Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PattersonTBTM7101-1
Tiffany C. Patterson
A theory is a set of concepts interrelated to shape a structural view of phenomena that can be
represented or projected (Imenda, 2014). The seed of a theory begins with a question that seeks to find
similarities between things that are seemingly unrelated. It contains foundational characteristics such as
who (the theory variables); how (element linkage); why (the interpretation of the fundamental
dynamics); and when, where (the parameter conditions) (Byron and Thatcher, 2016). A theory is built
when a researcher attempts to articulate a phenomenon through data collection in order to explain a
theory. Data collection may include: independent research to better understand the phenomenon, a
determination of related theories or the creation of a new theory (Garud and Gehman, 2016). Once
plausible connections are made, the researcher then builds a hypothesis to explain the observations of
the phenomena. The hypothesis may contain independent and dependent variables but must be
measured in order to transform the prediction into an evidence-based theory. Measuring the hypothesis
is derived from integrating experiments into the environment to test the hypothesis. Performing
repeatable tests by the researcher and peers or advisers validates the creditability of the hypothesis in
order to create a theory (Earman, 1984). If the replicated tests do not support the researcher’s
prediction then the hypothesis is incorrect and the researcher may need to refine the hypothesis. If the
replicated tests do yield the same evaluated results from researcher to peer or adviser, then the logic
behind the hypothesis is sound and the theory can be confirmed with certainty. Once a theory is
developed and a conclusion has been drawn, the theory is then peer-reviewed and re-evaluated (if
necessary) to ensure the theory is good. This process may also cause the researcher to conduct
Conclusion
The framework behind developing and testing a theory is intertwined. Without testing, a
hypothesis cannot be proven and it becomes nothing more than an educated guess. In this case,
3
PattersonTBTM7101-1
measurable evidence (which I think is the most complex portion of this process) is key to theory
development. While both aspects of this process are vital to the framework of a good theory, I would
prefer to develop a theory rather than test it. Testing a theory may require multiple experiments to
confirm my predictions and it also requires meticulous annotation to keep an accurate record of the
results. During this process I could see myself getting easily frustrated if the outcomes do not yield the
desired results. While theory development would probably help me to maintain my sanity, I do
recognize the value behind theory testing and ultimately would like to confirm my predictions. This
References
Byron, K., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2016). Editors’ Comments: “What I Know Now That I Wish I Knew
https://doi-org.proxy1.ncu.edu/10.5465/amr.2015.0094
Central https://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Garud, R., & Gehman, J. (2016). Theory Evaluation, Entrepreneurial Processes, and Performativity.
Imenda, S. (2014). Is There a Conceptual Difference between Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks?