Michael W. Hancock, P.E.

, President
Secretary, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet

Bud Wright, Executive Director

444 North Capitol Street NW, Suite 249, Washington, DC 20001
(202) 624-5800 Fax: (202) 624-5806 • transportation.org • centennial.transportation.org

ERRATA for
A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

November 2013

Dear Customer:

Recently, we were made aware of some technical revisions that need to be applied to the 2011 A Policy
on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 6th Edition.

Please replace the existing text with the corrected text to ensure that your edition is both accurate and
current.

In addition to the technical corrections, two unfortunate errors occurred in the front matter of the Green
Book. First, Reza Amini, Geometric Design Engineer for the Oklahoma Department of Transportation,
was inadvertently omitted from the Technical Committee on Geometric Design. Mr. Amini has served
on the technical committee from 2001 until the present and was the primary author of Chapter 2.
AASHTO definitely wishes to recognize his technical expertise and the dedication he has shown over
the years. The voluntary services he has provided help make the Green Book the model of excellence
that it is today. AASHTO staff apologizes profusely for this oversight and deeply appreciates his
understanding in this matter.

Secondly, the name of one representative from Kansas to the Highway Subcommittee on Design was
unfortunately misspelled as “Robert Lacy.” The correct spelling is “Rodney Dean Lacy.” Again, we
apologize and appreciate Mr. Lacy’s understanding in this matter.

AASHTO staff sincerely apologizes for any inconvenience to our readers.

Additional copies of this erratum can be downloaded from AASHTO’s online bookstore at

http://downloads.transportation.org/GDHS-6-Errata.pdf

© 2013 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.
 GDHS-6-E1—November 2013*
Page Existing Text
Chapter 2
2-13 Two dimensions of the Intercity Bus (BUS-12
[BUS-40]) in Figure 2-4 were “rounded up”
to the tenth decimal in the U.S. Customary
unit measurements. For the sake of accuracy,
the current measurements of 7.09 m [23.3 ft])
and 1.93 m [6.3 ft] should be changed to
7.09 m [23.25 ft]) and 1.93 m [6.25 ft],
respectively.
2-14 The dimensions for the back overhang of the
Intercity Bus (BUS-14 [BUS-45]) in Figure 2-5
are incorrect. The current measurement of the
back overhang (2.12 m [7.0 ft]) should be
changed to 2.67 m [8.8 ft].
2-25 All double-trailer combination design vehicles
(WB-30D [WB-67D]) depicted in Figure 2-16
should be 5-axle trucks.
2-28 All turnpike-double combination design
vehicles (WB-33D [WB-109D]) depicted in
Figure 2-19 should be 9-axle trucks.
2-35 In Figure 2-25, the legends in both the SI and
the U.S. Customary unit graphs list the
Minimum Braking Distance as X = Wet
Pavement and Y = Dry Pavement.
Chapter 3
3-7 For the 70 km/h design speed in Table 3-3, the
Decision Sight Distance for Maneuver B is
listed as 325 m.
3-12 Item 4 refers to a PC design vehicle.
3-86 The second paragraph on page 3-86 refers to
“for tangent lane widths, Wn.”
3-87 Figure 3-17 should be updated.
© 2013 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.
Corrected Text
Please substitute page 2-13 with the
attached page that includes the revised
figure.
Please substitute page 2-14 with the
attached page that includes the revised
figure.
Please substitute page 2-25 with the
attached page that includes the revised
figure.
Please substitute page 2-28 with the
attached page that includes the revised
figure.
These representations should be reversed so
that X = Dry Pavement and Y = Wet
Pavement.
Please change “325 m” to “235 m.”
Please change “PC design vehicle” to
“P design vehicle.”
Please change “tangent lane widths” to
“tangent two-lane traveled way widths.”
Please substitute page 3-87 with the
attached page that includes the revised
figure.
 GDHS-6-E1—November 2013*
Page Existing Text
3-88 Figure 3-18 should be updated.
3-92 The second sentence of the final paragraph on
page 3-92 begins “The differences in track
widths of the SU, WB-12, WB-19, WB-20,
WB-20D, WB-30T, and WB-33D [SU, WB-40,
WB-62, WB-67, WB-67D, WB-100T, and
WB-109D] design trucks are substantial for the
sharp curves associated with . . .”
3-94 The first note under Table 3-26b references the
metric WB-19 design vehicle.
3-96 In the Radius of Curve column, the 2nd row
value is listed as 25000.
3-99 The final sentence in the section about Case II
begins “Case I widths for these longer vehicles,
including the WB-19, WB-20, WB-30T, and
WB-33D [WB-62, WB-65, WB-100T, and WB-
109D] design vehicles, may . . .”
3-103 Bottom section of Table 3-29
3-114 The final paragraph on page 3-114 reads
“The effect of rate and length of grade on the
speed of a typical heavy truck is shown in
Figures 3-24 and 3-25. From Figure 3-24 it
can be determined how far a truck, starting
its climb from any speed up to approximately
120 km/h [70 mph], travels up various grades
or combinations of grades before a certain or
uniform speed is reached. For instance, with
an entering speed of approximately 110 km/h
[70 mph], the truck travels about 950 m
[2,700 ft] up a 6 percent grade before its
speed is reduced to 60 km/h [35 mph]. If the
entering speed is 60 km/h [35 mph], the speed
at the end of a 300-m [1,000-ft] climb is about
© 2013 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.
Corrected Text
Please substitute page 3-88 with the
attached page that includes the revised
figure.
Please change this sentence to read “The
differences in track widths of the SU-9,
SU-12, WB-12, WB-19, WB-20, WB-20D,
WB-28D, WB-30T, and WB-33D [SU-30,
SU-40, WB-40, WB-62, WB-67, WB-67D,
WB-92D, WB-100T, and WB-109D]
design trucks are substantial for the sharp
curves associated with . . .”
Please change this reference to the U.S.
Customary design vehicle WB-62.
Please change “25000” to “2500.”
Please change this sentence to read “Case I
widths for these longer vehicles, including
the WB-19, WB-20, WB-20D, WB-28D,
WB-30T, and WB-33D [WB-62, WB-67,
WB-67D, WB-92D, WB-100T, and WB-
109D] design vehicles, may . . .”
For clarification, add a row below
“Application of Modification for Edge
Conditions” with the headings “Case I,
Case II, and Case III” in columns 2, 3,
and 4, respectively; repeat in columns 6,
7, and 8 respectively.
Please change this paragraph to read
“The effect of rate and length of grade on
the speed of a typical heavy truck is
shown in Figures 3-24 and 3-25. From
Figure 3-24 it can be determined how far
a truck, starting its climb from any speed
up to approximately 110 km/h [70 mph],
travels up various grades or
combinations of grades before a certain
or uniform speed is reached. For
instance, with an entering speed of
approximately 110 km/h [70 mph], the
truck travels about 750 m [2,700 ft] up a
6 percent grade before its speed is
reduced to 60 km/h [35 mph]. If the
 GDHS-6-E1—November 2013*

Page Existing Text Corrected Text

43 km/h [26 mph]. This is determined by
starting on the curve for a 6 percent grade
corresponding to 60 km/h [35 mph] for which
the distance is 750 m [2,500 ft], and
proceeding along it to the point where the
distance is 300 m [1,000 ft] more, or 1050 m
[3,500 ft], for which the speed is about
43 km/h [26 mph]. Figure 3-24 shows the
performance on grade for a truck that
approaches the grade at or below crawl
speed. The truck is able to accelerate to a
speed of 40 km/h [25 mph] or more only on
grades of less than 3.5 percent. These data
serve as a valuable guide for design in
appraising the effect of trucks on traffic
operation for a given set of profile
conditions.”
entering speed is 60 km/h [35 mph], the
speed at the end of a 300-m [1,000-ft]
climb is about 43 km/h [26 mph]. This is
determined by starting on the curve for
a 6 percent grade corresponding to
60 km/h [35 mph] for which the distance
is 750 m [2,700 ft], and proceeding along
it to the point where the distance is 300 m
[1,000 ft] more, or 1050 m [3,700 ft], for
which the speed is about 43 km/h
[26 mph]. Figure 3-25 shows the
performance on grade for a truck that
approaches the grade at or below crawl
speed. The truck is able to accelerate to a
speed of 40 km/h [25 mph] or more only
on grades of less than 5.5 percent. These
data serve as a valuable guide for design
in appraising the effect of trucks on
traffic operation for a given set of profile
conditions.”

3-147 Equation 3-39 is shown as Please change Equation 3-39 to read

V2 V2
L= for the Metric units and as L= for the Metric units and
254 ( R − G ) 254 ( R ± G )

V2 V2
L= for the U.S. Customary units. L= for the U.S. Customary
30 ( R − G ) 30 ( R ± G )
units.

Chapter 4

4-2 Figure 4-1 incorrectly labels the traveled way Please substitute page 4-2 with the attached
and the roadway. page that includes the revised figure.

Chapter 6

6-13 Under Sight Distance, the final subsection of Please change this cross reference to Tables
Section 6.3.1, the final sentence references 6-3 and 6-4.
Tables 6-2 and 6-3.

Chapter 9

9-42 The design speeds shown in U.S. Customary Please substitute page 9-42 with the
units in Figure 9-18 are incorrect. attached page that includes the revised
figure.

© 2013 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.
 GDHS-6-E1—November 2013*

Page Existing Text Corrected Text

th
9-45 In the 7 row of Table 9-9 under U.S. Please change this Design Speed to 45.
Customary units, the Design Speed is listed as 4.

9-74 The dimensions for Diagram B in Figure 9-28 Please substitute page 9-74 with the
(Metric) are incorrect. attached page that includes the revised
figure.

9-75 The dimensions for Diagram B in Figure 9-28 Please substitute page 9-75 with the
(U.S. Customary) are incorrect. attached page that includes the revised
figure.

Chapter 10

10-78 In Figure 10-53, Part B2 incorrectly cross Please change the cross reference to “For
references Figure 10-69. Deceleration Length See Table 10-5.”

10-93 Item 1 under Superelevation and cross slope The correct cross reference should be
refers to Figures 3-21 through 3-25. “Tables 3-8 through 3-12.”

Item 3 refers to Figures 3-29 and 3-30. Please change these cross references to
Tables 3-15 and 3-16, respectively.

10-108 Note 2 in Figure 10-69 states, “Point A Please change “100 ft” to “1,000 ft.”
controls speed on the ramp. La should not
start back on the curvature of the ramp
unless the radius equals 300 m [100 ft] or
more.”

* Items shown in bold are recent additions to the 2012 edition of the GDHS-6 errata.

© 2013 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.
 GDHS-6-E1—November 2013

Chapter 2—Design Controls and Criteria 2-13

0.30 m
[1.0 ft]

1.07 m
[3.5 ft]
2.12 m 1.22 m 7.09 m 1.93 m
[7.0 ft] [4.0 ft] [23.25 ft] [6.25 ft]
12.36 m
[40.5 ft]
0 5 ft 10 ft

0 1m 2.5 m
Scale
Path of front overhang
if the bus is equipped
with a bicycle rack

Path of left Path of front

front wheel overhang
CT
R
=

.
5 min
.
11

[44. m max
53.

[4 m
ft]

Min
m

rad . turn
.1
6.
7 ft]
[3

14
2

in
7.

ius
13.6

=1 g
8

n.
ft]

2.7
0m mi
[41 1 m
.7 f ]
t] 7.4 .3 ft
[24

0 5 ft 10 ft

0 1m 2.5 m
Scale

2.59 m
[8.5 ft]
Path of right
rear wheel

● Max. steering angle is 41.9º

● CTR = Centerline turning
radius at front axle
Figure 2-4. Minimum Turning Path for Intercity Bus (BUS-12 [BUS-40]) Design Vehicle

© 2011 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.
 GDHS-6-E1—August 2012

2-14 A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

0.30 m
[1.0 ft]

1.07 m
2.67 m 1.22 m 8.08 m 1.89 m [3.5 ft]
[8.8 ft] [4.0 ft] [26.5 ft] [6.2 ft]

13.86 m
[45.5 ft]

0 5 ft 10 ft

0 1m 2.5 m
Scale
Path of front overhang
if the bus is equipped
with a bicycle rack

Path of left Path of front

front wheel overhang
&7
5



.
9 min



[47. PPD[
P

[4 m
ft]

0LQ
>

UDG WXUQ
1


.9
8.
0 ft]

LXV LQ



14

  J

IW@


 n.
P> mi
I m
4 t]
W@
7.5 .7 f
[24

0 5 ft 10 ft

0 1m 2.5 m
Scale

Path of right
2.59 m
rear wheel
[8.5 ft]

Ɣ0D[VWHHULQJDQJOHLVž
Ɣ&75 &HQWHUOLQHWXUQLQJ
 UDGLXVDWIURQWD[OH

Figure 2-5. Minimum Turning Path for Intercity Bus (BUS-14 [BUS-45]) Design Vehicle

© 2011 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.
 GDHS-6-E1—August 2012

Chapter 2—Design Controls and Criteria 2-25

8.69 m 8.69 m 1.98 m

[28.5 ft] [28.5 ft] [6.5 ft]

7.01 m 7.01 m
[23.0 ft] [23.0 ft]
0.91 m 0.76 m 0.91 m 0.76 m
[3.0 ft] [2.5 ft] [3.0 ft] [2.5 ft]

2.13 m 0.71 m 3.35 m 0.71 m

[7.0 ft] [2.3 ft] [11.0 ft] [2.3 ft]
20.42 m
[ 67.0 ft ]
22.04 m
[72.3 ft]
0 5 ft 10 ft

0 1m 2.5 m
Scale

Path of left Path of front

front wheel [ overhang
[45. PPD
4 ft]


&7

0LQ
5

UDG WXUQ
LXV L


  QJ
ft] n.


i
[19 m m





P

P
.1

>
3
>

5.8

I


W@

IW@

0 5 ft 10 ft

0 1m 2.5 m
Scale

Path of right
rear wheel

Ɣ0D[VWHHULQJDQJOHLVž
Ɣ&75 &HQWHUOLQHWXUQLQJ
 UDGLXVDWIURQWD[OH
Ɣ$$ ž
Ɣ$$ ž
2.59 m
[8.5 ft]
Figure 2-16. Minimum Turning Path for Double-Trailer Combination (WB-20D [WB-67D]) Design Vehicle

© 2011 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.
 GDHS-6-E1—August 2012

2-28 A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

14.63 m 14.63 m 1.98 m

[48.0 ft] [48.0 ft] [6.5 ft]

12.34 m 12.34 m
[40.5 ft] [40.5 ft]
1.37 m 0.91 m 1.37 m 0.91 m
[4.5 ft] [3.0 ft] [4.5 ft] [3.0 ft]

1.35 m
[4.4 ft]
1.28 m 3.08 m
[4.2 ft] [10.1 ft]
1.22 m 3.05 m 12.19 m 3.72 m 0.71 m
[4.0 ft] [10.0 ft] [40.0 ft] [12.2 ft] [2.3 ft]
33.28 m
[109.2 ft]
34.75 m
[114.0 ft]

0 5 ft 10 ft

0 1m 2.5 m
Scale

Path of left Path of front

front wheel overhang
[
[60. PPD
&7

4 ft]

0LQ

5



UDG WXUQ
LXV L
  QJ







P

P>
>

2.44 m I


W@ 4.19 m min.


