Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cameron Johns
Mr. Gardner
2 November 2020
Do Coaches Matter?
Watching sports is a popular pastime in America and most parts of the world. People
love to cheer on their favorite teams and players. With every team competing for wins and
collegiate team is to assemble the best athletes in the world, so that they can bring fame and
glory to their institution. Now obviously the players and athletes themselves have the most direct
impact on the results of any given sports match, as well as the success that their team
achieves. However, you can’t have just players, because everyone knows that any team needs
a coach. A coach has a big responsibility to his/her team, which includes preparing their team
for a match, being the leader of their team, as well as the primary motivator. Although they
never step foot on the big stage, they do a lot of behind the scenes work. That leads to the
question: How much does a coach affect the success of a professional or collegiate sports
team?
Before deciding whether or not a coach has a substantial effect on a team’s success, it’s
vital to first understand what a coach does, as well as the behavioral qualities of those that are
considered to be good coaches. According to Cat North’s article “How Coaches Influence
Athletes,” the most important characteristics of a coach are encouragement and leadership,
well as the team. Top-notch coaches help produce winning players and teams. How
encouragement beyond the sports environment, and this also carries over to athletic
performance (North).
The author states encouragement as the primary role of a coach. This means that a coach must
have an emotional attachment to his/her team and players. The best coaches know all their
players personally, and they are friendly with each other on and off the field of play. A coach will
often give some version of a pre-game speech or a half-time speech that doesn’t address
specific technical game plans or strategies, but puts their players in the right mindset to perform
their best. This is all part of creating the right environment as the author mentions above. The
coach works to bring the right attitude to their team through leading by example. This is why a
coach must be a leader for not only the whole team, but to each player individually as well. The
most successful coaches will have the respect of their players, and the whole team will have the
same mindset when it comes to their respective sport. Lastly, the author addresses that
coaches can have an influence on athletes “beyond the sports environment,” which again
emphasizes the fact that coaches must support players as individuals in order to have a
After looking at what a coach’s responsibility to his/her team is, it is crucial to understand
the coach-athlete relationship, and whether or not it has a substantial impact on player and
team success. Possibly the most competitive athletic events occur in the Olympics, in which
athletes around the world train for years to compete in contests that could be decided by less
than a second. Former Australian Olympic Rower and current coaching assistant Bo Hanson
describes in a video a study about coach and athlete relationships, as well as his own
experience as an Olympian. The study seeked to find the most important factors for the athletes
that either achieved a personal best, or recorded a podium finish. The five key factors identified
included the quality of the training environment, the support mechanisms behind the athlete,
and athlete self-awareness, but the primary “non-negotiable” factor was the quality of the coach-
athlete relationship. Hanson goes on to explain that there needs to be a mutual trust and
Johns 3
respect between both coach and athlete, saying that they need to know what is expected of
themselves and each other, how they both communicate, and have the same goal in mind
(Hanson). Now obviously the coach-athlete relationship for an Olympian is on a much higher
level than that of the relationship of a team sport athlete and his/her coach. Team athletes will
often play on multiple teams throughout their career, or in the case of college athletes, will only
play for a limited time, but that doesn’t subtract from the fact that the better the relationship, the
The main problem with evaluating a coach’s worth is that their value is in their qualitative
attributes. Unlike how it is with players, coaches don’t have stats about their pros and cons
besides their win records, which reflect on the whole team. One way that statisticians have
looked at determining a coach’s value is by looking at a coach’s win rates over their career (see
Fig. 1).
https://chance.amstat.org/2016/11/coaching-tenure/.
The graph above shows the relationship between head coaching tenure and coaching
performance for all coaches in the NBA from the years 1976-2016. On the y-axis, labeled “Avg.
Coaching Win Shares,” it shows how well the team performed that year in the coach’s career,
Johns 4
with higher numbers being better seasons. On the x-axis, labeled “Consecutive Seasons with
Same Head Coach,” it shows what year the coach was consecutively coaching that team.
Although there is a spike and a dip over season six and seven, the trend shows that the longer
a coach stays with a team, the more long term success that team has. As stated by the
publisher of this graph, the chart only goes up to ten years due to a lack of sample size for
higher numbers. Although this graph is used originally to support the idea that the longer a
coach stays with the same team, the more successful they are, one could argue that the reason
that there is not a lot of data above ten years is because most coaches are fired before then due
to bad performance.
Only in recent years have analysts and statisticians found ways to determine how much
of an effect a coach has on the outcome of a game. At the MIT Sloan Sports Analytics
Conference in 2019, Christopher Berry and Anthony Fowler published a report on their findings
after using some incredibly complicated formulas and equations that attempted to debunk the
previous analytical opinion that coaches are important, but they don’t have much of an effect on
the results of a game. This opinion existed in the analytics community primarily because there
was a lack of quantitative evidence to prove a coach’s value, and numbers and statistics is what
analytics is all about. They found that coaches do have an effect on their teams, and they
attempted to measure the extent of that effect across sports. To summarize, they found that
coaches strengthen defensive results more than they boost offensive results, as well as
coaches have a greater effect in collegiate sports than professional. Although they are confident
in their results, the authors conclude by saying, “Our goal in this paper has not been to deliver
software that analysts can use to study the effects of coaches on any measurable outcome
Before extensively researching the topic of coach influence on success, I believed that
the role of a coach was essential, but that individual coaches were, more or less,
Johns 5
interchangeable. I thought that as long as you had the leader to make sure everyone was on the
same page, then the athletes would be able to do what they do and get the results that they
deserved to get. As a fan of basketball and the NBA, I have seen a lot of coaching changes
occur in the last few years, and I have felt that in most cases the coach is fired because they
can’t capture the respect and loyalty of their team. However, now that I understand a little more
about what coaches do, it starts to become more clear about how difficult being a coach could
be. My opinion is that a coach sets the tone for the whole team, and that any given player may
or may not mesh so well with that coach. This means that a coach could be a victim of a bad
situation, in which a coach and a player may not get along, and management will often side with
a star player instead of a coach. Lastly, I also believe that in order to achieve the best results
and long-term success, it is crucial to find the best possible coaching candidate in the first place,
and stick with them for as long as you can, as data proves that longer-tenured coaches tend to
be more successful.
After looking at the data and personal testimonies of athletes about the role and
effectiveness of coaches in a high-level sport, it’s hard to argue that a coach doesn’t
determine the actual value of a coach because of the many qualitative traits one has, the limited
data we have opens up analytical ways to prove that coaches are not simply interchangeable.
The combination of emotional and statistical factors makes it challenging to find the best
coaching candidate, but it is important to invest in a coach for as long as possible to yield the
Works Cited:
Berry, Christopher R. and Fowler, Anthony. “How Much Do Coaches Matter?” MIT Sloan Sports
content/uploads/2019/02/Do-Coaches-Matter.pdf
https://chance.amstat.org/2016/11/coaching-tenure/.
2016. https://www.athleteassessments.com/coach-athlete-relationship-performance-
factor/
North, Cat. “How Coaches Influence Athletes.” SportsRec. 31 October 2018. Web. 14 October
2020 https://www.sportsrec.com/7910089/how-coaches-influence-athletes