris flow deposit. The base of the blocky massive
sandstone sequence is commonly composed of very coarse, pebble-rich sandstones or conglomerates with a variable
amount of mud clasts. Where the sequence is overlain by drift-mound sediments identified in the seismic, the top of
sequence can also show a fining-upward trend.
Interpretation: The above described F5 Massive Sandstones with dewatering structures indicate sediment transport and
en-masse deposition by the basal high density part of bipartite gravity flows. High resolution seismic amplitude mapping
suggests that this can be an indicator for either stacked channels or proximal lobe deposits. The basal mudclast and
conglomerate lag-deposits point to an initial cutting phase, dominated by erosion and sediment bypass. A notable contrast
to conventional deep water settings is the almost complete absence of finer grained intercalations within the blocky
sandstone sequences like medium-fine sands, silts and shale.
2) Low N/G Facies Association: This facies association is generally more variable and has a net to gross ratio that ranges
40-60% and shows common deep-water turbidite facies types with some unusual intercalations:
a) The common stacking pattern is formed of a lower part with blocky, several meter thick coarse and structureless
facies types (F5) with varying pebble and mudclast content or conglomeratic lag deposits.
The upper part is composed of prominent fining upward units that can reach up to 20 m in thickness. The fining up unit
starts basally with a few decimeters thick structureless (F8) to parallel laminated (F7), fine to medium grained sandstone
beds that can be normal- or inverse-graded (F7-D). The upper part of the fining upward unit is formed by heterolithic,
centimeter to decimeter thick alternations of current-rippled fine to very fine sandstones (F9) and silty shales. The
sandstones of this finer grained part are commonly normal graded and can show a variable intensity of bioturbation. The
laminae of the current ripples are often separated by thin clay-drapes.
b) The unusual facies types appear preferably in the middle part by forming abrupt intercalations of 0.4m to 1m thick
coarse to very coarse sandstone beds with high-angle trough cross-bedding (F5-D). The beds can show slight normal- or
inverse-grading. In contrast to the poorly sorted F5 Sandstones, the individual cross-bedding laminae show very good
internal sorting and are often separated by aligned shale rip-up clasts and foraminifera following the cross bedding
planes.
Interpretation: Seismic amplitude extractions indicate that this facies association occurs commonly in the internal,
irregularly meandering channel and levee complexes. The massive sands and conglomerates are interpreted as basal
channel fills formed by high density turbidites with enhanced erosion and bypass capacity. The thick fining upward units
above are interpreted as levee complexes documenting the successive off-axis deposition and channel migration.
Indication for the influence of bottom current activity in these facies types are generally subtle and mainly given by the
presence of the trough cross-bedded well-sorted sands and the shale-drapes in the rippled facies types. Trough cross
bedding and the coarse grain size are the result of sediment traction transport and current velocities around 0.3- 0.6 m/s.
However, the elevated sorting within the cross-bedding laminae and aligned mudclasts indicate an erosive, prevailing,
slightly pulsate nature of the flow. This points more towards bottom current activity rather than internal reworking by
either bypassing successive gravity flows or the turbidite tail.
3) Non-reservoir Facies: Consists mainly of massive hemipelagic shales, thinly laminated heterolithic silty shales, slumps
and debris flow. Whereas the heterolithic silty shales occur preferably in the thick-drift mounds in the northern part of the
fan, slumps and debris flows occur internally. They are highly variable in thickness and in composition, but remain
generally below seismic resolution and occur preferably a) below the massive high net to gross facies associations and b)
towards the base of the Coral Fan.
6 OTC-24907-MS
Electro facies
Since the wire line log resolution ranges around half a meter, a practical and simplified electrofacies definition was carried out
with a Neural Network and a Vshale cut-off. In a first step key-logs where identified and investigated for their correlation with
the grouped core facies. The grouped core facies were then used half as training and half as control datasets to define three
discrete electro-facies types: a) Massive Sands (F5) b) Thin beds (F7 and F8) c) Non reservoir (F9, Debris Flow, slumps shales
etc.)
Geometrical Modeling
Structurally, the area around Coral shows a few normal faults with minor throws. Therefore, the geometrical modeling
focused mainly on capturing the stratigraphy and the reservoir bodies. The geometrical pillar grid is vertically delimited by the
large scale 3rd order stratigraphic surfaces of the Coral low stand systems tract. Five additional medium-scale stratigraphic
surfaces define the internal zonation of the model. Each zone is layered proportionally with minimum cell thickness of 0.5
meters. The high seismic quality and the application of enhanced interpretation and mapping workflows allowed deterministic
modeling of the main reservoir bodies (Fig.4):
a) In a first step the medium-scale bodies identified on the seismic amplitude maps were modeled with the corresponding
polygons for each stratigraphic zone.
b) The bodies were grouped according to facies association and connectivity indicated from MDT pressure data in 1) Upper
High N/G Body, 2) Separated Low N/G Body, 3) Connected Low N/G body and 4) Tight Background
c) The top of the Coral Reservoir is characterized by the Gas Sand Envelope horizon (Fig.4) which was interpreted on the
Fluid Indicator Volume. It delimits reservoir bodies that extend above this horizon and marks the lateral transition between the
high net to gross facies association and the non-reservoir drift-mound fines.
Fig.4 The figure depicts the workflow of the deterministic reservoir body mapping, grouping and the vertical cut-off with the
seismic gas-sand envelope horizon.