[8.0 ft]
IW@

[13.8 ft]

0 5 ft 10 ft

0 1 m 2.5 m
Scale

Path of right
rear wheel

Ɣ 0D[VWHHULQJDQJOHLVž
Ɣ &75 &HQWHUOLQHWXUQLQJ
 UDGLXVDWIURQWD[OH
Ɣ $$ ž
Ɣ $$ ž
2.59 m
[8.5 ft]

Figure 2-19. Minimum Turning Path for Turnpike-Double Combination (WB-33D [WB-109D])
Design Vehicle

© 2011 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.
 GDHS-6-E1—August 2012

Chapter 3—Elements of Design 3-87

METRIC
600

500 Symbol Design Vehicle Represented

P Passenger Car
SU SU, S-BUS-11, S-BUS-12, MH, P/T, P/B
WB-12 WB-12, BUS-12, BUS-14, CITY-BUS, A-BUS, MH/B
SU-8 SU-8
Radius of Curve, R (m)

400 WB-20 WB-20, WB-28D

WB-19 WB-19, WB-30T
WB-33D WB-33D
WB-20D WB-20D

300

200

WB-20
WB-33D
SU-8 WB-19
100
SU WB-12
WB-20D
P

0
1 2 3 4 5 6

Track Width, U (m)

U.S. CUSTOMARY
2000

Symbol Design Vehicle Represented

1500 P Passenger Car
SU SU, S-BUS-36, S-BUS-40, MH, P/T, P/B
WB-40 WB-40, BUS-40, BUS-45, CITY-BUS, A-BUS, MH/B
SU-25 SU-25
Radius of Curve, R (ft)

WB-67 WB-67, WB-92D

WB-62 WB-62, WB-100T
WB-109D WB-109D
WB-67D WB-67D
1000

WB-67
500
WB-109D
WB-62
SU-25

SU WB-40
P WB-67D

0
4 8 12 16 20

Track Width, U (ft)

Figure 3-17. Track Width for Widening of Traveled Way on Curves

© 2011 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.
 GDHS-6-E1—August 2012

3-88 A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

METRIC
1000

Symbol Design Vehicle Represented

800
P P, P/T, P/B, WB-12, WB-20D, WB-28D, WB-30T,
WB-33D, S-BUS-11
Radius of Curve, R (m)

S SU-9, SU-12, WB-19, WB-20, MH, MH/B

B BUS-12, BUS-14, CITY-BUS, A-BUS
SB S-BUS-12
600
R BUS-12 with Bike Rack, BUS-14 with Bike Rack,
CITY-BUS with Bike Rack

400

200

P S B R
SB
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Front Overhang, FA (m)

U.S. CUSTOMARY
3000

2500 Symbol Design Vehicle Represented

P P, P/T, P/B, WB-40, WB-67D, WB-92D, WB-100T,
WB-109D, S-BUS-36
Radius of Curve, R (ft)

2000 S SU-30, SU-40, WB-62, WB-67, MH, MH/B

B BUS-40, BUS-45, CITY-BUS, A-BUS
SB S-BUS-40
R BUS-40 with Bike Rack, BUS-45 with Bike Rack,
1500 CITY-BUS with Bike Rack

1000

500

R
P S SB B
0
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

Front Overhang, FA (ft)

Figure 3-18. Front Overhang for Widening of Traveled Way on Curves

© 2011 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.
 GDHS-6-E1—August 2012

4-2 A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

slightly rounded surface at the crown line and increasing cross slope toward the edge of the traveled
way. Because the rate of cross slope is variable, the parabolic section is described by the crown height
(i.e., the vertical drop from the center crown line to the edge of the traveled way). The rounded section
is advantageous in that the cross slope steepens toward the edge of the traveled way, thereby facilitating
drainage. Disadvantages are that rounded sections are more difficult to construct, the cross slope of the
outer lanes may be excessive, and warping of pavement areas at intersections may be awkward or difficult
to construct.

