Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ben Sparkman
12 March 2012
Review of: Strazzulla, M. 2009. “War and Peace: Housing the Ara Pacis in the Eternal City”
Abstract
In her article “War and Peace: Housing the Ara Pacis in the Eternal City”, Strazzulla
asserts that despite its criticisms and shortcomings, the Ara Pacis Museum in Rome is a fitting
combination of modern architectural ideas and ancient art tradition. She likes the contemporary
look and feel of the building but complains about its lighting and overall size. She concludes that
regardless of its faults, the museum is a bold contemporary statement to the old traditional
Strazzulla begins her article with a detailed history of the Ara Pacis Augustae (Altar of
Augustan Peace), which was commissioned in 13 B.C.E. to honor the return of Augustus from
peace talks in Spain. She describes the altar and its decoration in detail and tells the story of how
and why the new museum was built. In the 1930’s, Benito Mussolini had the excavated pieces of
the Ara Pacis reconstructed and housed in a pavilion designed by Vittorio Ballio Morpugo. In
1996, architect Richard Meier was commissioned to create a new museum to house the altar. The
building is a rectangle, with the longer sidewalls and front entrance made primarily of glass. The
altar is easily viewed from the street and plaza outside, but the horizontal louvers on the glass
throw inconvenient shadows and light reflections that distort the view from inside. She also
complains that the internal lighting is unsatisfactory and the walkways on either side of the altar
are so narrow that visitors have trouble viewing the side friezes.
Sparkman 2
However, she enjoys seeing the altar in the context of the rest of the city through the glass
walls, looking from inside to outside. The rear travertine wall creates a nice backdrop for the
altar, but blocks the view of other important buildings in the area when viewed at certain angles
from outside. Strazzulla feels that certain additions to the museum were unnecessary, including
the auditorium and outside obelisk. She indicates that the omission of these could have
minimized the footprint of the museum. Other features such as a computerized virtual tour,
relevant exhibits, state-of-the-art interior environmental controls, and the overall elegance and
Context
Strazzula also tackles the idea of the museum as a concept rather than simply a building.
Some critics were displeased at the destruction of the Morpugo pavilion, which they felt had
exhibition design. Strazzula argues that the pavilion changed much over the years, and was so
different from the original plan that it could not be considered a “cornerstone of rational
architecture” (Strazzula 4). Spiro Kostof’s “The Emperor and the Duce: The Planning of Piazzale
Augusto Imperatore in Rome” details Mussolini’s and the Fascist’s involvement with the Ara
Pacis. Strazzula also mentions the museum’s biggest public criticism by Vittorio Sgarbi, who
claimed it looked like a “highway rest stop or a pizzeria, good for the outskirts of Las Vegas, but
certainly not for the center of Rome” (Architettiroma 2003, 19 March). Strazzula counters by
indicating the materials and design choices that Meier made “reclaimed the urban context,
renewing it with a touch of class,” and that condemning any modern architecture ensures that
Bibliography
Architettiroma. 2003, 19 March. “Ara Pacis: Il cantiere delle polemiche opinione di Vittorio
Kostof, S. 1978. “The Emperor and the Duce: The Planning of Piazzale Augusto Imperatore in
Rome.” In Art and Architecture in the Service of Politics, edited by H.A. Millon and L.
Strazzulla, M.J. 2009. “War and Peace: Housing the Ara Pacis in the Eternal City.” Online
http://www.ajaonline.org/sites/default/files/AJA1132_Strazzulla.pdf.