To support the author’s position regarding mixed method as the

ideal approach to solve the philosophical conflict between

researchers working in the same team, a discussion about the
advantages and the appropriateness of the mixed method
approach is important. First of all, mixed method serves as a
bridge to present different philosophical positions. Creswell et al.
mentioned that the mixed method provides an opportunity to
bridge the conflict between different philosophical perspectives
such as constructivism, pragmatism, postpositivism and
transformative perspectives (2011). They stated that this would
help in creating dialectal standpoints that help in advancing both
objective and subjective knowledge. They illustrated the practical
diverse approach of pragmatism where it could highlight the
importance of the research question by focusing on the objective
and subjective aspects of the research problem. On the other
hand, the orienting framework of transformative
To support the author’s position regarding mixed method as the
ideal approach to solve the philosophical conflict between
researchers working in the same team, a discussion about the
advantages and the appropriateness of the mixed method
approach is important. First of all, mixed method serves as a
bridge to present different philosophical positions. Creswell et al.
mentioned that the mixed method provides an opportunity to
bridge the conflict between different philosophical perspectives
such as constructivism, pragmatism, postpositivism and
transformative perspectives (2011). They stated that this would
help in creating dialectal standpoints that help in advancing both
objective and subjective knowledge. They illustrated the practical
diverse approach of pragmatism where it could highlight the
importance of the research question by focusing on the objective
and subjective aspects of the research problem. On the other
hand, the orienting framework of transformative
To support the author’s position regarding mixed method as the
ideal approach to solve the philosophical conflict between
researchers working in the same team, a discussion about the
advantages and the appropriateness of the mixed method
approach is important. First of all, mixed method serves as a
bridge to present different philosophical positions. Creswell et al.
mentioned that the mixed method provides an opportunity to
bridge the conflict between different philosophical perspectives
such as constructivism, pragmatism, postpositivism and
transformative perspectives (2011). They stated that this would
help in creating dialectal standpoints that help in advancing both
objective and subjective knowledge. They illustrated the practical
diverse approach of pragmatism where it could highlight the
importance of the research question by focusing on the objective
and subjective aspects of the research problem. On the other
hand, the orienting framework of transformative
To support the author’s position regarding mixed method as the
ideal approach to solve the philosophical conflict between
researchers working in the same team, a discussion about the
advantages and the appropriateness of the mixed method
approach is important. First of all, mixed method serves as a
bridge to present different philosophical positions. Creswell et al.
mentioned that the mixed method provides an opportunity to
bridge the conflict between different philosophical perspectives
such as constructivism, pragmatism, postpositivism and
transformative perspectives (2011). They stated that this would
help in creating dialectal standpoints that help in advancing both
objective and subjective knowledge. They illustrated the practical
diverse approach of pragmatism where it could highlight the
importance of the research question by focusing on the objective
and subjective aspects of the research problem. On the other
hand, the orienting framework of transformative