OTC-24907-MS 7
Facies Modeling
For the facies distribution, the deterministic mapping of the reservoir bodies had the advantage that a) the simplified electro
facies types could be used to model sedimentologically meaningful scenarios and b) the facies fractions of the wells can be
considered. In order to address the substantially different heterogeneities and sedimentology within the grouped geobodies, the
facies modeling was carried out in a hierarchical way (Fig.5). The final facies distribution, particularly within the High N/G
Bodies is considered as one of the key drivers of the well-placement in Coral. Generally, for each Reservoir Body the facies
fractions of the 3D distributions are matched to those of the upscaled facies logs.
o The High N/G Bodies show an extraordinarily high level of amalgamation and the remaining shale relicts are
considered to have limited lateral extension. Therefore, the modeling was carried out with Sequential Indicator
Simulation and Azimuth maps to consider the general orientations of the depositional system. To obtain a gradual
transition rather than an abrupt change between the massive sands and the drift fines, 3D facies probability cubes
were created and applied for these bodies.
o The facies distribution of the Low Net to Gross Bodies was slightly more complex and was split in two steps. Firstly,
a background property was modeled containing the shales and thin bed facies types with a Sequential Indicator
Simulation algorithm using local variable azimuth maps and spherical variograms.
Secondly the channels were modeled with an Object Based Modeling approach. The result of the thin bed modeling is
kept as background. Object-based Modeling resulted as the most feasible option to distribute the sand within the Low
N/G bodies. Attempts with Multiple Point Geostatistics could improve the lateral facies contacts and relationships,
but did not respect the proportions and were relatively time consuming. Channel parameters for thickness, width,
sinuosity etc. were taken from some measureable examples within the Low Net to Gross Bodies and channels in the
overburden. To control the channel orientations and the lateral connectivity, flow fairway polygons were introduced.
Fig.5 Hierarchical facies modeling workflow showing one cross sections (left) and different exemplary time- slices (right)
through the reservoir representing each facies modeling step.
8 OTC-24907-MS
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank eni East Africa, eni E&P Exploration, eniUk MPM-Reservoir team and their associated
development partners Galp, Kogas, ENH and CNPC for their contributions and the approval of this publication. Furthermore,
we would like to thank Eni Management, in particular Filippo Maioli and Pablo Flores for their help in improving this paper.
References
Bouma, A. H., Kuenen, P. H., & Shepard, F. P. (1962). Sedimentology of some flysch deposits: a graphic approach to facies
interpretation (Vol. 168). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Fonnesu, F., (2013). The Mamba Complex supergiant gas discovery (Mozambique): an example of turbidite fans modified by
deepwater tractive bottom currents. The 12th PESGB/HGS Conference on African E&P, London. September 13th 2013
Gong, C., Wang, Y., Zhu, W., Li, W., & Xu, Q. (2013). Upper Miocene to Quaternary unidirectionally migrating deep-water
channels in the Pearl River Mouth Basin, northern South China Sea. AAPG bulletin, 97(2), 285-308.
Hüneke, H., & Stow, D. A. V. (2008). Identification of ancient contourites: problems and palaeoceanographic significance.
Developments in Sedimentology, 60, 323-344.
Partyka, G., Gridley, J., & Lopez, J. (1999). Interpretational applications of spectral decomposition in reservoir
characterization. The Leading Edge, 18(3), 353-360.
Pickering, K. T., Hiscott, R. N., & Hein, F. J. (1989). Deep-marine environments: clastic sedimentation and tectonics. Allen &
Unwin Australia.
Mayall, M., Jones, E., & Casey, M. (2006). Turbidite channel reservoirs—key elements in facies prediction and effective
development. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 23(8), 821-841
Martín–Chivelet, J., Fregenal–Martínez, M. A., & Chacón, B. (2008). Traction structures in contourites. Developments in
Sedimentology, 60, 157-182.
Mutti, E. & Carminatti, M. (2011). Deep-Water Sands of the Brazilian Offshore Basins, Abstract AAPG International
Conference and Exibition , Milan, Italy, October 23-26, 2011
Mutti, E. (1992). Turbidite sandstones. Agip, Istituto di geologia, Università di Parma
Salman, G. and Abdula, I., (1995). Development of the Mozambique and Ruvuma sedimentary basins, offshore Mozambique.
Sedimentary Geology, 96, 7-41.
Shanmugam, G., Spalding, T. D., & Rofheart, D. H. (1995). Deep-marine bottom-current reworked sand (Pliocene and
Pleistocene), Ewing Bank 826 field, Gulf of Mexico. In Turbidite and Associated Deep-water Facies. Society Economic
Paleontologists Mineralogists, SEPM Core Workshop (No. 20, pp. 25-54).
Stow, D.A., Brackenridge R., & Hernandez-Molina, J. (2011). Contourite Sheet Sands: New Deepwater Exploration Target,
Abstract, AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA, April 10-13, 2011
Stow, D. A., Faugères, J. C., Viana, A., & Gonthier, E. (1998). Fossil contourites: a critical review. Sedimentary Geology,
115(1), 3-31.
Stow, D. A. V., & Faugères, J. C. (2008). Contourite facies and the facies model. Developments in Sedimentology, 60, 223-
256.Stow, D. A. V., Hunter, S., Wilkinson, D., & Hernández-Molina, F. J. (2008). The nature of contourite deposition.
Developments in Sedimentology, 60, 143-156.
Viana, A. R., & Rebesco, M. (Eds.). (2007). Economic and palaeoceanographic significance of contourite deposits (No. 276).
Geological Society.