Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cassandra L. Conaton
Oakland University
Acknowledgement 4
Abstract 5
Chapter 1 – Introduction 6
Background 6
Definition of Terms 8
Evaluation/Research Questions 8
Introduction 9
Literature Review 9
Overview 13
Selection of Subjects 14
Evaluation/Research Design 14
Description of Instruments 15
Data Analysis 15
Summary 16
Triangulation of Data 17
Discussion of Results 21
Conclusion 23
Recommendation 24
Appendix 26
References 36
Acknowledgements
4
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
I want to acknowledge the support of Mr. Jonathan Cross, Baker Middle School Principal for providing
me the opportunity to assist in leading, developing, and supporting our staff and students in our school
improvement journey.
I want to acknowledge the open-mindedness and support of the Baker Middle School staff as we shift
focus to not just student well-being but self-reflection on our practices at Baker. Our conversations have
Thank you to my professors and cohort members for learning and growing with me. The last two years
have been incredibly self-reflective and affirming of my purpose and direction. Only possible through
our conversations, laughter, and frustrations we have shared during our learning during a global
pandemic.
Many thanks and love to my husband and children. Thank you for pushing me to continue learning and
giving me laughter and love daily. My appreciation for you only increases as we continue to grow
together.
Abstract
5
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
The action research presented in this paper focus on two strategies; Restorative Practice and
Character Education under our school improvement plan objective of Student Well-Being at Baker
Middle School. Baker Middle School is in the Troy School District. It is one of four middles schools in
the Troy School district with 740 6th – 8th grade students. A prior Title One building, Baker has a
reputation for having the “tough” students. Baker has had many faces over the last seven years. The
process of school improvement at Baker Middle School has evolved to become the roadmap of the
school, bringing staff together to focus on areas of academic achievement, teacher professional learning,
and student well-being. The study collected data to determine the effectiveness of these strategies on the
overall well-being of our students. Quantitative and qualitative data was collected to determine the
impact Restorative Practices and Character Education had on student well-being during the 2019-20
school year. This study connects research around the topic of student well-being and effective strategies
Chapter I
6
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
Introduction
Background
My research topic A Study of the Effectiveness of School Improvement Initiatives at Baker Middle
School specifically focuses on the impact of Restorative Practices and Character Education on student
well-being. Baker Middle School and the Troy School District designed their vision into four different
pillars. One of the four pillars, the Red Pillar, focuses on Student Well-being. For the 2019-20 school
year, Baker Middle School formulated the School Improvement plan to directly align with three of the
four pillars. The Red Pillar objectives, outlined in the school improvement plan, focuses on Character
The decision to utilize Restorative Practices and Character Education comes from research to support the
claim of the impact on student and school well-being. With the insurgence of Restorative Practices
within school systems, research on effectiveness has increased as well. In the Conflict Resolution
Quarterly, Norris (2019) stated, “Evaluations consistently point to a range of metrics, such as increased
attendance, better grades, less victimization, and overall incidents of conflict, in schools advocating RA‐
based policies.”
Baker Middle School is in the southeast corner of the City of Troy, Michigan. Troy is a highly
populated suburb of Detroit, upper-middle class with pockets of low-income neighborhoods bordering
surrounding cities. Troy is a very diverse city, representing many ethnic backgrounds, religions, and
socio-economic statuses. Baker Middle School serves 727 students, white students being the majority,
followed by Asian, the African American. A total of 17% of students receive free or reduced lunch. This
is the 2nd highest free and reduced need in the district. Academically, Baker performs above State and
comparable schools in standardized testing, such as PSAT or MStep. Our subgroups of economically
disadvantaged and minority students, and student with disabilities perform below proficiency. With
academics being a strong suit, a school culture with low teacher efficacy for behavior and high suspension
and referral rates, lends itself towards a deeper look at the needs of our students and staff.
