Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Instructor’s Name
25 November 2015
The theory regarding the I or the Imago as expressed in the readings of Jacques
Lacan a well placed in an analysis of the relationship between the stories unnamed
narrator and Inspector Dupin. I would argue that the narrator’s iterations regarding
ever being recourse for an outsider to be given the slightest insight into a possible
shortcoming from the side of the notorious detective. The shortcoming I therefore
see is the nature of the narrator and concurrently Edgar Allen Poe, the author
The I as described by Lacan is that “ We have only to understand the mirror stage
assumes an image.
This relation of an assumed image is taken on directly by the author Edgar Allen
Poe, particularly in his role as the unnamed narrator. In spite of the fact that
Lacan’s argument of The Mirror Stage and subsequently the formation of the “I”
relation to Lacan’s conception that “The spectacle of the initial encounter with a
mirror as an infant serves as the precipitation of the ‘I’.” With Poe as the egoic
Furthermore Lacan states that the initial encounter with the “I” precipitates the
Assuming that the conception of the other is an alternate to the “I” as self, Poe’s
“I” in the shape of an “other” as Lacan puts it; while fulfilling the
In addition Dupin fits the categorisation of the “Ideal I” perfectly because of what
is first a literal fictional direction and secondly because of the nature of the ease
with which he goes about superseding the Police Prefect in solving the mystery,
fulfilling Lacan’s prophecy of the child who “anticipates or foresee’s his own
constituted.” The glory and magnificence through which the reader is intended to
perceive Dupin is entirely at the whim of Poe, this is highlighted best particularly
when Dupin goes about deducing the truth of the method behind the letter’s
concealment, stating in reference to the search carried out by the police that, “ the
measures adopted were not only the best of their kind, but carried out to
described by Dupin/Poe, they were nonetheless foiled in their attempts, but Poe’s
incarnation of Dupin transcends the very best, even by his own admission( as
stated above) by being not only capable of discovering but in also explaining his
method of deduction. Dupin states that the police failed by using methods
“inapplicable to the case, and to the man.” It therefore follows that in spite of
having no previous knowledge of the man or the case, no more than the police
case but the culprit himself, and it is here that Poe has failed to give satisfactory
reason for such superlative claims, for his description of the method of “even or
at this point that it is revealed that the possibility of Dupin being an “Ideal I”
plausible.