Here and there, now and later. Technical elements and deconstruction. These phases are planned and are demountable and reusable, and biological executed with minimum environmental or social elements can also be brought back into the impact, optimise high-value material use, are adaptive biological cycle. and future-proof.
The definition is in line with the EMF’s definition
of circularity, in that the preservation of value of buildings and their components is ensured by optimising use and reuse cycles with minimal use of virgin resources. In addition, it stresses the importance of both the technical and biological cycles. In line with Gladek’s broader definition, it addresses human needs and a healthy biosphere within the planetary boundaries.
It is important to note that a systems perspective
is needed to achieve circularity at the building level. Smart integration into the surrounding (built) environment is key to maximising positive impacts, for instance by making sure that (reused) materials are sourced locally to minimise transport, or by efficiently combining renewable energy sources like geothermal heating. Indeed:
During the use-phase impacts are primarily net-
positive, and the building contributes to circular flows (of water, energy, and consumer goods) at the level of the building and its surroundings.
Within the circular built environment, a circular
building should take into account its location in the surrounding area and district, and its particular spatial characteristics (see Box 2 for more information on the importance of an integrated approach). A circular building is not an indivisible entity, it consists of different layers that can be distinguished as according to the 6S framework developed by Stewart Brand: site, structure, skin, space plan, services and stuff (furnishing & fittings), that are all part of a circular system of products, components and materials.
Circular buildings ideally contribute to a sustainable
built environment in all lifecycle phases: conception,