7
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
Supporting student character development is not a new idea. This practice has been around for
many years as a vital aspect of improved and sustained positive school culture. Diggs and Akos (2016)
state “Previous research has found an association between character education programs and positive
outcomes in student behavioral domains as well. Schools that effectively adopt character education
programs have been found to have students who are more on-task. Furthermore, these schools also
dispense less referrals, suspensions, and expulsions (Skaggs & Bodenhorn). “Implementation of a
Character Education focus at Baker Middle School has been in place for many years. Under new
leadership for the 2018-29 School Year, Baker administrators looked at student, staff, and family
perception data, as well as behavior referral and suspension data to determine if changes to the current
structure was needed. With high suspension and referral rates, low teacher efficacy for behavior
management, and low student perception of Baker Middle School culture, a need for change was evident.
Following the structure outline in Character.Org, Baker Middle School assessed the current Character
Education initiative and made several changes. This restructuring will assist with not only
Assumptions for this research study will be that all teachers are implementing Character
Education within the classroom and utilizing Restorative Practice tools. Additionally, there is an
assumption that all teachers, students, and parents will complete surveys with honest answers and return
surveys back in a timely manner. Limitations for this research will be the staff perception of the
Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Supports Initiative (MiBlSi) Student Risk Screener data
we will collect and the impact of “time” on teachers. This negative perception could limit the staff ability
to be objective in the data collection process. Another limitation is that the selection of Baker MS is a
sample of convenience, and thus, the results of this study cannot be generalized to other schools.
8
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
Definition of Terms
Red Pillar Objective – Baker Middle School’s School Improvement objective that is focused on strategies
Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Supports Initiative (MiBlSi) – Supports, resources,
Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS) – Data collection process for internal and external risk behaviors as
Evaluation/Research Questions
Introduction
The purpose of this literature review was to provide resources and support in the areas of character
education and restorative practices impact on student well-being. The use of restorative practices and
character education is widely supported, valued, and emphasized within school systems. Emphasis on
these areas are evident in school across the country and numerous text supporting the positive impacts on
student achievement and well-being are have been and are continuing to be produced (as you will see
below). Character education and restorative practices have overlapping themes: conflict resolution, core
values, relationships, and others. While there are similar characteristics there are also specific areas each
cover. The text within this literature review highlights the similarities, differences, and also the impact on
Literature Review
In regard to restorative practices, it is easy to see the relevance in different educational journals,
research, and professional learning opportunities through school districts and intermediate districts.
House Bill 5619 was introduced in the summer of 2016 states restorative practices must be in place and
seven factors to take into consideration when suspending or expelling a student. One of the seven factors
to consider is the use of restorative practices to repair and reduce the likelihood of a reoccurrence. With
this new legislation, school began researching and developing how restorative practices will be
implementing within their buildings and districts. Providing the fundamental research behind restorative
practices, The Restorative Practices Handbook: For Teachers, Disciplinarians and Administrators
(Wachtel, J., & Wachtel, T, 2009) outlines research, resources, and guidelines for restorative practices as
developed through the International Institute for Restorative Practices. The International Institute for
Restorative Practices (IIRP) is a world renown institute focused on the training, implementation, and
10
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
research of restorative practices in various venues. This text is staple for restorative practice
implementation. Within the text, a comprehensive overview of the restorative practice continuum is
outlined, defining the “why” this approach has a positive impact on students and school well-being.
Multiple journal and quarterlies, such as The Impact of Restorative Practices on Well-Being: an
Evaluation of happiness and engagement in schools (Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 2019) continue
providing support and research for educators looking at implementation of restorative practices,
“Proactive practices largely involve integrating restorative techniques into daily school interactions,
resulting in a positive change to school culture over time” (Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 2019).