Roadway
Variable Foreslope

S TW S
Drainage Channel

e
lop
Rounding c ks
Ba
slope
Fore Rounding
–A–

Roadway
Sidewalk
S TW S
Edge of
Building

–B–

Roadway Variable

S TW S

Guardrail

Drainage Pipe

–C–

Note: TW = Traveled Way

S = Usable Shoulder
= Rate of Slope 2 to 6%

Figure 4-1. Typical Cross Section, Normal Crown

© 2011 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.
 GDHS-6-E1—August 2012

9-42 A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

METRIC
130

120
PC
110

100
COMB
90
Design Speed (km/h)

80

SU
70
SSD

60

50

40

30

20
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

Length of Sight Triangle Leg (m)

U.S. CUSTOMARY

PC

SU COMB
Design Speed (mph)

SSD

Length of Sight Triangle Leg (ft)

Figure 9-18. Intersection Sight Distance—Case B2, Right Turn from Stop, and Case B3, Crossing Maneuver

© 2011 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.
 GDHS-6-E1—August 2012

9-74 A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

Angle
of Turn
WB-28D Design

he l
r W ee
el
ea Wh
Vehicle Path

r R ont
Fr

0.2 m
er
ut
ne

Fr
O
In

on
of

7.5 ft
of

tO
th
th
Pa

ve
Pa

rha
ng
R m
= 23
& 143 = 43 m
23 m R 1
PC
m &
2.
C

6
m

C
PC

PC
m

PT
R 0.6
3. 0.6 =
1

26 3 m
La 6-m m 26 43

La 6-m
m
14

m
ne m m

ne
6

3.
=

2.
R

Three-Centered Compound Curve with

143 m – 23 m – 143 m Radii, Offset 3 m

–A–

Angle
of Turn
WB-28D Design
he l
r W ee
el
ea Wh

Vehicle Path
r R nt
ne ro

0.2 m
In r F
te
th Ou

Fr
on
Pa of
of

tO
7.2 m
th
Pa

ve
rh
an
g
PC

2.
C

6
R

m
=

C
46

m
PC

PC
2
m

15

0.6
&

&
R

27

3. m
m
=

La 6-m
m

27
46

ne
=
m

R
27

m
.5

PT

0.6
m

m
2
15

La 6-m
=

m
R

ne
3.
2.
m
.6
29

Three-Centered Compound Curve with

46 m – 27 m – 152 m Radii, Offset 0.5 m and 2.6 m

–B–

METRIC
Figure 9-28. Minimum Edge-of-Traveled-Way Designs (WB-28D [WB-92D] Combination Trucks)

© 2011 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.
 GDHS-6-E1—August 2012

Chapter 9—Intersections 9-75

Angle
of Turn
WB-92D Design

he l
r W ee
Vehicle Path

el
ea Wh
r R ont
Fr

0.5 ft
er
ut
ne
O

Fr
In
of

on
of
th

23.5 ft

tO
th
Pa
Pa

ve
rh
a
ng
R t
= 0f
PC & 7 470 47

C
PC
C 5 ft ft ft &
8. 75
5 =
ft R
PC t
2f

PT
R
2f =

ft
1 4
La 2-ft 85 70 f

0
t

47

La 2-ft
ft

ft
ne ft t

=
85

ne
1
R

8.
Three-Centered Compound Curve with
470 ft – 75 ft – 470 ft Radii, Offset 10 ft

–A–

Angle
of Turn
WB-92D Design
el

Vehicle Path
he

el
tW

he
rW
on
Fr

ea

0.5 ft
rR
er
ut
ne
O

Fr
In
of

on
23.5 ft
of
th

tO
th
Pa

ve
Pa

rh
an
g
PC

8.
C

5
R

ft
=

C
15
PC

ft
PC
0
0f

50
t&
R

2f
ft &
=

90

1 t
15

La 2-ft
90
ft
0f

ne
t

91
.5
ft
PT

t
2f
ft
0
50
=

La 2-ft
ft
R

ne
1
8.
ft
.5
98

Three-Centered Compound Curve with

150 ft – 90 ft – 500 ft Radii, Offset 1.5 ft and 8.5 ft

–B–

U.S. CUSTOMARY
Figure 9-28. Minimum Edge-of-Traveled-Way Designs (WB-28D [WB-92D]
Combination Trucks) (Continued)

© 2011 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.