Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Communications
Introduction
Design
Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of the proposed power divider for UWB
operation. To broaden the bandwidth, we used extended transmission line with the
same characteristic impedance of the main line Z3=ZI but with different electrical
length 83 following the A/4 branch of conventional one-section power divider.
ZS,8S
Port 2
ZI,81 Z3,83 (Output)
Port 1
(Input)
The proposed UWB power divider has been tested by simulation using full-wave
analysis with two different numerical techniques. The first one is Ansoft HFSS
software based on Finite Element (FE) method while the other one is Ansoft
Designer software based on Method of Moments (MoM). The parameters of the
proposed power divider were optimized to attain good return loss at all ports and
good isolation over the whole UWB frequency range. The substrate used in our
design is Rogers RT5880 with a thickness of 0.508mm, and a relative permittivity
of2.2. The layout of the proposed UWB power divider is presented in Figure 2.
#2
#3
The overall size of the proposed power divider is 20x11.565mm2. It has been
shown that the proposed power divider performance is better than the traditional
three-section in [3] or the modified two-section Wilkinson power divider in [5],
with about 54.8% reduction in size. From calculated S-parameters shown in
Figure 3, the power is split equally between the output ports, Le. SI2 = SI3 = -3dB
with very small insertion loss ranges from -O.ldB to -0.5dB (using HFSS) or from
-0.5dB to -ldB (using Designer). The return losses are lower than -13dB at the
input port and lower than -10dB at the output ports through the whole UWB
range. The calculated isolation between the two outputs ports is better than -1 OdB.
O.---------.------.-----------r---------.-------r---------r-----..---------,
, , ,
,--------------------r--------------------.-------------------
, , ,
,, ,, ,,
, ,, ,,
··,,
,
, ,
,, ,,
· , ,
-10
-15 ---
m-20
~
:
------------------+--------
~ I :
Q)
Q) -25 ------------,
E
_50'------.L.....----.l......----.l......----...L...----...L...----....L...-----'---------'
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
frequency (GHz)
Figure 3 Calculated return loss, insertion loss, and isolation.
The phase difference between the two outputs ports are shown in Figure 4. It has
been shown that the two output signals are in phase with phase difference is
00±0.25° across the whole frequency band. Figure 4 presents the calculated group
delay between the input and the output ports. The group delay of the proposed
UWB power divider is almost constant and less than 120ps (0. 12ns) which shows
good linearity within the UWB frequency spectrum.
2 170
1.5 ···················i···················.j.-················.-f.···················i···················.j..················.-f.···················i··················· 160
1 1 1 1 1 ; 1
C) 1 :j [ : ( ···············[····················1··················· 150
Q) ! ! ! ! ! i :
c.. -2
1-- : :
GD (P01°tl,P01i2) [
·90
-2.5 1- GD (portl,pol't3) I· 80
-3
3 4 5 678 9
Frequency (GHz)
Figure 4 Calculated phase difference and group delay between output ports.
Conclusions
References