Character Education within school systems has been encouraged by the Michigan State Board of
Education since 1996. The explicit teaching of character and principles focusing on respect,
responsibility, caring, trustworthiness, justice, and citizenship has been discussed, researched,
implemented in various ways across the country. In New Pedagogies for Deep Learning, Fullan
identified 6 Cs for deep learning. Each C is a component of learning that strengthens and deepens the
learning for all. Two of the Cs described are Character and Citizenship. Fullan created rubrics to assess
student experiences within each of these Cs. Within the text character refers to the qualities of the
individual essential for being personally effective in a complex world (Fullan, 2017). Fullan made the
point throughout the text that without the intentional development of character deep learning cannot take
place. Similar to Fullan’s work, various organizations such as Character.org, have developed rubrics,
implementation guides, resources, and evaluation of comprehensive character education within various
school levels and at a district level. From the direction of the Superintendent in the Troy School District,
all schools are encouraged to utilize the resources and guidance from Character.org to plan, implement,
According research from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, school connectedness
is the number one (or two) factor in reducing the risk of self-harm or suicide in school age children (CDC,
2009). The ability for schools to strengthen culture to one where all students feel connected to an adult,
peers, and overall school community has been a challenging venture for some years. Deterrents to school
11
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
connectedness can range from grading practices, disciplinary practices, restrictive learning or connection
opportunities for English language learners, special education students, minorities, or economically
disadvantaged students. Overall guidance indicates it is necessary for school buildings to work on
inclusivity for all students in the areas of academics, social emotional learning, and connectedness. Your
Students, My Students, Our Students: Rethinking Equitable and Inclusive Classrooms the focus is
primarily on inclusive and equitable opportunities for special education students, though the practices and
philosophies introduced cover all students and specifically address staff culture as it relates to teaching
practices (Jung, 2019). In both resources above, recommendations are to begin with staff reflection on
their grading practices and personally beliefs regarding individual student achievement. The belief that
all students can learn and will learn is at the core of the shift in culture for staff. An indicator of students
who feel connected to school is believe the adults believe they can achieve academically or behave
appropriately. Students who are consistently cycled in special education courses or are repeatedly
suspended demonstrate a detachment to school (Jung, 2019). Strengthening the adult culture to embrace
We are utilizing the Michigan Integrated Behavior and Learning Intervention Support Initiative
(MiBliSi) resources to collect data to track progress and analyze impact on our use of Restorative
Practices and Character Education on student well-being. This organization provides multiple resources
to identify at risk students and various tools to measure and analyze the data. At risk attributes MiBliSi
identifies are indicators of internal and external behavior, behavior, attendance, and low-grade tracking
for the school year all of which correlate to the overall well-being of the student. These strategies are
integrated into our school improvement plan for the 2019-20 school year. Incorporating these strategies
into our school improvement plan allows for our building to utilize time and resources to support the
Overall, the literature provided comes together in the diagram in Appendix E. The diagram illustrates
that restorative practices and character education can improve school connectedness, though those are not
the only strategies that can accomplish this. My research topic A Study of the Effectiveness of School
12
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
Improvement Initiatives at Baker Middle School specifically focused on the impact of Restorative
Practices and Character Education on student well-being. School Connectedness is another factor in
student wellness as the research also suggests. The literature used in this study supported the research
Method of Study
Overview
Baker Middle School is one of four middle schools within the Troy School District. Baker
Middle School established different character education practices into the building, with minimal
administrative monitoring and overall buy-in from staff. Under the direction of Dr. Rich Machesky,
Superintendent of the Troy School District, an adoption of the district vision upheld by four pillars
focused on Well-Being, Professional Learning, Early Childhood Education, and Deep Learning, Baker
Middle School’s School Improvement Plan now aligns with the same pillars (with the exception of Early
Childhood Education). Baker’s School Improvement plan, now containing a specific objective on student
The questions raised in monitoring the effectiveness of school improvement initiatives, will
specifically look at Restorative Practice and Character Education impact on student well-being. This will
be measured by Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Support Initiative’s (MiBliSi) Student Risk
Screening Scale (SRSS) and Early Warning Indicators (EWI), student perception data, and collection of
artifacts of staff implementation of Character Education and Restorative Practices. Data were collected at
each grade level at different times throughout the school year for measuring and monitoring of school
improvement goals. Consent to use school improvement data, consisting of student perception survey,
behavioral data, as well as staff artifacts was obtained by the building principal, Mr. Jonathan Cross and
shared with staff and student families. Consent forms are located in Appendix A and B. Data collected
evaluates any needs of social/emotional support for students and progress monitor Tier II and III students.
Data were analyzed for growth in student conflict resolution skills or use of resources as well as improved
The selection of subjects for this study were all grade levels at Baker Middle School. This study
is in alignment with the School Improvement objective at Baker Middle School, to measure the
effectiveness of Restorative Practices and Character Education implementation. There is no control group
for this study, rather an analysis on the impact these initiatives have on Baker Middle School students.
Evaluation/Research Design
This study was conducted through the collection of three quantitative data points: SRSS, EWI,
and Student Perception Survey and one qualitative data point: staff implementation artifacts. SRSS data
were collected at the 11th week mark of the 2019-20 school year. Teachers were given the opportunity to
select twenty students they currently had in class to assess internal and external risk behaviors. Teachers
were given three weeks and a portion of professional learning time to complete this fifteen-question
assessment on students. Data were compiled for school wide data analysis. At the end of the first quarter,
EWI data was collected. This data was added to the SRSS data in a conditionally formatted spreadsheet
which created a Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) pyramid. Each quarter EWI data were collected
The student perception survey was created in house, questions targeted towards student
perceptions on Character Education and Restorative Practice within Baker Middle School. The Student
Perception Survey was a Likert scale and delivered digitally to students on March 11th, 2020. Results of
Throughout the course of the year, staff compiled artifacts of Character Education and
Restorative implementation and were given time to reflect and collaborate on their practices. Artifacts
collected on Schoology were used as a qualitative data point demonstrating fidelity of implementation.
15
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
Description of Instruments
The SRSS is a Likert instrument, looking at internal and external risk indicators (Appendix B).
Teachers were given a spreadsheet to complete for twenty of their current students selected for the current
year. EWI data identified students with one or more of the following criteria met each quarter (10
weeks):
1. 1 or more suspensions
2. 3 or more absences
This data were collected for a building wide MTSS spreadsheet to identify Tier I, II, and III students
(Appendix C).
Data Analysis
Likert scale responses in the perception survey were converted to a numeric scale of zero being
least likely to five being most likely. Responses are given equal weight and an average for an overall
Anecdotal data regarding staff implementation were determined through artifacts provided by
staff throughout the course of the school related to Character Education and Restorative Practices. This
data helped determine staff implementation of the school improvement initiatives and to what level of
fidelity.
SRSS data rated thirteen different indicators on a numerical scale from zero being behaviors not
evident to 4 behaviors consistently evident. Each student is given an overall numerical total that equates
1. No Risk (0)
EWI data identified three different indicators. Each indicators has a numerical value of one.
1. No Risk (0)
Students are placed in a MTSS spreadsheet and placed in tier I, II, or III depending on the numerical
1. Tier I (0-2)
2. Tier II (3-4)
Summary
Collection of data, both qualitative and quantitative were completed due to the nature of the
school improvement monitoring process. This building wide approach eases the need to assess smaller
samples and provide comparable data. The study was intended to identify impact of Restorative Practices
and Character Education on student overall well-being, specifically looking at SRSS, EWI, Student
perception data, and anecdotal staff implementation data. These data points were used to assist in
Chapter 4
Triangulation of Data
The sources of data used in this study were student perception data, teacher anecdotal data, and
student behavioral data. Anecdotal staff data were qualitative whereas the student behavioral data and
student perception survey were quantitative. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the focus of student well-
being remains the same but use of restorative practices and character education are limited in use. The
Baker Middle School A-OK Survey I was given to students on March 11, 2020. The purpose of this
survey was to measure student perceptions around our school improvement focus on student well-being.
We use this perception data as a measurement of wellness strategies used at Baker, such as Character
This survey was developed early 2020 to gain the perception of students regarding the use of our
Character Education focus and use of Restorative Practices at Baker Middle School (Appendix J). The
survey utilized a likert scale of strongly agree to strongly disagree. The development of the statements
focused on specific areas connected to our Red Pillar School Improvement initiatives such as Character
Education and Restorative Practices as well as school connectedness. Eight of the questions listed were
focused on Character education. Three questions focused on School Connectedness. Four questions
focused on Restorative Practices. Baker Middle School had 727 students in the 2019-20 school year. On
March 11th we received 368 responses from 6th – 8th grade students (51%).
what the Character Focus traits were to student perception of their own behavior and peers’ representation
of the traits. For example, I know what the A-OK Character traits are at Baker? or My peers treat me
18
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
with Kindness or I am open-minded. Students answered these statements using a Likert scale, responses
● Strongly Agree – 5
● Agree – 4
● Neutral – 3
● Disagree – 2
● Strongly Disagree – 1
A bar graph representation of the average score of each question demonstrates an overall
understanding of the Character Education traits (Appendix F). Questions 1-4 and 12-15 are related to the
student’s understanding and perception of self and peer’s application of Character Education at Baker
Middle School. Overall, the character education grouping averaged a 4.1 with the highest rating
reflecting the question I know what the AOK character traits are at Baker (4.5) and the lowest rated
statement Baker Middle School students are open-minded (3.5). This data tells us students have an
individual understanding of the Character focus traits but do perceive all students applying these
characteristics at school.
The next group of statements 5-6 and 10-11 were focused on student connection. This grouping
averaged a 3.7. Statements were focused on identifying a trusting adult and participation in school
activities, such as performing arts, athletics, and clubs. The highest rated statement was I have an adult I
can trust (4.4). Overall, it appears students agree they have a trusting adult and opportunity to participate
The final grouping of statements 7-9 were focused on student perception of Restorative Practices.
Overall rating of this group was the lowest with 3.4. The statement with the lowest level of agreement
was I have used the Den to solve a problem (2.1) while the other statements were focused on safety and
care. The overall rating demonstrated students felt safe and cared for at Baker but do not utilize the
rating and analysis of each grouping showed a high understanding and perception of the Character
Education focus at Baker Middle School and a low usage of Restorative Practices strategies. Though
students were connected to opportunities and adults offered at Baker Middle School, student participation
in clubs was limited. Limitations in this data would included a lack of student participation in the survey
51%, understanding of the “neutral” response on the Likert Scale, and implementation of the survey to the
students.
Baker Middle School utilized the following types of data to establish a multi-tiered system of
support (MTSS) for student behavior. This MTSS process allowed us to look at early warning indicators
such as: one or more failing grades, five or more absences, and number of suspensions every 10 weeks. In
addition to the early warning indicators, the Baker middle school staff also administered a survey called
Student Risk Screener Survey. This survey gave teachers the opportunity to assess student behaviors,
focusing on internal and external descriptors. This data were collected in the fall of 2019 at the end of
Quarter 1 and again at the end of Quarter 2 in January. Baker Middle School counselors, administrators,
and social workers used this data to identify different tiers of students with a focus on risk factor
behavior. Different supports were put into place for Tier III and Tier II students with supports being
Comparing MTSS data from Quarter 1 to Quarter 2 shows an increase in Tier I – II – III students
and a decrease in the number of students showing No Risk Factors (NR) (Appendix G). The SRSS was
not administered a second time due to the COVID-19 school closure. Maintaining the same SRSS risk
factors for both quarters looked at the Early Warning Indicators informed us of increases in all three
categories. The largest EWI increase was in the number of students failing one or more classes. This was
an increase of 72%. The total number of students with Early Warning Indicators increased by 91%. The
20
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
increase of the number of students with Early Warning Indicators directly correlated the increase in Tier I,
Limitations to this data were the unlikely disruption COVID-19 caused to schools and our
country. Baker Middle School staff was unable to collect the second quarter SRSS and the subsequent
10-week full data collection (Quarter 3 and Quarter 4). The data did tell us we need to support students
with low grades, target those students and provide supports. The increase in attendance indicators gave us
Baker Middle School teachers collected artifacts of implementation character education, MTSS,
and Restorative practices. In order to collect artifacts to support implementation, teachers utilized
Schoology to house examples of implementation and to share strategies with one another. Once a month
staff had the opportunity to share with one another their submissions and gather feedback from one
another. Using Schoology as the artifact collection tool, (Appendix H) during the 2019-20 school year,
90% of teachers documented and shared different ways to demonstrate and teach the A-OK traits at
school.
Students were exposed to Character Education A-OK (accountable, open-minded, kind) traits
directly, through explicit teaching and defining of character traits, and indirectly through the use of
posters, policies, and language. Character traits were used to create a positive school culture through the
employment of a school-wide incentive-based program in which students were rewarded for exemplifying
the traits. In addition, individual teachers recognized the A-OK traits within their classrooms in various
ways. Teachers and students worked together to define what accountability, kindness, and open-
mindedness look like in the classroom, developing expectations for behavior. Students were provided
opportunities to show kindness and empathy through school-wide service learning. Staff have support in
place to help Tier 2 and 3 students develop social-emotional skills in addition to academic skills. The
school-wide discipline code provided students with an opportunity to be accountable for their actions
21
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
using restorative practices including; restorative justice, den sessions (conflict resolution), community
circles, and reflection. The staff engaged in professional development to reflect on the ways in which we
help students understand the A-OK character traits, using a Schoology discussion and twitter that all can
see and refer back to, in addition to conversations at staff meetings and department meetings.
Examples of implementation were found by a teacher creating different ways to teach kindness
through different projects and activities (Appendix H). Students and teacher develop what it looks like to
be Accountable when a substitute teacher is present (Appendix H). These were a few examples of how
teachers integrated character education into their classrooms to support the school improvement strategy.
Limitations of this data were around the consistency of implementation throughout the course of
the year. Teachers may upload one artifact to Schoology to present implementation. This does not
The qualitative and quantitative data presented in this study helped answer the questions:
Baker Middle School created an intentional effort to embed Character Education into the classroom and
building. The artifact collection presented different ways the majority of teachers and staff achieved this
objective. Fullan references the importance of Character Development in a student’s ability to learn
deeply (Fullan, 2017). The artifact data in this study confirmed that the work was being presented to
students during the 2019-20 school year. Knowing this, looking at the quantitative data in the perception
survey and behavior MTSS data told us two different stories. The overall data in the perception survey
demonstrated students had an understanding of the Character traits as well as perception of self and peer
application of traits. This data also demonstrated a lack of Restorative Practice strategies within the
building. These two data points, artifact collection of implementation and student perception survey,
showed intentional teaching and exposure of Restorative Practices and Character education and student
22
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
learning and application. The MTSS behavior data demonstrated how Character Education and
Restorative Practices impacted behavior, looking at the Early Warning indicators and internal and
external behaviors of students. Looking at this data there were increases in EWI indicators from quarter 1
to quarter 2. The largest increases were in the number of students with failing one or more classes. With
the addition of increased low grades, increased students with 3 or more absences were also presented.
Looking at grading practices and inclusivity of the classroom culture can attribute to a student feeling
connected to the class, teacher, and school family. Overall, the data showed an intentional effort to
incorporate Character Education and Restorative practices into the classroom and building culture. The
impact of this work is an increased understanding and perception of the core character traits but did not
have a positive impact on student behavior after the first 10-week period. This lack of impact represents a
lack of connectedness to school, as evident in the increase of all early warning indicators in the MTSS
behavior protocol.
23
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
Chapter 5
Overview
The action research set out to answer questions regarding the effectiveness of Restorative
Practices and Character Education on student well-being. Baker Middle School implemented specific
School Improvement goals focused on increasing student achievement and well-being. In researching
best practices in student well-being, multiple sources supported the implementation of Character
Education and Restorative Practices. Data collected were quantitative and qualitative utilizing student
perception surveys, student behavior inventory, and anecdotal artifacts from staff implementation of
strategies.
The data tells a story of strong implementation but a need for a longer study and data collection
specifically focused on Restorative Practices and then Character Education. The impact COVID-19 had
on this study resulted in short-term data. The findings do demonstrate a positive impact on
implementation and student awareness of Character Education. A longer study could help determine if
Conclusions
This study has found that Baker Middle School Students developed an awareness of Character
Education and implementation from Staff while Restorative Practice awareness was lacking. This study
also shows a lack of longitudinal data to support changes in behavior when implementing Character
Education and Restorative practices. Connecting to literature in chapter 2, utilizing multiple ways to
24
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
impact student well-being can prove to be effective in enhancing empathy, social awareness, and conflict
resolution skills. The research shared in this paper demonstrate why Baker Middle School implemented
practice resources students had available to them such as the Den for conflict resolution.
o This study demonstrated high awareness and implementation of character education and
awareness of traits and associated practices. There was a lack of data to demonstrate
Recommendations
The findings of this study have several important implications for future practice. First, continue a
school improvement goal focused on well-being through strengthening character education. The evidence
in this study indicates positive trends towards implementation and impact. The global pandemic resulted
in a lack of longitudinal data needed to determine overall effectiveness. In this area, a recommendation to
continue with data collection (SRSSS and EWI) multiple times throughout the school year will assist in
implementation with staff and awareness with students. Data suggests little implementation from staff
and awareness from students. That being said, working with staff to strengthen the use of restorative
circles and conferencing will be important to increase confidence in implementation. Using common
language and strategies around conflict resolution will assist in student understanding of identify
Research suggests Restorative Practices and Character Education should positively impact and support all
students. When looking at this statement and research closer, a connection to Multi-Tiered Systems of
Support (MTSS) can be made. MTSS creates a structure to identify proactive measures to support Tier I
(all), Tier II (some) and Tier III (few) students in the area of academics or behavior. (Appendix I) As the
pyramid moves up the intensity of support increases as well. The bottom half of the pyramid holds
proactive strategies to support all students. A further study could assess the impact a Multi-Tiered
System of Support (MTSS) focused on behavior. More specifically, what aspects of character education
and restorative practices would be focused on Tier I, II, or III support? A comprehensive MTSS would
provide targeted support and opportunities for all students. If given the time/resources to continue this
study focused on MTSS, investigation into where Character Education and Restorative Practices fit into
an MTSS model would assist in determining what strategies most impact student well-being and who
Appendix
E – Literature Connection
Accountability
School Connectedness
Inclusive
Equitable
Efficacy
G – MTSS Data
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Tier III Tier II Tier I No Risk
Quarter 1 Quarter 2
Quarter 1 Quarter 2
Tier III 11 17
Tier II 120 137
Tier I 314 323
No Risk 286 253
33
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
G – MTSS Data
Quarter 1 Quarter 2
Quarter 1 Quarter 2
Fail 1+ 58 100
Suspension 13 15
5+ Absences 32 87
Total # of
Students 91 174
34
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
H – Staff Implementation Artifacts
35
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
H – Staff Implementation Artifacts
36
ACTION RESEARCH OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
I – Sample MTSS Pyramid
References
Costello, B., Wachtel, J., & Wachtel, T. (2009). The restorative practices handbook: For teachers,
Smith, D., Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2015). Better than carrots or sticks: Restorative practices for positive
classroom management.
Jung, L. A. (2019). Your students, my students, our students: Rethinking equitable and inclusive
classrooms.
Fullan, Michael (2017). NEW PEDAGOGIES FOR DEEP LEARNING. Place of publication not
Diggs, Calvary R. and Akos, Patrick (2016) "The Promise of Character Education in Middle School: A
https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/mgreview/vol2/iss2/4
https://miblsi.org/practices/behavior